Drupal-Site-Builder Acquia Certified Drupal Site Builder Exam for Drupal 10, 11 Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

In Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, menus can be displayed as blocks and configured to show specific levels of the menu hierarchy. The “Main navigation” block includes settings such as “Starting level” (or initial visibility level) and “Maximum number of levels to display.” These settings allow site builders to control which part of the menu tree is visible in a given region.

To display only the child pages (submenu items) when a user is on a child page, you need to configure the block to start displaying from level 2 , which corresponds to the submenu under the current top-level section. This ensures that only relevant sibling pages within the same section are shown in the sidebar, improving usability and navigation.

Option B (level 1) would still show top-level menu items, not just the submenu. Option A is not recommended because using CSS to hide elements does not follow Drupal’s configuration best practices. Option D is unnecessary and inefficient, as Drupal’s menu system already supports hierarchical display without creating duplicate menus.

Thus, configuring the menu block with an initial visibility level of 2 is the correct and recommended approach.

Drupal’s configuration management system is specifically designed to move site configuration —such as content types, fields, vocabularies, and Views—between environments by exporting configuration to files and then importing it elsewhere. Drupal documentation explicitly describes configuration as the administrative settings that determine how the site functions, and it lists fields and views as examples of configuration.

That makes option D the correct workflow: build the new fields and View on a development copy of the site, export the configuration to code, deploy that code to staging, import it for QA review, and then repeat the import in production after approval. This preserves live editorial activity such as comments , because comments are site content , not configuration, and configuration deployment avoids overwriting production content with a copied database.

Option A is risky because copying the staging database back to production could overwrite live comments and other newly created production content. Option B is false because staging and production do not automatically share configuration through one database in a normal deployment workflow. Option C is inferior because configuration should be created from a development copy of the actual site, where the existing modules, schema, and site setup already match the target environments.

Drupal’s official security guidance for the super user account ( user 1 ) specifically recommends that administrators do not name the first account “admin” or something obvious . The reason is straightforward: obvious usernames make brute-force and credential-guessing attacks easier, because attackers already know half of the login credentials they need to target. Drupal’s administration and security documentation also recommends limiting direct use of user 1 and protecting it carefully because it is a uniquely powerful account.

That makes option D the correct answer. The other options do not match Drupal’s documented best practices. There is no Drupal security rule about “members of the Drupal community in good standing” being allowed to use user 1. Canceling the user 1 account is not the recommended solution for this situation, and removing the Administrator role from user 1 would not make the account anonymous; in Drupal, user 1 is a special account with superuser behavior that is handled separately from ordinary role assignment. Drupal’s own guidance emphasizes safer naming and tighter handling of the account, not these alternative actions.

In Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, content that appears in the sidebar across all pages is typically implemented as a custom block placed in a theme region via the Block Layout system. Drupal documentation explains that reusable content like contact information is best managed through custom blocks , which can be edited centrally and automatically update everywhere they are placed.

Option A is correct because the proper way to update such content is to go to Structure → Block layout → Custom block library , locate the block, and edit it. This ensures the change is reflected globally wherever the block is used.

Option C is also correct because Drupal provides contextual links (the pencil icon) that allow administrators to directly edit blocks from the front end. This is a standard and documented shortcut for editing block content.

Option B is incorrect because Layout Builder is not mentioned and is not required here. Option D is incorrect because editing individual pages would not update a shared sidebar block and would be inefficient and incorrect.

Thus, the correct Drupal site-building approaches are editing the custom block via the block library or using contextual links, making A and C correct.

In Drupal 10 and Drupal 11 Views, the correct place to add a CSS class to each rendered row is the Format → Settings → Row class option. Drupal core’s Views API shows that style plugins can provide a Row class text field, and when the display uses fields, this option explicitly supports field tokens . The documentation in core states: “You may use field tokens … for all fields.” That means you can add the Manufacturer field to the View and use its token in the Row class setting so each row gets a class derived from that field’s value. Drupal then token-replaces the value for each row and sanitizes it into a valid CSS identifier.

The other options do not match how Drupal Views handles per-row CSS classes. Attachments do not assign row classes to the main display, a separate custom field is not required for this built-in capability, and group-by options are for grouping results rather than applying row-level CSS classes. So the Drupal-native, documented method is to put the Manufacturer field token directly into the Row class setting in the display’s Format settings .

In Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, favicon settings are managed at the theme level , not through general site configuration. The official Drupal theming documentation explains that each theme has its own configurable settings, including the ability to upload or replace the site’s favicon.

To change the favicon, you navigate to Appearance → Settings (or specifically the active theme’s settings page), where you will find an option to upload a custom favicon or use the default. This allows you to replace the default Drupal icon (Druplicon) with your organization’s icon.

Option A is incorrect because the Site branding block controls elements like the logo and site name, not the favicon. Option C is incorrect because Basic Site Settings does not manage favicon configuration in modern Drupal versions. Option D is unnecessary and incorrect, as CSS is not used to change favicons.

Therefore, the correct and documented method is to update the favicon through the theme settings in the Appearance section , making option B correct.

For a corporate site where public visitors do not need self-service accounts, the correct Drupal site-building solution is to disable visitor registration. Drupal’s official User Guide for Configuring User Account Settings says to go to Configuration > People > Account settings and, under Registration and cancellation , select “Administrators only” as the people with permission to register user accounts. This turns off public account creation and is the standard Drupal method for stopping spam registrations on sites that do not need open sign-up.

The other choices do not match Drupal’s documented account-management approach. Option B still allows visitors to create accounts, so it does not prevent spam registrations; a password strength indicator is unrelated to blocking bot sign-ups. Option A would protect the entire site at the web-server level, which is not the intended Drupal account-registration setting and would block all anonymous access, contradicting the site’s normal public use. Option D refers to unrelated contact-form behavior and does not control account creation. Drupal’s account settings documentation specifically identifies “Administrators only” as the way to stop visitor registration, making C the verified answer.

The correct answer is D . Drupal core’s Layout Builder is specifically designed to let site builders create different display layouts for different bundles, including content types such as Page and Article . The official Layout Builder documentation explains that it can be used to create layouts for content types and other entity types, and that layout defaults apply to all items of a given bundle. That matches this scenario exactly: one content type needs a default three-column layout and another needs a default two-column layout.

Option B is not the best answer because the extra setting “Allow each content item to have its layout customized” enables layout overrides for individual nodes. The question asks for different layouts by content type , not per individual content item, so overrides are unnecessary. Drupal documentation states that layout overrides are optional and are only needed when each entity may differ from the bundle default.

Option A is incorrect because field grouping and theme styling are not the Drupal core mechanism for bundle-level visual page layouts. Option C is also incorrect because content types are not assigned page layouts during field creation. In Drupal core, this is handled later through Manage display with Layout Builder enabled for each content type.

In Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, block placement is defined per theme . The Block Layout documentation explains that when placing a block, you are assigning it to a region in a specific theme , not globally for all themes. So when you switch the site’s default theme, the new theme may have a different set of regions or different region names, and block placements from the previous theme may no longer map correctly.

Drupal’s theming documentation is even more explicit: if a theme does not define a region that blocks were assigned to, those blocks are treated as assigned to an invalid region and are disabled . The Block module documentation also states that disabled blocks (blocks not assigned to any region in your theme) are never shown . This is exactly why blocks can appear to “disappear” after changing themes.

The other options do not match Drupal’s documented behavior. Blocks do not need to be “registered” with a theme in this sense, contributed themes are not limited to system blocks, and custom blocks generally do not need to be recreated just because the theme changed. The issue is the theme-specific region mapping , which makes D the correct answer.

Drupal 10 and Drupal 11 provide multiple ways to control how content is displayed without altering the underlying data. The requirement here is to show only selected fields (image, title, cuisine) in a listing, while keeping the full description available on the detail page.

Option A is correct because Views allows you to display content as fields , meaning you can explicitly choose which fields to show. This is a core feature of the Views module and is commonly used for listing pages.

Option C is also correct because Drupal supports view modes (like Teaser and Full). The documentation explains that you can configure the Teaser view mode to show only selected fields. Then, in Views, you can display content using that view mode. This approach is reusable and aligns with Drupal’s display system.

Option B is incorrect because creating a duplicate content type is unnecessary and violates content modeling best practices. Option D is incorrect because hiding fields with CSS does not remove them from the rendered output and is not a proper Drupal solution.

Thus, using Views fields or Teaser view mode are the correct, documented approaches.

In Drupal 10 (Standard installation profile), several roles are created automatically to support common editorial workflows. These include Authenticated user , Content editor , and Administrator .

Authenticated user is a core default role in all Drupal installations. It represents any logged-in user and is always present.

Content editor is provided by the Standard installation profile as part of Drupal’s out-of-the-box editorial workflow, allowing users to create and manage content.

Administrator is also included and has full permissions to manage the entire site.

Options A (Site builder) and C (Publisher) are not default roles created by Drupal core or the Standard profile. While such roles can be created manually or may appear in specific distributions, they are not included by default.

Drupal’s documentation for installation profiles confirms that the Standard profile provides a pre-configured editorial setup, including roles like Content editor, in addition to the core Authenticated user and Administrator roles.

Therefore, the correct answers are B, D, and E .

Drupal’s recommended way to let visitors narrow a Views listing by a field value is to add that field as a filter criterion and then expose the filter to site visitors . The core Views documentation explains that filters can be exposed so users can interact with the data shown in the view, instead of hard-coding separate displays or relying on free-text searching.

This question specifically says the recipes are tagged with a curated taxonomy vocabulary of ingredients. Drupal’s User Guide uses Ingredients as an example of a field that should be a taxonomy term reference , because the allowed values come from a managed list that can grow over time. That means the correct filter is the Recipe content type’s Ingredients taxonomy-reference field in the View. Since visitors should be able to choose the ingredients they have on hand, the exposed filter should allow multiple selections .

The other options are not the standard Drupal site-building solution. Separate displays per ingredient do not scale, a combined-text search is not a structured taxonomy filter, and a menu block is navigation rather than a proper Views filter.

In Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, user accounts are fieldable entities , which means you can add custom fields directly to user accounts through the administrative UI. Drupal’s field documentation explains that fields can be added to various entity types, including users , not just content types. So if you want each user to choose a favorite weapon, the correct site-building approach is to add a field such as Favorite weapon to the User entity using the Manage fields interface for user accounts. This makes option A correct.

This approach is also flexible. The field could be a plain list, an entity reference, or a taxonomy term reference if the site needs a controlled list of weapons. The important point is that the selection belongs to the user profile/account , because the requirement is about storing a preference for each user.

The other options are not the correct primary solution. Option B creates taxonomy terms but does not by itself provide the user-selection field. Option C uses content and Views instead of storing a value on user accounts. Option D is incorrect because Drupal users are not modeled as a content type. Therefore, adding a field to user accounts is the proper Drupal-native solution.

Drupal core search does not index newly created or updated content immediately in the default workflow. According to the official Drupal core Search module overview , content actions such as creating, editing, or deleting content automatically mark the affected content items for indexing or reindexing at the next cron run . Until cron runs, the new or changed content is not updated in the search index, so a newly created article may not appear in search results even though search is otherwise functioning correctly.

This makes option C the correct answer. The other options do not match Drupal core behavior. There is no normal site-building step where you configure core search to “recognize” a specific term, and Drupal does not provide an “Add to search index” checkbox when creating an article in core search. Also, while contributed search solutions exist, the question states that Drupal core search is already working correctly, so the missing result is best explained by indexing timing, not by a flaw requiring another module. Drupal’s search documentation is explicit that cron is responsible for updating the index after content changes.