SAA-C03 Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate (SAA-C03) Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

This solution meets the requirements because it allows the company to improve visibility into the infrastructure by using ALB access logging and Amazon Athena. ALB access logging is afeature that captures detailed information about requests sent to the load balancer, such as the client’s IP address, request path, response code, and latency. By enabling ALB access logging to Amazon S3, the company can store the access logs in an S3 bucket as compressed files. Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. By creating a table in Amazon Athena for the access logs, the company can query the logs and get results in seconds. This way, the company can better understand the abnormal traffic access patterns across the application.

An Application Load Balancer (ALB) is a type of Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) that distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, Lambda functions, and IP addresses, in multiple Availability Zones1. An ALB can be internet-facing or internal. An internet-facing ALB has a public DNS name that clients can use to send requests over the internet1. An internal ALB has a private DNS name that clients can use to send requests within a VPC1. This solution meets the requirements of the question because:

It allows external internet traffic to connect to the web server on ports 80 and 443, as the ALB listens for requests on these ports and forwards them to the EC2 instance in the private subnet1.

It does not violate the corporate security mandate, as the EC2 instance is launched in a private subnet and does not have a public IPaddress or a route to an internet gateway2.

It reduces the operational overhead, as the ALB is a fully managed service that handles the tasks of load balancing, health checking, scaling, and security1.

This option is the most cost-effective and simple way to enable SFTP access to the S3 data lake. AWS Transfer Family is a fully managed service that supports secure file transfers over SFTP, FTPS, and FTPprotocols. You can create an SFTP-enabled server with a public endpoint and associate it with your S3 bucket. You can also use AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles and policies to control access to your S3 data lake. The service scales automatically to handle any volume of file transfers and provides high availability and durability. You do not need to provision, manage, or patch any servers or load balancers.

Option B is not correct because Amazon S3 File Gateway is not an SFTP server. It is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides a local file system interface to S3. You can use it to store and retrieve files as objects in S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS and SMB. However, itdoes not support SFTP protocol, and it requires deploying a file gateway appliance on-premises or on EC2.

Option C is not cost-effective or scalable because it requires launching and managing an EC2 instance in a private subnet and setting up a VPN connection for the new partner. This would incur additional costs for the EC2 instance, the VPN connection, and the data transfer. It would also introduce complexity and security risks to the solution. Moreover, it would require running a cron job script on the EC2 instance to upload files to the S3 data lake, which is not efficient or reliable.

Option D is not cost-effective or scalable because it requires launching and managing multiple EC2 instances in a private subnet and placing a NLB in front of them. This would incur additional costs for the EC2 instances, the NLB, and the data transfer. It would also introduce complexity and security risks to the solution. Moreover, it would require running a cron job script on the EC2 instances to upload files to the S3 data lake, which is not efficient or reliable. References:

What Is AWS Transfer Family?

What Is Amazon S3 File Gateway?

What Is Amazon EC2?

[What Is Amazon Virtual Private Cloud?]

[What Is a Network Load Balancer?]

AWS Glue DataBrew is a visual data preparation tool that allows you to easily clean, normalize, and transform your data without writing any code. You can create and run data preparation jobs on your data stored in Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, or other data sources. AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. You can use Step Functions to orchestrate your DataBrew jobs, define the order and parallelism of execution, handle errors and retries, and monitor the state of your workflow. By using AWS Glue DataBrew and AWS Step Functions, you can meet the requirements of the company with minimal operational overhead, as you do not need to write any code, manage any servers, or deal with complex dependencies.

This solution will meet the requirements of minimizing hosting service costs based on demand and providing the streaming content of a movie within 5 minutes of a user purchase. S3 Intelligent-Tiering is a storage class that automatically optimizes storage costs by moving data to the most cost-effective access tier when access patterns change. It is suitable for data with unknown, changing, or unpredictable access patterns, such as newer movies that may have higher demand1. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is a storage class that provides low-cost storage for archive data that is retrieved asynchronously. It offers flexible data retrieval options fromminutes to hours, and free bulk retrievals in 5-12 hours. It is ideal for backup, disaster recovery, and offsite data storage needs2. By using expedited retrieval, the user can access the older movie video file in 1-5 minutes, which meets the requirement of 5 minutes3.

The most cost-effective DynamoDB table configuration for the web application is to configure DynamoDB in on-demand mode by using the DynamoDB Standard table class. This configuration will allow the company to scale in response to application traffic and pay only for the read and write requests that the application performs on the table.

On-demand mode is a flexible billing option that can handle thousands of requests per second without capacity planning. On-demand mode automatically adjusts the table’s capacity based on the incoming traffic, and charges only for the read and write requests that are actually performed.On-demand mode is suitable for applications withunpredictable or variable workloads, or applications that prefer the ease of paying for only what they use1.

The DynamoDB Standard table class is the default and recommended table class for most workloads. The DynamoDB Standard table class offers lower throughput costs than the DynamoDB Standard-Infrequent Access (DynamoDB Standard-IA) table class, and is more cost-effective for tables where throughput is the dominant cost.The DynamoDB Standard table class also offers the same performance, durability, and availability as the DynamoDB Standard-IA table class2.

The other options are not correct because they are either not cost-effective or not suitable for the use case. Configuring DynamoDB with provisioned read and write by using the DynamoDB Standard table class, and setting DynamoDB auto scaling to a maximum defined capacity is not correct because this configuration requires manual estimation and management of the table’s capacity, which adds complexity and cost to the solution. Provisioned mode is a billing option that requires users to specify the amount of read and write capacity units for their tables, and charges for the reserved capacity regardless of usage.Provisioned mode is suitable for applications with predictable or stable workloads, or applications that require finer-grained control over their capacity settings1. Configuring DynamoDB with provisioned read and write by using the DynamoDB Standard-Infrequent Access (DynamoDB Standard-IA) table class, and setting DynamoDB auto scaling to a maximum defined capacity is not correct because thisconfiguration is not cost-effective for tables with moderate to high throughput. The DynamoDB Standard-IA table class offers lower storage costs than the DynamoDB Standard table class, but higher throughput costs.The DynamoDB Standard-IA table class is optimized for tables where storage is the dominant cost, such as tables that store infrequently accessed data2. Configuring DynamoDB in on-demand mode by using the DynamoDB Standard-Infrequent Access (DynamoDB Standard-IA) table class is not correct because this configuration is notcost-effective for tables with moderate to high throughput. As mentioned above, the DynamoDB Standard-IA table class has higher throughput costs than the DynamoDB Standard table class, which can offset the savings from lower storage costs.

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is a scalable and reliable service that can ingest, buffer, and process streaming data in real-time. It can handle large traffic spikes and preserve the order ofthe incoming data records. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that can process the data streams from Kinesis Data Streams without requiring any infrastructure management. It can also scale automatically to match the throughput of the data stream. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed, highly available, and fast NoSQL database that can store the processed updates from Lambda. It can also handle high write throughput and provide consistent performance. By using these services, the solutions architect can design a solution that meets the requirements of the company with the least operational overhead.

The least outstanding requests (LOR) algorithm is a load balancing algorithm that distributes incoming requests to the target with the fewest outstanding requests. This helps to avoid overloading any single target and improves the overall performance and availability of the web application. The LOR algorithmcan use the RequestCount and TargetResponseTime CloudWatch metrics to determine the number of outstanding requests and the response time of each target. These metrics measure the number of requests processed by each target and the time elapsed after the request leaves the load balancer until a response from the target is received by the load balancer, respectively. By using these metrics, the LOR algorithm can route new requests to the targets that are less busy and more responsive, and avoid sending requests to the targets that are already overloaded or slow. This solution meets the requirements of the company.

Amazon EFS is a fully managed, elastic, and scalable file system that can be shared between multiple containers. It provides high availability and fault tolerance by replicating data across multiple Availability Zones. Amazon EFS is compatible with Amazon EKS and AWS Fargate, and can be registered in a StorageClass object on an EKS cluster. Amazon EBS volumes are not supported by AWS Fargate, and cannot be shared between multiple containers without using EBS Multi-Attach, which has limitations and performance implications. EBS Multi-Attach also requires the volumes to be in the same Availability Zone as the worker nodes, which reduces availability and fault tolerance. Synchronizing data between multiple EFS file systems using AWS Lambda is unnecessary, complex, and prone to errors. References:

Amazon EFS Storage Classes

Amazon EKSStorage Classes

Amazon EBS Multi-Attach

This option is the most cost-effective way to reduce the S3 storage costs in this situation. Incomplete multipart uploads are parts of objects that are not completed or aborted by the application. They consume storage space and incur charges until they are deleted. By enabling an S3 Lifecycle policy that deletes incomplete multipart uploads, you can automatically remove them after a specified period of time (such as one day) and free up the storage space. This will reduce the S3 storage costs and also improve the performance of the application by avoiding unnecessary retries or errors.

Option A is not correct because switching from multipart uploads to Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration will not reduce the S3 storage costs. Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration is a feature that enables faster data transfers to and from S3 by using the AWS edge network. It is useful for improving the upload speed of large objects over long distances, but it does not affect the storage space or charges. In fact, it may increase the costs by adding a data transfer fee for using the feature.

Option C is not correct because configuring S3 inventory to prevent objects from being archived too quickly will not reduce the S3 storage costs. Amazon S3 Inventory is a feature that provides a report of the objects and their metadata in an S3 bucket. It is useful for managing and auditingthe S3 objects, but it does not affect the storage space or charges. In fact, it may increase the costs by generating additional S3 objects for the inventory reports.

Option D is not correct because configuring Amazon CloudFront to reduce the number of objects stored in Amazon S3 will not reduce the S3 storage costs. Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that distributes the S3 objects to edge locations for faster and lower latency access. It is useful for improving the download speed and availability of the S3 objects, but it does not affect the storage space or charges. In fact, it may increase the costs by adding a data transfer fee for using the service. References:

Managing your storage lifecycle

Using multipart upload

Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration

Amazon S3 Inventory

What Is Amazon CloudFront?

This option is the most cost-effective and scalable way to process the files uploaded to S3. AWS CloudTrail is used to log API calls, not to trigger actions based on them. AWS AppSync is a service for building GraphQL APIs, not for processing files. Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is used to ingest and process streaming data, not to send data to S3. Amazon SNS is a pub/sub service that can be used to notify subscribers of events, not to process files. References:

Using AWS Lambda with Amazon S3

AWS CloudTrail FAQs

What Is AWS AppSync?

[What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Streams?]

[What Is Amazon Simple Notification Service?]

This option is the most cost-effective and scalable way to allow the Lambda function in the primary account to access the EFS file system in the secondary account. VPC peering enables private connectivity between two VPCs without requiring gateways, VPN connections, or dedicated networkconnections. The Lambda function can use the VPC peering connection to mount the EFS file system as a local file system and access the files as needed. The solution does not incur additional data transfer or storage costs, and it leverages the existing EFS file system without duplicating or moving the data.

Option A is not cost-effective because it requires creating a new EFS file system and using AWS DataSync to copy the data from the original EFS file system. This would incur additional storage and data transfer costs, and it would not provide real-time access to the files.

Option C is not scalable because it requires creating a second Lambda function in the secondary account and configuring cross-account permissions to invoke it from the primary account. This would add complexity and latency to the solution, and it would increase the Lambda invocation costs.

Option D is not feasible because Lambda layers are not designed to store large amounts of data or provide file system access. Lambda layers are used to share common code or libraries across multiple Lambda functions. Moving the contents of the EFS file system to a Lambda layer wouldexceed the size limit of 250 MB for a layer, and it would not allow the Lambda function to read or write files to the layer. References:

What Is VPC Peering?

Using Amazon EFS file systems with AWS Lambda

What Are Lambda Layers?

The solution that will improve the performance of the data tier is to deploy an Amazon ElastiCache for Redis cluster in front of the existing DB instance and modify the game to use Redis. This solution will enable the game to store and retrieve the location data of the players in a fast and scalable way, as Redis is an in-memory data store that supports geospatial data typesand commands. By using ElastiCache for Redis, the game can reduce the load on the RDS for PostgreSQL DB instance, which is not optimized for high-frequency updates and queries of location data. ElastiCache for Redis also supports replication, sharding, and auto scaling to handle the increasing user base of the game.

The other solutions are not as effective as the first one because they either do not improve the performance, do not support geospatial data, or do not leverage caching. Taking a snapshot of the existing DB instance and restoring it with Multi-AZ enabled will not improve the performance of the data tier, as it only provides high availability and durability, but not scalability or low latency. Migrating from Amazon RDS to Amazon OpenSearch Service with OpenSearch Dashboards will not improve the performance of the data tier, as OpenSearch Service is mainly designed for full-text search and analytics, not for real-time location tracking. OpenSearch Service also does not support geospatial data types and commands natively, unlike Redis. Deploying Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) in front of the existing DB instance and modifying the game to use DAX will not improve the performance of the data tier, as DAX is only compatible with DynamoDB, not with RDS for PostgreSQL. DAX also does not support geospatial data types and commands.

This solution meets the requirements because it uses the following components and features:

AdministratorAccess identity-based policy: This is an AWS managed policy that provides full access to AWSservices and resources1. By attaching this policy to the IAM user group, the solutions architect can grant the permissions needed for the designated employees to perform any task in the AWS account.

IAM user group: This is a collection of IAM users that share common permissions2. By creating a user group and adding the five designated employees as members, the solutions architect can simplify the management of permissions and reduce the risk of human errors or inconsistencies.

IAM users: These are identities that represent the designated employees in AWS2. By creating an IAM user for each employee and requiring them to sign in with their own credentials, the solutions architect can enhance the security and accountability of the AWS account.

These two steps will meet the requirements because they will provide high availability and scalability for the web application without rewriting it. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling allows you to automatically adjust the number of EC2 instances in response to changes in demand. By configuring Auto Scaling with multiple Availability Zones in private subnets, you can ensure that your web application is distributed across isolated and fault-tolerant locations, and that your instances are not directly exposed to the internet. An Application Load Balancer operates at the application layer and distributes incoming web traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, or Lambda functions. By configuring an Application Load Balancer in a public subnet, you can enable your web application to handle requests from the internet and route them to the appropriate targets in the private subnets.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is cost-effective, as it only charges for the storage and data transfer of the replicated objects, and does not require any additional AWS services or custom scripts. S3 Same-Region Replication (SRR) is a feature that automatically replicates objects across S3 buckets within the same AWS Region. SRR can help you aggregate logs from multiple sources to a single destination for analysis and auditing. SRR also preserves the metadata, encryption, and access control of the source objects.

It is operationally efficient, as it does not require any manual intervention or scheduling. SRR replicates objects as soon as they are uploaded to the source bucket, ensuring that the destination bucket always has the latest log data. SRR also handles any updates or deletions of the source objects, keeping the destination bucket in sync. SRR can be enabled with a few clicks in the S3 console or with a simple API call.

It is secure, as it does not allow the logs to leave the us-west-2 Region. SRR only replicates objects within the same AWS Region, ensuring that the data sovereignty and compliance requirements are met. SRR also supports encryption of the source and destination objects, using either server-side encryption with AWS KMS or S3-managed keys, or client-side encryption.

To use AWS Budgets to create and manage budgets for different AWS accounts, the company needs to do the following steps:

Use AWS Budgets to create a budget for each AWS account that needs a different budget amount. The budget can be based on cost or usage metrics, and can have different time periods, filters, and thresholds. The company can set the budget amount under the Billing dashboards of the required AWS accounts1.

Create an IAM role for AWS Budgets to run budget actions with the required permissions. A budget action is a response that AWS Budgets initiates when a budget exceeds a specified threshold. The IAM role allows AWS Budgets to perform actions on behalf of the company, such as applying an IAM policy or a service control policy (SCP) to restrict the provisioning of additional resources2.

Add an alert to notify the company when each account meets its budget threshold. The alert can be sent via email or Amazon SNS. The company can also add a budget action that selects the IAM role created and the appropriate SCP to prevent provisioning of additional resources. An SCP is a type of policy that can be applied to an AWS account or an organizational unit (OU) within AWS Organizations. An SCP can limit the actions that users and roles can perform in the account or OU3.

 S3 Lifecycle is a feature that allows you to automate the management of your S3 objects based on predefined rules. You can use S3 Lifecycle to delete expired object versions and retain the two most recent versions by creating a lifecycle configuration rule that applies to all objects in the bucket and specifies the expiration action for noncurrent versions. This way, you can reduce the storage costs of your S3 bucket without requiring any application changes or manual intervention. S3 Lifecycle runs once a day and marks the eligible object versions for deletion. You are no longer charged for the objects that are marked for deletion. S3 Lifecycle is the most cost-effective and simple solution among the options.

B. Use an AWS Lambda function to check for older versions and delete all but the two most recent versions. This option is not optimal because it requires you to write, test, and maintain a custom Lambda function that scans the S3 bucket for older versions and deletes them. This can incur additional costs for Lambda invocations and increase the operational complexity and overhead. Moreover, you need to ensure that your Lambda function has the appropriate permissions and error handling mechanisms to perform the deletion operation.

C. Use S3 Batch Operations to delete noncurrent object versions and retain only the two most recent versions. This option is not ideal because S3 Batch Operations is designed for performing large-scale operations on S3 objects, such as copying, tagging, restoring, or invoking a Lambda function. To use S3 Batch Operations to delete noncurrent object versions, you need to provide a manifest file that lists the object versions that you want to delete. This can be challenging and time-consuming to generate and update. Moreover, S3 Batch Operations charges you for each operation that you perform, which can increase your costs.

D. Deactivate versioning on the S3 bucket and retain the two most recent versions. This option is not feasible because deactivating versioning on an S3 bucket does not delete the existing object versions. Instead, it prevents new versions from being created. Therefore, you still need to delete the older versions manually or use another method to do so. Additionally, deactivating versioning can compromise the data protection and recovery capabilities of your S3 bucket.

These options are the most suitable ways to configure the network architecture to provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Option A enables and configures enhanced networking on each EC2 instance, which is a feature that improves the network performance of the instance by providing higher bandwidth, lower latency, and lower jitter. Enhanced networking uses single root I/O virtualization (SR-IOV) or Elastic Fabric Adapter (EFA) to provide direct access to the network hardware. You can enable and configure enhanced networking by choosing a supported instance type and a compatible operating system, and installing the required drivers. Option C runs the EC2 instances in a cluster placement group, which is a logical grouping of instanceswithin a single Availability Zone that are placed close together on the same underlying hardware. Cluster placement groups provide the lowest network latency and the highest network throughput among the placement group options. You can run the EC2 instances in a cluster placement group by creating a placement group and launching the instances into it.

Option B is not suitable because grouping the EC2 instances in separate accounts does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Separate accounts are used to isolate and organize resources for different purposes, such as security, billing, or compliance. However, they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, grouping the EC2 instances in separate accounts would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would require setting up cross-account networking and permissions.

Option D is not suitable because attaching multiple elastic network interfaces to each EC2 instance does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Elastic network interfaces are virtual network interfaces that can be attached to EC2 instances to provide additional network capabilities, such as multiple IP addresses, multiple subnets, or enhanced security. However, they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, attaching multiple elastic network interfaces to each EC2 instance would consume additional resources and limit the instance type choices.

Option E is not suitable because using Amazon EBS optimized instance types does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Amazon EBS optimized instance types are instances that provide dedicated bandwidth for Amazon EBS volumes, which are block storage volumes that can be attached to EC2 instances. EBS optimized instance types improve the performance and consistency of the EBS volumes, but they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, using EBS optimized instance types would incur additional costs and may not be necessary for the streaming data workload. References:

Enhanced networking on Linux

Placement groups

Elastic network interfaces

Amazon EBS-optimized instances

This option is the best solution because it allows the company to decouple the analytics software from the user requests and scale the EC2 instances dynamically based on the demand. By using Amazon SQS, the company can create a queue that stores the user requests and acts as a buffer between the users and the analytics software. This way, the software can process the requests at its own pace without losing any data or overloading the EC2 instances. By using EC2 Auto Scaling, the company cancreate an Auto Scaling group that launches or terminates EC2 instances automatically based on the size of the queue. This way, the company can ensure that there are enough instances to handle the load and optimize the cost and performance of the system. By updating the software to read from the queue, the company can enable the analytics software to consume the requests from the queue and process the data from Amazon S3.

A. Create a copy of the instance Place all instances behind an Application Load Balancer. This option is not optimal because it does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the high CPU utilization of the EC2 instances. An Application Load Balancer can distribute the incoming traffic across multiple instances, but it cannot scale the instances based on the load or reduce the processing time of the analytics software. Moreover, this option can incur additional costs for the load balancer and the extra instances.

B. Create an S3 VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 Update the software to reference the endpoint. This option is not effective because it does not solve the issue of the high CPU utilization of the EC2 instances. An S3 VPC endpoint can enable the EC2 instances to access Amazon S3 without going through the internet, which can improve the network performance and security. However, it cannot reduce the processing time of the analytics software or scale the instances based on the load.

C. Stop the EC2 instances. Modify the instance type to one with a more powerful CPU and more memory. Restart the instances. This option is not scalable because it does not account for the variability of the user load. Changing the instance type to a more powerful one can improve the performance of the analytics software, but it cannot adjust the number of instances based on the demand. Moreover, this option can increase the cost of the system and cause downtime during the instance modification.

These two steps will meet the requirements with the fewest changes to the application because they will enable the company to replicate the data to the new S3 buckets and minimize latency for both video streaming and uploads. One-way replication from the us-east-2 S3 bucket to the other two S3 buckets will ensure that the data is synchronized across all three regions. The company can use S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) to automatically copy objects across buckets in different AWS Regions. CRR can help the company achieve lower latency and compliance requirements by keeping copies of their data in different regions. Creating an S3 Multi-Region Access Point and modifying the application to use its ARN will allow the company to access the data through a single global endpoint. An S3 Multi-Region Access Point is a globally unique name that can be used to access objects stored in S3 buckets across multiple regions. It automatically routes requests to the closest S3 bucket with the lowest latency. By using an S3 Multi-Region Access Point, the company can simplify the application architecture and improve the performance and reliability of the application.

This option is the best solution because it allows the company to migrate the container application to AWS with minimal changes and leverage a managed service to run the Kubernetes cluster and the message queue. By using Amazon EKS, the company can run the container application on a fully managed Kubernetes control plane that is compatible with the existingKubernetes tools and plugins. Amazon EKS handles the provisioning, scaling, patching, and security of the Kubernetes cluster, reducing the operational overhead and complexity. By using Amazon MQ, the company can use a fully managed message broker service that supports AMQP and other popular messaging protocols. Amazon MQ handles the administration, maintenance, and scaling of the message broker, ensuring high availability, durability, and security of the messages.

A. Migrate the container application to Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to retrieve the messages. This option is not optimal because it requires the company to change the container orchestration platform from Kubernetes to ECS, which can introduce additional complexity and risk. Moreover, it requires the company to change the messaging protocol from AMQP to SQS, which can also affect the application logic and performance. Amazon ECS and Amazon SQS are both fully managed services that simplify the deployment and management of containers and messages, but they may not be compatible with the existing application architecture and requirements.

C. Use highly available Amazon EC2 instances to run the application Use Amazon MQ to retrieve the messages. This option is not ideal because it requires the company to manage the EC2 instances that host the container application. The company would need to provision, configure, scale, patch, and monitor the EC2 instances, which can increase the operational overhead and infrastructure costs. Moreover, the company would need to install and maintain the Kubernetes software on the EC2 instances, which can also add complexity and risk. Amazon MQ is a fully managed message broker service that supports AMQP and other popular messaging protocols, but it cannot compensate for the lack of a managed Kubernetes service.

D. Use AWS Lambda functions to run the application Use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to retrieve the messages. This option is not feasible because AWS Lambda does not support running container applications directly. Lambda functions are executed in a sandboxed environment that is isolated from other functions and resources. To run container applications on Lambda, the company would need to use a custom runtime or a wrapper library that emulates the container API, which can introduce additional complexity and overhead. Moreover, Lambda functions have limitations in terms of available CPU, memory, and runtime, which may not suit the application needs. Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queue service that supports asynchronous communication, but it does not support AMQP or other messaging protocols.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that allows you to run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can create Lambda functions using various languages, including Java, and specify the amount of memory and CPU allocated to your function. Lambda charges you only for the compute time you consume, which is calculated based on the number of requests and the duration of your code execution. You can use Amazon EventBridge to trigger your Lambda function on a schedule, such as every hour, using cron or rate expressions. This solution will optimize the costs to run the job, as you will not payfor any idle time or unused resources, unlike running the job on an EC2 instance. References: 1: AWS Lambda - FAQs2, General Information section2: Tutorial:Schedule AWS Lambda functions using EventBridge3, Introduction section3: Schedule expressions using rate or cron - AWS Lambda4, Introduction section.

The company wants to deploy its containerized application workloads to a VPC across three Availability Zones, with high availability and minimal changes to the application. The solution that will meet these requirements with the least operational overhead is:

Use Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS). Amazon ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service that allows you to run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install, operate, and scale your own cluster management infrastructure. Amazon ECS also integrates with other AWS services, such as VPC, ELB, CloudFormation, CloudWatch, IAM, and more.

Configure Amazon ECS Service Auto Scaling to use target tracking scaling. Amazon ECS Service Auto Scaling allows you to automatically adjust the number of tasks in your service based on the demand or custom metrics. Target tracking scaling is a policy type that adjusts the number of tasks in your service to keep a specified metric at a target value. For example, you can use target tracking scaling to maintain a target CPU utilization or request count per task for your service.

Set the minimum capacity to 3. This ensures that your service always has at least three tasks running across three Availability Zones, providing high availability and fault tolerance for your application.

Set the task placement strategy type to spread with an Availability Zone attribute. This ensures that your tasks are evenly distributed across the Availability Zones in your cluster, maximizing the availability of your service.

This solution will provide high availability across Availability Zones, require minimal changes to the application, and reduce the operational overhead of managing your own cluster infrastructure.

To securely access AWS services like S3 and Secrets Manager from a private VPC without using public IPs, interface VPC endpoints are required. These endpoints are accessible via private IP addresses. For the application to reach these endpoints, appropriate routes must be configured in the route table.

The most secure and least operationally intensive method is to configure cross-account access using resource-based policies on the S3 bucket. This allows trusted external AWS accounts (consulting agencies) to securely access the S3 data without the need to manage user credentials or build additional infrastructure.

Options A and B pose security risks. Option D increases operational complexity and violates least privilege by managing external users inside your AWS account.

Amazon CloudFront is a highly cost-effective CDN that caches content like images and videos at edge locations globally. This reduces latency and the load on the origin S3 bucket. It is ideal for static content that is accessed by many users.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Amazon EC2 On-Demand Instances: Since the batch jobs cannot be disrupted, On-Demand Instances provide the necessary reliability and availability.

Amazon S3 Standard: Storing data in S3 Standard for the first 30 days ensures quick and frequent access.

S3 Glacier Deep Archive: After 30 days, moving data to S3 Glacier Deep Archive significantly reduces storage costs for data that is rarely accessed.

S3 Lifecycle Configuration: Automating the transition and deletion of objects using lifecycle policies ensures cost optimization and compliance with data retention requirements.

For a large-scale multi-account AWS environment with many VPCs and centralized Direct Connect, AWS recommends using a Transit Gateway (TGW) architecture combined with a Direct Connect gateway (DXGW). This setup allows scalable, centralized connectivity between on-premises and multiple VPCs across accounts.

Step B: Creating a Direct Connect gateway and Transit Gateway in a central network account and connecting them via a transit VIF enables the on-premises network to access all connected VPCs.

Step D: Sharing the transit gateway with other accounts via AWS Resource Access Manager (RAM) allows the central TGW to attach VPCs in multiple accounts, simplifying multi-account connectivity.

Step F: To route cloud resources’ internet traffic back through the on-premises data center (for centralized egress), provisioning only private subnets and routing outbound internet traffic through NAT or firewall services in the data center is necessary. This requires configuring transit gateway and customer gateway routes appropriately.

Option A is partially correct in the use of Direct Connect gateway but association proposals are not scalable for hundreds of VPCs and accounts compared to transit gateway. Option C (internet gateway) is irrelevant here as traffic egress is required via on-premises data center, not directly to the internet. Option E (VPC peering) is not scalable for hundreds of VPCs.

DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) is a fully managed, in-memory cache for DynamoDB that delivers up to a 10x performance improvement—even at millions of requests per second. DAX requires minimal changes to existing applications and offloads the read workload from DynamoDB during report generation.

Reference Extract:

"DAX provides in-memory acceleration for DynamoDB tables, reducing response times from milliseconds to microseconds with minimal application changes."

Source: AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Official Study Guide, DynamoDB and Performance section.

Amazon DynamoDB supports both TTL (Time to Live) for automatic deletion and Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR) for backup and restore of table data. It's ideal for frequently updated data with short retention requirements and minimal operational overhead.

TTL attribute ensures expired items are automatically removed.

PITR enables recovery from accidental deletes or application errors.

Amazon API Gateway supports multiple API types: REST, HTTP, WebSocket, and gRPC. HTTP APIs are a newer, lightweight option that support JWT authorizers natively, enabling secure, scalable authentication for APIs with JSON Web Tokens.

HTTP APIs can integrate with ALBs as a backend target, providing direct connectivity and simplified API management with JWT authentication built in.

REST APIs support JWT but are more feature-rich and complex, often used for legacy or more complex use cases, and have higher costs and latency. WebSocket APIs are for real-time, bidirectional communication, which is not requested here. gRPC APIs support RPC calls but are less common for public HTTP-based APIs with JWT auth.

Therefore, HTTP API with JWT authorizers is the best fit for this use case.

A. VPC peering:Creates a fully meshed architecture, which is complex to manage for multiple VPCs.

B. Transit gateway:Simplifies network management by connecting multiple VPCs and on-premises networks via a central hub.

C. PrivateLink:Restricts communication to the application endpoint but may not allow full VPC connectivity.

D. ALB with internet exposure:Not secure or specific to private network communication.

By exporting AWS Cost and Usage Reports (CUR) to Amazon S3 and analyzing them with Amazon QuickSight, companies can generate interactive visual dashboards. This solution is fully AWS-managed, requires no third-party tools, and integrates deeply with AWS cost data.

Why Option C is Correct:

S3 Access Points: Provide scalable management of access to large datasets with specific permissions for individual prefixes.

Dynamic Prefixes: Access points simplify managing access to a growing number of prefixes without relying solely on a single bucket policy.

Fine-Grained Control: Resource-based permissions on access points enforce prefix-level isolation effectively.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option A: Using deny/allow bucket policies introduces complexity and is less scalable for dynamic prefixes.

Option B: Encryption ensures data security but does not address access management.

Option D: Pre-signed URLs are temporary and not suitable for managing access at scale.

AWS References:

Amazon S3 Access Points:AWS Documentation - S3 Access Points

To securely publish messages to an encrypted Amazon SNS topic, the following steps are required:

A. Resource policy for SNS topic:Ensures that the Lambda function is explicitly allowed to publish messages to the topic.

C. Resource policy for KMS key:Provides the necessary permissions to use the customer-managed key for encryption.

F. Lambda execution role:Grants the Lambda function the necessary IAM permissions to use the encryption key.

Other options:

Bis invalid because using SSE-KMS does not eliminate the need for resource policies.

Doverlaps with A, but specifying the ARN in the topic policy is covered by creating the resource policy.

Eis unrelated as API Gateway is not required for this setup.

AWS Documentation Reference:

Amazon SNS and KMS Permissions

When using imported key material with AWS KMS, you maintain control over the key lifecycle. AWS KMS allows you to import new key material into an existing KMS key (of type "external" or "imported"), thus rotating the key material without changing the key ID or ARNs. This enables applications to continue using the same key for cryptographic operations without disruption.

You can also set an expiration time for the old key material, after which AWS KMS deletes the old material and requires new key material to be imported, enforcing regular rotation per your compliance requirements.

AWS Documentation Extract:

"To rotate imported key material, you can re-import new key material into the same KMS key. This retains the same key ID and ARNs so applications are unaffected. You can set an expiration time for imported key material and replace it as needed, ensuring compliance with your rotation policy."

(Source: AWS Key Management Service Developer Guide, Importing Key Material, Rotating Key Material)

Other options:

A: You cannot create a new KMS key with the same key ID as an existing one.

B: Deleting and recreating the key disrupts application access because the key ID changes.

D: Automatic rotation is only available for AWS-managed keys, not for imported key material.

If the SQS visibility timeout is set shorter than the time it takes for the application to process and delete the message, the message becomes visible to other consumers and can be processed again, resulting in duplicate processing. This is a common cause of duplicate messages when using SQS.

Reference Extract from AWS Documentation / Study Guide:

"If the visibility timeout for a message is set shorter than the time it takes to process the message, the message becomes visible again and can be received and processed again, resulting in duplicate processing."

Source: AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Official Study Guide, SQS and Messaging section.

A: Amazon Macie can scan S3 buckets for sensitive data and identify PII.

C: S3 Object Lock legal hold prevents object deletion until a review is complete, meeting compliance requirements.

E: EventBridge can trigger the Lambda function automatically when Macie detects sensitive data, creating an automated workflow.

AWS Documentation Extract:

"Amazon Macie automatically discovers, classifies, and protects sensitive data in AWS. You can use EventBridge to invoke a Lambda function for post-processing, such as applying Object Lock legal hold to flagged objects."

(Source: AWS Macie and S3 Object Lock documentation)

B, D: Moving to Glacier Deep Archive or applying retention in governance mode is not specific to deletion prevention pending review.

F: MFA Delete adds a security layer but does not automate object retention for flagged PII.

The requirement is to monitor network metrics such as total packet loss and round-trip time (RTT) between on-premises and AWS over Site-to-Site VPN with minimal operational overhead. AWS CloudWatch Network Monitor (formerly known as VPC Network Manager) provides a managed solution to monitor connectivity, including packet loss and latency, between AWS and on-premises networks. This solution does not require managing any additional infrastructure like EC2 instances or Lambda functions and thus reduces operational overhead significantly.

CloudWatch Network Monitor leverages AWS-managed probes and integrates natively with CloudWatch dashboards and alarms, enabling automated, centralized monitoring of network health. This aligns with the AWS Well-Architected Framework’s operational excellence pillar by minimizing manual intervention and enabling proactive detection of network issues.

Option B, C, and D involve creating custom probes with EC2, Lambda, or Batch jobs, which increases complexity, cost, and maintenance effort. They also require scheduling, script management, and additional monitoring infrastructure.

Amazon S3 Access Points simplify managing data access for shared datasets in S3 by allowing the creation of distinct access policies for different applications or users. Each access point has its own policy and can be managed independently. This method avoids overloading a single bucket policy and helps remain within policy size limits.

Option D provides a scalable and operationally efficient solution by offloading individual access controls from a central bucket policy to individually managed access points, which is ideal for environments with many consuming applications.

Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (formerly Kinesis Data Analytics) is a fully managed, serverless service for real-time processing of streaming data. You can consume data from Kinesis Data Streams, perform anomaly detection, and then output the results to another Kinesis stream. This approach is loosely coupled, fully managed, and does not require modifying the application code.

AWS Documentation Extract:

“Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink enables you to process streaming data in real time, integrating with Kinesis Data Streams as source and sink, and is fully managed and serverless.”

(Source: Apache Flink on AWS documentation)

B: S3/Redshift is not real-time and adds complexity.

C, D: EC2/ECS solutions are not serverless or fully managed.

The company’s requirements are:

Store gigabytes of rarely accessed files daily.

Files must be available within minutes during the first year.

Retain files for 7 years cost-effectively.

The S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval storage class provides low-cost, long-term storage for data accessed occasionally, with millisecond retrieval time. This fits the requirement for availability within minutes during the first year. After one year, transitioning files to S3 Glacier Deep Archive (the lowest cost S3 storage class) with longer retrieval times is cost-effective for data retention over 7 years.

Option B uses S3 Standard and Glacier Flexible Retrieval, which is higher cost during the first year and slower retrieval times. Option C is less cost-efficient because EBS volumes are expensive for rarely accessed data and snapshots incur additional costs. Option D uses EFS, which is designed for low-latency file storage but is more expensive than S3 Glacier classes for long-term archival.

AWS Lambda supports encrypting environment variables at rest using AWS KMS. You can use encryption helpers (or Lambda’s built-in support) to encrypt sensitive environment variable values using a KMS key. These encrypted variables are not visible in plaintext to developers, either in the console or when running the code.

AWS Documentation Extract:

"AWS Lambda automatically encrypts environment variables at rest. For additional security, you can use AWS KMS keys and encryption helpers to encrypt environment variables, ensuring they are never exposed in plaintext."

(Source: AWS Lambda documentation, Environment Variables Security)

A: Does not address the issue (and adds more management overhead).

B, C: There is no native support for environment variable encryption via CloudHSM or ACM.

Auto Scalingis the most effective solution for ensuring seamless scalability of a stateless application. Key points:

Dleverages Auto Scaling with a Spot Fleet for cost efficiency and attaches an ALB to distribute traffic.

A and Bdo not provide automated scaling and would require manual intervention to add more instances.

Cchanges the instance type but does not scale out horizontally, which is required here.

AWS Documentation Reference:

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

Amazon RDS Proxy is designed to manage a large number of database connections from applications, especially serverless applications that can scale quickly. It improves application availability and scalability by pooling and sharing established database connections. This reduces the overhead of database connections and prevents overload during traffic spikes.

Detailed Explanation:

A. RDS:Suitable for relational databases but does not provide native support for data lakes or row-level access.

B. Redshift:Primarily for analytics, not designed for large-scale data lake governance.

C. S3 + Lake Formation:Provides native support for data lakes with granular access control, including row-level permissions.

D. Glue Catalog + DataBrew:Focused on data preparation and metadata management, not row-level access control.

The requirements include:

Scalability: The solution must scale as video files are uploaded.

Long-running tasks: Processing tasks can take up to 30 minutes. AWS Lambda has a maximum execution time of 15 minutes, which rules out options that involve Lambda performing all the processing.

Serverless and event-driven architecture: Ensures cost-effectiveness and high availability.

Analysis of Options:

Option A:

AWS Lambda has a 15-minute timeout, which cannot support tasks that take up to 30 minutes.

EventBridge Scheduler is unnecessary for monitoring files when native event notifications are available.Not a valid choice.

Option B:

AWS Step Functions and AWS Fargate can handle long-running processes, but Amazon EFS is not the ideal storage for uploaded video files in a serverless architecture.

Processing tasks triggered by EFS events are not a common pattern and may introduce complexities.Not the best practice.

Option C:

Amazon S3 is used for storing uploaded files, which integrates natively with event-driven services like EventBridge and Step Functions.

Amazon S3 event notifications trigger a Step Functions workflow, which can orchestrate Fargate tasks to process large video files, meeting the scalability and execution time requirements.Correct choice.

Option D:

Similar to Option A, AWS Lambda cannot handle long-running processes due to its 15-minute timeout.

Invoking Lambda for processing directly is not feasible for tasks that take up to 30 minutes.Not a valid choice.

AWS References:

Amazon S3 Event Notifications:AWS Documentation - S3 Event Notifications

AWS Step Functions:AWS Documentation - Step Functions

AWS Fargate:AWS Documentation - Fargate

Comparison of Storage Services:AWS Storage Options

By leveragingAmazon S3,Step Functions, andFargate, this solution provides a scalable, efficient, and serverless approach to handling video processing tasks.

The best practice for secure access control in AWS is to use IAM roles with least-privilege policies, granting only the permissions necessary to perform required tasks. Assigning roles individually ensures that developers cannot overstep their intended access boundaries.

Sharing credentials or using permanent access keys increases the risk of security breaches. Cognito is primarily intended for managing user access to applications, not AWS infrastructure. Thus, Option B best meets security and access control requirements.

For bidirectional communication such as chat applications, Amazon API Gateway WebSocket API is the correct service. WebSocket APIs allow clients to establish long-lived connections and exchange messages with the backend Lambda functions in real time.

HTTP APIs and REST APIs are suitable for request-response models, not continuous two-way communication. CloudFront cannot maintain stateful WebSocket connections, so only Option C fits the requirements for a real-time, bidirectional application.

Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is a fully managed, elastic, shared file system that can be mounted concurrently by multiple EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones. EFS automatically grows and shrinks as files are added or removed, providing seamless scalability for unpredictable and growing storage needs. It supports simultaneous access from multiple compute resources, making it ideal for applications where several EC2 instances must read and write to the same data set concurrently. EBS volumes cannot be shared across multiple Availability Zones, and S3 Glacier is intended for archival and infrequent access, not for active, hourly data analysis.

Reference Extract from AWS Documentation / Study Guide:

"Amazon EFS provides a scalable, fully managed elastic NFS file system for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. It can be mounted to many EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones and is ideal for shared data scenarios."

Source: AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Official Study Guide, Storage Solutions section; Amazon EFS User Guide.

AWS Fargate with Amazon ECS is a serverless, fully managed compute engine for containers. Fargate eliminates the need to provision or manage servers, and is ideal for periodic, long-running batch jobs. You only pay for the resources consumed during job execution, making it cost-effective for jobs that run infrequently. Lambda is not suitable because the maximum execution time is 15 minutes, but the job can take up to 2 hours.

AWS Documentation Extract:

“AWS Fargate lets you run containers without managing servers or clusters. Fargate is ideal for batch jobs, event-driven processing, and scheduled tasks that require hours of compute.”

(Source: AWS Fargate documentation)

A: Reserved Instances are cost-inefficient for infrequent workloads and require server management.

B: Lambda has a hard limit of 15 minutes per execution, insufficient for this job.

D: ECS on EC2 requires you to manage and provision EC2 instances, increasing cost and management overhead.

Amazon Neptune is a fully managed graph database service optimized for storing and navigating complex many-to-many relationships like social graphs or network topologies.

It supports Gremlin and openCypher queries that allow efficient traversal of connections even multiple levels deep. SQL JOINs (Athena or RDS) are inefficient for deep relationship queries due to exponential complexity.

QuickSight is used for data visualization, not graph traversal.

Amazon RDS Multi-AZ deployment provides automated failover and increased availability for MySQL databases. In case of infrastructure failure or power outage in one Availability Zone, RDS automatically fails over to a standby replica in another AZ, minimizing downtime. This is the AWS-recommended way to achieve high availability for relational databases.

AWS Documentation Extract:

"Amazon RDS Multi-AZ deployments provide high availability, failover support, and data redundancy for database instances. In the event of infrastructure failure, Amazon RDS performs an automatic failover to the standby."

(Source: Amazon RDS documentation, High Availability)

A: An ALB does not increase availability for a single database instance.

B: EC2 instance recovery does not move the instance across Availability Zones.

D: Termination protection prevents accidental deletion, not availability issues.

AWS PrivateLinkis the most suitable solution for providing fine-grained access control while allowing multiple VPCs, potentially across multiple accounts, to access the new application. This approach offers the following advantages:

Fine-grained control: Endpoint policies can restrict access to specific services or principals.

No need for route table updates: Unlike VPC peering or transit gateways, AWS PrivateLink does not require complex route table management.

Scalable architecture: PrivateLink scales to support traffic from multiple VPCs.

Secure connectivity: Ensures private connectivity over the AWS network, without exposing resources to the internet.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option A:

VPC peering is not scalable when connecting multiple VPCs or accounts.

Route table management becomes complex as the number of VPCs increases.Not scalable.

Option B:

While transit gateways provide scalable VPC connectivity, they are not ideal for fine-grained access control.

Transit gateways allow connectivity but do not inherently restrict access to specific applications.Not ideal for fine-grained access control.

Option D:

Exposing the application through an ALB over the internet is not secure and does not align with the requirement to use private network resources.Security risk.

AWS References:

AWS PrivateLink:AWS Documentation - PrivateLink

AWS Networking Services Comparison:AWS Whitepaper - Networking Services

A & B. GuardDuty:Designed for threat detection, not for identifying or classifying sensitive data in S3 buckets.

C. Macie with EventBridge + SNS:Automatically identifies sensitive data, triggers alerts, and uses SNS for immediate notification via email.

D. Macie with EventBridge + SQS:Introduces latency due to periodic polling and adds unnecessary complexity.