TM3 BCS ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level - Test Management v3.0 Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

InPeople Skills – Team Composition, the syllabus distinguishes four competence areas.Personal competencecovers attributes such asself-confidence,resilience, self-management, and ownership—traits related to how an individual conducts themselves. “Ability to act with confidence” is therefore categorized underpersonal competence, not methodological (techniques), professional (domain/technical knowledge), or social (interaction with others).

(ISTQB CTAL-TM v3.0 — Chapter “People Skills – Team Composition”: competence categories and examples; self-confidence falls underpersonal competence.)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

InTest Tool and Automation, the syllabus states that determining thebusiness case/ROIfor a tool requires identifying and quantifyingall relevant costs(acquisition, maintenance,training,pilot/rollout,integration,customization) andbenefits(e.g.,effort reductionacross activities, quality and cycle-time gains), then comparing them over a defined period within the organization’s context. A % effort reduction alone is insufficient without knowing thebaseline effort/cost, number of users, training/transition costs, and implementation scope. Therefore, ROI cannot be accurately computed with the given data.

(Reference: CTAL-TM v3.0 —Test Tool and Automation: tool selection and introduction; establishing a business case/ROI by quantifying costs and benefits; considering acquisition, maintenance, training, pilot, integration, process changes, and productivity gains.)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

The syllabus emphasizesSMART exit criteriatailored to the test level:

Forcomponent testing, structural coverage metrics (e.g.,decision coverage) are appropriate and measurable at code level, makingiii (80% decision coverage)suitable and SMART.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

Forprocess improvement and root-cause analysis, the syllabus highlights the value ofdefect origin and detection phase datato evaluatewhere defects are injected and where they are detected, calculate removal effectiveness, and focus improvements (e.g., earlier-phase prevention or reviews). Thelifecycle phase detectedenables meaningful analysis ofphase containment, trends, and improvement targets; the other fields are useful operationally but less pivotal fororganizational/process improvement analytics(Chapter 2: Test Management in the Organization – improvement approaches using defect data; Chapter 5: Reporting and analysis of defect trends).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

The syllabus distinguishesorganizational-levelprocess areas (e.g.,test policy, test organization) fromproject-levelprocess areas (e.g.,test planning, monitoring/control; test design, implementation, execution) when applyingmodel-based improvementssuch as TMMi at different scopes.

Atproject level, assessments focus onproject processes and practices;test policyandtest organizationareorganizationalconcerns, not a correct inclusion for a project-level assessment.

Therefore,C is not truefor a project-level model-based improvement focus.A and Bare correct inclusions at project scope, andDis consistent with the syllabus guidance totailor organizational practices to the project context.

(References: CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus — Chapter 2 “Test Management in the Organization” – improvement approaches and scopes; descriptions contrasting organizational vs. project-level process areas and the use of model-based frameworks such as TMMi.)

===========

The syllabus explicitly states thatexit criteriamust be met before considering completion of a test level:

“Exit criteria are the conditions that must be achieved to declare completion of a given test level… including coverage criteria and status of required tests (e.g., passed).”

— ISTQB CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus, Chapter 5Test Monitoring and Test Control

And test control must act when exit criteria are not met:

“If the exit criteria are not satisfied, appropriate actions must be taken to address the situation.”

— ISTQB CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus, Chapter 5

Sincetest condition 2 still has critical tests not yet executed, thedefined exit criteria are not fulfilled, and therefore a release decision should not be approved.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

Same rationale as Q35. In Agile,no formal defect reportis typically created when the team canfix the issue immediatelyand maintain flow (e.g., defect on a high-priority user story that is quickly addressed). Formal reports are encouraged whenblocking,spanning iterations, orrequiring cross-teamwork for visibility/traceability. Refer to CTAL-TM v3.0, Chapter 5 on defect management and Agile reporting considerations.

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

The syllabus reminds test managers thattool introduction must be problem-drivenandrequirements-based. Before (or alongside) demos, teams should clarify:

Athebusiness/testing problemsand improvement goals the tool is meant to address (e.g., traceability, automation scale, reporting).

Baclear set of tool requirements/selection criteriato objectivelyassess the toolduring a demo or evaluation.These two are theminimum critical questionsto ground any evaluation. WhileC,D, andEare important for later stages (rollout planning, piloting, and training), ISTQB stresses thatsuccessful adoption starts with defined needs and evaluation criteria, ensuring the demo and subsequent selection are aligned to real objectives.Relevant syllabus areas:Test Tool and Automation—Tool selection and introduction(identify problems/opportunities, define requirements and success criteria, evaluate, then plan pilot/rollout/training).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

UnderTest Tool and Automation, the syllabus explains thatcoverage tools(often calledcode coverage tools) measurewhich parts of the code or structure(e.g., statements, branches, conditions) have beenexecuted by tests. This directly answers the question about “which part of the test object has been exercised.”

Amanages requirements and traceability, not execution coverage.

Bexecutes tests but typically does not measure structural coverage of the code by itself.

Canalyzes code without executing it; it identifies defects or coding standard violations, not runtime coverage.Relevant syllabus areas:Test Tool and Automation—Coverage measurement tools(structural coverage for assessing extent of code exercised by testing).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

According to theISTQB CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus, Chapter 3 – Test Planning, Monitoring, and Control, one of the main tasks oftest planningis todefine and document test completion criteria and test level entry criteriaas part of the test plan.

“The test plan shall include the entry and exit criteria for each test level, including the conditions that must be met to start and finish testing activities at that level.”

(ISTQB CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus, Chapter 3: Test Planning activities)

Thetest planprovides the structure for managing multiple test levels such as integration, system, and user acceptance tests. Since this question context explicitly mentions severaltest levels, the most critical aspect to document in detail isthe entry and exit criteria per test level, ensuring clarity on when each test level starts and completes, and what constitutes sufficient testing for release or transition.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. An approach to regression testing– While important, regression strategy typically belongs to thetest approachsection, not the detailed planning of multi-level testing criteria.

B. A list of acceptance criteria for each of the user stories– This belongs toAgile acceptance testdocumentation, not the formaltest planfor multiple test levels (integration, system, UAT).

D. A set of logical test cases– Test cases are outputs oftest design, not part of thetest plandocument.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

In the stakeholder power–interest matrix used by test managers, stakeholders withhigh power but low interestare categorized asLatents. They generally “do not have a strong interest in day-to-day tasks,” yet theirdecisions are critical for resources and strategic direction. Promoters are high power/high interest; Defenders are low power/high interest; Apathetics are low power/low interest. This mapping guides how test managers engage and communicate with each stakeholder group (CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus, chapter on organizational aspects of test management and stakeholder engagement).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

In regulated, safety-critical domains with audits and strong traceability requirements, the syllabus emphasizes defining amethodical, documented test approachwithin test planning, includingselection of formal test design techniquesandrisk-based testingto focus effort on the most critical features. These elements are explicitly tied toV-modelcontexts, where traceability from requirements through test conditions and cases is expected, and evidence is essential for internal and external audits (CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus — Chapter 3, Test Planning; and Chapter 4, Risk-Based Testing and effort allocation).

Option B aligns with these needs: applyingrisk-based testingto prioritize safety-critical functions and usingformal techniquesto producetraceable, auditabletest assets.

Options A and D are practices typically associated with agile/ATDD and “definition of done,” which do not best fit asequential V-modelcontext. Option C (experience-based) may complement but isinsufficientas the primary approach wheretraceability and auditabilityare key.

(References: CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus — Chapter 3 “Test Planning, Monitoring, and Control” – defining the test approach and selecting test design techniques; Chapter 4 “Risk-Based Testing and Other Approaches for Test Prioritization and Effort Allocation” – prioritizing safety-critical areas; material on traceability/audit expectations in regulated contexts.)

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

For effectivedefect management and control, the report needs information that supportsprioritization and scheduling of fixes. The syllabus emphasizes fields such aspriority/severity, status, environment, and reproducibility to supportplanning, monitoring, and controldecisions. In the described process, addingpriorityis most critical to drivetimely assignment and fixing order(Chapter 5: Test Monitoring, Control, and Reporting – defect reporting to support control; Chapter 3: Test Planning – using priorities to allocate effort).

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level – Test Manager v3.0 syllabus:

The syllabus positionsproduct risk analysisas a core activity for test managers toprioritize testing and allocate effort. Performingproduct risk identification and analysisdrives the selection of features, levels, and test types to focus on, informs coverage depth, and guides where to automate for maximum value. While defining acceptance criteria (A) is important and often handled during backlog refinement, and automation (D) is valuable, withoutrisk analysisthe team cannot ensure efforts target the most critical quality risks—especially forhigh-impact, customer-facing mobile applications(CTAL-TM v3.0 Syllabus, chapter on Risk-Based Testing: risk identification, analysis, and applying risk to test prioritization and coverage).