L4M5 CIPS Commercial Negotiation Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

Mark-upis calculated as:

Mark-up %=(ProfitCost)×100\text{Mark-up \%} = \left( \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{Cost}} \right) \times 100Mark-up %=(CostProfit​)×100

In this case:

Profit = $240 - $160 = $80

Cost = $160

Mark-up = (80 / 160) × 100 =50%

“Understanding mark-up percentages helps in assessing supplier pricing behaviour and negotiating realistic margins.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models and Profit Margins)

Giving positive group and individual feedback is easy, as is self-congratulation and, in many cases, it is hoped, this will be an accurate reflection on actual performance. When it comes to developmental or difficult feedback, it is only natural to want to move on and not reflect on the negative or developmental points, or why a negotiation did not achieve its objectives. But this is a mistake. The best learning opportunities come from reflection on what could be done better, and this can be achieved without blame, threat or condemnation. Everyone and every team will make mistakes and/or have areas where they could have improved. Clearly, if every reflection session concludes that an individual or team keeps making the same mistake, then there is a case to change roles or consider alternative approaches.

About Dos and Don'ts of reflection, you can refer here: https://offices.depaul.edu/human-resources/employee-relations/Documents/Self%20Assesement.pdf

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are multiple variables to consider when choosing between 'push' and 'pull'. Professor Fiona Dent of Ashridge Business School proposes situations when each style might be most appropriate, breaking down push into 'directive' and 'reasoning' and 'pull' into 'collaborative' and 'visionary':

Table Description automatically generated

Text Description automatically generated

Using logical and objective reasons is one of the typical characteristics of persuasion reasoning method.

Partnership relationshipsare strategic and long-term. They emphasizetrust, collaboration, and information sharing. Unlike transactional relationships, they go beyond price and delivery to focus on joint value creation.

“Collaborative partnerships involve open information sharing and mutual support. These relationships are built on joint objectives, trust, and commitment to long-term success.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.2 - Types of Supplier Relationships)

The mark-up percentage is calculated as the profit divided by the cost of production, then multiplied by 100 to convert it into a percentage.

Calculation:

(

80

/

160

)

×

100

=

50

%

(80/160)×100=50%

Thus, the supplier’s mark-up percentage is 50%, as per standard pricing calculations used in procurement.

In a win-lose outcome, tactics often involve lowering the other party’s resistance point (1) and convincing them that the offer is the best possible (2). These strategies are designed to maximize advantage for one party at the expense of the other, fitting with CIPS’s win-lose negotiation techniques.

Distributive negotiation carries several risks beyond justlosing out on value. These includedamaging supplier relationships,eroding trust, andreaching an impasse, where neither party can agree. This could result in delayed projects, increased costs, or supplier withdrawal.

“Distributive negotiation can lead to a breakdown in communication, impasses, and long-term relationship damage. The win-lose mindset can prevent collaborative problem-solving.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.5 - Risks of Distributive Approaches)

Jayden's use ofeye contact to demonstrate understandingis a core element ofactive and effective listening. This technique includes not only listening to spoken words but also using non-verbal cues (e.g., nodding, eye contact) to confirm comprehension and engagement. Effective listening is essential to ensure that both parties feel heard and respected, which can de-escalate tension and improve outcomes.

“Effective listening involves verbal and non-verbal behaviours that show attentiveness. Maintaining eye contact, nodding, and reflecting key points show engagement and help in building rapport and trust.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.3 - Communication Techniques in Negotiation)

There are many factors that can influence the balance of power in a negotiation. These factors are classified into 3 levels:

Macro level: STEEPLE framework: social, technological, economic, environment, political, legal and ethical

Micro level: Porter's five forces:

Diagram Description automatically generated

One-to-one buyer-supplier dynamics.

The question asks about the micro factors that increases supplier's bargaining power. Among 5 answers, only 2 are likely to increase buyer's power:

There are no close substitutes for rubber: the buyer has to buy rubber, not any other material.

Costs of changing suppliers are high: buyer entails a large barrier if they want to switch supplier.

Other answers cannot be correct because:

SRI sets up its own rubber plantation: Buyer secures its own supply

SRI's purchase amount makes significant proportion of supplier revenue: Suppliers are reliant on buyer. If the buyer stops buying from them, they can face serious cash flow problems

Rubber from different suppliers is virtually similar: undifferentiated product would shift the power balance towards buyer.

A useful model of personal power that has survived the test of time and provide a simple way to analyse negotiation in French and Raven's Power Base Model, which describes six bases of power:

Procurement can negotiate various aspects of a purchase requisition even without a formal value analysis. While value analysis can enhance cost-effectiveness, procurement professionals often negotiate on pricing, terms, and conditions to add value independently of value analysis, as per CIPS’s guidelines on procurement flexibility in negotiations.

Conflicts arise in procurement when risks, costs, or gains are not fairly shared, creating perceptions of exploitation. Another frequent source is late payment of supplier invoices, which damages trust and supplier cash flow. Scheduling or early involvement, by contrast, usually supports collaboration unless poorly managed. Conflict is natural in negotiations due to divergent interests, but recognising sources allows proactive management. Skilled negotiators use integrative approaches to turn potential conflict into opportunity, aligning incentives and ensuring fairness.

Buying organisation may increase its leverage with suppliers by concentrating spend. Supplier spend consolidation can take many forms as outlined below:

Vendor base reduction: straightforward reduction of number of suppliers in any category

Volume pooling: pooling cross organisational requirement until your order volume is high enough to attract new bidders/additional discounts

Volume redistribution: making recommendations following spend analysis to move from one supplier to another

Volume consolidation across categories: certain purchase requirements may be common across a number of categories

Standardisation and harmonisation of specifications: analysis of specifications and standards for a high spend purchased input, may show that there is a little difference between them and that the specification can be standardised or at least harmonised across the group or across national, regional or global operations.

Forming purchasing consortia: buyers may decide to come together and combine their purchase volumes to attract better deals.

In microeconomics, equilibrium price is determined when the quantity demanded is equal to the quantity supplied at equilibrium price in a market, there will be no shortages and no surpluses. If we combine our supply and demand curves on one graph, the point at which they converge determines the equilibrium price. If the price is set above this price and you read across the graph you will see the supply excess demand and there will be a surplus. In order to reduce this surplus, the price will need to fall. The scenario is illustrated in the graph below:

Chart, line chart Description automatically generated

Buying organisation may increase its leverage with suppliers by concentrating spend. Supplier spend consolidation can take many forms as outlined below:

- Vendor base reduction: straightforward reduction of number of suppliers in any category

- Volume pooling: pooling cross organisational requirement until your order volume is high enough to attract new bidders/additional discounts

- Volume redistribution: making recommendations following spend analysis to move from one supplier to another

- Volume consolidation across categories: certain purchase requirements may be common across a number of categories. In the scenario, XYZ has combined different categories but closely related to office services into a larger contract so that they can increase their leverage.

- Standardisation and harmonisation of specifications: analysis of specifications and standards for a high spend purchased input, may show that there is a little difference between them and that the specification can be standardised or at least harmonised across the group or across national, regional or global operations.

- Forming purchasing consortia: buyers may decide to come together and combine their purchase volumes to attract better deals.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Below are some examples of cost input that can be analysed in PPCA process:

- Material costs

- Process and labour costs

- Employment costs

- Overhead costs

- Distribution costs

- Depreciation on equipment

- Profit

If you want to learn more on PPCA, you can study from OGC document here: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100609100650/www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Cost_Price_analysis(1).pdf

LO 2, AC 2.1

Variable pricing can lead to budgeting challenges and financial uncertainty over a 12-month period. While variable pricing may allow flexibility, it complicates financial planning and forecasting. For predictable budgeting and reduced financial risk, fixed pricing is typicallypreferred in such contract durations, aligning with CIPS recommendations on pricing models in contract management.