L5M1 CIPS Managing Teams and Individuals Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Blake and Mouton’sLeadership Gridhighlights five leadership styles based on two dimensions:concern for peopleandconcern for task. Kevin can use different styles depending on the skills of his team and the importance of each project.

Impoverished Management (Low task/Low people)This style shows little concern for people or performance. Kevin would provide minimal guidance or support, essentially leaving the team to their own devices. While not usually effective, it may be applied temporarily where staff are highly capable and self-motivated, or in less critical projects where close oversight is not needed.

Country Club Management (High people/Low task)Here, Kevin shows strong concern for people but little focus on results. He prioritises team harmony, morale, and relationships. This could be used with a new or inexperienced team to build confidence and trust, but it risks low performance if project deadlines or targets are missed.

Task Management (High task/Low people)This style focuses heavily on performance, structure, and efficiency, with little attention to employee needs. Kevin might use this in high-pressure procurement projects, such as negotiating urgent supply contracts, where results are critical. However, overuse can demotivate staff and create high turnover.

Middle-of-the-Road Management (Medium task/Medium people)This is a balanced approach where Kevin gives some attention to both people and results but does not excel in either. It produces average performance and morale. Kevin might use this style for steady projects with moderate importance, though it risks mediocrity if not adapted when situations demand more.

Team Management (High task/High people)This is considered the most effective style, where Kevin drives high performance while also motivating and supporting his team. He involves employees in decision-making, sets challenging goals, and encourages collaboration. For example, in strategic procurement projects, Kevin could adopt this style to achieve strong results while also developing his team’s skills.

By switching between these styles, Kevin can match leadership behaviours to the skills of his team and the importance of the task. For example, urgent, high-value contracts may need task management, while long-term development projects may benefit from team management.

Conclusion:

Blake and Mouton’s grid provides five leadership styles – impoverished, country club, task-focused, middle-of-the-road, and team management. Each has strengths and weaknesses, and Kevin’s role as Head of Procurement is to adapt his approach depending on the project demands and the skills of his team members. By applying situational leadership, he can ensure both high performance and team engagement.

Part A – Employee Development (5–8 marks):

Employee development refers to the ongoing process of improving staff knowledge, skills, and behaviours to enhance their performance and career progression. It includes both formal methods such as training courses, mentoring, and professional qualifications, and informal methods such as on-the-job learning, self-directed study, and peer collaboration. For ABC Ltd, employee development could mean providing software engineers with technical training, leadership coaching, or professional certifications to improve capability and engagement.

Part B – Positive Impacts of Lifelong Learning (15–18 marks):

Improved performance and productivity:Continuous learning ensures employees remain skilled in the latest technologies, enabling ABC Ltd to deliver innovative software solutions and maintain competitiveness.

Employee motivation and morale:When staff see the company investing in their development, they feel valued, which increases engagement and reduces alienation.

Retention and loyalty:Lifelong learning encourages employees to stay with the organisation as they see opportunities for growth, reducing turnover costs.

Adaptability and resilience:In fast-moving sectors such as software, continuous learning helps staff adapt to new tools, coding languages, and market changes, ensuring the business remains agile.

Innovation and creativity:Learning stimulates new ideas and problem-solving approaches, leading to more effective solutions in product development and project delivery.

Career progression and leadership pipeline:Lifelong learning develops not only technical skills but also soft skills such as communication, negotiation, and leadership, building the next generation of managers.

Conclusion:

Employee development is about building skills, knowledge, and behaviours to improve individual and organisational performance. Lifelong learning delivers multiple benefits, including productivity, innovation, motivation, and retention. For ABC Ltd, investing in continuous development will strengthen competitiveness, employee satisfaction, and long-term organisational success.

When preparing a business case for additional resource, Zarah should follow a structured process to ensure that the proposal is clear, evidence-based, and aligned with the hospital’s strategic objectives.

The first step is toidentify the need. Zarah must gather evidence to show that the current department is understaffed and unable to manage the workload effectively. This may include statistics on increased purchase orders, supplier contracts, delays, or risks caused by the lack of staff.

Secondly, she shoulddefine the objectives of the business case. In this case, the objective is to secure funding and approval for an additional Procurement Assistant to ensure efficiency, compliance, and risk management in hospital procurement.

Thirdly, Zarah mustanalyse options. The business case should not only present recruitment as the only choice but also consider alternatives such as outsourcing, redistributing workload, or temporary staff. Each option should be reviewed in terms of cost, feasibility, and benefits.

Fourthly, she shouldpresent the costs and benefits. The costs will include salary, training, and any associated overheads. The benefits may include faster order processing, reduced errors, improved supplier management, compliance with healthcare regulations, and freeing up senior staff for strategic tasks. Non-financial benefits, such as improved staff morale and better patient outcomes through timely supply of materials, should also be highlighted.

The fifth step is toassess risks. For example, not hiring an additional assistant may risk delays in ordering medical supplies, poor compliance with procurement standards, and reputational damage to the hospital. Conversely, recruiting without sufficient workload planning could lead to under-utilisation of resources.

Sixthly, Zarah shouldrecommend the preferred option. Based on evidence, she would recommend hiring one additional Procurement Assistant as the best way to meet the workload demands while delivering value.

Finally, she shouldprepare the formal document and presentationfor hospital executives or the finance committee. The business case should be structured with an introduction, background, options, costs/benefits, risks, and recommendations.

Conclusion:

To create a strong business case, Zarah must identify the need, set clear objectives, analyse options, present costs and benefits, assess risks, and make a clear recommendation. A well-prepared business case will increase the likelihood of approval and ensure the procurement team has the resources needed to deliver efficient, compliant, and high-quality outcomes for the hospital.

When entering negotiations with a new supplier, a procurement professional must use a variety of interpersonal and cognitive skills to achieve the best outcome. Three important qualities arecuriosity, creative thinking, and reflective analysis.

Curiosity (8–9 marks):

Curiosity means asking questions, exploring options, and seeking to understand the supplier’s position. In a negotiation, curiosity allows the buyer to uncover the supplier’s motivations, constraints, and priorities. For example, asking why a supplier has higher costs may reveal underlying logistics challenges, which could be solved collaboratively. Curiosity builds rapport, demonstrates interest, and helps procurement move beyond price to explore value-added benefits such as quality improvements or sustainability initiatives.

Creative Thinking (8–9 marks):

Creative thinking is about generating new solutions and finding alternatives to traditional approaches. In negotiation, this may involve looking for win-win outcomes rather than focusing only on cost. For example, instead of demanding lower prices, procurement could propose longer contracts, volume commitments, or joint innovation projects that benefit both parties. Creative thinking expands the scope of negotiation and helps develop more sustainable supplier relationships.

Reflective Analysis (8–9 marks):

Reflective analysis involves reviewing past experiences and learning from them to improve decision-making. Before negotiating, procurement professionals can reflect on what has worked or failed in previous negotiations. During the negotiation, reflective analysis helps assess whether strategies are effective and adapt accordingly. After the negotiation, reflection allows continuous improvement in approach. For example, a buyer may reflect on why a past supplier negotiation failed due to being too aggressive, and adjust by using more collaborative tactics with the new supplier.

Conclusion:

Curiosity helps procurement gather insights, creative thinking enables innovative solutions, and reflective analysis ensures continuous improvement. Together, these skills allow procurement professionals to build trust, secure better value, and establish strong long-term relationships with new suppliers.

Part A – Sources of Conflict (15 points):

Conflict is natural in groups and arises when individuals or teams have incompatible goals, interests, or behaviours. Three common sources are:

Task-based conflict– This occurs when members disagree about the content of the work, objectives, or methods. For example, in a procurement team, conflict may arise over whether to prioritise cost savings or sustainability in supplier selection.

Relationship conflict– This stems from personality clashes, communication breakdowns, or differences in working styles. For instance, an extroverted negotiator may clash with an introverted analyst who prefers data-driven approaches.

Resource conflict– Groups often compete for limited resources such as time, budget, or staff. In procurement, this could occur if multiple project teams require the same supplier’s resources or internal budgets.

Part B – Outcomes of Conflict (10 points):

Positive outcomes:

Can lead to creativity and innovation as different perspectives are debated.

Encourages problem-solving and improvement of processes.

Strengthens understanding when conflicts are resolved constructively.

Negative outcomes:

May reduce morale and trust if personal attacks or unresolved tension occur.

Can delay projects, damage productivity, and harm relationships with stakeholders or suppliers.

Creates stress and alienation, leading to higher turnover if prolonged.

In procurement, positive conflict may lead to innovative supplier solutions, while negative conflict may damage supplier negotiations or internal collaboration.

Conclusion:

The three main sources of conflict are task, relationship, and resource issues. Conflict is not always harmful – it can drive improvement and creativity if managed well, but if left unresolved, it can damage morale, performance, and stakeholder relationships. Managers must therefore encourage constructive conflict while minimising destructive forms.

Intrinsic motivation comes from within the individual and relates to personal satisfaction, growth, and achievement, rather than external rewards such as pay. TheJob Characteristics Model (Hackman and Oldham)identifies several features of a role that can make it intrinsically motivating.

The first isSkill Variety. A role that allows employees to use a range of skills and abilities prevents boredom and makes the job more stimulating. For example, a procurement professional who undertakes supplier negotiations, contract management, and market analysis will find their role more engaging than one limited to routine administration.

The second isTask Identity. This means being able to complete a whole piece of work from start to finish. Employees are more motivated when they can see a clear outcome. In procurement, this could be managing a sourcing project end-to-end, from supplier selection through to contract award.

Thirdly,Task Significanceadds motivation by making employees aware of the impact of their work on others. If individuals see that their role contributes to organisational goals or wider society, they gain intrinsic satisfaction. For example, a buyer working on sustainable sourcing projects may feel motivated by contributing to environmental and ethical improvements.

The fourth isAutonomy. When employees have control over how they perform their work, they feel trusted and empowered. In procurement, this could mean giving staff flexibility in how they manage supplier relationships or structure negotiations, rather than micro-managing every step.

Finally,Feedbackis a key factor. Employees are motivated when they receive clear information on their performance, either from managers, colleagues, or the work itself. For example, a procurement professional who gets recognition for achieving cost savings or reducing supplier risks will feel intrinsically rewarded.

In summary, roles that offerskill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedbackare more likely to be intrinsically motivating. For managers, designing jobs with these characteristics is essential for creating engaged and high-performing teams, particularly in procurement where complex, meaningful, and responsible work opportunities can drive motivation.

Individuals learn in different ways, and managers must understand these methods to develop their teams effectively.

One method isformal learning, such as classroom courses, e-learning, or qualifications like CIPS. This gives structured knowledge and ensures consistency, but it may lack immediate workplace application.

A second method ison-the-job learning, where skills are developed through daily tasks, job rotation or shadowing. This is practical and tailored to the workplace but may be inconsistent without good supervision.

A third approach isexperiential learning, based on Kolb’s cycle of experience, reflection, conceptualisation and testing. For example, a buyer may learn negotiation skills by practising in a live supplier meeting, reflecting on performance, and then improving.

Another method issocial learning, as described by Bandura. Individuals learn by observing and modelling others’ behaviour. In procurement, junior staff may observe how senior colleagues manage supplier relationships and copy effective practices.

Finally, there isself-directed learning, where individuals take initiative through reading, research or online courses. This builds independence but requires strong personal motivation.

In contrast, formal learning is structured and standardised, while experiential and social learning are more practical and situational. On-the-job learning blends practice with support, whereas self-directed learning provides autonomy but less guidance. Most organisations use a mix of these methods to ensure balanced development.

One important factor that influences learning is an individual’slearning style. According to Honey and Mumford, some people areactivists(learn best by doing), others arereflectors(learn by observing and thinking),theorists(prefer analysing concepts), orpragmatists(want to apply ideas in practice). For example, in procurement training, an activist may benefit from a role-play negotiation, while a theorist may prefer studying sourcing models before application. Managers who recognise learning styles can tailor development activities to individual preferences, making learning more effective.

In conclusion, individuals can learn through formal, on-the-job, experiential, social, or self-directed approaches, each with strengths and weaknesses. Learning effectiveness depends on personal factors such as style, and managers who understand these differences can create development opportunities that are both motivating and productive.

Organisational culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, norms and behaviours that shape “the way things are done” in a workplace. One of the most widely used models isCharles Handy’s four types of organisational culture, which describe different ways in which organisations can operate.

The first is thePower Culture. In this type, authority is concentrated at the centre, usually with a strong leader or small group of individuals. Decisions are made quickly, and personal influence is key. This culture can be dynamic and decisive but may create dependency on the leader and limit employee autonomy. In procurement, a power culture might mean senior management unilaterally deciding supplier strategies without consulting the wider team.

The second is theRole Culture. Here, the organisation is highly structured with clear roles, rules, and procedures. Power comes from position rather than personality. Stability and order are prioritised, making it efficient in predictable environments. However, it can be rigid and resistant to change. In procurement, this culture might be seen in public sector bodies where strict compliance, policies, and audit controls dominate purchasing activities.

The third is theTask Culture. This type is project-oriented, with teams formed to solve problems or deliver objectives. Power is based on expertise, and collaboration is valued. It is flexible, innovative, and well-suited to dynamic environments, but can cause conflict if resources are limited. In procurement, task culture is often evident in cross-functional category teams formed to deliver strategic sourcing projects.

The fourth is thePerson Culture. Here, the focus is on individuals rather than the organisation. Employees see themselves as more important than the structure, and autonomy is prioritised. This is rare in large organisations but can be found in professional partnerships such as law or consultancy firms. In procurement, a person culture may appear where highly specialised experts operate independently, sometimes resisting organisational control.

In conclusion, Handy’s four types of culture — power, role, task, and person — each offer strengths and weaknesses. Effective managers must understand the prevailing culture in their organisation and adapt their leadership approach. In procurement and supply, recognising cultural influences is vital to building cohesive teams, aligning strategies, and driving ethical and sustainable practices.

Part A – Embedding Learning into the Culture (5 points):

Embedding learning into the organisational culture means creating an environment where continuous learning and development are valued and encouraged. In Tania’s case, this is vital because the team has had no formal training, which contributes to low skills and low morale. A learning culture ensures employees feel supported in developing new abilities, reduces resistance to change, and prepares staff for future challenges. For procurement, this could involve training on negotiation skills, supplier relationship management, or e-procurement tools.

Part B – Role Congruence (5 points):

Role congruence means ensuring that an individual’s skills, experience, and abilities match the tasks they are assigned. At present, some staff are being asked to complete tasks they are not comfortable with, which lowers confidence and morale. Aligning people’s roles to their capabilities improves job satisfaction, builds confidence, and enhances performance. For example, a staff member skilled in analysis should be allocated spend analysis tasks, rather than being pushed into high-pressure supplier negotiations without support.

Part C – Actions Tania Should Take (15 points):

Training and development programmes– introduce structured training to close knowledge gaps and give staff confidence in their roles.

Role review and alignment– assess individual skills and reassign tasks to match strengths, ensuring role congruence.

Mentoring and coaching– pair experienced staff with less experienced members to support learning and build capability.

Encourage continuous learning– build learning into team culture through workshops, lunch-and-learns, and reflection sessions after projects.

Regular performance reviews– provide feedback, set development goals, and celebrate progress to improve motivation.

Empowerment and involvement– involve staff in identifying training needs and improvement ideas to increase ownership.

Recognition and morale building– acknowledge achievements to rebuild confidence and team spirit.

Conclusion:

Embedding learning into the culture ensures that development is continuous, reducing skills gaps and raising confidence. Role congruence ensures that tasks match people’s abilities, improving morale and performance. For Tania, focusing on training, role alignment, coaching, and recognition will rebuild her procurement team into a skilled, motivated, and high-performing unit.

Part A – Knowledge Transfer (10 points):

Knowledge transfer refers to the process of sharing skills, experience, insights and information from one person or group to another within an organisation. It ensures that valuable expertise is not lost and that best practice can be replicated. This can happen formally, such as through training, mentoring, or documented procedures, or informally, through conversations, collaboration, and shared experiences. In procurement, knowledge transfer might involve senior buyers passing negotiation tactics to junior colleagues or documenting supplier performance insights in a shared database.

Part B – Ensuring Strong Knowledge Management (15 points):

Managers play a key role in creating systems and cultures that support knowledge sharing. Some ways include:

Creating knowledge repositories– using databases, intranets, or category management playbooks where information is stored and accessible to all team members.

Encouraging mentoring and coaching– pairing experienced staff with new employees helps transfer tacit knowledge that may not be written down.

Promoting collaboration and teamwork– cross-functional project teams and regular knowledge-sharing meetings spread expertise across functions.

Using technology– collaboration platforms (e.g., SharePoint, Teams) allow procurement staff to record supplier insights, lessons learned, and contract data in real time.

Rewarding knowledge sharing– recognising and incentivising individuals who share expertise encourages a culture of openness rather than knowledge hoarding.

Embedding learning in processes– after-action reviews, lessons-learned sessions after supplier negotiations or tenders ensure experiences are captured systematically.

Leadership behaviours– managers must role-model transparency and collaboration, showing staff that sharing knowledge is valued.

Conclusion:

Knowledge transfer is about ensuring that critical experience and expertise are shared across the organisation. Managers can ensure strong knowledge management by combining systems, processes, and culture – from IT tools and databases to mentoring and recognition. In procurement, effective knowledge management helps avoid repeated mistakes, builds stronger supplier relationships, and improves decision-making across the team.