SY0-701 CompTIA Security+ Exam 2026 Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

A tabletop exercise simulates incident scenarios to test and validate the effectiveness of an organization ' s Incident Response Plan (IRP), identifying gaps and areas needing updates. It promotes team readiness without disrupting operations.

Addressing audit findings (A), collecting remediation times (B), and calculating ROI (D) are separate activities and not the primary purpose of tabletop exercises.

This practice is an integral part of Security Operations and Incident Response training in SY0-701【6:Chapter 14†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

Attestation refers to providing formal evidence or proof that a particular process or activity has been completed according to standards or requirements. In this context, attestation involves demonstrating to customers or stakeholders that software developers have received appropriate training on secure coding practices.

Assurance generally refers to confidence or guarantees about the security posture but does not specifically mean proving or certifying training. Due diligence is the effort made to ensure compliance or safety, but it is not the act of proving training has occurred. A contract is a legal agreement, which may include requirements for training but is not the act of proving training itself.

The importance of attestation in compliance and governance processes is discussed in the Security Program Management and Oversight domain in SY0-701 materials【7:Chapter 5†CompTIA Security+ Practice Tests】.

User Behavior Analytics (UBA) monitors user activities and detects anomalous behavior such as unauthorized data access or exfiltration, including when employees attempt to copy sensitive customer contact information before leaving. UBA can alert security teams to insider threats proactively.

File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) (A) detects unauthorized changes to files but is less effective against data exfiltration by insiders. Network Access Control (NAC) (B) controls device access to the network, and Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) (C) detect suspicious network activity but do not specifically analyze user behaviors.

UBA is a critical tool for insider threat detection covered in Security Operations【6:Chapter 14†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

One of the primary advantages of SIEM tools is their ability to correlate events across multiple hosts and devices to identify patterns that may indicate coordinated attacks or advanced threats. Reviewing logs for correlations helps detect complex incidents that might be missed when looking at individual systems.

Checking password resets (A) and monitoring DDoS (B) are possible but less common primary reasons. Assessing privacy breach scope (C) is usually done post-incident, not typically during initial SIEM log reviews.

Log correlation capabilities are a core SIEM feature described in Security Operations【6:Chapter 14†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】

Key escrow is a method of storing encryption keys in a secure location, such as a trusted third party or a hardware security module (HSM). Key escrow is important for FDE because it allows the recovery of encrypted data in case of lost or forgotten passwords, device theft, or hardware failure. Key escrow also enables authorized access to encrypted data for legal or forensic purposes.

TPM presence is a feature of some laptops that have a dedicated chip for storing encryption keys and other security information. TPM presence is important for FDE because it enhances the security and performance of encryption by generating and protecting the keys within the chip, rather than relying on software or external devices. TPM presence also enables features such as secure boot, remote attestation, and device authentication. 

Disabling access is an automation use case that would best enhance the security posture of an organization by rapidly updating permissions when employees leave a company. Disabling access is the process of revoking or suspending the access rights of a user account, such as login credentials, email, VPN, cloud services, etc. Disabling access can prevent unauthorized or malicious use of the account by former employees or attackers who may have compromised the account. Disabling access can also reduce the attack surface and the risk of data breaches or leaks. Disabling access can be automated by using scripts, tools, or workflows that can trigger the action based on predefined events, such as employee termination, resignation, or transfer. Automation can ensure that the access is disabled in a timely, consistent, and efficient manner, without relying on manual intervention or human error.

Hardening access to a new database system requires implementing controls that restrict and secure how administrators and applications connect to the database. A jump server (A) is a hardened intermediary system used to manage access to sensitive systems such as databases. By forcing administrators to authenticate through a controlled, monitored jump host instead of connecting directly, organizations reduce attack surfaces and prevent unauthorized lateral movement. Security+ SY0-701 identifies jump servers as critical in securing high-value systems.

A host-based firewall (E) provides system-level traffic filtering directly on the database server. It allows only trusted IPs, ports, and services to communicate with the database, significantly reducing exposure. This is an essential hardening measure because databases should only accept connections from specific application servers or administrative hosts.

NIDS (B) monitors traffic but does not harden access. Monitoring (C) provides visibility but does not restrict access. A proxy server (D) is not typically used for database access. A WAF (F) protects web applications, not internal database systems.

Thus, A (Jump server) and E (Host-based firewall) are the correct hardening controls.

Shadow IT refers to the use of information technology systems, devices, software, applications, and services without explicit IT department approval. This is the most likely cause of introducing vulnerabilities on a corporate network by deploying unapproved software, as such software may not have been vetted for security compliance, increasing the risk of vulnerabilities.

References =

CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Course Content: The concept of Shadow IT is discussed as a significant risk due to the introduction of unapproved and potentially vulnerable software into the corporate network​​.

The correct answer is Attack surface because opening multiple common service ports unnecessarily increases the number of potential entry points an attacker can target. In the Security+ SY0-701 exam objectives, the attack surface is defined as the total number of exposed interfaces, services, ports, protocols, and access points that an attacker could attempt to exploit. Each open port corresponds to a listening service, and every exposed service represents an opportunity for reconnaissance, exploitation, or abuse.

In this scenario, the business intends to open ports for FTP, SSH, SMTP, HTTP, and HTTPS without clearly limiting access. While some of these services may be required, opening all of them broadly—especially to a screened subnet—significantly expands the attack surface. If any of these services are misconfigured, unpatched, or vulnerable, attackers could exploit them to gain unauthorized access. The SY0-701 study guide emphasizes minimizing exposed services as a foundational defensive strategy, often referred to as reducing attack surface area.

Option C, least privilege, is related but not the best answer. Least privilege focuses on granting users or systems only the minimum access required, whereas this question specifically concerns exposed network services rather than access rights. Option A, secure access service edge (SASE), is a cloud-based architecture model and is unrelated to basic firewall port exposure decisions. Option D, separation of duties, applies to role and responsibility distribution, not network exposure.

By advising against opening multiple common ports, the consultant is recommending a reduction in exposed services to limit opportunities for attack. This aligns directly with SY0-701 guidance on secure network design, firewall hardening, and minimizing externally accessible services.

In summary, limiting open ports reduces the organization’s attack surface, making Attack surface the correct and best answer.

A content filter is a device or software that blocks or allows access to web content based on predefined rules or categories. In this case, the new retail website is mistakenly categorized as gambling by the content filter, which prevents users from accessing it. To resolve this issue, the content filter’s categorization needs to be updated to reflect the correct category of the website, such as shopping or retail. This will allow the content filter to allow access to the website instead of blocking it.

File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) is specifically designed to detect and prevent unauthorized changes to critical system files, configuration files, registry entries, binaries, and logs. According to CompTIA Security+ SY0-701, FIM creates a cryptographic baseline (usually via hashing) of protected system files. Any attempt to modify, add, or delete protected files immediately triggers an alert, enabling rapid detection of tampering—whether caused by malware, insider threats, or misconfigurations.

NIDS (A) monitors network traffic, not system-level modifications. DLP (B) prevents unauthorized data exfiltration, not system-file tampering. NAC (C) controls device access to the network but does not protect system files.

FIM is a core tool for ensuring system integrity in compliance frameworks such as PCI-DSS, which explicitly requires organizations to monitor critical system files. By preventing unauthorized changes to system-level data and alerting administrators to suspicious activity, FIM provides a strong defensive mechanism against malware, ransomware, and configuration drift.

Thus, FIM is the correct answer.

The best answer is B. Updating default credentials and applying network segmentation.

IoT devices often present increased security risk because they may have weak default settings, limited security features, and persistent network connectivity. Two of the most effective ways to reduce this risk are:

Updating default credentialsMany IoT devices come with default usernames and passwords that are widely known or easy to guess. Leaving default credentials unchanged creates a major security weakness.

Applying network segmentationSegmenting IoT devices onto a separate network or VLAN limits their ability to interact with critical corporate systems. If one device is compromised, segmentation helps contain the threat and reduces lateral movement.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Assigning static IP addresses to the devicesStatic IP addresses may help with management and inventory, but they do not significantly reduce the core security risk.

C. Connecting the devices to the guest Wi-Fi to prevent interactions with corporate ITThis may seem helpful, but guest Wi-Fi is typically designed for temporary user access, not secured management of business IoT systems. It is not the best practice compared with a properly segmented and controlled IoT network.

D. Allowing the vendor to have remote access for day-to-day managementRoutine vendor remote access can increase risk if not tightly controlled. Third-party access should be limited, monitored, and secured, not broadly allowed as a default control.

From the SY0-701 perspective, IoT security commonly emphasizes changing insecure defaults, restricting access, segmentation, and reducing exposure. Therefore, B is the strongest and most complete answer.

The scenario describes a large number of unsolicited emails sent to multiple users. This is characteristic of phishing, which SY0-701 defines as mass-distributed fraudulent messages designed to trick recipients into clicking malicious links, downloading malware, or divulging sensitive information.

Phishing campaigns typically involve:

High volume

Non-targeted messaging

Use of spoofed addresses or fake content

Delivery through email systems

A watering-hole attack (A) compromises a legitimate website frequented by targets—not email. Typosquatting (B) relies on malicious websites with deceptive URLs. Business Email Compromise (C) involves highly targeted spear-phishing or impersonation attacks, not bulk email blasts.

Because this incident involves “hundreds of messages” delivered to “multiple users,” it clearly matches the characteristics of a phishing attack, not a sophisticated targeted attack type.

Phishing is the most common form of social engineering and is emphasized heavily in the Security+ exam due to its frequency and effectiveness.

Detailed Explanation:Standard operating procedures (SOPs) outline the steps to be followed to maintain a secure baseline, such as testing and deploying patches while minimizing risk to the system. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 4: Security Operations, Section: " Patch Management and Baseline Compliance " ​​.

Detailed Explanation:Quarantining a potentially infected system by placing it into an air-gapped environment physically disconnects it from the network. This prevents the spread of malware while maintaining the integrity of forensic evidence. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 4: Security Operations, Section: " Incident Response and Containment " ​​.

A Mobile Device Management (MDM) platform protects organizational mobile devices by enforcing security policies, restricting unauthorized configuration changes, and detecting compromised devices. One of the major vulnerabilities MDM mitigates is jailbreaking, which occurs when a user removes manufacturer restrictions to gain unrestricted access to the file system and install unapproved apps.

Security+ SY0-701 explains that jailbroken devices:

Bypass built-in security protections

Are more susceptible to malware

Can be used for data exfiltration

Violate corporate mobile security policies

MDM solutions detect jailbroken or rooted devices and automatically block them from accessing corporate resources, enforce compliance rules, and remotely wipe devices if necessary.

TPM (A) is a hardware security chip unrelated to MDM. Buffer overflow (B) and SQL injection (D) are software development vulnerabilities, not mobile device policy issues.

Thus, the correct answer is C: Jailbreaking.

The best answer is C. Apply aggregation.

In Security+ logging and monitoring concepts, log aggregation means collecting logs from multiple systems and centralizing them in one place, often for use by a SIEM or another monitoring platform. This improves the speed and efficiency of searches because analysts do not need to query many separate devices or locations individually. Centralized logs are much easier to index, correlate, and search quickly.

Why the other options are not the best choice:

A. Conduct deduplicationDeduplication reduces repeated data and may save storage space, but it is primarily a storage-efficiency method. It does not directly provide the best improvement for fast searching across logs.

B. Conduct archivingArchiving is used for long-term retention, but archived logs are usually moved out of readily searchable live storage. This would not support the requirement for the shortest search time frame.

D. Apply compressionCompression saves storage capacity, but compressed logs may require decompression or additional processing before review. This does not best support the need for the fastest searches.

From a Security+ perspective, when the goal is rapid log review, correlation, and search performance, aggregation is the strongest answer because it supports centralized monitoring and efficient analysis of live logs over the retention period.

The best solution is Mobile Device Management (MDM), which allows IT administrators to centrally configure, update, and push applications or settings to company-owned devices. When employees report missing features or misconfigurations, MDM platforms enable rapid remote remediation, policy enforcement, patch distribution, and application deployment—all of which can be completed within the 48-hour requirement.

Security+ SY0-701 emphasizes MDM as the primary tool for ensuring consistent configuration baselines, enforcing security restrictions, deploying apps, and preventing unauthorized changes on mobile devices.

EDR (A) provides threat detection, not configuration restoration.

COPE (B) is a device ownership model (Corporate Owned, Personally Enabled); it does not solve configuration issues.

FDE (D) encrypts storage, unrelated to missing features.

Therefore, C: MDM is the correct answer.

Detailed Explanation:Insecure key storage refers to vulnerabilities caused by improper handling of cryptographic keys and certificates, such as storing them in plaintext or lacking access controls. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 2: Threats, Section: " Cryptographic Vulnerabilities and Mitigation " ​​.

The best answer is C. Hacktivists often target organizations without prior access or internal affiliation.

The clearest distinction between hacktivists and insider threats is that insider threats typically have authorized access or internal affiliation with the organization, while hacktivists usually act from the outside.

Hacktivists are often motivated by political, ideological, or social causes, but the strongest differentiator in this comparison is that they generally do not begin with legitimate internal access.

Why the other options are less correct:

A. Hacktivists often act based on ideological or political beliefs rather than organizational access.This is true about motivation, but it does not distinguish them as directly as the lack of internal access does.

B. Hacktivists are generally employed by the target organization at the time of attack.This describes insiders, not hacktivists.

D. Hacktivists are primarily motivated by personal conflicts or employment-related dissatisfaction.This is more typical of some insider threats, not hacktivists.

From the SY0-701 perspective, the strongest distinction is external targeting without prior authorized access, so C is the best answer.

Creating a VLAN for Wi-Fi-enabled environmental sensors is the most likely and appropriate action. Security+ SY0-701 recommends network segmentation for IoT and sensor devices to reduce attack surface and limit lateral movement. A dedicated VLAN isolates sensors from critical systems while allowing controlled access to data collectors or management platforms.

Adding items to a risk register (A) documents risk but does not provide protection. Physically air gapping (C) contradicts the requirement for Wi-Fi connectivity. Configuring TLS 1.2 (D) is beneficial for data-in-transit protection but does not address network-level isolation and blast-radius reduction.

Thus, B: Create a VLAN for the sensors best aligns with secure design.

Hashing produces a fixed-length fingerprint of the script’s contents. By comparing the current hash with a known good hash, the engineer can verify if the script has been altered. Hashing is a one-way function used to validate integrity.

Masking (A) hides data, obfuscation (B) hides code logic, and encryption (D) protects confidentiality but does not verify integrity as simply.

Integrity checking through hashing is fundamental in General Security Concepts【6:Chapter 7†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

A bastion host is a hardened system placed at a network boundary to absorb attacks and limit exposure. When deployed to mitigate risks from zero-day vulnerabilities, it acts as a compensating control. CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 defines compensating controls as alternative safeguards used when primary controls are insufficient or unavailable—such as when no patch exists for a zero-day.

Detective controls (B) identify issues but do not reduce exposure. Operational controls (C) refer to procedural or human-driven processes. Physical controls (D) secure physical environments (e.g., locks, cameras).

Because a bastion host compensates for the lack of a patch, the correct answer is A: Compensating.

A hot site is a fully operational offsite facility that is equipped with hardware, software, and up-to-date data, and is ready to take over operations immediately if the primary site fails. This allows for minimal downtime and quick failover, meeting the requirement for rapid recovery.

Software-defined networking (SDN) enables microsegmentation by allowing administrators to create fine-grained, dynamic network segments at the software layer independent of physical network topology. This capability isolates workloads and controls traffic flows between segments, enhancing security within data centers and cloud environments.

Next-generation firewalls (A) provide advanced filtering and inspection but do not inherently deliver the granular segmentation flexibility of SDN. Embedded systems (C) and air-gapped systems (D) refer to specific hardware or physical isolation techniques but do not implement microsegmentation as a network control method.

The concept of microsegmentation through SDN is detailed in the Security Architecture domain of the SY0-701 exam【6:Chapter 3†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.