CMMC-CCP Cyber AB Certified CMMC Professional (CCP) Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Key References for a Lead Assessor in a CMMC AssessmentALead Assessorconducting aCMMC assessmentmust rely onofficial CMMC guidance documentsto evaluate whether anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)meets the required cybersecurity practices.

TheCMMC Assessment Guideprovidesdetailed descriptionsof eachpractice and processat the specificCMMC level being assessed.

It defines:✔Theassessment objectivesfor each practice.✔Therequired evidencefor compliance.✔Thescoring criteriato determine if a practice isMET or NOT MET.

Most Relevant Reference: CMMC Assessment Guide

A. DoD adequate security checklist for covered defense information → Incorrect

TheDoD adequate security checklistis related toDFARS 252.204-7012 compliance, butCMMC assessmentsfollow theCMMC Assessment Guide.

B. CMMC Model Overview as it provides assessment methods and objects → Incorrect

TheCMMC Model Overviewprovideshigh-level guidance, butdoes not contain specific assessment criteria.

C. Safeguarding requirements from FAR Clause 52.204-21 for a Level 2 Assessment → Incorrect

FAR 52.204-21is relevant toCMMC Level 1 (FCI protection), butCMMC Level 2 follows NIST SP 800-171and requiresCMMC Assessment Guidesfor validation.

D. Published CMMC Assessment Guide practice descriptions for the desired certification level → Correct

TheCMMC Assessment Guideis theofficial documentused to determine if anOSC meets the required security practices for certification.

Why is the Correct Answer "D. Published CMMC Assessment Guide practice descriptions for the desired certification level"?

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Specifies thatLead Assessors must use the CMMC Assessment Guidefor official scoring.

CMMC Assessment Guide for Level 1 & Level 2

Providesdetailed descriptions, assessment methods, and scoring criteriafor each practice.

CMMC-AB Guidance for Certified Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs)

Confirms thatCMMC assessments must follow the Assessment Guide, not general DoD security policies.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

Final Answer:✔D. Published CMMC Assessment Guide practice descriptions for the desired certification level.

Understanding Licensed Training Providers (LTPs) in CMMCALicensed Training Provider (LTP)is an entity that is authorized by theCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB)todeliver CMMC trainingbased on anapproved curriculum.

Provides CMMC-AB-approved training programsfor individuals seeking CMMC certifications.

Uses an official CMMC curriculumthat aligns with theCMMC Body of Knowledge (BoK)and other CMMC-AB guidance.

Prepares students for CMMC roles, such asCertified CMMC Assessors (CCA) and Certified CMMC Professionals (CCP).

Key Responsibilities of an LTP:

A. Creates DoD-licensed training → Incorrect

TheCMMC-AB, not the DoD, manages LTP licensing. LTPsdo not create new training contentbut mustfollow an approved curriculum.

B. Instructs a curriculum approved by CMMC-AB → Correct

LTPsteacha curriculum that has beenapproved by the CMMC-AB, ensuring consistency in CMMC training.

C. May market itself as a CMMC-AB Licensed Provider for testing → Incorrect

LTPs provide training, not testing. Testing is handled byLicensed Partner Publishers (LPPs)and exam bodies.

D. Delivers training using some CMMC body of knowledge objectives → Incorrect

LTPs mustfully adhereto theCMMC-AB-approved curriculum, not just "some" objectives.

Why is the Correct Answer "Instructs a curriculum approved by CMMC-AB" (B)?

CMMC-AB Licensed Training Provider (LTP) Program Guidelines

Defines LTPs as entities thatdeliver CMMC-AB-approved training programs.

CMMC Body of Knowledge (BoK)

Specifies that training must follow theCMMC-AB-approved curriculumto ensure standardization.

CMMC-AB Training & Certification Framework

Requires LTPs todeliver structured training that meets CMMC-AB guidelines.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

Final Answer:✔B. Instructs a curriculum approved by CMMC-AB

Understanding High-Level Scoping in a CMMC AssessmentDuringHigh-Level Scoping, aCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)determines thepeople, processes, and technologythat are within scope for theCMMC Level 1 or Level 2 assessment.

Supporting Organization/Unitsrefer to thespecific groups, departments, or teamsthat handleControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)orFederal Contract Information (FCI)and are responsible for applyingCMMC security practices.

These units aredirectly involved in the contract's executionand are included in the CMMC assessment scope.

Key Term: Supporting Organization/Units

A. Host Unit → Incorrect

This term is not used inCMMC assessment scoping.

B. Branch Office → Incorrect

Abranch officemay or may not be in scope; scoping is based onwhether the unit handles CUI or FCI, not its physical location.

C. Coordinating Unit → Incorrect

No official CMMC term refers to a "Coordinating Unit."

D. Supporting Organization/Units → Correct

This termcorrectly describes the entities that apply security controls for the contract and are within the CMMC assessment scope.

Why is the Correct Answer "D. Supporting Organization/Units"?

CMMC Scoping Guidance for Level 1 & Level 2 Assessments

DefinesSupporting Organization/Unitsasin-scope entities responsible for implementing cybersecurity controls.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Specifies that theC3PAO must identify and document the units responsible for security compliance.

DoD CMMC 2.0 Guidance on Scoping

Requires theassessment team to define the people, processes, and technology that fall within the scopeof the assessment.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

TheAudit and Accountability (AU) domainis one of the14 familiesof security requirements inNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, which is fully adopted byCMMC 2.0 Level 2.

A. Level 1→Incorrect

CMMCLevel 1only includes17 basic FAR 52.204-21 safeguarding requirementsand does not coverAudit and Accountability (AU)practices.

B. Level 2→Correct

TheAU domain is required at Level 2, which aligns withNIST SP 800-171.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2includes110 security controls, among whichAU-related controlsfocus on logging, monitoring, and accountability.

C. Levels 1 and 2→Incorrect

Level 1 does not requireaudit and accountability practices.

D. Levels 1 and 3→Incorrect

CMMC 2.0 only has Levels 1, 2, and 3, andAU is present in Level 2, making Level 3 irrelevant for this answer.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 (Audit and Accountability - Family 3.3)

TheAU domainconsists of security controls3.3.1 – 3.3.8, focusing on audit log generation, retention, and accountability.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Practices (Aligned with NIST SP 800-171)

AU practices (Audit and Accountability) are only required at Level 2.

Analysis of the Given Options:Official References Supporting the Correct Answer:Conclusion:TheAU domain applies only to CMMC 2.0 Level 2, making the correct answer:

✅B. Level 2.

Understanding Assessment Methods in CMMC 2.0According to theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, assessors usethree primary assessment methodsto determine compliance with security practices:

Examine– Reviewing documents, policies, configurations, and system records.

Interview– Speaking with personnel to gather insights into security processes.

Test– Performing technical validation of system functions and security controls.

TheAssessment Team Memberis inspectingAssessment Objects(e.g., system configurations, user access control settings, policies) to determine if the OSC's evidence is sufficient forAC.L1-3.1.1 (Access Control – Authorized Users).

This activity aligns directly with theExaminemethod, which involves reviewing artifacts such as:

Access control lists (ACLs)

System user authentication logs

Account management policies

Role-based access control settings

"Observe" (Option B)is incorrect because "observing" is not an official assessment method in CMMC.

"Test" (Option A)is incorrect because the assessment is not actively executing a function but ratherreviewingevidence.

"Interview" (Option D)is incorrect because no personnel are being questioned—only documentation is being reviewed.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, Section 3.5 – Assessment Methods

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide – Access Control Practices (AC.L1-3.1.1)

Why Option C (Examine) is CorrectOfficial CMMC Documentation ReferencesFinal VerificationSince the activity involves reviewing documents and records to verify access control measures, it falls under theExaminemethod, makingOption C the correct answer.

Planning and preparing for aCMMC assessmentinvolves collaboration between theassessorand theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)to determine scope, required evidence, and logistics. This planning process isdynamicand must adapt as new information emerges.

Assessment Scope and Requirements May Change

As assessors gather evidence and analyze the environment,new details about assets, networks, and security controlsmay require adjustments to the assessment plan.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guideemphasizes that assessmentrequirements and scope should be continuously reviewed and updatedto reflect real-time findings.

Assessors Follow an Adaptive Approach

DuringCMMC assessments, organizations may discover additionalFCI or CUI assets, which can change the required security practices to be evaluated.

Assessors shouldrevise the assessment approach accordinglyrather than strictly following an initial, unchangeable plan.

A. Scoping an assessment is easy and worry-free→Incorrect

Scoping is acritical and complex processthat requires careful evaluation of the OSC’s information systems and assets.

CMMC Scoping Guidestates thatidentifying in-scope assets is crucial and requires significant effort.

B. The initial plan cannot be changed once agreed upon→Incorrect

Theinitial assessment plan is a starting point, butit must be flexiblebased on real-time findings.

CMMC CAP Guideemphasizescontinuous refinementduring the assessment process.

C. There is a determined amount of time that the OSC's point of contact has to submit evidence and rough order-of-magnitude→Incorrect

While there aretimelines, the key focus is ensuring thatall necessary evidence is gathered accuratelyrather than rushing to meet a strict deadline.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide– States that assessment requirements and planning should be updated as additional information is gathered.

CMMC Scoping Guide (Nov 2021)– Explains that assessors must continually refinein-scope assets and requirementsthroughout the process.

Why the Correct Answer is "D"?Why Not the Other Options?Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:Final Justification:Assessment planning is a dynamic process.Assessors must continuously review and update the requirements and planas new information emerges, makingDthe correct answer.

In the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) assessment process, the presentation of the Final Recommended Assessment Findings is a critical step. According to the CMMC Assessment Process guidelines, the Lead Assessor is responsible for compiling and presenting these findings. The prescribed method for this presentation is the utilization of the standardized CMMC Findings Brief template.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Responsibility of the Lead Assessor:

The Lead Assessor oversees the assessment process and is tasked with compiling the Final Recommended Assessment Findings.

Utilization of the CMMC Findings Brief Template:

To ensure consistency and adherence to CMMC standards, the Lead Assessor must use the official CMMC Findings Brief template when presenting the assessment findings.

Presentation of Findings:

The findings, documented in the CMMC Findings Brief template, are then presented to the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC). This presentation ensures that the OSC receives a clear and standardized report of the assessment outcomes.

UnderCMMC 2.0 Level 2, which aligns with the requirements ofNIST SP 800-171, maintaining robust control overnonlocal maintenance sessionsis critical. While multifactor authentication (MFA) is a required safeguard for secure access, additional measures must be implemented to fully meet the maintenance requirements as outlined inControl 3.3.5:

Key Requirements for Nonlocal Maintenance:

Termination of Nonlocal Maintenance Sessions:

To reduce the attack surface and prevent unauthorized access, nonlocal maintenance connectionsmust be terminated immediately after the maintenance activity is completed. This is a direct requirement to mitigate risks associated with lingering remote sessions that could be exploited by threat actors.

Supporting Reference:NIST SP 800-171, Control 3.3.5 states: "Ensure that remote maintenance is conducted in a controlled manner and disable connections immediately after use."

Multifactor Authentication (MFA):

OSCs are required to implement MFA for nonlocal remote maintenance sessions. MFA must includeat least two factors(e.g., something you know, something you have, or something you are).

While the OSC’s use of MFA satisfies part of the requirement, it does not complete the control unless proper termination procedures are in place.

Policy and Procedure Adherence:

The OSC must also document amaintenance policyand ensure it reflects the need for terminating connections post-maintenance. The policy should outline roles, responsibilities, and steps for ensuring secure nonlocal maintenance practices.

Incorrect Options:

B. Unlimited connections:Allowing unrestricted nonlocal maintenance sessions is a significant security risk and violates the principle of least privilege.

C. Removing restrictions:Removing restrictions for convenience directly undermines compliance and security.

D. Multifactor authentication details:While MFA is necessary, the question states the OSC already uses it. Termination of sessions is the missing requirement.

Conclusion:

The requirement toterminate nonlocal maintenance sessions after maintenance is complete(Option A) is critical for compliance withCMMC 2.0 Level 2andNIST SP 800-171, Control 3.3.5. This ensures that nonlocal maintenance activities are secured against unauthorized access and potential vulnerabilities.

The CMMC Model v2.0 is cumulative. The Advanced Level (Level 3) requires full implementation of NIST SP 800-171 (aligned to Level 2) and adds a subset of additional practices from NIST SP 800-172. Because levels build on one another, the Access Control (AC) practices at Level 3 inherently include those from Level 1 (basic FCI protections), Level 2 (CUI protections), and additional Level 3 requirements.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CMMC Model v2.0 Overview: “The model is cumulative; practices at a higher level include the practices of all lower levels.”

Level 3 description: “Advanced… Expert Level requires implementation of NIST SP 800-171 plus a subset of NIST SP 800-172.”

Why Option D is Correct:

The Advanced Level includes all AC practices from Level 1 and Level 2, as well as the additional ones unique to Level 3.

Therefore, it contains Access Control practices from Levels 1, 2, and 3.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Model v2.0, Overview of Levels (Cumulative nature of practices).

NIST SP 800-171 and NIST SP 800-172 (control sources for Levels 2 and 3).

===========

Who Determines the Assessment Method for Each Practice?In aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theLead Assessorhas thefinal authorityin determining theassessment methodused to evaluate each practice.

Key Responsibilities of the Lead Assessor✅Ensures theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guideis followed.

✅Determines whether a practice is evaluated usinginterviews, demonstrations, or document reviews.

✅Directs theCertified CMMC Professionals (CCPs)and other assessors on themethodologyfor gathering evidence.

✅Works under aCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)to ensure proper assessment execution.

CCP (Option A) assists in the assessment but does not make final decisionson methods.

OSC (Option B) is the Organization Seeking Certification, and they do not control assessment methodology.

Site Manager (Option C) may coordinate logistics but has no authority over assessment decisions.

Why "Lead Assessor" is Correct?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. CCP

❌Incorrect–A CCPassistsbut doesnot determine assessment methods.

B. OSC

❌Incorrect–The OSC is beingassessedand does not decide assessment methods.

C. Site Manager

❌Incorrect–The Site Manager handles logistics butdoes not control assessment methods.

D. Lead Assessor

✅Correct – The Lead Assessor has the final say on the assessment method used.

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– Defines theLead Assessor’s rolein determining assessment methods.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Lead Assessor, as they havefinal decision-making authority over the assessment methodology.

CMMC Level 2 requires full implementation of the 110 security requirements specified in NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations. These practices form the foundation for safeguarding CUI across defense contractor systems.

NIST SP 800-53 is a broader catalog of security controls for federal systems, not specific to CUI in the defense contractor environment.

48 CFR 52.204-21 establishes basic safeguarding requirements for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and corresponds to CMMC Level 1.

DFARS 252.204-7012 defines safeguarding and incident reporting obligations but does not enumerate the specific security practices required.

Thus, Level 2 practices are aligned to NIST SP 800-171.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Model v2.0 Overview, December 2021

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2

Assets that store, process, or transmit FCI or CUI are always in scope for CMMC. If a server with a cloud provider is used for long-term storage of FCI, that server is considered in scope because it directly holds covered data.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CMMC Scoping Guide for Level 1: “Assets that store, process, or transmit FCI are in scope.”

CMMC Scoping Guide for Level 2: confirms the same rule applies for CUI.

Why Option A is Correct:

The server stores FCI, making it automatically in scope.

Option B is incorrect because long-term storage does not make an asset out of scope.

Option C is incorrect — Level 1 (FCI) does not require a Level 2 certified provider.

Option D is incorrect because encryption does not remove scope requirements.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Scoping Guide, Level 1.

CMMC Model v2.0, Scoping and Implementation guidance.

===========

ACertified CMMC Professional (CCP)advising anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)must ensure thatFederal Contract Information (FCI)andControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)are properly documented within required security documents.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. System Security Plan (SSP)

CMMC Level 2requires anSSPto documenthow CUI is protected, including:

Security controlsimplemented

Asset categorization(CUI Assets, Security Protection Assets, etc.)

Policies and proceduresfor handling CUI

✅2. Asset Inventory

Anasset inventorylistsall relevant IT systems, applications, and hardwarethat store, process, or transmitCUI or FCI.

TheCMMC Scoping Guiderequires OSCs to identifyCUI-relevant assetsas part of their compliance.

✅3. Network Diagram

Anetwork diagramvisually representshow data flows across systems, showing:

WhereCUI is transmitted and stored

Security boundaries protectingCUI Assets

Connectivity betweenCUI Assets and Security Protection Assets

✅4. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(B) Within the hardware inventory, data flow diagram, and in the network diagram❌

While adata flow diagramis useful,hardware inventory alone is insufficientto document CUI.

(C) Within the asset inventory, in the proposal response, and in the network diagram❌

Aproposal responseis not a required document for CMMC assessments.

(D) In the network diagram, in the SSP, within the base inventory, and in the proposal response❌

Base inventoryis not a specific CMMC documentation requirement.

TheCMMC Assessment Guideconfirms that FCI and CUI must be documented in:

The SSP

The asset inventory

The network diagram

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:Thus, the correct answer is:

✅A. "In the SSP, within the asset inventory, and in the network diagram."

In CMMC scoping terminology, an HQ Organization is the entity legally responsible for contract performance and delivery of products or services.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CMMC Scoping Guide: “HQ Organization is the legal entity responsible for the performance and delivery of contract requirements.”

Why Option D is Correct:

The HQ Org is legally accountable, while Host Units (option A/B) are subordinate entities.

Option C refers to shared services, not the HQ.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Scoping Guide, High-Level Scoping Definitions.

===========

DFARS clause 252.204-7012 establishes the safeguarding of Covered Defense Information (CDI), which aligns with CUI categories. The clause specifies that the DoD is responsible for determining whether information is Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and marking it accordingly before sharing it with contractors. Contractors do not make determinations about what constitutes CUI; they are responsible for safeguarding information once it is received and marked as CUI.

Reference Documents:

DFARS 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting

CMMC Model v2.0 Overview, December 2021

TheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Assessment Process (CAP)outlines strict guidelines regardingconflicts of interest (COI)to ensure the integrity and impartiality of assessments conducted byCertified Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs)andCertified Assessors (CAs).

The scenario presented involves apotential conflict of interestdue to a prior relationship (former college roommate) between thecertified assessorand an individual at theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC). While this prior relationship does not automatically disqualify the assessor, it must bedisclosed, documented, and mitigated appropriately.

Inform the OSC and C3PAO of the Potential Conflict of Interest

TheCMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)requires assessors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

Transparency ensures that all parties, including theOSC and C3PAO, are aware of the situation.

Document the Conflict and Mitigation Actions in the Assessment Plan

PerCMMC CAP documentation, potential conflicts should be assessed based on their material impact on the objectivity of the assessment.

The conflict and proposed mitigation strategies must beformally recorded in the assessment planto provide an audit trail.

Determine If the Mitigation Actions Are Acceptable

If theOSC and C3PAOdetermine that the mitigation actions adequatelyeliminate or reduce the risk of bias, the assessment may proceed.

Common mitigation strategies include:

Assigning another assessor forinterviews with the conflicted individual.

Ensuring thatdecisions regarding the OSC’s compliance are reviewed independently.

Proceed with the Assessment If Mitigation Is Acceptable

If the mitigation actions sufficiently address the conflict, the assessment may continue understrict adherence to documented procedures.

CMMC Conflict of Interest Handling Process

A. Do not inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest, and continue as planned.❌Incorrect. This violates CMMC’s integrity requirements and could result indisciplinary actions against the assessor or invalidation of the assessment. Transparency is mandatory.

B. Inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest, and start the entire process over without the conflicted team member.❌Incorrect. The CAP doesnotmandate immediate reassignment unless the conflict isunresolvable. Instead, mitigation strategies should be considered first.

C. Inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest but since it has been an acceptable amount of time since college, no conflict of interest exists, and continue as planned.❌Incorrect.The passage of time alone does not automatically eliminate a conflict of interest. Proper documentation and mitigation are still required.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Defines COI requirements and mitigation actions.

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)– Outlines ethical responsibilities of assessors.

CMMC Accreditation Body (Cyber-AB) Guidance– Provides rules on conflict resolution.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option D is the most correct choice, as it aligns with the official CMMC conflict of interest procedures.

The CAP specifies that the C3PAO is responsible for assigning the Lead Assessor to an OSC’s assessment. While the OSC contracts with the C3PAO, the authority to appoint the Lead Assessor resides solely with the C3PAO.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CAP v2.0, Assessment Team Composition (§2.10): “The C3PAO shall designate a qualified Lead Assessor to lead the assessment.”

Why Option B is Correct:

Only the C3PAO has the authority to select and assign the Lead Assessor.

The OSC may influence scheduling and planning but cannot appoint assessors.

Options A, C, and D are inconsistent with CAP requirements.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v2.0, Assessment Team Roles and Responsibilities (§2.10).

Step 1: Define CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)CUI is information thatrequires safeguarding or dissemination controlspursuant to and consistent with applicable law, regulations, and government-wide policies, butis not classifiedunder Executive Order 13526 or the Atomic Energy Act.

✅Step 2: Authority over CUI — NARA’s RoleNARA – National Archives and Records Administration, specifically theInformation Security Oversight Office (ISOO), is thegovernment-wide executive agentresponsible for implementing the CUI program.

Source:

32 CFR Part 2002 – Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Executive Order 13556 – Controlled Unclassified Information

CUI Registry – https://www.archives.gov/cui

NARA:

Maintains theCUI Registry,

Issuesmarking and handling guidance,

DefinesCUI categoriesand their authority under law or regulation,

Trains and informs Federal agencies and contractors on CUI policy.

B. NIST✘ NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) developstechnical standards(e.g., SP 800-171), but it doesnot define or mark CUI. It helps secure CUI once it’s identified.

C. CMMC-AB (now Cyber AB)✘ The Cyber AB is theCMMC ecosystem’s accreditation body, not a government agency, and hasno authority over CUI classification or marking.

D. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)✘ While DHS mayhandle and protect CUI internally, it is not the executive agent for the CUI program.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

NARAis theofficial U.S. government authorityresponsible for defining, categorizing, and marking CUI via theCUI Registryand associated policies underExecutive Order 13556.

In the context of a Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) assessment, the roles and responsibilities of individuals involved are clearly delineated to ensure a structured and effective evaluation process. The term "applicable staff" refers to personnel within the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) who possess specific knowledge or expertise pertinent to the assessment. These individuals are integral to the assessment process as they provide essential information, demonstrate the implementation of security practices, and facilitate the assessment team's understanding of the organization's cybersecurity posture.

In this scenario, the employee serving as the primary system administrator is responsible for managing and maintaining the organization's systems. Given their comprehensive understanding of the system configurations, security controls, and operational procedures, this individual is best categorized as "applicable staff." Their involvement is crucial during the assessment, as they can provide detailed insights, demonstrate compliance measures, and address technical inquiries from the assessment team.

The other options can be delineated as follows:

Analyzer:Typically refers to individuals who analyze data or security incidents, often as part of a security operations center. This role is not specifically defined within the CMMC assessment context.

Inspector:Generally denotes a person who examines or inspects systems and processes, possibly as part of an internal audit or compliance check. This term is not a standard designation within the CMMC assessment framework.

Demonstration staff:While this could imply personnel responsible for demonstrating systems or processes, it is not a recognized role within the CMMC assessment process.

Therefore, the primary system administrator, by virtue of their role and responsibilities, aligns with the "applicable staff" category, playing a pivotal role in facilitating a successful CMMC assessment.