PECB ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Practice Test Questions Answers

The auditor should assess whether the organization ' s planned action (using masks in case of dust extraction failure) is both implemented and effective. This aligns with ISO 45001 requirements to ensure that control measures are functional and meet the intended objectives.

Clause 8.1.2 (Hierarchy of Controls):The use of PPE, such as masks, is considered a last resort in the hierarchy of controls. The organization must demonstrate that the measure is:

Implemented (e.g., PPE is available and workers are trained to use it).

Effective (e.g., masks provide adequate protection against dust).

Analysis of Options:

A. Advise that the factory should cease operations if the dust extraction equipment malfunctioned.While ceasing operations may be a necessary control in extreme situations, it is not a practical or realistic recommendation unless a high-risk scenario cannot be otherwise managed.

B. Ask the OHSMS Manager to confirm regulatory compliance.Regulatory compliance is important but does not fully address the requirement to ensure the action is effective.

C. Seek evidence that the response action is both implemented and effective.This is the most appropriate response. The auditor must verify implementation and effectiveness to determine conformity.

D. Suggest increasing maintenance checks.Maintenance is important for preventing equipment breakdowns, but this option does not address the immediate audit finding about the adequacy of response actions.

ISO References:

Clause 8.1.2: Emphasizes applying the hierarchy of controls effectively.

Clause 9.1.1: Requires monitoring and measuring controls to ensure effectiveness.

Clause 8.1.4.2 requires the organisation to coordinate its procurement processes with contractors to identify hazards and assess and control OH and S risks arising from contractor activities and operations. A establishes explicit OH and S requirements within the contractual relationship, creating a controlled mechanism through which Shelf-Fit can specify and enforce relevant safety expectations. B requires contractors to provide site-specific risk-assessment information before work begins, enabling Shelf-Fit to coordinate hazard identification and risk controls proactively rather than relying on contractor expertise or historical absence of incidents. The existing ODT confirms that contractor coordination must cover hazard identification, assessment and control of OH and S risks. Auditing contractors only after incidents is reactive, while chemical retention or merely suggesting training does not establish systematic coordination. ISO 45001 certification of every contractor is also not required by Clause 8.1.4.2.

Clause 5.2 of ISO 45001:2018 outlines requirements for the OH and S policy, emphasizing commitment to continual improvement, compliance with legal requirements, and communication of the policy to interested parties.

Analysis of Options:

A. The management is committed to health and safety improvement:Correct. The policy explicitly states the organization’s commitment to improvement, meeting Clause 5.2 requirements.

C. The organization has a good reputation for safe experiences:Not relevant to ISO 45001 requirements; reputation is not a policy criterion.

D. The organization intends to communicate its policy to external parties:Correct. Clause 5.2 requires the policy to be communicated to interested parties.

E. The organization is committed to continual health and safety improvement:Correct. This directly aligns with Clause 5.2, which mandates continual improvement.

F. The organization meets all statutory requirements:The policy does not explicitly state compliance with legal requirements, even though this is implied.

G. The organization satisfies its customers’ health and safety requirements:The policy does not specifically address customer requirements.

H. The organization uses contractors committed to health and safety:Not stated in the policy.

I. The organization’s processes deliver the intended improvement to health and safety:This is not evident from the policy statement.

ISO References:

Clause 5.2: OH and S policy.

Clause 9.3 of ISO 45001:2018 outlines the requirements for management reviews. These reviews must evaluate the performance of the OHSMS and identify opportunities for improvement. Outputs of management reviews typically include decisions and actions that align with strategic and operational priorities.

Analysis of Options:

A. Decisions related to continual improvement opportunities:This is a valid output, as continual improvement is a key objective of management reviews under Clause 10.3.

B. Allocation of a bigger budget for the OHS department:Resource allocation is a common output of management reviews to address identified needs.

C. Improvements in the OHSMS:Improvements reflect the organization’s commitment to enhancing safety performance.

D. Minutes of previous management reviews:While minutes provide context, they are not an output of the current management review.

E. Opportunities to integrate the OHS management system with other business processes:Integration opportunities are valid outputs, as they enhance the system ' s effectiveness.

F. Plan to prioritize health and safety issues as a business strategy:Strategic alignment of health and safety with business objectives is an expected output.

G. Procurement of new safety harnesses for workers:This is an operational action, not a direct output of the management review process.

H. Report showing the trend of an increase in safety incidents:This is an input to the management review, not an output.

I. Updates to the risk register:Risk register updates reflect changes in identified hazards and risks, making this a valid output.

J. Worker feedback of positive and negative comments:Worker feedback is an input to the management review, not an output.

ISO References:

Clause 9.3: Management review inputs and outputs.

Clause 10.3: Continual improvement actions.