P_SAPEA_2023 SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

As the Chief Enterprise Architect for Green Elk & Company, the strategic goal of expanding into emerging markets with a new business model tailored for smaller farms requires a careful and considered approach to implementing S/4HANA productive systems. The best implementation approach in this scenario would be Phased by Application.

This approach allows for a gradual rollout of the S/4HANA system across different applications, which can be prioritized based on the most critical business needs and the unique requirements of each regional market. By implementing in phases, the company can ensure that each application is tailored to support the new business model effectively while maintaining a high degree of standardization across the regions.

The benefits of a Phased by Application approach include:

Risk Mitigation: By deploying one application at a time, the company can minimize the risks associated with a large-scale implementation.

Focused Attention: Each phase allows the project team to focus on specific applications, ensuring better quality and alignment with business needs.

Feedback Incorporation: After each phase, feedback can be gathered and incorporated into subsequent phases, aligning with agile principles.

Resource Optimization: Resources can be allocated more efficiently, with expertise focused on specific applications during each phase.

The other options, such as Big Bang, would involve a high-risk, all-at-once implementation, which is not suitable given the strategic and operational changes required. Small buck is not a recognized implementation strategy in the context of enterprise architecture. Phased by Company could be considered if the organizational structure was the primary concern, but given the focus on application alignment with the new business model, Phased by Application is the most appropriate.

References:

SAP SE. (n.d.). Implementing SAP S/4HANA: A Framework for Planning and Executing SAP S/4HANA Projects. SAP SE.

The Open Group. (2018). TOGAF® Version 9.2: Enterprise Architecture Framework.

SAP SE. (n.d.). SAP Activate Methodology. SAP SE.

The SAP Data Flow Diagram (DFD) is an artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture that shows which data objects are exchanged between SAP application components in a given end-to-end scenario. The DFD uses a graphical representation to show the flow of data between different components of a system.

The SAP Data Object Diagram (DOD) is also an artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture, but it does not show the flow of data between different components. The DOD shows the structure of data objects, including their attributes and relationships.

The SAP Data Component Diagram (DCD) is an artifact from SAP Signavio Process Explorer, which is a tool for modeling business processes. The DCD shows the different components of a system, including their relationships.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

Here is a table that summarizes the different artifacts and their purposes:

According to the SAP Reference Architecture Content: An Overview – Part 2 , the SAP Data Flow Diagram is an artifact that shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination. It also shows which data objects are exchanged between the different components and services of the SAP solution, such as master data, transactional data, analytical data, or configuration data. The SAP Data Flow Diagram can help you to understand and communicate how data is created, transformed, and consumed in a SAP solution, and to identify and optimize the data integration points and dependencies.

The other options (A and C) are not correct for the artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture that shows which data objects are exchanged between SAP application components in a given end-to-end scenario, because they either do not exist or do not show the data flow. For example:

Option A is not correct because there is no such artifact as SAP Data Object Diagram in the SAP Reference Solution Architecture content. The SAP API Business Accelerator Hub (api.sap.com) is a platform that provides access to SAP APIs, events, and related resources, but it does not provide any diagrams that show the data objects exchanged between SAP application components.

Option C is not correct because the SAP Data Component Diagram is not an artifact that shows the data flow, but rather an artifact that shows the main components and services that constitute the target application architecture, as well as their relationships and interactions. The SAP Data Component Diagram does not show which data objects are exchanged between the different components and services of the SAP solution. The SAP Signavio Process Explorer is a tool that helps you to model, analyze, and optimize business processes, but it does not provide any diagrams that show the data flow.

The best answer for the integration approach to take for this solution is C. According to the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M), which is a methodology offered by SAP that helps enterprise architects define an integration strategy for their organizations and derive related integration guidelines, the recommended approach for identifying an integration solution and strategy is:

Document and review the existing integration (architecture). This step involves documenting and analyzing the current state of the integration landscape, including the integration scenarios, technologies, patterns, standards, and governance processes. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the existing integration (architecture) and identify the gaps and improvement areas.

Scope focus areas, for example future required building blocks. This step involves defining and prioritizing the focus areas for the integration project, such as new or changed business requirements, integration scenarios, or technologies. The focus areas are derived from the gaps and improvement areas identified in the previous step, as well as from the business goals and drivers of the organization. The focus areas are also mapped to future required building blocks, which are logical components that represent the desired capabilities or functionalities of the integration solution.

Identify architecture relevant use-cases (technology agnostic/clustered in use-case patterns). This step involves identifying and describing the use-cases that are relevant for the integration project, such as process integration, data integration, user integration, or thing integration. The use-cases are technology agnostic, meaning that they do not specify any particular technology or service for implementation. The use-cases are also clustered in use-case patterns, which are generic templates that capture the common characteristics and requirements of similar use-cases.

Map these use case patterns to integration technology. This step involves mapping the use-case patterns to suitable integration technologies or services that can implement them. The mapping is based on a set of criteria and decision tables that consider various aspects of the use-case patterns, such as complexity, performance, security, or scalability. The mapping also takes into account the existing or planned integration technologies or services in the organization’s landscape.

Define Integration Best Practices. This step involves defining and documenting the best practices and guidelines for designing, developing, testing, deploying, monitoring, and governing the integration solutions. The best practices and guidelines are based on SAP’s recommendations and industry standards, as well as on the organization’s specific needs and preferences. The best practices and guidelines also cover various aspects of the integration project, such as naming conventions, error handling, logging, tracing, or versioning.

Enable a Practice of Empowerment. This step involves enabling and empowering the different roles and personas involved in the integration project, such as integration architects, developers, testers, operators, or business users. The goal is to foster a culture of collaboration and innovation among the stakeholders, and to provide them with the necessary skills, tools, and resources to execute their tasks effectively and efficiently.

The other options (A and B) are not correct for the integration approach to take for this solution, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M). For example:

Option A is not correct because it does not include identifying architecture relevant use-cases (technology agnostic/clustered in use-case patterns), which is a key step to define and categorize the integration requirements in a generic way. It also does not include enabling a practice of empowerment, which is a key step to ensure the success and sustainability of the integration project.

Option B is not correct because it does not include documenting and reviewing the existing integration (architecture), which is a key step to understand the current state of the integration landscape and identify the gaps and improvement areas. It also does not include scoping focus areas or mapping use case patterns to integration technology, which are key steps to define and prioritize the future state of the integration solution.

For more information on the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) and its steps, you can refer to SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology: Template version 4.0 available now |SAP Blogs or Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M): Define Integration Guidelines for Your Organization | SAP Blogs.

For ABAP developers looking to build SAP extensions that adhere to the clean-core strategy, the recommended programming model is the RESTful Application Programming (RAP) model. RAP is designed specifically for developing SAP Fiori applications and services with a focus on maintaining a clean and stable core while allowing for extensions.

RESTful Application Programming (RAP)offers a modern ABAP programming model that supports development both in the cloud and on-premise. It is centered around services that are exposed through RESTful APIs, making it ideal for creating clean, decoupled extensions that do not interfere with the core S/4HANA system. This approach supports the clean-core strategy by enabling developers to create extensions that communicate with the core system via stable, well-defined APIs without modifying the core system itself.

Option A, SAP Cloud Application Programming (CAP), although a robust model for cloud-native application development, is not specific to ABAP and does not inherently align with the ABAP developer environment. Option B, the SAP Classic Extensibility model, often involves direct modifications to the core system, which contradicts the principles of the clean-core strategy.

References:

SAP documentation on RESTful Application Programming Model.

SAP community articles and guides on developing with RAP.

In a hybrid scenario, where business capabilities require services which partners have implemented in SAP BTP and an on-premise SAP S/4HANA system, the following SAP components and services are required to integrate such BTP partner services with the on-premise system:

SAP Cloud Connector: The SAP Cloud Connector is a software component that allows you to connect your on-premise SAP systems to SAP BTP. The Cloud Connector provides a secure connection between your on-premise system and SAP BTP, and it also makes your on-premise system available to applications and services in SAP BTP.

SAP BTP Destination Service: The SAP BTP Destination Service is a service that provides a single point of entry for accessing on-premise systems from SAP BTP. The Destination Service makes it easy to manage and secure connections to on-premise systems, and it also provides a way to federate data from different on-premise systems.

In order to integrate BTP partner services with an on-premise SAP S/4HANA system, you will need to install the SAP Cloud Connector on your on-premise system and register the Cloud Connector with SAP BTP. You will also need to create a destination in the SAP BTP Destination Service for your on-premise system. Once you have done this, you will be able to access the on-premise system from applications and services in SAP BTP.

It is important to note that you can also use other SAP components to integrate on-premise systems with SAP BTP. However, the SAP Cloud Connector and the SAP BTP Destination Service are the most commonly used components for this purpose.

To integrate BTP partner services with an on-premise SAP S/4HANA system, you need to use the SAP Cloud Connector, which is a reverse proxy that establishes a secure connection between your on-premise system and your SAP BTP subaccount5. The Cloud Connector acts as a bridge between your on-premise network and a trusted subaccount on SAP BTP6. It allows you to access resources in your on-premise network from applications running on SAP BTP without exposing your internal landscape to the internet7.

To simplify the configuration and consumption of the Cloud Connector connection, you can use the SAP BTP Destination Service, which is a service that allows you to define and manage destinations for accessing remote systems from applications running on SAP BTP8. A destination is a set of properties that contains information such as the URL, authentication method, proxy type, and additional parameters of a remote system9. By using the Destination Service, you can centrally manage and securely store the connection details of your on-premise system and consume them from your BTP partner services.

Verified References: 5: https://help.sap.com/viewer/cca91383641e40ffbe03bdc78f00f681/Cloud/en-US/e6c7616abb5710148cfcf3e75d96d596.html |  6: https://help.sap.com/viewer/cca91383641e40ffbe03bdc78f00f681/Cloud/en-US/8d3b28a7c1644a1c9d1ee165ec0a8cf4.html |  7: https://help.sap.com/viewer/cca91383641e40ffbe03bdc78f00f681/Cloud/en-US/e54cc8fbbb571014a4d9e7f02f9fa8e4.html |  8: https://help.sap.com/viewer/cca91383641e40ffbe03bdc78f00f681/Cloud/en- US/3cb7b81115c44cf594e0e3631291af94.html | 9: https://help.sap.com/viewer/cca91383641e40ffbe03bdc78f00f681/Cloud/en-US/e54f70d327154aa0a4ba36ce7ac49c83.html

SAP provides several artifacts as part of the SAP Reference Solution Architecture content to guide and streamline solution design and implementation. The artifacts provided are aimed at delivering comprehensive architectural documentation to cover various aspects of the solution architecture. Option B includes the Solution Context Diagram, which provides a high-level view of the system's environment and boundaries. The Solution Component Diagram gives an overview of the components and their interactions within the system. The Solution Application Use-Case Diagram describes how different users will interact with the application. The Solution Value Flow Diagram illustrates the value that flows through the system and between stakeholders.

References:

SAP documentation on Solution Architecture best practices.

Resources detailing the SAP Reference Architecture framework.

The Statement of Architecture Work should encompass a Fit Gap Assessment to understand what requirements are currently not met by existing capabilities, the definition of the Solution Context to set the boundaries and scope of the architecture project, and the outline of the aspirational Solution Concept thatencapsulates the stakeholders' needs and business requirements. These steps are vital in the preparatory phase to ensure that the architecture work is well-defined and targeted to deliver the anticipated outcomes.References= These activities are part of standard enterprise architecture practices and are necessary to develop a comprehensive and actionable Statement of Architecture Work that guides the SAP IBP implementation initiative.

Identifying the online marketing business capabilities and processes will help to understand the current state of the ecosystem and identify the areas where improvement is needed. For example, if the ecosystem does not have the ability to track leads or manage customer relationships, then these will be areas that need to be addressed.

Identifying the key organizational units, partners, and stakeholder groups that make up the online marketing ecosystem will help to understand the relationships between the different entities in the ecosystem and identify the dependencies between them. For example, if the marketing team relies on the sales team to provide leads, then this dependency will need to be considered when designing the new ecosystem.

The other two options, Identifying a suitable online marketing application that is better integrated with SAP CRM and ECC and can replace the existing one and Drawing an organization map highlighting the inter relationships and hierarchies amongst the above organizational units, partners, and stakeholder groups, are not as critical at this stage. The application can be identified and the organization map can be drawn once the business capabilities and processes have been identified and the key organizational units, partners, and stakeholder groups have been identified.

Therefore, the best course of action is to identify the online marketing business capabilities and processes and identify the key organizational units, partners, and stakeholder groups that make up the online marketing ecosystem. This will help to understand the current state of the ecosystem and identify the areas where improvement is needed.

The business capabilities 'Marketing Analytics' and 'Recommendation Management' align with the goal of enhancing the number of leads through targeted campaigns and cross-selling opportunities. 'Marketing Campaign Management' is central to designing and executing effective campaigns. 'Social Media Management' is pivotal for achieving high visibility on platforms where potential customers are most active.References= These capabilities should be part of Wanderlust's business architecture to support the CIO's objectives, and they are likely detailed in the SAP Reference Business Architecture content, which includes capabilities needed to execute comprehensive marketing strategies.

Considering Wanderlust's product range and business model, which targets individual customers and offers a wide range of electric car combinations, the Lead to Cash-B2C with Make to Stock variant would be suitable for orders that can be met from existing stock. Similarly, the Lead to Cash-B2C with Make to Order variant would fit the business model when an individual customer orders a combination not available in stock, necessitating production scheduling. Both variants cater to the business-to-consumer (B2C) model and account for the direct sales approach to individual customers.References= These variants would be documented in SAP's Business Process Architecture content, which includes various Lead to Cash process scenarios, adjusted for different business contexts.

Starting with the current processes will help to understand the capabilities that are needed in a new application. This will help to narrow down the field of potential applications and identify those that are most likely to meet the needs of Wanderlust.

Mapping business capabilities to these processes will help to identify the gaps in the current capabilities and the areas where improvement is needed. This will help to ensure that the new application meets the needs of Wanderlust and addresses the issues plaguing the existing application.

Relating Wanderlust processes to industry standard processes will help to identify applications that are already being used by other organizations. This can be a good way to ensure that the new application is compatible with other systems and that it can be easily integrated with existing systems.

The other two options, Comparing the costs of those market leading online marketing applications and Understanding the features of leading online marketing applications available in the market through product demonstrations and ranking the applications in terms of features, are not as critical at this stage. The costs of the applications can be compared once the shortlist of applications has been finalized. The features of the applications can be understood through product demonstrations once the shortlist has been finalized.

Therefore, the best course of action is to start with the current processes, map business capabilities to these processes, and identify which application(s) in the market can deliver such capabilities. This will help to narrow down the field of potential applications and identify those that are most likely to meet the needs of Wanderlust.

Here are some of the benefits of taking a process-centric approach to selecting a new marketing application:

It can help to ensure that the new application meets the needs of the business.

It can help to identify applications that are already being used by other organizations.

It can help to ensure that the new application is compatible with other systems and that it can be easily integrated with existing systems.

The business activities 'Analyze and respond to customer insight' and 'Implement promotional activities' directly relate to the CIO’s goals of increasing cross-selling opportunities through online recommendations and running highly visible campaigns. Analyzing customer insights can provide data that enhances recommendation engines, leading to effective cross-selling. Implementing promotional activities, particularly in high-visibility platforms like social media, is key to driving campaign effectiveness.References= These relationships between business activities and goals would be informed by best practices in online marketing strategies, as documented within the Lead to Cash - B2C Business Process Variant.