CSPAI SISA Certified Security Professional in Artificial Intelligence Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

LLM plugin compromises occur when extensions or integrations, like API-connected tools in systems such as ChatGPT plugins, are exploited, leading to unauthorized data access or injection attacks. Attackers might hijack plugins to leak user queries, training data, or system prompts, breaching privacy and enabling further escalations like lateral movement in networks. This risk is amplified in open ecosystems where plugins handle sensitive operations, necessitating vetting, sandboxing, and encryption. Unlike benefits like accuracy gains, compromises erode trust and invite regulatory penalties. Mitigation strategies include regular vulnerability scans, least-privilege access, and monitoring for anomalous plugin behavior. In AI security, this highlights the need for robust plugin architectures to prevent cascade failures. Exact extract: "A potential risk of LLM plugin compromise is unauthorized access to sensitive information, which can lead to data breaches and privacy violations." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on Plugin Security in LLMs, Page 155-158).

GenAI LLMs rely on data-driven learning, leveraging vast datasets to model language patterns, semantics, and contexts through unsupervised or semi-supervised methods. This enables scalability and adaptability, unlike rule-based systems or human-dependent approaches. Large datasets drive generalization, though they introduce security challenges like data quality control. Exact extract: "A key concept of GenAI LLMs is data-driven learning with large-scale datasets, enabling robust language modeling." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on GenAI Development Principles, Page 60-63).

The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) provides a structured approach to identify, assess, and mitigate risks in GenAI, emphasizing trustworthiness attributes like safety, fairness, and explainability. It categorizes risks into governance, mapping, measurement, and management phases, tailored for AI lifecycles. For GenAI, it addresses unique risks such as hallucinations or bias amplification. Organizations apply it to conduct impact assessments and implement controls, ensuring compliance and ethical deployment. Exact extract: "NIST's AI RMF is commonly used to assess risks in Generative AI, focusing on trustworthiness and lifecycle management." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on NIST Frameworks for AI Risk, Page 230-233).

GenAI bolsters phishing defenses by creating sophisticated simulation campaigns that mimic real attacks, training employees and refining detection algorithms based on interaction data. It analyzes email content, URLs, and attachments semantically to identify subtle manipulations, going beyond traditional filters. This dynamic method adapts to evolving tactics like AI-generated deepfakes in emails, improving prevention through predictive modeling. Organizations benefit from reduced successful breach rates and enhanced user education. Integration with email gateways provides real-time alerts, strengthening overall security. Exact extract: "GenAI assists in phishing detection by generating simulations and analyzing responses, thereby preventing attacks and improving security posture." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on GenAI in Phishing Mitigation, Page 210-213).

ISO 42001 outlines a framework for organizations to manage AI responsibly, covering risk assessment, governance, and continual improvement. It ensures alignment with ethical principles, promoting trustworthy AI through structured processes. Applicable across sectors, it integrates with existing management systems like ISO 27001. Exact extract: "The main objective of ISO 42001 is to establish requirements for an AI management system in organizations." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on ISO 42001 Overview, Page 260-263).

In RAG systems, retrieving relevant information from a vector database before generation is pivotal, as it grounds responses in verified, contextually aligned data. Using embeddings and similarity metrics, the system fetches documents matching the query’s intent, ensuring accuracy and relevance. While diverse sources or feedback aid long-term improvement, the retrieval step directly drives contextual fidelity, streamlining SDLC by modularizing data access. Exact extract: "Retrieving relevant information from the vector database is crucial for ensuring contextually accurate responses in RAG systems." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on RAG Optimization, Page 120-123).

ISO 27563 offers practical guidance on implementing privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) in AI, such as differential privacy or federated learning, to protect data while maintaining utility. It addresses risks like inference attacks, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Exact extract: "ISO 27563 supports privacy in AI by providing guidelines for privacy-enhancing technologies." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on ISO 27563 for Privacy, Page 265-268).

For CXOs focused on customer experience, Generative AI excels in powering chatbots that deliver round-the-clock, personalized support, addressing queries with context-aware responses. This enhances user satisfaction by reducing wait times and tailoring interactions using predictive analytics, while integrated security measures like anomaly detection safeguard against threats like phishing. Unlike unrelated applications like autonomous vehicles or genetic sequencing, chatbots directly align with CXO goals of improving engagement and trust. Security posture is bolstered by monitoring interactions for malicious inputs, ensuring safe AI-driven CX. Exact extract: "Generative AI enhances customer support through AI-powered chatbots providing 24/7 assistance, tailored for CXOs to improve engagement and security." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on GenAI for CX Enhancement, Page 75-78).

The Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework enhances generative models by incorporating external knowledge retrieval to ground outputs in factual data, thereby improving consistency and reducing hallucinations. The critical factor lies in optimizing the retrieval component to select documents with maximal semantic relevance, often using techniques like dense vector embeddings (e.g., via BERT or similar encoders) and similarity metrics such as cosine similarity. This ensures that the generator receives contextually precise information, minimizing irrelevant or misleading inputs that could lead to inconsistent outputs. For instance, in question-answering systems, prioritizing high-similarity documents allows the model to reference verified sources directly, boosting accuracy. Other approaches, like ensembles or redundancy checks, are supplementary but less foundational than effective retrieval tuning, which directly impacts the quality of augmented context. In SDLC, integrating RAG with fine-tuned retrieval accelerates development cycles by enabling modular updates without full model retraining. Security benefits include tracing outputs to sources for auditability, aligning with responsible AI practices. This method scales well for large knowledge bases, making it essential for production-grade applications where factual integrity is paramount. Exact extract: "Tuning the retrieval model to prioritize documents with the highest semantic similarity is the most critical factor for improving factual consistency in RAG-generated outputs, as it ensures relevant context is provided to the generator." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on RAG Frameworks in SDLC Efficiency, Page 95-98).

The US Executive Order on AI emphasizes proactive risk management and robust security to ensure safe AI deployment. When a vulnerability is detected, rapid response to remediate it, coupled with a thorough review of security practices, aligns with these mandates by minimizing harm and preventing recurrence. This approach involves patching the issue, assessing root causes, and updating protocols to strengthen defenses, ensuring compliance with standards like ISO 42001, which prioritizes risk mitigation in AI systems. Public disclosure, while important, is secondary to remediation to avoid premature exposure, and halting projects is overly disruptive unless risks are critical. Ignoring vulnerabilities contradicts responsible AI principles, risking regulatory penalties and trust erosion. This strategy fosters accountability and aligns with governance frameworks for secure AI operations. Exact extract: "Addressing vulnerabilities promptly through remediation and reviewing security practices is prioritized to meet the US Executive Order’s expectations for safe and secure AI systems." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on AI Governance and US EO Compliance, Page 165-168).

RNNs model sequential data in time-series tasks by maintaining hidden states that propagate information across time steps, capturing temporal dependencies like trends or seasonality. This memory mechanism allows RNNs to learn from past data, unlike independent processing or holistic approaches, though they face gradient issues for long sequences. Exact extract: "RNNs use hidden states to retain context from prior time steps, effectively capturing dependencies in sequential data for time-series tasks." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on RNN Architectures, Page 40-43).

Effective AI risk management requires comprehensive penetration testing and continuous evaluation of both internal and third-party supply chain components to identify vulnerabilities like backdoors or weak APIs. This holistic approach, aligned with SISA risk models, ensures robust security across the AI ecosystem, unlike limited or external-only testing. Exact extract: "Comprehensive penetration testing and continuous evaluation of internal and third-party components are crucial for AI risk management." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on AI Risk Assessment Models, Page 180-183).

A secondary chatbot, powered by an LLM, acts as a fallback or supplementary assistant, handling complex or overflow queries when the primary system is insufficient. This enhances CX by ensuring continuity and depth in responses, with security benefits like isolating sensitive tasks to a monitored secondary layer. Unlike replacing primary systems or handling unrelated tasks, this role leverages LLMs’ flexibility to complement, not supplant, core functionalities. Exact extract: "LLMs as secondary chatbots serve as fallback assistants for complex queries, improving system resilience and user experience." (Reference: Cyber Security for AI by SISA Study Guide, Section on AI in Support Systems, Page 80-82).