PDI Salesforce Certified Platform Developer (Plat-Dev-201) Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine the value of x when it is written to the debug log, we need to analyze the Apex code step by step, focusing on the behavior of the do-while loop and how it affects the variable x. Let’s break down the code execution systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official Apex Developer Guide.

Code Analysis:

The given Apex code is:

apex

Copy

Integer x = 0;

do {

x++;

} while (x < 1);

System.debug(x);

Step 1: Initial State

Integer x = 0;: The variable x is initialized to 0. The Apex Developer Guide states: “An Integer in Apex is a 32-bit number that does not include decimal points, initialized to 0 by default if no value is provided” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Primitive Data Types). Here, x is explicitly set to 0.

Step 2: Understanding the do-while Loop

A do-while loop in Apex executes the loop body at least once before evaluating the condition. The Apex Developer Guide explains: “The do-while loop executes the block of code in the do statement first, then checks the condition in the while statement. If the condition is true, the loop continues; otherwise, it exits” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Loops).

The loop body is:

apex

Copy

x++;

This increments x by 1 using the post-increment operator (++). The Apex Developer Guide confirms: “The ++ operator increments the value of the variable by 1” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Expressions and Operators).

The condition is:

apex

Copy

while (x < 1);

The loop continues as long as x < 1 evaluates to true.

Step 3: Loop Execution

First Iteration:

Initial value: x = 0.

Execute the loop body: x++ → x becomes 1 (0 + 1).

Evaluate the condition: x < 1 → 1 < 1 → false (since 1 is not less than 1).

Since the condition is false, the loop exits after the first iteration.

After the Loop:

The value of x is now 1.

The do-while loop guarantees at least one execution, which is why x is incremented once before the condition check fails.

Step 4: Debug Statement

System.debug(x);: This writes the value of x to the debug log. At this point, x = 1. The Apex Developer Guide states: “System.debug outputs the value of the specified variable to the debug log for troubleshooting” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, System Class).

Therefore, the debug log will show 1.

Evaluating the Options:

A. 0: Incorrect. The initial value of x is 0, but the do-while loop increments x to 1 in the first iteration, and the loop exits because the condition x < 1 is false. The debug log shows the final value of x, which is 1.

B. 2: Incorrect. The loop only runs once because after the first iteration, x becomes 1, and the condition x < 1 fails (1 < 1 is false). There is no second iteration to increment x to 2.

C. 1: Correct. As calculated, the loop executes once, incrementing x from 0 to 1, and then exits because the condition x < 1 is false. The debug log outputs x = 1.

D. 3: Incorrect. The loop does not run enough times to increment x to 3. It only runs once, setting x to 1.

Why Option C is Correct:

Option C (1) is correct because:

The do-while loop executes the body (x++) exactly once, incrementing x from 0 to 1.

The condition x < 1 evaluates to false when x = 1, causing the loop to exit after the first iteration.

The System.debug(x) statement outputs the final value of x, which is 1.

This behavior aligns with Apex loop semantics as defined in the Salesforce Apex Developer Guide.

Handling Typos:

The code in the image contains a typo: “salesforce” is randomly inserted in the middle of the do-while loop. This appears to be an artifact of the image and not part of the intended code. For analysis, we ignore this text and treat the code as:

apex

Copy

Integer x = 0;

do {

x++;

} while (x < 1);

System.debug(x);

There are no other syntactic issues in the code that affect the execution or outcome.

Example for Clarity:

To illustrate, here’s how the code executes:

Integer x = 0; // x is 0

do {

x++; // First iteration: x becomes 1

} while (x < 1); // Condition: 1 < 1 → false, exit loop

System.debug(x); // Outputs: 1

If this code were run in a Salesforce org, the debug log would show:

DEBUG|1

When working with a Lightning Web Component (LWC), the correct syntax for importing an Apex method is:import methodName from "@salesforce/apex/ControllerName.methodName";.

Why not other options?

A,B, andC: These use incorrect syntax for importing Apex methods in LWCs.

Lightning Web Components Documentation

Advantages of Lightning Web Components (LWC):

A. Rich component ecosystem:

LWCs have a modern, rich component library designed for modular and reusable development.

D. Self-contained and reusable units:

LWCs are designed to be modular, reusable, and self-contained, reducing duplication and enhancing maintainability.

Why Not Other Options?

B. Log capturing via Debug Logs Setup page: This is unrelated to LWC and is a debugging feature.

C. Built-in standard and custom set controllers: Relevant to Visualforce, not LWCs.

To check test coverage for autolaunched flows before deployment, developers need to use SOQL queries with the Tooling API. This provides detailed information about which flows are covered and their test results.

AnExternal ID fieldis used to match data in Salesforce with data from external systems (like an on-premise SQL database). It allows for easy upserts and data integration without relying on Salesforce IDs.

Why not other options?

A: External objects are used for real-time integration with external systems but do not address data matching directly.

C: Formula fields are calculated fields and cannot be used for data matching.

D: Lookup fields are used for creating relationships between objects within Salesforce, not for matching external data.

A try-catch block allows the batch to continue processing even if some records cause errors. Errors can be logged for review, ensuring the integration process does not stop entirely.

For declarative development:

A. Record-Triggered Flow:Allows building complex logic declaratively without code.

D. Validation Rules:Enforce data quality by validating record fields before saving.

Why a try/catch block is required:

In Salesforce, DML operations such as insert, update, delete, and upsert can throw exceptions due to issues like validation rule violations, field constraints, or sharing rule restrictions.

Using a try/catch block ensures that these exceptions are caught and handled gracefully, preventing the entire transaction from failing.

How to modify the code:

The update statement in the code can be wrapped in a try/catch block to catch and handle any exceptions that occur. For example:

apex

Copy code

public static void insertAccounts(List theseAccounts) {

try {

for (Account thisAccount : theseAccounts) {

if (thisAccount.website == null) {

thisAccount.website = 'https://www.demo.com ';

}

}

update theseAccounts;

} catch (DmlException e) {

System.debug('DML Exception: ' + e.getMessage());

}

}

Why not the other options?

A. Implement the upsert DML statement:

upsert is used to either insert or update records based on an external ID or primary key. It does not inherently handle exceptions.

B. Implement Change Data Capture:

Change Data Capture (CDC) is used for tracking changes to data in real time and is unrelated to handling DML exceptions.

D. Remove null items from the list of Accounts:

While cleaning the input data is a good practice, it does not address the need for exception handling during DML operations.

75% Code Coverage (A):To deploy Apex code to production, Salesforce requires at least 75% of the code to be covered by tests across the organization.

Option A: Thefire()method is used to publish Aura application events in the traditional publish-subscribe model.

Not Suitable:

Option B:sendEvent()is not a valid method for Aura events.

Option C:FireEvent()does not exist.

Option D:emit()is not part of the Aura event framework.

Aura Application Events

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine the correct declaration of the class and methods for a custom SOAP Web Service in Apex, we need to evaluate the syntax and access modifiers required for SOAP Web Services, as well as the handling of helper methods that are not exposed to the external Web Application. Let’s analyze the problem and each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official Apex Developer Guide.

Understanding SOAP Web Services in Apex:

SOAP Web Service: Salesforce allows developers to create SOAP Web Services using Apex by defining methods that can be called externally via SOAP. The Apex Developer Guide states: “Apex SOAP Web Services allow external applications to invoke Apex methods over SOAP by exposing them with the webservice keyword” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, SOAP Web Services).

Class Declaration: For an Apex class to be a SOAP Web Service, it must be declared as global to allow external access. The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “The class containing SOAP Web Service methods must be declared as global to be accessible externally” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, SOAP Web Services).

Method Declaration:

Methods exposed as Web Service operations must be static and annotated with the webservice keyword. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “Methods defined as SOAP Web Service operations must be static and use the webservice keyword” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, SOAP Web Services).

The return type and parameters of webservice methods must be compatible with SOAP (e.g \String, Integer, sObjects, etc.).

Helper Methods: The question specifies that helper methods are included but not used by the Web Application, meaning they should not be exposed as part of the Web Service. Helper methods can be private or public and should not have the webservice keyword, ensuring they are not part of the WSDL (Web Service Definition Language) exposed to the external application.

Requirement Analysis:

Class: Must be global to expose the Web Service to external applications.

Web Service Method (updateRecords): Must be static, use the webservice keyword, and be part of the global class to be callable via SOAP.

Helper Method (helperMethod): Should be private (or not webservice) to ensure it’s not exposed in the WSDL and is only used internally within the class.

Evaluating the Options:

A.

apex

Copy

webservice class WebServiceClass {

private Boolean helperMethod() { /* implementation ... */ }

global static String updateRecords() { /* implementation ... */ }

}

Class Declaration: Uses webservice class instead of global class. The webservice keyword is not a valid modifier for a class in Apex. The Apex Developer Guide clarifies: “The webservice keyword is used for methods, not classes. The class itself must be global” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, SOAP Web Services). This results in a compilation error.

Helper Method: private Boolean helperMethod() is correct, as it’s not exposed to the Web Service (no webservice keyword).

Web Service Method: global static String updateRecords() uses global, which is incorrect for a method. Methods in a global class should use webservice to be exposed as Web Service operations, not global. The Apex Developer Guide states: “Methods in a Web Service class use the webservice keyword, not global” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, SOAP Web Services).

Conclusion: Incorrect due to invalid class declaration (webservice class) and incorrect method modifier (global instead of webservice).

B.

apex

Copy

global class WebServiceClass {

private Boolean helperMethod() { /* implementation ... */ }

webservice static String updateRecords() { /* implementation ... */ }

}

Class Declaration: Uses global class, which is correct. A SOAP Web Service class must be global to be accessible externally.

Helper Method: private Boolean helperMethod() is correct, as it’s not exposed to the Web Service (no webservice keyword), fulfilling the requirement that it’s not used by the Web Application.

Web Service Method: webservice static String updateRecords() is correct. It uses the webservice keyword to expose the method as a Web Service operation, is static as required, and returns a SOAP-compatible type (String).

Conclusion: Correct, as it meets all requirements for a SOAP Web Service class, exposes the updateRecords method properly, and keeps the helper method internal.

C.

apex

Copy

webservice class WebServiceClass {

private Boolean helperMethod() { /* implementation ... */ }

webservice static String updateRecords() { /* implementation ... */ }

}

Class Declaration: Uses webservice class, which, as noted in option A, is invalid. The class must be global, not webservice.

Helper Method: private Boolean helperMethod() is correct (not exposed).

Web Service Method: webservice static String updateRecords() is correct in syntax, but the class declaration error makes the entire code segment invalid.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to the invalid class declaration (webservice class).

D.

apex

Copy

global class WebServiceClass {

private Boolean helperMethod() { /* implementation ... */ }

global String updateRecords() { /* implementation ... */ }

}

Class Declaration: Uses global class, which is correct.

Helper Method: private Boolean helperMethod() is correct (not exposed).

Web Service Method: global String updateRecords() is incorrect. The method uses global instead of webservice, and it’s not static. For a method to be exposed as a SOAP Web Service operation, it must be webservice and static. Additionally, global is not a valid modifier for methods in this context; it’s used for the class. The Apex Developer Guide warns: “Non-static methods or methods without the webservice keyword are not exposed in the WSDL” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, SOAP Web Services).

Conclusion: Incorrect, as the updateRecords method is not properly exposed as a Web Service operation (missing webservice and static).

Why Option B is Correct:

Option B is correct because:

The class is declared as global class WebServiceClass, making it accessible to external applications as required for a SOAP Web Service.

The updateRecords method is declared as webservice static String updateRecords(), correctly exposing it as a Web Service operation that can be called via SOAP.

The helper method helperMethod is private and lacks the webservice keyword, ensuring it’s not exposed in the WSDL and is only used internally, meeting the requirement that it’s not used by the Web Application.

This aligns with Salesforce best practices for SOAP Web Services as outlined in the Apex Developer Guide.

Example for Clarity:

Here’s how option B would be implemented in a complete Apex class:

apex

Copy

global class WebServiceClass {

// Helper method, not exposed in the WSDL

private Boolean helperMethod() {

return true; // Example implementation

}

// Web Service method, exposed in the WSDL

webservice static String updateRecords() {

if (helperMethod()) {

return 'Records updated successfully';

}

return 'Update failed';

}

}

When this class is deployed, Salesforce generates a WSDL that includes the updateRecords method but excludes helperMethod, allowing the external Web Application to call updateRecords via SOAP while keeping helperMethod internal.

Handling Typos:

The options are syntactically correct in the provided image, with no typos to address. The placeholders (/* implementation ... */) are standard for indicating omitted code and do not affect the analysis.

The question’s phrasing is clear, and the options align with typical Apex syntax patterns for Web Services.

Throwing Exceptions in Apex:

throw new ExceptionType();creates a new instance and throws it.

A: No argument constructor.

B: Constructor with a custom error message.

Why Not Other Options?

C and D: These create exception instances but do not throw them, which is not valid syntax for firing an exception.

The deployment fails because the Apex trigger has 0% test coverage. Even though the helper class is covered, Salesforce requires at least 1% test coverage for the trigger itself. To resolve this, a test class and methods must specifically invoke the trigger by performing DML operations on the related object.

This is a classicbulkification problem, covered under"Apex Development Best Practices"in the PD1 guide.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine the correct implementation of the CheckPaymentProcessor class that adheres to the PaymentProcessor interface, we need to evaluate each option based on Apex syntax for interfaces, class implementation, and method overriding. Let’s analyze the problem and each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official Apex Developer Guide.

Understanding Interfaces in Apex:

Interface Definition: An interface in Apex defines a contract of methods that must be implemented by any class that implements the interface. The PaymentProcessor interface declares a single method: void pay(Decimal amount);. The Apex Developer Guide states: “An interface is a collection of method signatures that a class can implement, requiring the class to provide concrete implementations for each method” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Interfaces).

Implementing an Interface: A class implements an interface using the implements keyword, and it must provide a concrete implementation (method body) for each method defined in the interface. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “A class that implements an interface must implement all the methods declared in the interface, with matching signatures” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Interfaces).

Key Points:

Interfaces are implemented using implements, not extends.

The implemented methods must match the interface’s method signature (name, return type, parameters) and provide a method body.

Interfaces cannot be extended using extends because they are not classes; extends is used for class inheritance.

Requirement Analysis:

Interface: PaymentProcessor defines one method: void pay(Decimal amount);.

Class: CheckPaymentProcessor must implement this interface to provide check processing payment capabilities, meaning it must define the pay method with a matching signature and a concrete implementation.

Correct Implementation: The class must use implements PaymentProcessor and provide a concrete pay method with a body.

Evaluating the Options:

A.

apex

Copy

public class CheckPaymentProcessor implements PaymentProcessor {

public void pay(Decimal amount) {}

}

Syntax: Uses implements PaymentProcessor, which is correct for implementing an interface in Apex.

Method Implementation: Defines public void pay(Decimal amount) {}, which matches the interface’s method signature (void pay(Decimal amount)) and provides a concrete implementation (empty body, but still valid). The Apex Developer Guide confirms: “The implementing class must provide a method body for each interface method, even if it’s empty” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Interfaces).

Access Modifier: The pay method is public, which is required because interface methods are implicitly public, and the implementing method must have the same or less restrictive visibility.

Conclusion: Correct, as it properly implements the PaymentProcessor interface with a concrete pay method.

B.

apex

Copy

public class CheckPaymentProcessor implements PaymentProcessor {

public void pay(Decimal amount);

}

Syntax: Uses implements PaymentProcessor, which is correct.

Method Implementation: Declares public void pay(Decimal amount); with a semicolon instead of a method body (curly braces {}). In Apex, a method declaration without a body (ending in a semicolon) is valid in an interface or abstract class, but in a concrete class implementing an interface, it must provide a method body. The Apex Developer Guide states: “A class implementing an interface must provide a concrete implementation for each method, or the class must be declared abstract” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Interfaces). Since CheckPaymentProcessor is not abstract, this results in a compilation error: “Method does not override any method from its superclass or interfaces.”

Conclusion: Incorrect, as it fails to provide a concrete implementation of the pay method, causing a compilation error.

C.

apex

Copy

public class CheckPaymentProcessor extends PaymentProcessor {

public void pay(Decimal amount);

}

Syntax: Uses extends PaymentProcessor, which is incorrect. In Apex, extends is used for class inheritance, not for implementing interfaces. The PaymentProcessor is an interface, not a class, so it cannot be extended using extends. The Apex Developer Guide clarifies: “Use implements to implement an interface; extends is used for class inheritance” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Interfaces). This results in a compilation error: “Interfaces cannot be extended using extends.”

Method Implementation: Even if the syntax were correct, the pay method lacks a body (ends with a semicolon), causing the same issue as option B.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to the invalid use of extends for an interface and the lack of a method body.

D.

apex

Copy

public class CheckPaymentProcessor extends PaymentProcessor {

public void pay(Decimal amount) {}

}

Syntax: Uses extends PaymentProcessor, which, as noted in option C, is incorrect for an interface. The correct keyword is implements, not extends, leading to a compilation error.

Method Implementation: Provides a concrete pay method, which is correct in form, but the class declaration error makes the entire implementation invalid.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to the invalid use of extends for an interface, despite the correct method implementation.

Why Option A is Correct:

Option A is correct because:

It uses implements PaymentProcessor to properly declare that CheckPaymentProcessor implements the PaymentProcessor interface.

It provides a concrete implementation of the pay method (public void pay(Decimal amount) {}), matching the interface’s method signature and fulfilling the contract.

The public access modifier aligns with the implicit public visibility of interface methods.

This implementation adheres to Apex best practices for interfaces as outlined in the Salesforce Apex Developer Guide.

Example for Clarity:

Here’s the complete correct implementation (option A) with a sample method body:

apex

Copy

public interface PaymentProcessor {

void pay(Decimal amount);

}

public class CheckPaymentProcessor implements PaymentProcessor {

public void pay(Decimal amount) {

// Example implementation for check processing

System.debug('Processing check payment of amount: ' + amount);

// Add logic to process a check payment

}

}

The CheckPaymentProcessor class implements the PaymentProcessor interface and provides a concrete pay method, satisfying the interface’s contract.

This class can now be used wherever a PaymentProcessor is required, such as in a payment processing system.

Handling Typos:

The question’s code snippet and options are syntactically correct, with no typos to address.

The interface and class names are consistent throughout the question.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine the correct definition of the Apex method for a Next Best Action strategy’s Enhance Element, we need to evaluate the syntax and requirements for an @InvocableMethod used in this context, focusing on its accessibility, input/output types, and compatibility with Next Best Action. Let’s analyze the problem and each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official documentation.

Understanding Next Best Action and Enhance Elements:

Next Best Action (NBA): NBA is a Salesforce feature that provides personalized recommendations to users, often used in process automation (e.g., via Flow or Einstein Next Best Action). It evaluates strategies to suggest actions, such as offering a discount to a Contact.

Enhance Element: In NBA, an Enhance Element allows developers to invoke custom logic (e.g., an Apex method) to modify or generate recommendations. The Salesforce Next Best Action documentation states: “An Enhance Element in a Next Best Action strategy can invoke an Apex method to dynamically generate or modify recommendations” (Salesforce Help, Next Best Action).

Apex Method Requirements:

The method must be annotated with @InvocableMethod to be callable from NBA or Flow.

It must be global and static to be accessible outside the class.

For NBA, the method typically returns recommendations as a List or List> (for bulk processing).

The input can be a List of a custom wrapper class (e.g., ContactWrapper) to pass data like Contact details.

The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “An @InvocableMethod must be global, static, and can take a List of inputs and return a List of outputs” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation).

Requirement Analysis:

Purpose: The method determines a discount level for a Contact, which suggests it generates or modifies a recommendation (e.g., a discount offer).

Input: The method likely takes a List as input, where ContactWrapper is a custom class containing Contact data and other factors.

Output: Since this is for NBA, the method should return a List, where Recommendation is a standard Salesforce sObject used by NBA to represent suggested actions (e.g., a discount offer). The Salesforce Object Reference Guide confirms: “The Recommendation object represents a suggested action in Next Best Action, with fields like Name, Description, and ActionReference” (Salesforce Object Reference Guide, Recommendation Object).

Enhance Element Specifics: An Enhance Element typically expects a List as output for each input, not a nested List>, unless bulkified in a specific way. However, the method must support bulkification (taking a List as input and returning a List).

Evaluating the Options:

A.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global static List> getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: global static and @InvocableMethod are correct for an invocable method.

Input: List is appropriate, assuming ContactWrapper is a custom class with @InvocableVariable properties to pass Contact data.

Output: Returns List>, which is a nested list. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “An @InvocableMethod can return a nested List, but for Flow or NBA, the expected output is typically List for direct mapping” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation). In NBA, an Enhance Element generally expects a List<Recommendation> to map directly to recommendations, not a nested list. A nested list (List<List<Recommendation>>) is more common in Flows when processing multiple outputs for multiple inputs, but for NBA, this is not the standard pattern for an Enhance Element.

Conclusion: Incorrect, as the nested List> return type does not align with the typical expectation of an Enhance Element in NBA, which expects List.

B.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global Recommendation getLevel(ContactWrapper input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: Uses @InvocableMethod and global, but the method is not static. The Apex Developer Guide states: “An @InvocableMethod must be static to be callable from Flow or Next Best Action” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation). This results in a compilation error.

Input: Takes a single ContactWrapper, not a List. Invocable methods must support bulkification by taking a List as input, even if only one record is passed. The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “Invocable methods must take a List as input to support bulkification” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation).

Output: Returns a single Recommendation, not a List. Similarly, the output must be a List to support bulkification.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to missing static keyword, and both input and output violate the bulkification requirement (must use List).

C.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global List> getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: Uses @InvocableMethod and global, but the method is not static, resulting in a compilation error (same issue as option B).

Input: List is correct for bulkification.

Output: Returns List>, which, as noted in option A, is not the typical return type for an NBA Enhance Element. It expects List to directly map to recommendations.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to missing static keyword and the nested List> return type, which is not ideal for NBA Enhance Elements.

D.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global static List getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: global static and @InvocableMethod are correct, making the method accessible to NBA.

Input: List supports bulkification and is appropriate for passing Contact data and factors.

Output: Returns List, which aligns with the expectation of an NBA Enhance Element. The Enhance Element can use the returned recommendations (e.g., discount offers) directly in the NBA strategy. The Salesforce Help documentation for Next Best Action confirms: “An Apex method invoked by an Enhance Element typically returns a List to provide or modify recommendations” (Salesforce Help, Next Best Action Enhance Element).

Conclusion: Correct, as it meets all requirements: proper accessibility, bulkified input/output, and the expected return type for NBA.

Why Option D is Correct:

Option D is correct because:

It uses @InvocableMethod, global, and static, making the method callable from a Next Best Action Enhance Element.

The input List supports bulkification and allows passing Contact data and other factors.

The output List matches the expected return type for an NBA Enhance Element, allowing the strategy to use the returned recommendations (e.g., discount offers) directly.

This aligns with Salesforce best practices for invocable methods in process automation, as outlined in the Apex Developer Guide and Next Best Action documentation.

Example for Clarity:

Here’s how option D might be implemented:

apex

Copy

global class DiscountCalculator {

@InvocableMethod(label='Get Discount Level' description='Determines discount level for a Contact')

global static List getLevel(List input) {

List recommendations = new List();

for (ContactWrapper wrapper : input) {

// Example logic to determine discount level

Decimal discountLevel = 0.1; // 10% discount based on factors

Recommendation rec = new Recommendation();

rec.Name = 'Discount Offer';

rec.Description = 'Offer a ' + (discountLevel * 100) + '% discount to ' + wrapper.contactName;

rec.ActionReference = 'ApplyDiscount'; // Reference to a Flow or action

recommendations.add(rec);

}

return recommendations;

}

}

global class ContactWrapper {

@InvocableVariable

global String contactName;

@InvocableVariable

global Id contactId;

// Add other factors as InvocableVariables

}

Usage in NBA: The Enhance Element in the Next Best Action strategy calls getLevel, passing a List with Contact data. The method returns a List, each representing a discount offer, which NBA can then present to the user.

Handling Typos:

The options are syntactically correct in the provided image, with no typos to address.

The question assumes ContactWrapper is a properly defined class with @InvocableVariable properties, which is a reasonable assumption for the context.

Option D’s ListRecommendation in the original question appears to be a typo (missing < and >). The correct syntax is List, as assumed in the analysis and corrected in the formatted options.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To implement an interface in Apex, the implements keyword is used in the class definition. This ensures that the class provides concrete implementations of the interface’s methods.

Execution Flow:

The loop runs 500 times (iranges from 0 to 499).

In each iteration, a newAccountrecord is created and inserted.

Governor Limits:

This code violates the governor limit of 150 DML statements per transaction because eachinsertis executed individually.

However, the code logically attempts to insert 500 accounts.

Key Consideration:

The code demonstrates inefficient handling of DML operations and would fail in a real-world scenario.

Option A: The Lightning Component Framework uses client-side rendering for improved performance and responsiveness.

Option B: Lightning components automatically adhere to accessibility standards (e.g., ARIA).

Option D: The framework allows for seamless integration with external libraries via JavaScript.

Not Suitable:

Option C: Lightning components are compatible with modern browsers but not all browsers.

Lightning Component Benefits