PSP AACE International Planning & Scheduling Professional (PSP) Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

The linear scheduling velocity diagram uses time on one axis and location on the other. This graphically represents the progression of work at various locations over time.

Option C (time and rate of progress) and Option D (time and crew size) refer to related concepts but do not accurately describe the axes.

Option A (location and crew size) is unrelated.

This aligns with graphical techniques discussed for construction scheduling​.

To maintain the product availability date while accommodating a 15-day delay in proofing corrections, the best course of action is to expedite another activity on the critical path. The PSP Study Guide outlines methods for schedule recovery and acceleration (Section 2.3.5, "Acceleration"). Expediting the Draft Product Manual by 5 days helps redistribute the time lost, aligning subsequent tasks to achieve the original completion milestone without delaying the overall schedule.

 Analyze the Data and Logic:

Activity 9004 ("Valve House Embankment"): This activity has a direct Finish-to-Start (FS) relationship with Activity 10002, with a lag of 7 days.

Late Start (LS) and Late Finish (LF): In backward pass calculations, the late finish of the successor activity is adjusted for lag and task duration to determine the late start of the predecessor activity.

 Formula for Late Finish (LF):

The Late Finish of Activity 9004 is derived by taking the Late Start (LS) of Activity 10002, subtracting the lag of 7 days, and subtracting 1 day to calculate the exact finish date.

 Correct Date Calculation:

Given the Late Start (LS) of Activity 10002:

LS.10002 = 11-28-03.

Apply the formula:LF.9004 = LS.10002 - Lag.7 - 1 day = 11-28-03 - 7 days - 1 day = 11-20-03.

 Cross-Verification with Answer Options:

Option A: Incorrect. Misrepresents the formula.

Option B: Incorrect. Incorrect application of logic and lag adjustments.

Option C: Incorrect. Omits the correct lag consideration.

Option D: Correct. Matches both formula and calculated date.

 Scenario Review:

Delay in the parking structure foundation is an off-critical path activity.

No impact on the overall project completion date.

 Delay Analysis:

While the foundation activity is delayed, the float ensures that no downstream activities are impacted.

 Cross-Verification:

Option B: Incorrect. Assumes a 4-day impact.

Option C: Incorrect. Overestimates delays.

Option D: Incorrect. Miscalculates delays.

 Late Finish Analysis for Activity C (Develop Plans and Specs):

Activity C duration is 5 months, starting after Activity A (3 months).

Late finish = Early start of successor (Activity E) = 10 months.

 Cross-Verification:

Based on backward pass calculations, Activity C must end by month 10 to not delay its successor.

 Verification with PSP Guidelines:Late finish values are calculated during backward pass (Ref: PSP Study Guide, Chapter 2A: Backward Pass and Float Calculations).

 Shape of Cumulative BCWS:

The Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS) reflects a cumulative expenditure curve over time, typically shaped like an "S".

 Explanation of the S-Curve:

Initially slow expenditure, acceleration during peak work, and tapering off near completion.

 Verification with PSP Guidelines:The PSP Study Guide discusses BCWS as part of earned value management (Ref: PSP Study Guide, Chapter 1D: Earned Value Analysis).

Total float is influenced by factors like multiple calendars, start/finish constraints, and preferential logic because these directly affect the calculation of early and late dates.

Option D (front end loading), which involves distributing work to earlier project phases, does not inherently affect float calculations as it primarily pertains to resource or phase management strategies​​.