CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence ACFE Certified Fraud Examiner - Fraud Prevention and Deterrence Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Three General Approaches to Controlling Corporate Crime:

Government Intervention:Strong regulations and enforcement to ensure accountability.

Voluntary Corporate Changes:Encouraging ethical practices through organizational policies.

Consumer Action:Pressure from consumers demanding corporate responsibility.

Why D is Incorrect:

Media blacklisting is not a formal or systematic approach to controlling corporate crime. It is a consequence rather than a preventive or corrective measure.

Five Components of COSO’s Internal Control Framework:

A. Control activities:Policies and procedures to ensure objectives are met.

C. Risk assessment:Identifying and analyzing risks.

D. Monitoring:Ongoing evaluation of control effectiveness.

Control environment:Includes the tone at the top and organizational ethics.

Information and communication:Facilitates the flow of relevant information.

Explanation of Ethical Culture:

While ethical culture is critical to the control environment, it is not one of the five standalone components of the framework.

Conclusion:Ethical culture is not a separate component but a part of the control environment.

Understanding Behavioral Responses:

Positive reinforcement:Increases desired behavior by providing rewards.

Negative reinforcement:Increases desired behavior by removing an unfavorable condition.

Punishment:Reduces undesired behavior by introducing a negative consequence or removing a positive condition.

Application to the Scenario:

Demotion is a punitive action designed to discourage the employee’s poor performance, making it an example of punishment.

Conclusion:The manager’s action aligns with the concept of punishment.

Impartiality in Fraud Risk Assessment:

As the lead on the fraud risk assessment, Glenda must maintain objectivity and avoid the appearance of bias.

Her history of disagreements with Bridgette creates a potential conflict of interest, which could compromise the assessment's credibility.

Why Option D is Correct:

Assigning the accounts receivable department's assessment to another individual eliminates the risk of perceived or actual bias.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Confrontation:Not appropriate during a professional assessment.

B. Including disagreements:Personal conflicts should not influence risk evaluations.

C. Automatic high-risk designation:This lacks a factual basis and undermines objectivity.

Conclusion:Option D ensures objectivity and credibility in the fraud risk assessment.

The ACFE has found that terminating the employee involved in fraud is the most common internal response to substantiated cases. While many fraud cases are handled internally without being referred to law enforcement, this is often due to concerns such as reputational damage or cost considerations rather than a lack of evidence.

 Fraud Risk Management Program Requirements:

A fraud risk management program includes mechanisms to detect and respond to noncompliance, sanctions for violations, and measures to address control failures.

 Why B is Incorrect:

Responsibility for handling suspected incidents should remain within the organization, typically assigned to compliance officers or internal audit teams. Delegating it to external parties undermines internal governance.

 Why Other Options are Correct:

A, C, and D describe essential elements of a fraud risk management program, including monitoring, sanctions, and corrective measures for anti-fraud controls​​.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

The G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance advocate for transparent and fair markets and the efficient allocation of resources, making Option A the correct statement. These principles are internationally recognized as a standard for policy makers, investors, corporations, and other stakeholders worldwide. The principles are intended to apply to both developed and emerging markets, not justemerging ones (rejecting Option C), and while influential, they are not legally binding mandates (rejecting Option D). They also support the equitable treatment of shareholders, regardless of share class (rejecting Option B).

 Corruption and Fraud Risks:

Corruption involves abuse of power for personal or organizational gain and includes bribery, kickbacks, and aiding vendor fraud.

 Why B is Correct:

Espionage by competitors is not typically classified as corruption, as it does not directly involve abuse of internal authority or a relationship of trust. It is instead an external threat.

 Other Options:

A, C, and D are classical examples of corruption-related fraud risks​​.

Understanding Fraud Risk Management Responses:

Risk mitigation refers to implementing controls or measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk.

In this case, by implementing additional internal controls, management aims to mitigate the identified fraud risk.

Definition of Other Options:

A. Assuming the risk:This refers to accepting the risk without taking action to mitigate it. This is generally done when the risk is deemed tolerable.

C. Avoiding the risk:This involves changing business practices or ceasing activities to eliminate the risk entirely.

D. Transferring the risk:This occurs when the responsibility for the risk is shifted to another party, such as through insurance.

Conclusion:The described response clearly aligns with risk mitigation, as it focuses on reducing the risk through internal control measures.

Behaviorist Theories on Reinforcement:

Positive reinforcement is the most effective way to encourage desired behavior by providing rewards for compliance.

Analysis of Options:

B. Public criticism:May create resentment and decrease morale.

C. Loss of paid time off:A punitive measure that may not motivate improvement.

D. Demotion:Effective for extreme cases but harsh and potentially counterproductive for minor errors.

Conclusion:Offering a bonus for perfect reconciliation aligns with behaviorist principles of positive reinforcement.

Fraud Discovered During an Audit:

Under ISAs, auditors must communicate findings of fraud to the appropriate governance body, such as the audit committee or board of directors.

This ensures accountability and allows the organization to take appropriate remedial action.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Confront management:This could compromise the investigation and is not the auditor's role.

B. Report to regulators:Not immediately required unless legal reporting obligations apply.

D. Confidentiality:Confidentiality rules allow communication with governance bodies as part of the audit process.

Conclusion:Reporting findings to the audit committee aligns with ISA requirements and best practices.