CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence ACFE Certified Fraud Examiner - Fraud Prevention and Deterrence Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Fraud Prevention Through Performance Management:Performance measurement and management programs can play a role in preventing fraud by ensuring accountability, setting ethical expectations, and reinforcing organizational goals.

Analysis of Options:

A. Ethics-based metrics:Encourages accountability and reduces fraud risks.

B. Regular training:Ensures employees are competent, reducing errors and opportunities for fraud.

D. Reasonable performance goals:Prevents pressure to commit fraud by setting realistic benchmarks.

C. Loosely defined job descriptions:This creates ambiguity, reduces accountability, and increases the risk of fraud, making it ineffective.

Conclusion:Option C is not an effective way to prevent fraud.

 Research Findings by Silk and Vogel:

Their research highlights that business leaders often justify non-compliance with regulations by arguing that adhering to such rules significantly increases operational costs and reduces profitability.

 Rationalization in Legal Violations:

This rationalization is consistent with the fraud triangle concept, where rationalization serves as a justification for unethical or illegal actions.

 Why A is Correct:

This accurately represents a common justification for regulatory non-compliance as documented in fraud and compliance research​​.

Defining Fraud Risk Management Objectives:

Management should focus on tailoring objectives to the organization's needs, examining past fraud incidents, and balancing costs with benefits. Assigning a quantitative measure to risk appetite, while potentially useful, is not a requirement for effective fraud risk management.

Analysis of Options:

A. Examining previous frauds:This helps identify vulnerabilities and design controls.

B. Balancing costs and benefits:Essential to ensure the program's efficiency and feasibility.

D. Tailoring objectives:Necessary for aligning the program with organizational goals.

Conclusion:Option C is false because assigning a quantitative measure to risk appetite is not mandatory in defining fraud risk management objectives.

Impact of Reporting to Law Enforcement:

Reporting fraud incidents to law enforcement demonstrates a zero-tolerance approach, acting as a deterrent to potential fraudsters.

It also ensures that perpetrators face legal consequences, discouraging others from engaging in fraudulent activities.

Prevention Mechanism:

The public nature of such actions signals organizational commitment to ethics and integrity, enhancing its reputation and strengthening internal controls.

Supporting References:

ACFE guidelines advocate for reporting fraud to appropriate authorities as part of an effective fraud prevention strategy​​.

Regulatory and Legal Misconduct:

This category includes practices that violate laws or regulations, such as anti-competitive behavior, insider trading, and conflicts of interest.

Why A is Correct:

Fraudulent customer payments are typically categorized under operational or financial fraud, not regulatory and legal misconduct.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B, C, and D:These practices involve violations of regulations or legal obligations, directly aligning with regulatory and legal misconduct​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Fraud Examination Guide and related professional standards​​.

International and jurisdictional auditing standards for public-sector auditors​​.

COSO and governance frameworks on fraud risk management​​.

Corporate Governance Requirements for Public Corporations:

Publicly traded companies must adhere to the listing standards of the stock exchanges where their shares are traded (e.g., NYSE or NASDAQ).

B. G20/OECD Principles:These are guidelines, not binding requirements.

C. No requirements:Incorrect; corporate governance regulations apply regardless of jurisdiction.

D. Universal Corporate Governance Act:No such act exists globally.

Conclusion:Public corporations must comply with stock exchange-specific listing standards.

 ACFE Code of Professional Ethics:

Fraud examiners must avoid expressing opinions about guilt or innocence. They are tasked with presenting evidence and findings objectively, leaving determinations of guilt to legal or regulatory authorities.

 Why A is Correct:

Maria’s statement that "Rita is guilty" constitutes a violation because it goes beyond the role of a fraud examiner.

 References:

ACFE standards emphasize objectivity and avoidance of subjective judgments in fraud reporting​​.

Fraud Risk Management Program Requirements:

Effective fraud risk management programs ensure transparency, consistency, and fairness.

Sanctions for noncompliance should be transparent and communicated to demonstrate a commitment to accountability.

Analysis of Options:

A. Mechanisms for breaches:Necessary to address compliance issues.

B. Consistent and firm punishment:Ensures a deterrent effect.

D. Designated compliance monitors:Vital for program enforcement.

C. Enacted privately:This is false because transparency is essential to maintain trust and deter similar actions.

Conclusion:Option C is false as formal sanctions should be communicated appropriately to promote deterrence and accountability.

Management is ultimately responsible for ensuring the effectiveness of the organization’s anti-fraudprogram. They set the tone at the top, establish internal controls, and ensure that the necessary resources and oversight mechanisms are in place to prevent and detect fraud. Other stakeholders, such as auditors and compliance officers, provide support but do not bear ultimate responsibility.

=================

Analysis of Each Scenario:

A. Rodrigo:Reporting unrelated findings without a clear mandate violates principles of focus and relevance under the ACFE Code.

B. Vivian:Overlooking evidence demonstrates a lack of due diligence and professionalism.

C. Tom:Complying with a court order is permissible, but failure to safeguard client confidentiality before receiving the order constitutes a breach.

Ethical Standards:

Each scenario demonstrates a failure to meet the ethical and professional responsibilities outlined in the ACFE Code.

Conclusion:All scenarios represent violations of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics.

Impact of Specialized Departments on Fraud Risk:While specialization improves operational efficiency, it can also create silos, reducing oversight and coordination. This fragmentation may increase the overall fraud risk.

Key Considerations:

Fraud often occurs in areas where controls and communication are weak. Specialized departments may inadvertently facilitate fraud by isolating information.

Cross-departmental collaboration and centralized controls are essential to mitigate these risks.

Conclusion:The existence of many specialized departments increases the risk of fraud if not properly managed.

Purpose of Anti-Fraud Education:

Education is most effective when employees understand the real consequences of fraud. Providing examples of prior incidents reinforces the importance of compliance.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Include detection procedures:While this can increase awareness, it risks exposing sensitive controls.

C. Restricting to formal mechanisms:Education should be flexible and incorporate informal, ongoing messaging.

D. Executives and professionals only:While they play an essential role, education should engage employees at all levels.

Conclusion:Including examples of prior misconduct effectively conveys the seriousness of fraud prevention.

Understanding G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance:These principles provide a framework to improve corporate governance worldwide. Key elements include board responsibilities, shareholder rights, equitable treatment, and stakeholder roles.

Analysis of Options:

A. Guidance on board structures:This is included in the principles to ensure effective governance and oversight.

C. Framework for corporate governance:Governments are encouraged to create legal and regulatory frameworks supporting corporate governance.

D. Stakeholder importance:Stakeholders' roles in governance are recognized, acknowledging their contribution to sustainable business practices.

B. Stronger protection for foreign shareholders:The principles advocate for equitable treatment of all shareholders, not preferential treatment for any group.

Conclusion:Option B contradicts the principle of equitable treatment, making it the correct answer.

Due Diligence for Large Orders on Credit:

Before extending credit, it is critical to assess the financial stability of the new customer to mitigate credit risk.

Examining net worth provides a direct measure of ABC’s ability to fulfill financial obligations.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Corruption risk countries:Due diligence should be applied universally, not selectively.

B. No verification needed:Verification is essential, especially for new customers.

D. Same due diligence for all customers:While consistency is important, the level of due diligence may vary based on transaction specifics.

Conclusion:Examining ABC's net worth is a necessary step in the due diligence process.

Behavioral Studies by B.F. Skinner:

Punishment may temporarily suppress undesired behavior but does not address the root cause or provide alternative positive behaviors.

Once punishment ceases, the behavior often resurfaces.

Analysis of Options:

A. Increase in behavior:This contradicts findings; punishment reduces behavior temporarily.

B. No effect:Punishment does affect behavior but typically in the short term.

D. Permanent suppression:Rarely achieved without reinforcement of alternative behaviors.

Conclusion:Punishment results in temporary suppression of undesired behavior.