GFMC AGA Examination 3: Governmental Financial Management and Control (GFMC) Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

 Segregation of Duties and the Fraud Triangle:

TheFraud Triangleidentifies three conditions that contribute to fraud:pressure,opportunity, andrationalization.

Segregating duties (e.g., separating authorization, recordkeeping, and asset custody) is specifically designed to reduceopportunity, which is the chance for an employee to commit fraud without detection.

 Why Opportunity Is Key:

If one person has too much control over a process, they may exploit it for personal gain. Segregating duties creates checks and balances, making it harder for fraudulent activities to go unnoticed.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Pressure:Pressure refers to personal or financial stresses that drive someone to commit fraud, but segregation of duties does not address this directly.

C. Rationalization:Rationalization involves justifying fraudulent behavior, which segregation does not prevent.

D. Detection:While segregation can aid in fraud detection, its primary role is to reduce opportunities for fraud.

 References and Documents:

GAO Standards for Internal Control (Green Book):Emphasizes segregation of duties as a control to mitigate opportunities for fraud.

COSO Internal Control Framework:Identifies segregation of duties as a key tool to reduce fraud risk.

 Why Is This the Best Measure for Performance?

Comparing thecost per acre maintainedto that of another jurisdiction provides a meaningful benchmark for performance evaluation. It allows the director to assess how efficiently the department is operating relative to similar organizations.

This comparison ensures that the department is managing resources effectively and identifies potential areas for improvement.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Use a single measure of citizen satisfaction:While citizen satisfaction is important, it is subjective and does not provide insight into operational efficiency.

B. Evaluate funds spent on grounds maintenance:Total spending does not measure efficiency or productivity; it merely reflects the amount allocated.

C. Analyze staffing levels:Staffing levels do not directly measure performance; they are only one factor in determining efficiency.

 References and Documents:

Governmental Performance Reporting (AGA):Recommends using comparative benchmarks for evaluating efficiency in service delivery.

Performance Management Framework by GAO:Highlights cost-effectiveness metrics such as cost per acre maintained.

 What Are We Solving For?

We are calculating thepresent value (PV)of $20,550 to be received at theend of year 2using a discount rate of10%.

The formula for present value is: PV=FV(1+r)nPV = \frac{FV}{(1 + r)^n}PV=(1+r)nFV​ Where:

FVFVFV = Future Value = $20,550

rrr = Discount Rate = 10% or 0.10

nnn = Time Period = 2 years

 Calculation:

PV=20,550(1+0.10)2PV = \frac{20,550}{(1 + 0.10)^2}PV=(1+0.10)220,550​ PV=20,550(1.10)2PV = \frac{20,550}{(1.10)^2}PV=(1.10)220,550​ PV=20,5501.21PV = \frac{20,550}{1.21}PV=1.2120,550​ PV≈16,983PV ≈ 16,983PV≈16,983

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. $16,440:Results from incorrect discounting for one year instead of two.

C. $18,495:Results from applying a lower discount rate or an incorrect formula.

D. $20,550:This is the future value, not the present value.

 References and Documents:

GAO Financial Analysis Guide:Explains present value calculations for investment decision-making.

AICPA Present Value Guidelines:Provides step-by-step guidance on time value of money calculations.

 Materiality in Auditing:

Materiality refers to the significance of misstatements or omissions in financial statements that could influence the decisions of users relying on those statements.

During theplanning phaseof a financial audit, the auditor determines the dollar threshold for materiality based on professional judgment, considering the size and nature of the auditee’s operations and the needs of financial statement users.

 Why the Auditor Determines Materiality:

Theauditorhas the responsibility to form an independent opinion on the financial statements and must determine materiality thresholds to design audit procedures effectively.

Materiality thresholds guide the extent of testing and ensure the audit focuses on areas most likely to impact decision-making.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Auditee:The auditee provides the information, but it does not decide the materiality threshold.

C. Auditor in consultation with the auditee:The auditor may consult with the auditee for context, but the final determination is solely the auditor's responsibility.

D. Audit committee:While the audit committee oversees the audit, it does not set materiality thresholds.

 References and Documents:

GAAS (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards):States that materiality is determined by the auditor’s judgment.

AICPA AU-C Section 320:Provides guidance on materiality in planning and performing audits.

Government Auditing Standards (GAS):

GAS, often referred to as theYellow Book, outlines the responsibilities of auditors conducting financial statement audits for government entities.

One core requirement is that auditors must consider compliance with applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements that could materially affect financial statements.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Design tests to assess compliance with laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements: Correct. This is a required component under GAS to ensure financial statements are materially accurate and comply with legal and regulatory frameworks.

B. Identify violations of laws which could be punishable by monetary penalties: Incorrect. Auditors are not required to investigate or pursue penalties but to focus on material misstatements or risks.

C. Identify expenditures that exceed the related obligations: Incorrect. While this could indicate an issue, auditors are not required to specifically test for this unless it relates to material misstatements or compliance issues.

D. Design tests to detect fraud, waste, and abuse: Incorrect. Auditors are not specifically required to detect fraud, waste, and abuse, though they should be alert to indicators.

Definition of Cloud Computing:

Cloud computing refers to the delivery of computing services (e.g., servers, storage, databases, networking, software) over the internet.

A common feature of cloud computing is the "hosted" service model, where applications, storage, or infrastructure are hosted and managed by a cloud service provider.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Satellite-to-satellite: This involves communication between satellites, unrelated to cloud computing.

B. Hosted: Correct. Hosted services are a fundamental aspect of cloud computing, where applications or data are stored and accessed on remote servers.

C. Gateway transmission: Refers to communication gateways, unrelated to cloud computing services.

D. Mainframe computing: Mainframes are large on-premises computers, not part of the cloud model.

 What Is the Cash Management Improvement Act (CMIA)?

CMIA requires states and federal agencies to minimize the time between when federal funds are drawn (transferred to the state) and when those funds are spent (final disposition).

The goal is to reduce idle funds, ensure efficient use of federal funds, and reduce interest liabilities for both parties.

 Key Objective:

By minimizing the time between fund transfers and usage, the act ensures that federal funds are used promptly for their intended purposes, preventing excess cash from sitting idle in state accounts.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. States to pay invoices within 30 days:This is unrelated to CMIA; it is part of general payment practices.

C. Federal agencies to take discounts:This relates to payment terms, not the timing of fund transfers.

D. Federal agencies to disburse payments via EFT:While electronic funds transfers are a common practice, CMIA focuses on minimizing idle funds, not payment methods.

 References and Documents:

Cash Management Improvement Act (1990):Mandates reducing the time between fund transfer and usage.

Treasury Financial Manual:Provides specific guidelines for implementing CMIA.

Scope of Single Audit:The scope includes:

Financial Statements: Ensuring accurate reporting of financial activities.

Internal Controls: Evaluating effectiveness in compliance with federal requirements.

Compliance: Ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the award.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Financial statements: Included in the audit.

B. Internal controls: Included to ensure compliance.

C. Performance results: Correct. Single audits do not assess program outcomes or effectiveness.

D. Compliance with terms of the award: Included to ensure federal funds are used appropriately.

 What Is Control Risk?

Control riskrefers to the risk that an organization’s internal controls will fail to prevent or detect material misstatements in a timely manner.

The effectiveness of internal controls directly influences control risk. If controls are weak or poorly designed, the risk increases.

 Why Is Option B Correct?

The primary focus of control risk is the adequacy and effectiveness of an entity’s internal controls. Effective controls reduce the likelihood of material misstatements, while deficiencies increase control risk.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Inherent Risk:This is the risk of material misstatements due to the nature of the business or transactions, independent of controls.

C. Detection Risk:This refers to the risk that auditors will fail to detect material misstatements. It is influenced by the nature and extent of audit procedures, not internal controls.

D. Audit Risk:This is the overall risk that an auditor will issue an incorrect opinion. It combines inherent, control, and detection risks.

 References and Documents:

AICPA Standards on Audit Risk (AU-C 315):Explains control risk and its relationship to the effectiveness of internal controls.

GAO Yellow Book:Emphasizes assessing control risk when evaluating internal controls in audits.

Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990:This Act established a new accounting framework for federal credit programs, such as direct loans and loan guarantees. It requires using thenet present value (NPV)method to measure the costs of loans and guarantees by discounting future cash flows (e.g., loan repayments, defaults) to their present value.

Explanation of Financial Analytical Technique:

Net Present Value (NPV): Accounts for the time value of money by discounting future cash flows to the present. It provides an accurate measure of the economic cost to the government.

Other options:

A. Future value: Focuses on future cash flows, not their present cost.

C. Current value: Not a recognized technique for analyzing long-term cash flows.

D. Regression analysis: A statistical method, unrelated to calculating loan program costs.

Understanding Resource Allocation in Street Maintenance:When additional resources are provided for street maintenance, their allocation should address the most pressing infrastructure needs to maximize impact and public benefit.

Key Indicator (Pavement Rating Scores):Pavement rating scores are used to evaluate the condition of roads. Areas with the lowest scores (representing unmet needs) require prioritized funding to bring the infrastructure to acceptable levels.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Number of intersections: The number of intersections is not directly related to road conditions or pavement scores.

B. Historical budgeted amounts: Allocating based on past budgets does not address current infrastructure conditions or unmet needs.

C. Lane miles rated as acceptable by citizens: Roads already rated as "acceptable" do not require immediate attention.

D. Lane miles with unmet needs: Correct, as this aligns with addressing the most critical deficiencies based on the pavement scores.

Understanding the Procurement Process for Contractors:

When selecting contractors for government projects, the goal is to ensure the selection of aresponsible and responsive bidderwho meets all requirements outlined in the Request for Proposal (RFP) or bidding documents.

Key considerations include the contractor’s ability to meet deadlines, quality of work, and compliance with laws and regulations.

Analyzing the Answer Options:

A. The contractor with the lowest bid who has a history of delayed projects:While cost savings are important, a contractor with a history of delays poses a significant risk to project timelines and community satisfaction. This bidder is not considered "responsible" based on their track record.

B. The contractor with the second-lowest bid, who has no prior violations and meets all bid specifications:Although this is not the lowest bid, it is the best choice because the contractor meets all requirements and has a clean history. Selecting a reliable bidder ensures the project is completed on time and within acceptable quality standards. This is the most responsible and justified decision.

C. The contractor with the highest bid, who includes luxury, non-requested upgrades to the design:Selecting a contractor who proposes unnecessary and expensive upgrades is not cost-effective. Government procurement prioritizes fulfilling project specifications within the approved budget, making this choice impractical.

D. The contractor whose bid was submitted past the deadline but offers a discount for early payment:Late bids violate procurement rules, which emphasize fairness and transparency. Accepting this bid could lead to legal challenges or allegations of favoritism. Discounts do not justify breaching procurement guidelines.

Why Option B is Correct:

The second-lowest bid is the most responsible choice because the contractor:

Meets all bid requirements.

Has a strong history of compliance with regulations.

Avoids risks associated with unreliable or excessively expensive options.

This selection aligns with government procurement standards that prioritize balancing cost, quality, and reliability.

References and Documentation from the Government Financial Manager (GFM) by AGA:

Procurement Best Practices: The AGA emphasizes the importance of selecting bidders who demonstrate responsibility, reliability, and compliance with the bidding process.

Ethical Procurement Standards: TheYellow Book (Government Auditing Standards)highlights the importance of fairness, transparency, and accountability in contractor selection.

Source: AGA Certified Government Financial Manager (CGFM) study guides, Section IV: Internal Controls, Procurement, and Ethics.

 What Is Vertical Analysis?

Vertical Analysisevaluates a single year's financial statements by expressing each line item as a percentage of a base amount. For example, in an income statement, each expense may be presented as a percentage of total revenue.

This approach helps users understand the relative size of each financial statement item within the context of the total.

 Why Is Vertical Analysis Used for a Single Year?

Vertical analysis focuses solely on relationships within a single set of financial statements, making it the appropriate choice for single-year evaluations.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Comparative:Involves comparing financial data across entities or periods, not within a single year.

B. Horizontal:Focuses on changes in financial data over time (year-to-year comparisons).

C. Trend:Examines patterns over multiple periods to identify long-term trends, not a single year.

 References and Documents:

GAO Financial Audit Manual:Recommends vertical analysis for single-year financial statement evaluations.

AICPA Financial Statement Analysis Guide:Provides detailed examples of vertical analysis techniques.

 What Is Internal Control Evaluation?

Internal control evaluation is the process of assessing an organization’s internal controls to ensure they are adequate and effective in mitigating risks, ensuring compliance, and achieving objectives.

 Why Is Identifying Potential Risks the First Step?

The entire purpose of internal controls is to mitigate risks. Therefore, before evaluating the controls, you need to identify the risks they are meant to address.

Once risks are identified, the organization can evaluate whether the existing controls are adequate and effective in mitigating those risks.

This approach aligns with risk-based frameworks like theCOSO Internal Control Framework, which emphasizes risk identification as the foundation for effective controls.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Identifying the effectiveness of management activities:This is part of control evaluation but occurs after risks and controls are identified.

B. Assessing the adequacy of controls:Controls cannot be assessed until the risks they address are identified.

C. Documenting how transactions or events are processed:While this step is important, it comes later in the process, after risks and controls are identified.

 References and Documents:

COSO Internal Control Framework:Identifies risk assessment as the foundation for designing and evaluating controls.

GAO Standards for Internal Control (Green Book):Highlights risk identification as the first step in the control process.

 Capital Asset Transfers Within the Same Government:

When a capital asset is transferred between departments within the same government, the asset’sbook value(its original cost minus accumulated depreciation) should remain in the fixed asset tracking system.

The transfer does not change the overall value of the asset for the government as a whole, but it should reflect that the asset is now under the responsibility of the receiving department.

 Why This Is Important:

Accurate tracking ensures the fixed asset system reflects the current custodian of the asset and allows for proper asset management and accountability.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Recorded with the original department to maximize receipts:This is incorrect because it ignores the asset's transfer and would misrepresent which department is responsible for it.

B. Recorded with the second department to minimize costs:Cost minimization is irrelevant here; the transfer should reflect the book value.

C. Retained with no change in book value to either department:While the book value doesn’t change overall, the system must reflect the transfer to the receiving department.

 References and Documents:

GAAP (Governmental Accounting Standards Board - GASB):Requires accurate fixed asset tracking to reflect departmental transfers.

GASB Statement No. 34:Discusses fixed asset tracking and reporting requirements.

Performance Audit Overview:

A performance audit focuses on evaluating the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of government programs or activities.

Due professional care is a requirement inGovernment Auditing Standards (Yellow Book), ensuring auditors perform their duties responsibly and with professional judgment.

Key Requirement: Sufficient and Competent Evidence:

Auditors must collect sufficient and reliable evidence to support their findings, conclusions, and recommendations. This is the cornerstone of "due professional care."

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Obtain sufficient and competent evidence: Correct. This ensures audit findings are supported by reliable, documented evidence.

B. Determine scope: While part of audit planning, it is not directly related to due professional care.

C. Set materiality of financial statements: This applies to financial audits, not performance audits.

D. Present the findings in accordance with GAAP: GAAP is not a requirement for performance audits.

 What Did the Accountability for Tax Dollars Act Do?

This act expanded the audit requirements tovirtually all federal agencies, not just those covered under the CFO Act of 1990.

It mandated that agencies prepare audited financial statements to improve transparency, accountability, and the management of federal funds.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. CFO Act of 1990:This act required audited financial statements but only applied to the 24 largest federal agencies (those covered under the Chief Financial Officers Act).

C. Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996:Focused on financial system compliance with federal accounting standards, not expanding audit requirements.

D. Government Management Reform Act of 1994:Extended the CFO Act requirements to consolidated government-wide financial statements, not all federal agencies.

 References and Documents:

Accountability for Tax Dollars Act of 2002:Specifies the expanded audit requirements for federal agencies.

GAO Guide on Federal Financial Management Laws:Provides a comprehensive overview of key legislation.