BAPv5 BCS Practitioner Certificate in Business Analysis Practice v5.2 Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

Technical feasibility is the extent to which a proposed business change or solution is possible and realistic from a technical perspective. It helps to assess whether a proposed business change or solution can be developed, implemented and maintained using the available or required technology. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as it describes the areas of technical feasibility mentioned in the report. Proven is an area of technical feasibility that relates to whether the technology used for the proposed business change or solution has been tested and verified by previous or existing users or applications. It helps to ensure reliability and quality of the technology. An example of proven in the report is the new payment method has not yet been widely adopted although it has the backing of all the big phone brands. Compatible is an area of technical feasibility that relates to whether the technology used for the proposed business change or solution can work or integrate with other existing or required technologies. It helps to ensure interoperability and functionality of the technology. An example of compatible in the report is our current payments system will be upgraded next month to take payment as part of a scheduled release. Secure is an area of technical feasibility that relates to whether the technology used for the proposed business change or solution can protect or prevent unauthorised access, use, modification or disclosure of data or information. It helps to ensure confidentiality, integrity and availability of the technology. An example of secure in the report is cyber security testing is encouraging. Scalable is an area of technical feasibility that relates to whether the technology used for the proposed business change or solution can handle or adapt to changes in demand, volume or performance. It helps to ensure efficiency and flexibility of the technology. An example of scalable in the report is trials have shown that the technology will scale to our customer base. Option B is not a correct answer, as it does not describe all the areas of technical feasibility mentioned in the report. Timely is an area of technical feasibility that relates to whether the technology used for the proposed business change or solution can be developed, implemented and maintained within the available or required time frame. It helps to ensure punctuality and speed of the technology. There is no example of timely in the report. Option C is not a correct answer, as it does not describe all the areas of technical feasibility mentioned in the report. Reliable is an area of technical feasibility that relates to whether the technology used for the proposed business change or solution can perform consistently and accurately without errors or failures. It helps to ensure dependability and accuracy of the technology. There is no example of reliable in the report. Architectural alignment is an area of technical feasibility that relates to whether the technology used for the proposed business change or solution can fit or align with other existing or required architectures, such as business, data or application architectures. It helps to ensure consistency and coherence of the technology. There is no example of architectural alignment in the report. Option D is not a correct answer, as it does not describe any of the areas of technical feasibility mentioned in the report.

In a SWOT analysis, the “strengths” and “weaknesses” are internal factors (within the organisation), while “opportunities” and “threats” are external factors (arising from outside the organisation). The documentation is explicit: strengths and weaknesses are found within the organisation, whereas opportunities and threats arise from outside and can often be identified using external analysis tools (for example PESTLE or Porter’s Five Forces).

Applying that rule to the options:

A (high-quality locally sourced ingredients) is an internal capability and therefore aligns with a strength.

D (lower staff morale) is an internal people/culture issue, therefore a weakness.

B (being asked to collaborate on distribution) is an external development that could create growth or access advantages, so it is more consistent with an opportunity.

C (a large chain bakery entering the area) is a change in the external competitive environment that could reduce the bakery’s market share, pricing power, and customer footfall. That fits the definition of a threat because it originates outside the bakery and could negatively affect performance.

Therefore, the correct external threat is C.

A brand is a name, term, design, symbol or any other feature that identifies one seller’s good or service as distinct from those of other sellers. A brand perception is how customers and potential customers view a brand based on their experiences, associations and impressions. Therefore, option A is the best choice, as independent industry websites are likely to provide unbiased and reliable information on how customers perceive different brands in the market. They may also include customer reviews, ratings and feedback that can help measure customer satisfaction and loyalty. Option B is not a good choice, as the company website is likely to provide biased and selective information on its own brand that may not reflect how customers actually perceive it. It may also omit negative aspects or criticisms that could affect its image or reputation. Option C is not a good choice, as the company’s organisational structure is not relevant to its brand perception. It may show how the company is organised internally, but it does not indicate how customers view its products or services externally. Option D is not a good choice, as the company’s complaints procedures are not sufficient to measure its brand perception. They may show how the company handles customer issues or problems, but they do not capture how customers feel about its overall quality or value.

CATWOE is a technique that helps to understand different perspectives of a situation by analyzing six elements: Customers, Actors, Transformation process, Worldview, Owner, and Environmental constraints. Shelly could use CATWOE to improve her understanding of the IT and finance director’s views on the future direction of the business, by identifying who are the customers, actors, owners, and so on for each option (organic growth or acquisition), and how they differ. Option A is the correct answer.

A mind map is a technique for organising and visualising information in a hierarchical and associative way. It helps to generate, structure and classify ideas and concepts and show how they are related or connected. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as a mind map would enable Girby to model the arising themes and how they relate to each other. A mind map would help to identify the main theme or problem (declining production) and the sub-themes or causes (staff blaming each other, more parts being faulty etc.) and arrange them in a tree-like structure. A mind map would help to use colours, symbols, images and keywords to represent and emphasise the themes and their relationships. A mind map would help to analyse and evaluate the themes and their relationships and identify any patterns or gaps that may exist. Option B is not a correct answer, as a business activity model is not a technique for modelling the arising themes and how they relate to each other. A business activity model is a technique for modelling business activities within an organisation or project at a high level of abstraction. It helps to understand what an organisation does, how it does it, who does it, where it does it and why it does it. Option C is not a correct answer, as a rich picture is not a technique for modelling the arising themes and how they relate to each other. A rich picture is a technique for drawing a holistic view of a complex situation or problem using informal symbols and images. It helps to capture the main elements and aspects of a situation or problem and how they interact or influence each other. Option D is not a correct answer, as a business process model is not a technique for modelling the arising themes and how they relate to each other. A business process model is a technique for modelling business processes within an organisation or project at a low level of abstraction. It helps to understand how business processes are performed or delivered in terms of inputs, outputs, activities, tasks, roles, rules, events etc.

CATWOE is a technique for exploring stakeholder business perspectives by identifying six elements: Customer, Actor, Transformation, Worldview, Owner and Environment. It helps to understand how different stakeholders perceive a business situation or problem and what they expect from a solution. Therefore, option D is the correct answer, as environment is the element that cannot be identified from this scenario. Environment is the element that describes the external factors or constraints that affect a stakeholder’s perspective or limit their options. It helps to explain what factors or constraints are beyond the stakeholder’s control or influence. There is no information in this scenario that indicates what external factors or constraints affect Maria and Nelly’s perspective or limit their options. Option A is not a correct answer, as transformation is the element that can be identified from this scenario. Transformation is the element that describes what changes or processes take place in a business situation or problem or its solution. It helps to identify what inputs are converted into outputs in a business situation or problem or its solution. An example of transformation in this scenario is sourcing jewellery products from an overseas manufacturer and marketing them in luxury presentation boxes made by local craftsmen. Option B is not a correct answer, as actor is the element that can be identified from this scenario. Actor is the element that describes who carries out or performs a business situation or problem or its solution. It helps to identify who are responsible for implementing or delivering a business situation or problem or its solution. An example of actor in this scenario is Darren, who makes up the boxes and keeps the stockroom full. Option C is not a correct answer, as owner is the element that can be identified from this scenario. Owner is the element that describes who has the authority or power to start or stop a business situation or problem or its solution. It helps to identify who are the decision makers or influencers of a business situation or problem or its solution. An example of owner in this scenario is Maria and Nelly, who own the jewellery shop and are considering whether to renew the lease.

The bullet points describe taking candidate solutions and testing them, then collecting feedback to learn and decide what to do next. In design and change approaches, that is the essence of evaluation: trialling options (pilots) and assessing their suitability using stakeholder input and evidence.

The business analysis guidance places this kind of work in the “evaluate options / evaluate solution” part of the lifecycle: after a need is understood and options are generated, the next step is to assess them by considering feasibility, benefits, impacts, and risks, using structured stakeholder engagement such as workshops. Workshops are explicitly identified as an investigation technique used to gather and validate information collaboratively, which fits “workshops to capture feedback” from pilots.

Within a Double Diamond–style design process, developing multiple pilot solutions aligns with exploring the solution space, and then running pilots and gathering feedback aligns with converging by evaluating what works in practice and what should be refined, scaled, or discarded. That activity is best represented by Evaluate rather than Empathise (understanding users), Define (clarifying the problem), or Create (generating ideas without yet testing them).

Therefore, the stage present in the bullet points is Evaluate (Option C).

A consensus Business Activity Model (BAM) is a diagram that shows the high level activities that an organisation performs or delivers and the flow or sequence of the activities. It helps to understand what an organisation does, how it does it, who does it, where it does it and why it does it from a common or shared perspective of all relevant stakeholder groups. Therefore, options A, C and D are true statements about a consensus BAM. Option A is a true statement, as a consensus BAM is a conceptual model that represents a business situation or problem at a high level of abstraction. It helps to simplify and clarify the complexity and ambiguity of the business situation or problem. Option C is a true statement, as a consensus BAM shows the logical sequence of process steps that the organisation follows or performs to achieve its objectives and outcomes. It helps to identify the order and dependencies of the activities and how they are connected or related. Option D is a true statement, as a consensus BAM forms the basis of subsequent gap analysis that compares the current and desired situations or problems and identifies the differences or gaps between them. It helps to determine what changes or improvements are needed to bridge the gaps and achieve the desired situation or problem. Option B is not a true statement, as a consensus BAM does not show who undertakes the business activities, but what the business activities are. The actors or performers of the business activities are shown in another technique, such as RACI chart. Option E is not a true statement, as a consensus BAM does not describe a stakeholder’s perspective on what the business does, but a common or shared perspective of all stakeholder groups on what the business does. A stakeholder’s perspective on what the business does is described in another technique, such as CATWOE.

 A vision statement is a concise and inspiring statement of what the organisation aspires to be in the future. It should reflect the organisation’s core values and purpose, and provide direction and motivation for its stakeholders. A vision statement should not be too specific or focused on the current state of the organisation, but rather on the desired future state. Therefore, option A is the best choice, as it expresses a clear and aspirational vision that aligns with the company’s mission of meeting or undercutting all its competitors’ prices. Option B is too narrow and does not capture the essence of the organisation’s purpose. Option C is too vague and does not indicate how the organisation will achieve its goal. Option D is too generic and does not differentiate the organisation from its competitors.

A Power / Interest Grid is a technique for analysing and managing stakeholders based on their level of power and interest in an organisation or project. It helps to identify who are the key stakeholders and how they should be engaged and communicated with. Therefore, option B is the correct answer, as a Power / Interest Grid would help the business analyst to gain an understanding of who the stakeholders are, how much authority they have, and how much involvement they want in the project so that a stakeholder management plan can be created. A Power / Interest Grid would help to classify stakeholders into four categories based on their level of power and interest: high power, high interest; high power, low interest; low power, high interest; low power, low interest. A Power / Interest Grid would help to determine different stakeholder management strategies for each category: active and constant management; keep satisfied; keep informed; watch. Option A is not a correct answer, as CATWOE is not a technique for analysing and managing stakeholders based on their level of power and interest. CATWOE is a technique for exploring stakeholder business perspectives by identifying six elements: Customer, Actor, Transformation, Worldview, Owner and Environment. It helps to understand how different stakeholders perceive a business situation or problem and what they expect from a solution. Option C is not a correct answer, as RACI chart is not a technique for analysing and managing stakeholders based on their level of power and interest. RACI chart is a technique for defining roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in relation to tasks or activities within an organisation or project. It helps to identify who are Responsible, Accountable, Consulted or Informed for each task or activity. Option D is not a correct answer, as resource audit is not a technique for analysing and managing stakeholders based on their level of power and interest. Resource audit is a technique for identifying and evaluating the resources that an organisation has or needs to achieve its objectives. It helps to assess the availability and quality of an organisation’s resources, such as human, physical, financial and intangible resources.

The documentation describes the power/interest grid as a technique for analysing stakeholders, then using the analysis to plan management actions. It states that it is important to plot stakeholders where they actually are (not where you would like them to be), and then to explore strategies for managing them in their current positions or for moving them to more advantageous positions. It also emphasises that stakeholder analysis must be a continuing activity throughout the project, with the team watching for changes and re-evaluating strategies accordingly—this supports regular review of the grid.

Where option D differs is that it describes implementation of engagement strateggement actions is part of stakeholder management execution, which follows from the analysis rather than being a step “in conducting the analysis” itself. The text makes this separation clear: after plotting positions, up for managing stakeholders and the approach to take; the subsequent engagement is what the team then does based on that plan.

So A and B are explicitly in the technique guidance, and C aligns with the “continuing activity” requirement. D is the step that moves beyond the analysis activity into carrying out the management actions, making it the best choice for “not typically involved in conducting the analysis.” ION NO: 65

A business case has been developed for the introduction of a new customer service platform. In the “Impact Assessment” section, which key factor should the business analyst highlight to communicate the potential organisational changes resulting from the platform’s implementation?iomer service efficiency and employee workflow.

B. Discuss the usability of the recommended application and software requirements.

C. Review potential vendors including past experience in the industry and their financial stability.

D. Detail the operating system and solution architecture of the new platform.

Answer: A

The business case “Impact assessment” section is used to explain what will happen to the organisation if the proposed option is adopted—not just the financial costs and benefits. The documentation states that, in addition to costs and benefits, the business case should explore organisational impacts, some of which may have costs attached and some of which are simply consequences of change. It gives concrete examples such as changes to organisation structure (e.g., reorganising departments, creating new roles like a single customer point of contact, or moving from specialist to generalist roles) and the effects on interdepartmental relationships and working patterns.

Option A best mause “customer service efficiency and employee workflow” directly communicates the operational and people/process impacts that typically accompany a new customer service platform—how work will be performed, how staff will interact, and what the service outcomes may be. This is exactly the kihange decision-makers need surfaced in an impact assessment so they can plan mitigation and change management (e.g., handling disruption, new responsibilities, revised collaboration).

Options B and D focus on technical solution detail, and C focuses on vendor evaluation—none of these are the core purpose of an “impact assessment” section as defined in the business case guidance.

Planning activities are those that must be considered beforehand in order to complete the doing and enabling activities. They are usually related to defining or determining some aspects of the business. In this question, the activities c, d and e are planning activities, as they involve defining the skills sets of the consultants, agreeing on a marketing campaign, and running monthly open days. These activities are necessary to support the primary doing activity of delivering consultancy service. Option D is the correct answer.

The elements of PESTLE that are identified in this email are Economic, Environmental and Legal. Economic factors are related to the costs and prices of the business and its competitors. In this email, Nastya mentions that their competitors have lower costs and that they need to secure a better component price and negotiate with their energy supplier (B). Environmental factors are related to the natural resources and sustainability of the business and its impact on the environment. In this email, Nastya mentions that she wants a full review of the biodegradability of the packaging of all their products and that she is mindful of the costs of renewable power (E). Legal factors are related to the laws and regulations that affect the business and its operations. In this email, Nastya mentions that their employment regulations need revisiting due to changes in pension rules and paternity/maternity rights (L).

A SWOT analysis is a technique for identifying and evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats that affect an organisation or project. It helps to assess the internal and external factors that influence the performance and potential of the organisation or project. Therefore, options A, B and C are correct answers, as they should be included in the SWOT analysis for the company that sells van insurance. They describe different types of factors that affect the company’s situation and prospects. Option A describes an opportunity, which is a favourable or advantageous circumstance or situation that arises from the external environment and that can be exploited to achieve the objectives of the organisation or project. An example of an opportunity is the increase in home shopping, which has led to an increase in delivery drivers and vehicles across both markets. This creates a potential demand for van insurance that the company can cater to. Option B describes a weakness, which is a negative or unfavourable characteristic or situation that arises from the internal environment and that can hinder or prevent the achievement of the objectives of the organisation or project. An example of a weakness is the inability of the call centre to deal with the large influx of calls, which may result in poor customer service, dissatisfaction and loss of business. Option C describes a threat, which is a harmful or adverse circumstance or situation that arises from the external environment and that can endanger or damage the achievement of the objectives of the organisation or project. An example of a threat is the new regulatory hurdles following Brexit, which may affect the company’s ability to trade in Ireland and reduce its market share and revenue. Option D is not a correct answer, as strength is not a factor that has been discovered in the investigation for the SWOT analysis. A strength is a positive or favourable characteristic or situation that arises from the internal environment and that can facilitate or enhance the achievement of the objectives of the organisation or project. Option E is not a correct answer, as technology is not a type of factor that can be included in a SWOT analysis. Technology is an aspect of the external environment that can affect an organisation or project positively or negatively, depending on how it is used or adapted to.

The Double Diamond model uses two “diamonds” to show repeated cycles of divergent and convergent thinking: first to explore and narrow the problem, then to explore and narrow the solution. The Design Council (originator/populariser of the model) explains that the diamonds represent exploring an issue more widely or deeply (divergent thinking) and then taking focused action (convergent thinking). The four phases typically described are Discover and Define (problem space), followed by Develop and Deliver (solution space).

Looking at the answer options, timeboxes are not what the diamonds represent; the model is about the pattern of exploration and focus, not scheduling. Similarly, “identify one perspective” is not the purpose: the framework is intended to broaden understanding and then converge on a clear problem definition and a workable solution.

Therefore, among the provided options, the best match is D: Deliver the solution, because the second diamond culminates in “Deliver,” where solutions are tested, refined, and implemented.

The technique that best supports identifying root causes of problematic attitudes is the rich picture. The documentation explains that many problematic business situations have “human and cultural aspects” that traditional structured models (like process or data models) cannot capture well. These aspects include differing viewpoints, misunderstandings, stress, dissatisfaction with management, frustration at inadequate resources, and other “people” factors that can directly affect outcomes. A rich picture explicitly enables the analyst to document these human factors alongside information flows and other issues, because it is intentionally unstructured and allows a “brain dump” of what is happening and how people feel about it.

The guidance also positions rich pictures as particularly useful in messy situations with multiple causes, helping the analyst see connections between issues and progressively enrich understanding as new information emerges. This matters in the scenario: complaints about the UI may reflect deeper causes such as poor navigation, unclear content, inconsistent interaction patterns, internal constraints, or misalignment between user expectations and design choices—plus stakeholder tensions about priorities. A rich picture is designed to surface and connect these causes and perceptions early in investigation.

A mind map can help structure information, but the rich picture is explicitly highlighted as the technique that captures the essence of the whole situation, especially where attitudes and cultural factors are significant.

The glossary definition of a Business Activity Model states that it contains five activity types: Planning, Enabling, Doing, Monitoring, and Controlling. In the provided list, we can map each activity to these categories using the documented explanations and examples.

“Monitor call quality” is clearly a Monitoring activity, because monitoring activities measure performance and check whether expected results are being achieved. “Take control actions” is a Controlling activity. The guidance explains that when monitoring reveals performance is not as expected, control activities are required to institute remedial actions, and it provides an explicit example of a control activity (“Take control action”) on a BAM.

The remaining activities—“Define telesales skills,” “Determine sales targets,” and “Research target customers”—are Planning activities. The documentation describes planning activities as those that set direction for the business system, including defining numbers/skills needed and setting targets/KPIs. It also shows examples such as “Define target customers,” “Define nos/skills,” and “Define sales targets” as planning items on a BAM.

None of the listed items are Doing (the core operational delivery activity) or Enabling (acquiring/replenishing resources). Therefore, the three categories represented are Planning, Monitoring, and Controlling.

The statement commits to two outcomes: good quality accommodation and repairs addressed in a timely manner. The documentation emphasises that performance targets and measures must be chosen carefully and should reflect not only internal views but also customer expectations; otherwise performance may look “fine” internally while failing customers. It also stresses that KPIs/targets should be SMART and monitored regularly.

Option A provides a clear, measurable proxy for property condition: if emergency repairs are needed in a high proportion of properties, that indicates poor underlying condition and reactive maintenance. Setting a target like “no more than 5%” directly measures progress toward “good quality accommodation.”

Option C translates tenant experience into a clear target: limiting complaints about condition/repairs to a defined maximum per month is specific and measurable, and it reflects the customer perspective that the press statement is trying to reassure.

Option B is a valid measure but it is not defined as a target (it has no threshold), so it is less aligned to the question asking for “targets to measure performance against.” Option D measures media coverage, which is indirect and can be influenced by factors outside operational performance; it is not a reliable operational KPI for accommodation quality or repair timeliness. Therefore, A and C are the best targets.

 A power/interest grid is a tool for analysing stakeholders based on their level of power or influence and their level of interest or involvement in the organisation or project. The grid has four quadrants: high power, high interest; high power, low interest; low power, high interest; and low power, low interest. The position of a stakeholder on the grid can help to determine the appropriate strategy for engaging and communicating with them. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as the head of IT services currently occupies the high power, low interest quadrant. This means that he has the authority or ability to affect the outcome of the project, but he does not show much concern or involvement in it. Option B is not correct, as some power and influence and some interest would place the head of IT services in the middle of the grid, which is not a distinct quadrant. Option C is not correct, as high power or influence and high interest would place the head of IT services in the top right quadrant, which is not consistent with his lack of involvement. Option D is not correct, as low power and influence but high interest would place the head of IT services in the bottom right quadrant, which is not consistent with his authority.