L4M5 CIPS Commercial Negotiation Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Integrative negotiation is a negotiation strategy in which the involved parties work together to find a solution that satisfies the needs and concerns of each. This process often involves group brainstorming and creative thinking for individuals to suggest different ideas that benefit both parties.

Compromising is often common in integrative negotiation, and both sides may need to give up certain needs to reach a solution. Honesty can also promote successful integrative negotiation because it can lead to a comprehensive understanding of the issue and what each party needs to be satisfied with the result.

Direct costs are those directly attributable to the production of a unit — such as raw materials, components, and direct labour. Here, the metal used is a clear direct cost, as it varies with production output. Rent, insurance, and sales wages are indirect (overhead) costs, which must be allocated across products. Understanding this distinction is vital in negotiations, since direct costs are easier to challenge for efficiency gains, while indirect allocations may be arbitrary. Buyers with clear knowledge of cost breakdowns can negotiate more effectively, avoiding inflated pricing.

Win–lose strategies focus on gaining advantage at the other party’s expense. Forcing them to lower their resistance point or persuading them the deal is their best option are classic distributive tactics. Empathy, compromise, and creativity belong to integrative approaches aimed at mutual benefit. Recognising these distinctions ensures negotiators adopt the right strategy for the relationship type and context.

The supplier is using Rational persuasion by providing logical reasons, such as economic conditions and increased costs, to justify the price increase. This approach uses factual information to influence the buyer's decision, aiming to present the price hike as a reasonable adjustment, which aligns with CIPS strategies on influencing tactics in negotiations.

There are nine commonly used influence tactic:

1. Rational persuasion includes using facts, data, and logical arguments to try to convince others that your point of view is the best alternative. This is the most commonly applied influence tactic.

2. Legitimating

3. Personal appeals

4. Exchange

5. Ingratiation

6. Pressure refers to exerting undue influence on someone to do what you want or else something undesirable will occur.

7. Coalitions refer to a group of individuals working together toward a common goal to influence others.

8. Inspirational appeals

9. Consultation refers to the influence agent’s asking others for help in directly influencing or planning to influence another person or group.

In the scenario, there is a problem with demand forecasting and supply chain planning in Leitax. The new Supply chain director invites the stakeholders to a meeting to find the solution. She is using coalition tactics.

Commercial negotiations involve a wider set of stakeholders than procurement, budget holders, and users. Depending on context, directors, IT specialists, legal teams, regulators, or external partners may all be impacted. Ignoring them risks resistance or missed requirements. CIPS stresses stakeholder mapping tools (such as Mendelow’s Matrix) to identify influence and interest levels, ensuring all relevant parties are managed appropriately in negotiation preparation and execution. Narrow stakeholder identification can undermine outcomes.

Having a BATNA:

Increases assertiveness (A): Knowing the fallback position empowers the buyer to negotiate more confidently.

Reduces the chance of a poor agreement (B): A BATNA ensures the buyer does not feel pressured to accept suboptimal terms.

Identifies walk-away points (F): It sets a clear boundary, allowing the buyer to exit negotiations if terms don’t meet minimum requirements.

These align with CIPS’s guidance on using BATNA to strengthen negotiation strategies.

Mark-upis calculated as:

Mark-up %=(ProfitCost)×100\text{Mark-up \%} = \left( \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{Cost}} \right) \times 100Mark-up %=(CostProfit​)×100

In this case:

Profit = $240 - $160 = $80

Cost = $160

Mark-up = (80 / 160) × 100 =50%

“Understanding mark-up percentages helps in assessing supplier pricing behaviour and negotiating realistic margins.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models and Profit Margins)

Contribution = Price - Variable cost

Break-even point (volume) = Fixed cost/Contribution

Ray Carter coined the mnemonic STOPS WASTE to remind buyers of 10 cost-reduction ideas they can ask for themselves and their suppliers in any situation when considering a key purchase input. Stop Waste by:

Standardisation - is there a standard specification?

Transportation - is the inbound transport classification appropriate

Over-engineered - is the specification too tight?

Packaging - can packaging be reduced or eliminated?

Substitutes - is there a cheaper substitute material

Weight - is there opportunity to reduce weight of the product?

Any unnecessary processing - is there any unnecessary design or feature?

Supplier’s input - are suppliers able to assist with the cost reduction

To make - is it more economical to make or buy?

Eliminate - if no one uses the feature, can it be eliminated?

SAMOA is a useful acronym for checking and testing the information gathered from the Internet:

Source

Audience

Methodology

Objectivity

Accuracy

OWN-IT is acronym for 5 steps in the process of collecting and analysing the data and information needed in any field:

Outline

Wide search

Narrow search

Increase your stockpile of information

Transform your stockpile into new knowledge

A SMART goal is used to help guide goal setting. SMART is an acronym that stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-bound.

A perfectly competitive market is one with the following features:

- There are many firms producing identical or very similar (homogeneous) goods or services

- There are no barriers to entry to the market or exit from the market - anyone can enter or leave easily

- Both producers and customers have perfect knowledge of the market place, prices, costs of production and influences on demand and supply

Under these conditions, the price and quantity will always tend toward equilibrium as any producer that sets a price above equilibrium will not sell anything at all, and any producer that sets a price below a equilibrium will obtain 100% market share in theory. The demand curve is perfectly elastic, which means that it will be horizontal. In a perfectly competitive market, it is difficult to increase profits through pricing, and suppliers instead must focus on their cost structure. As these conditions imply, there are few if any examples of perfectly competitive market.

LO 2, AC 2.2

When facing a monopoly supplier, buyers must find creative ways to introduce leverage. Publicly exploring alternative solutions can create the perception of competition or a fallback plan, thus shifting bargaining power slightly toward the buyer.

Closed questions are effective for concluding negotiations, as they often elicit straightforward yes-or-no responses, helping to finalize terms and confirm agreement on specific points. This approach facilitates a clear and concise close to discussions, ensuring that both parties confirm their commitment to the agreed terms, as recommended by CIPS negotiation strategies.

Legitimate power comes from the belief that a person has the formal right to make demands, and to expect others to be compliant and obedient. Legitimate power comes from rules, formal authority, organisation rank, staff grade or official position held. In commercial negotiation, legitimate power can be demonstrated by job title and rank.

LO 1, AC 1.3

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are multiple variables to consider when choosing between 'push' and 'pull'. Professor Fiona Dent of Ashridge Business School proposes situations when each style might be most appropriate, breaking down push into 'directive' and 'reasoning' and 'pull' into 'collaborative' and 'visionary':

Table Description automatically generated

In the scenario, Rose intends to let both parties exchange their views and ideas so that solutions to current problems can be found. This is the typical characteristic of collaborative (pull) method.

An adversarial relationship in purchasing and supply arises when identical or equivalent good or services are available from competing suppliers and buyers/sellers are trying to gain an advantage over each other. Low levels of trust are characteristic of adversarial relationships. The outcome when two organisations with adversarial negotiate is most likely to be win-lose.

Microeconomic factors refer to elements that affect individual businesses or sectors rather than the economy as a whole. In this case:

Availability of investors (B): Access to investors impacts capital availability for businesses.

Distribution channels (D): Distribution methods directly influence a business’s ability to get products to market.

Levels of competition (F): Competition affects pricing and strategic decisions within specific industries.

Taxation rates, unemployment levels, and inflation rates are considered macroeconomic factors, affecting the economy on a broader scale, as per CIPS's definitions of microeconomic vs. macroeconomic influences.

There are many factors that can influence the balance of power in a negotiation. These factors are classified into 3 levels:

Macro level: STEEPLE framework: social, technological, economic, environment, political, legal and ethical

Micro level: Porter's five forces:

Diagram Description automatically generated

One-to-one buyer-supplier dynamics.

The question asks about the micro factors that increases supplier's bargaining power. Among 5 answers, only 2 are likely to increase buyer's power:

There are no close substitutes for rubber: the buyer has to buy rubber, not any other material.

Costs of changing suppliers are high: buyer entails a large barrier if they want to switch supplier.

Other answers cannot be correct because:

SRI sets up its own rubber plantation: Buyer secures its own supply

SRI's purchase amount makes significant proportion of supplier revenue: Suppliers are reliant on buyer. If the buyer stops buying from them, they can face serious cash flow problems

Rubber from different suppliers is virtually similar: undifferentiated product would shift the power balance towards buyer.

Professor Gavin Kennedy highlights that we need to distinguish negotiation from other forms of decision-making by focusing on what is unique about it (the voluntary exchange) and not shared by other

techniques such as persuasion, gambling (e.g., coin tossing), command decision, instruction, litigation and coercion.