CEHPC CertiProf Ethical Hacking Professional Certification Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

Secure Shell (SSH) is a cryptographic network protocol used for secure operating system logins and file transfers over insecure networks. While the protocol itself is built on strong encryption, it is not "impenetrable". Like any technology, SSH can be breached if it is misconfigured or if the human elements managing it fail.

Attackers use several methods to breach SSH services:

Brute Force and Dictionary Attacks: If an SSH server allows password authentication and the user has a weak password, an attacker can use automated tools to guess the credentials. This is the most common form of SSH breach.

Key Theft: SSH often uses "Private Keys" for authentication. If an attacker gains access to a user’s computer and steals an unencrypted private key, they can log into the server without a password.

Exploiting Vulnerabilities: While rare, flaws can be found in specific implementations of the SSH server software (like OpenSSH). If the server is not regularly updated, an attacker might use a "zero-day" or known exploit to bypass authentication.

Man-in-the-Middle (MITM): If a user ignores a "Host Key Verification" warning when connecting, an attacker could be intercepting their connection.

To harden SSH against these threats, ethical hackers recommend several controls: disabling root login, changing the default port (22) to a non-standard one to avoid automated bots, enforcing the use of SSH keys instead of passwords, and implementing "Fail2Ban" to lock out IP addresses that attempt too many failed logins. The security of SSH depends entirely on the rigor of its implementation.

The OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is one of the world’s most popular free, open-source security tools for finding vulnerabilities in web applications. It is actively maintained by a global community of volunteers under the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP). ZAP acts as a "man-in-the-middle proxy," meaning it sits between the tester’s web browser and the web application being tested. This allows the tester to intercept, inspect, and even modify the requests and responses traveling between the two.

ZAP provides a wide array of functionalities essential for theWeb Application Pentestingprocess:

Automated Scanner: It can automatically crawl a website to find vulnerabilities like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), and insecure headers.

Spidering: It maps out the structure of a website by following every link it finds.

Fuzzing: It can send many variations of malicious input to a specific field to see if it can break the application or trigger an error.

Active and Passive Scanning: It can passively watch traffic to find easy-to-spot issues or actively probe the server for deeper flaws.

For ethical hackers, ZAP is often compared to the commercial tool Burp Suite. While both perform similar tasks, ZAP’s open-source nature and robust API make it a favorite for integrating into "DevSecOps" pipelines, where it can automatically test new code for vulnerabilities before it is deployed. Mastering ZAP is a core skill for any professional focused on securing the web-facing assets of an organization.

Active reconnaissance is a phase of ethical hacking in which information is gathered bydirectly interacting with the target system. This makes option C the correct answer. Unlike passive reconnaissance, active reconnaissance involves sending requests, probes, or packets to the target to elicit responses that reveal useful technical details.

Common active reconnaissance techniques includeport scanning,service enumeration,banner grabbing,DNS queries, andnetwork mapping. These methods help ethical hackers identify open ports, running services, operating systems, and potential vulnerabilities. Active reconnaissance is typically conducted after passive techniques have provided initial intelligence.

Option A is incorrect because recognizing a target without action does not describe reconnaissance behavior. Option B is also incorrect because observing without interaction definespassive reconnaissance, not active reconnaissance.

From an ethical hacking perspective, active reconnaissance is more intrusive and therefore more likely to be detected by intrusion detection systems or firewalls. Because of this, it must always be performed withexplicit authorization. Despite the increased risk of detection, active reconnaissance provides far more accurate and actionable information, making it essential for effective penetration testing.

Understanding the distinction between active and passive reconnaissance helps security professionals choose the correct techniques based on scope, authorization, and risk tolerance. Properly managed, active reconnaissance enables organizations to identify weaknesses early and strengthen their defensive security posture.

In the context of ethical hacking, "Capture the Flag" (CTF) is a specialized competition or training exercise designed to sharpen the technical skills of cybersecurity professionals. A "flag" is a specific piece of data—often a unique alphanumeric string or a specific file—hidden within a target system, server, or application. The primary purpose of the flag is to serve as objective proof that an ethical hacker or penetration tester has successfully navigated the security layers of a machine and achieved a specific level of access, such as user-level or administrative (root) access.

From a technical standpoint, flags are strategically placed in directories that are typically restricted, such as /root or /home/user in Linux environments, or within sensitive database tables. Finding the flag confirms that the attacker has exploited a specific vulnerability, such as a misconfiguration, a weak password, or a software flaw. This methodology is integral to the "Post-Exploitation" phase of a penetration test, where the goal is to demonstrate the impact of a breach.

In professional certification environments like the CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) or platforms like TryHackMe and Hack The Box, these flags are submitted to a scoring engine to validate the completion of a task. Unlike the popularized imagery of "pirate flags" or simple command lists, a real-world digital flag is a cryptographic validator of a successful exploit. It ensures that the practitioner did not just stumble upon a system but actually manipulated its internal logic to extract sensitive information. Understanding the nature of flags helps researchers focus on the ultimate goal: identifying where sensitive data resides and how it can be protected against unauthorized extraction by malicious actors.

In computer security, a backdoor refers to ahidden method of accessing a system that bypasses normal authentication and security mechanisms, making option A the correct answer. Backdoors can be intentionally created by developers for maintenance purposes or maliciously installed by attackers after compromising a system.

From an ethical hacking perspective, backdoors are commonly discovered duringpost-exploitation activities. Attackers use them to maintain persistent access, even if passwords are changed or vulnerabilities are patched. Backdoors may take the form of hidden user accounts, modified services, malicious scripts, or hardcoded credentials.

Option B is incorrect because malware that spreads through instant messaging is typically classified as a worm or trojan, not specifically a backdoor. Option C is incorrect because a backdoor is not a legitimate or documented access point.

Understanding backdoors is essential for managing information security threats. Ethical hackers identify backdoors to demonstrate long-term risks and highlight weaknesses in system monitoring and access controls. Defenders can mitigate backdoor threats by implementing integrity monitoring, endpoint detection and response (EDR), regular audits, and strict access management.

Backdoors pose significant risks because they undermine trust in system security. Identifying and removing them is critical for restoring system integrity and preventing repeated compromise.

CVE stands forCommon Vulnerabilities and Exposures, making option C the correct answer. CVE is a standardized system used to identify, name, and catalog publicly disclosed cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

Each CVE entry is assigned a unique identifier, allowing security professionals worldwide to reference the same vulnerability consistently. Ethical hackers, system administrators, and security vendors rely on CVEs to track vulnerabilities, assess risk, and prioritize patching efforts.

Option A is incorrect because CVEs catalog vulnerabilities, not secure systems. Option B is incorrect because CVE is not a publication or magazine.

From an ethical hacking perspective, CVEs play a crucial role in vulnerability management and penetration testing. Ethical hackers reference CVEs to understand exploitability, identify affected systems, and demonstrate risk using documented evidence.

Understanding CVEs supports effective communication between security teams, vendors, and management. They are foundational to modern vulnerability scanning, patch management, and threat intelligence programs.

In the context of the Metasploit Framework, RHOSTS (often referred to in its singular form RHOST) is one of the most fundamental variables a penetration tester must configure. It stands forRemote Hostand represents the target IP address or hostname that the exploit or auxiliary module will attempt to interact with. Metasploit is designed around a modular architecture where users select an exploit, configure the necessary payloads, and then set the specific variables required for the module to execute successfully.

When a tester identifies a vulnerability on a target machine, they use the command set RHOSTS [Target_IP] within the msfconsole to direct the attack. This variable can take a single IP address (e.g., 192.168.1.10), a range of IP addresses (e.g., 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.50), or a CIDR notation (e.g., 192.168.1.0/24). Unlike LHOST (Local Host), which identifies the attacker's machine for receiving incoming connections, RHOSTS defines the destination.

Understanding these variables is critical for the "Exploitation" phase of a penetration test. If RHOSTS is set incorrectly, the exploit will be sent to the wrong machine, potentially causing unintended system crashes or alerts on non-target systems. Furthermore, modern versions of Metasploit use the plural RHOSTS even for single targets to maintain consistency across modules that support scanning entire networks. Mastering the configuration of these parameters ensures that an ethical hacker can efficiently deploy modules against specific vulnerabilities while maintaining precise control over the scope of the engagement.

In the Metasploit Framework, LHOST stands forLocal Host. This is a critical configuration variable that specifies the IP address of the attacker's (tester's) machine. When an ethical hacker deploys an exploit—particularly one that utilizes areverse shell—the LHOST tells the victim's machine exactly where to send the connection back to.

Setting the LHOST correctly is vital for the success of an exploitation attempt. In most network environments, especially those involving NAT (Network Address Translation) or VPNs, the tester must ensure they use the IP address that is reachable by the target system. For instance, if the tester is on a local network, they would use their internal IP; however, if they are testing over a wider network or the internet, they must ensure the LHOST points to a public IP or a listener configured to handle the traffic.

Along with LPORT (Local Port), LHOST defines the listener on the attacker's machine. When the exploit executes on the target (RHOST), the payload initiates a connection back to the address defined in LHOST. If this variable is misconfigured, the exploit might successfully run on the victim's end, but the tester will never receive the shell, resulting in a failed attempt. For an ethical hacker, double-checking the LHOST and LPORT settings is a standard "best practice" before launching any module to ensure a stable and reliable connection is established.

Metasploit is a widely used penetration testing framework designed to develop, test, and execute exploit code against target systems. It is primarily used by cybersecurity experts, including ethical hackers, penetration testers, red team members, and security researchers. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

In the context of ethical hacking, Metasploit is most commonly used during the exploitation and post-exploitation phases of penetration testing. After reconnaissance and vulnerability scanning identify potential weaknesses, Metasploit allows security professionals to safely verify whether those vulnerabilities can be exploited in real-world scenarios. This helps organizations understand the actual risk level of discovered flaws rather than relying solely on theoretical vulnerability reports.

Metasploit provides a vast library of exploits, payloads, auxiliary modules, and post-exploitation tools. Ethical hackers use these modules in controlled environments and with proper authorization to test system defenses, validate security controls, and demonstrate attack paths to stakeholders. It is not designed for non-technical professions such as agriculture or food engineering, making options A and B incorrect.

From an ethical standpoint, Metasploit supports defensive security objectives by enabling organizations to identify weaknesses before malicious attackers do. It is frequently used in security assessments, red team exercises, and cybersecurity training programs. When used legally and responsibly, Metasploit helps improve system hardening, incident response readiness, and overall organizational security posture.

Passive recognition (or passive reconnaissance) is the foundational phase of any ethical hacking or penetration testing engagement. Its primary objective is to collect as much intelligence as possible about a target while remaining completely undetectable. The hallmark of a passive approach is that itnever involves direct interactionwith the target’s infrastructure. By avoiding the transmission of packets directly to the target’s servers, the attacker or tester ensures that no logs are generated and no intrusion detection systems (IDS) or firewalls are triggered.

Instead, ethical hackers leverageOpen-Source Intelligence (OSINT)and third-party data sources. Common techniques include:

WHOIS and DNS Lookups: Querying public registries to find domain ownership, administrative contacts, and subdomains.

Social Media Analysis: Scraping platforms like LinkedIn or Twitter to identify key employees, their roles, and potential technologies used by the firm.

Search Engine Probing: Using "Google Dorking" to find exposed documents, metadata, or forgotten directories that might contain software version numbers or usernames.

Analyzing Public Databases: Checking repositories like GitHub for leaked source code or credentials.

The primary advantage of passive recognition is stealth; it allows a penetration tester to map a target's "footprint" without alerting security teams to an impending assessment. While the data gathered passively may occasionally be less precise than that obtained through active probing (like port scanning), it provides a low-risk way to identify broad vulnerabilities and potential entry points. It is a critical step in building a comprehensive picture of a target’s security landscape before moving into more intrusive phases.

In the field of ethical hacking, the distinction between legal skill-building and criminal activity is defined primarily by authorization and consent. Legislation such as the Computer Misuse Act (CMA) 1990 makes it a criminal offense to access computer material without explicit permission from the owner. However, practicing with "VulnHub" machines is entirely legal and considered an industry best practice for developing technical proficiency.

VulnHub provides intentionally vulnerable virtual machine (VM) images that researchers download and run within their own isolated, local environments. Because the individual practicing is the owner and administrator of the physical host machine and the virtualized target, they have absolute "authorization" to conduct testing. These machines are specifically designed to be disconnected from external networks or organizations, ensuring that the hacking activity remains confined to a "safe lab" environment.

Practicing in such a sandbox allows an ethical hacker to refine their exploitation techniques—such as reconnaissance, scanning, and gaining access—without risk of harming third-party systems or violating privacy laws. It provides a controlled setting where the "intent" is educational rather than malicious. Conversely, testing these same techniques against any external website or network without a formal contract and written scope would be a serious crime punishable by imprisonment. Therefore, using locally hosted vulnerable labs like VulnHub is not only legal but essential for any professional aspiring to earn certifications like the OSCP while staying within the confines of ethical and legal boundaries.

In the Linux operating system, "root" is the conventional name of the superuser who possesses the highest level of administrative control and access rights. Unlike standard user accounts, which are restricted to their own home directories and limited system actions, the root user has the authority to read, write, and execute any file on the system, regardless of the permissions set. This makes "root" the ultimate authority for system configuration, security management, and software installation.

Technically, the root user is identified by a User ID (UID) of 0. This account is essential for performing critical tasks such as managing user accounts, modifying the kernel, accessing protected hardware ports, and altering system-wide configuration files located in directories like /etc. In the context of ethical hacking and penetration testing, gaining "root access"—often referred to as "Privilege Escalation"—is frequently the ultimate goal. If an attacker gains root access, they have "full system compromise," meaning they can install backdoors, disable security logging, and pivot to other systems on the network.

Because of the immense power associated with this account, security controls dictate that it should be used sparingly. Most modern Linux distributions encourage the use of the sudo command, which allows a regular user to execute a specific task with root privileges temporarily. This minimizes the risk of accidental system damage or the permanent exposure of the root credentials. Protecting the root account is a fundamental master information security control; if the root password is weak or the account is left exposed via a remote service like SSH, the entire integrity of the information system is at risk. Understanding root is not just about identifying a user, but about understanding the hierarchy of permissions that governs all Linux-based security.

A common misconception in cybersecurity is that every single computer system is inherently vulnerable to a breach at any given moment. However, from an ethical hacking and defensive standpoint, a computer is only "hackable" if it presents an exploitable vulnerability. A system that is fully patched, correctly configured, and isolated from unnecessary network exposure is significantly harder to compromise, often to the point where an attack is no longer viable for a standard threat actor.

Vulnerabilities typically arise from three main areas: unpatched software, misconfigurations, and human error. Security patches are updates issued by vendors to fix known vulnerabilities in the operating system or applications. If an administrator applies these patches promptly, they close the "windows of opportunity" that hackers use to gain entry. Furthermore, "exposed ports" refer to network entry points that are left open and listening for connections. A secure system follows the principle of "Least Functionality," meaning only essential ports and services are active, thereby reducing the "attack surface."

The statement that all computers are hackable "without any complications" is incorrect because security is a layered discipline. While a persistent and highly funded state-sponsored actor might eventually find a "Zero-Day" vulnerability (a flaw unknown to the vendor), the vast majority of systems remain secure as long as they adhere to rigorous maintenance schedules. Defensive strategies focus on "Hardening," which involves removing unnecessary software, disabling unused services, and implementing strong authentication. Therefore, a computer that is meticulously updated and shielded by firewalls and intrusion prevention systems does not provide the necessary "foothold" for an attacker to exploit, effectively making it unhackable through known standard vectors. This highlights the importance of proactive management in mitigating attack vectors rather than assuming inevitable defeat.

Social engineering is an attack technique thatmanipulates human behaviorto gain unauthorized access to systems or information, making option A the correct answer. Asking users to disclose their passwords over the phone is a classic example of social engineering, often referred to as vishing (voice phishing).

Unlike technical attacks that exploit software vulnerabilities, social engineering targets human trust, fear, urgency, or lack of awareness. Attackers may impersonate IT staff, managers, or trusted vendors to convince victims to reveal credentials or perform harmful actions.

Option B is incorrect because antivirus software is a defensive security control, not an attack method. Option C is incorrect because updating the operating system is a security best practice that helps mitigate vulnerabilities.

From an ethical hacking standpoint, testing for social engineering vulnerabilities helps organizations understand their exposure tohuman-based attack vectors, which are among the most effective and commonly used by attackers. Ethical hackers may conduct controlled phishing simulations to assess employee awareness and response.

Mitigating social engineering attacks requires user training, security awareness programs, strong authentication methods, and clear verification procedures. Understanding social engineering is critical for building comprehensive defense strategies.

Shodan is aspecialized search engine designed to discover and index internet-connected devices, making option C the correct answer. Unlike traditional search engines that index websites, Shodan scans IP addresses to identify exposed services, open ports, device banners, and system metadata.

Shodan is widely used by ethical hackers, security researchers, and defenders to identify misconfigured or exposed systems such as webcams, routers, servers, industrial control systems, and IoT devices. It provides insight into how devices are exposed to the public internet.

Option A is incorrect because Shodan is not an application for food services. Option B is incorrect because Shodan does not function as a web browser or general-purpose search engine.

From an ethical hacking perspective, Shodan is often used duringpassive reconnaissanceto assess external attack surfaces without directly interacting with target systems. This helps organizations identify exposure risks before attackers exploit them.

Understanding Shodan reinforces the importance of proper configuration, firewall rules, and access control. Ethical hackers use Shodan responsibly to demonstrate how easily misconfigured devices can be discovered and targeted, encouraging stronger perimeter security and monitoring practices.

Updating an operating system is a fundamental aspect of maintaininginformation security hygiene, especially in security-focused distributions such as Kali Linux. The correct command used to update the package list in Kali Linux from the console is sudo apt-get update, making option C the correct answer.

This command synchronizes the local package index with the repositories configured on the system. It does not install upgrades itself but retrieves the latest information about available software versions and security patches. Ethical hackers and security professionals rely on updated systems to ensure that tools function correctly and that known vulnerabilities are patched.

Option A is incorrect because it is not a valid Linux command. Option B is incorrect due to invalid characters and improper syntax. Proper command accuracy is critical in security environments, as incorrect commands can lead to system instability or incomplete updates.

From an ethical hacking standpoint, keeping Kali Linux updated ensures access to the latest penetration testing tools, vulnerability scanners, and security fixes. Many exploits target outdated software, so regular updates significantly reduce exposure to known threats.

Understanding system maintenance commands supports secure operations and reinforces best practices in defensive security and professional ethical hacking workflows.

Ransomware is a pervasive and devastating form of malware that encrypts a victim's files, rendering them inaccessible until a ransom, typically in cryptocurrency, is paid to the attacker. A critical misconception in modern cybersecurity is that ransomware only targets high-value, large-scale organizations. In reality,anyonewith an internet-connected device is a potential target. While high-profile attacks on hospitals or infrastructure make the headlines, individuals, small businesses, and non-profits are frequently infected daily.

Attackers utilize varied methods to spread ransomware, many of which are non-discriminatory. These include:

Phishing: Sending mass emails with malicious attachments or links that, once clicked, execute the ransomware payload.

Exploiting Vulnerabilities: Automated bots scan the internet for unpatched software or exposed services (like RDP) to gain entry regardless of the target's identity.

Malvertising: Injecting malicious code into legitimate online advertising networks.

The shift toward "Ransomware-as-a-Service" (RaaS) has lowered the barrier to entry for criminals, allowing even low-skilled attackers to launch wide-reaching campaigns. For an individual, the loss of personal photos or tax documents can be just as traumatic as a data breach is for a company. Because ransomware can strike any operating system or device type, ethical hacking principles emphasize that every user must maintain a proactive defense. This includes regular data backups, keeping software updated to close security holes, and exercising extreme caution with email communication.

MD5 (Message Digest Algorithm 5) is acryptographic hash function, not an encryption algorithm. Therefore, it cannot technically be “decrypted.” However, option B is the correct answer becauseMD5 hashes can be cracked or reversedusing modern techniques such as rainbow tables, brute-force attacks, and online hash databases.

MD5 was once widely used for password storage and file integrity checks, but it is now consideredcryptographically brokendue to vulnerabilities such as collision attacks and its fast hashing speed. Ethical hackers routinely demonstrate how MD5-protected passwords can be recovered using tools available in security distributions like Kali Linux or online cracking services.

Option A and option C are incorrect because MD5 is neither a protocol nor a secure encryption algorithm. Its weaknesses make it unsuitable for protecting sensitive information in modern systems.

From an ethical hacking and defensive security perspective, testing MD5 hashes highlights the dangers of outdated cryptographic practices. Ethical hackers use these demonstrations to recommend stronger alternatives such asSHA-256, bcrypt, scrypt, or Argon2, which are designed to resist cracking attempts.

Understanding why MD5 is insecure helps organizations improve password storage mechanisms, comply with security standards, and reduce the risk of credential compromise.

A "backdoor" is a method, often hidden or undocumented, of bypassing normal authentication or encryption in a computer system, cryptosystem, or algorithm. In the realm of managing information security threats, backdoors represent one of the most dangerous risks because they provide persistent, unauthorized access to a system without the knowledge of the administrators. Once a backdoor is established, the attacker can return to the system at any time, even if the original vulnerability they used to gain entry—such as a weak password or a software bug—has been patched.

Backdoors can be implemented in several ways. Some are "Software Backdoors," where a developer might intentionally (or accidentally) leave a hardcoded username and password in the code for debugging purposes. Others are "Malicious Backdoors" installed by a Trojan or a rootkit after a system has been compromised. For example, a hacker might install a "Reverse Shell" that periodically "calls home" to the attacker's server, asking for commands. This effectively creates a secret entrance that bypasses the firewall's inbound rules.

Managing this threat requires a multi-layered approach. "Integrity Monitoring" tools are essential; they alert administrators if system files or binaries are modified, which could indicate the presence of a backdoor. Additionally, "Egress Filtering" helps detect backdoors that attempt to communicate with an external Command and Control (C2) server. From an ethical hacking perspective, identifying backdoors is a key part of "Post-Exploitation." During a penetration test, the goal is not just to get in, but to show how an attacker could maintain their presence. By understanding that a backdoor is specifically designed to circumvent standard security checks, professionals can better implement "Zero Trust" architectures and regular auditing to ensure that the only way into a system is through the front door, with full authentication.