PT0-003 CompTIA PenTest+ Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

The OSSTMM (Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual) is a comprehensive framework for security testing that includes 14 components in its life cycle. Here’s why option B is correct:

OSSTMM: This methodology breaks down the security testing process into 14 components, covering various aspects of security assessment, from planning to execution and reporting.

OWASP MASVS: This is a framework for mobile application security verification and does not have a 14-component life cycle.

MITRE ATT&CK: This is a knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques but does not describe a 14-component life cycle.

CREST: This is a certification body for penetration testers and security professionals but does not provide a specific 14-component framework.

References from Pentest:

Anubis HTB: Emphasizes the structured approach of OSSTMM in conducting comprehensive security assessments​​.

Writeup HTB: Highlights the use of detailed methodologies like OSSTMM to cover all aspects of security testing​​.

Conclusion:

Option B, OSSTMM, is the framework that breaks the life cycle into 14 components, making it the correct answer.

=================

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST):

DAST tools interact with the running application from the outside, simulating attacks to identify security vulnerabilities.

They are particularly effective in identifying issues like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities in web applications.

DAST tools do not require access to the source code, making them suitable for black-box testing.

Advantages of DAST:

Real-World Testing: DAST simulates real-world attacks by interacting with the application in the same way a user would.

Comprehensive Coverage: Can identify vulnerabilities in all parts of the web application, including input fields, forms, and user interactions.

Automated Scanning: Automates the process of testing and identifying vulnerabilities, providing detailed reports on discovered issues.

Examples of DAST Tools:

OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy): An open-source DAST tool widely used for web application security testing.

Burp Suite: A popular commercial DAST tool that provides comprehensive scanning and testing capabilities.

Pentest References:

Web Application Testing: Understanding the importance of testing web applications for security vulnerabilities and the role of different testing methodologies.

Security Testing Tools: Familiarity with various security testing tools and their applications in penetration testing.

DAST vs. SAST: Knowing the difference between DAST (dynamic testing) and SAST (static testing) and when to use each method.

By using a DAST tool, the penetration tester can effectively identify all vulnerable input fields on the customer website, ensuring a thorough assessment of the application's security.

=================

MAC address spoofing involves changing the MAC address of a network interface to mimic another device on the network. This technique is often used to bypass network access controls and gain unauthorized access to a network.

Understanding MAC Address Spoofing:

MAC Address: A unique identifier assigned to network interfaces for communication on the physical network segment.

Spoofing: Changing the MAC address to a different one, typically that of an authorized device, to gain access to restricted networks.

Purpose:

Bypassing Access Controls: Gain access to networks that use MAC address filtering as a security measure.

Impersonation: Assume the identity of another device on the network to intercept traffic or access network resources.

Tools and Techniques:

Linux Command: Use the ifconfig or ip command to change the MAC address.

Step-by-Step Explanationifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:11:22:33:44:55

Tools: Tools like macchanger can automate the process of changing MAC addresses.

Impact:

Network Access: Gain unauthorized access to networks and network resources.

Interception: Capture traffic intended for another device, potentially leading to data theft or further exploitation.

Detection and Mitigation:

Monitoring: Use network monitoring tools to detect changes in MAC addresses.

Secure Configuration: Implement port security on switches to restrict which MAC addresses can connect to specific ports.

References from Pentesting Literature:

MAC address spoofing is a common technique discussed in wireless and network security chapters of penetration testing guides.

HTB write-ups often include examples of using MAC address spoofing to bypass network access controls and gain unauthorized access.

OS identification in tools like Nmap relies on fingerprinting techniques, which analyze response characteristics (e.g., TCP/IP stack behavior).

The scan cannot gather one or more fingerprints from the target (Option D):

If the system is configured to block ICMP responses, or if certain ports are closed, fingerprinting fails.

Some modern firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPS) interfere with OS fingerprinting by modifying packet responses.

Pivoting allows attackers to use a compromised host as a gateway to access internal resources.

Create an SSH tunnel using sshuttle (Option A):

sshuttle creates a transparent VPN-like connection over SSH, allowing the tester to forward traffic securely.

Advantages:

Provides encryption, preventing IDS/IPS detection.

Requires minimal interaction with the compromised host.

If a wireless network lacks proper encryption, attackers can inject malicious packets into the traffic stream.

Packet injection (Option A):

Attackers forge and transmit fake packets to manipulate network behavior.

Common in WEP/WPA attacks to force IV collisions or spoof DHCP responses.

The tester is attempting to register a malicious DLL as a server-level plugin to escalate privileges.

Privilege escalation (Option B):

The command uses dnscmd.exe, a legitimate Windows tool for managing DNS servers.

By setting a malicious DLL (adduser.dll) as a server-level plugin, attackers can gain SYSTEM-level privileges.

This technique is a DLL hijacking attack.

In an authorized physical assessment, the goal is to test physical security controls. Tailgating is a common and effective technique in such scenarios. Here’s why option B is correct:

Tailgating: This involves following an authorized person into a secure area without proper credentials. During busy times, it’s easier to blend in and gain access without being noticed. It tests the effectiveness of physical access controls and security personnel.

Cloning Badge Information: This can be effective but requires proximity to employees and specialized equipment, making it more complex and time-consuming.

Picking Locks: This is a more invasive technique that carries higher risk and is less stealthy compared to tailgating.

Dropping USB Devices: This tests employee awareness and response to malicious devices but does not directly test physical access controls.

References from Pentest:

Writeup HTB: Demonstrates the effectiveness of social engineering and tailgating techniques in bypassing physical security measures​​.

Forge HTB: Highlights the use of non-invasive methods like tailgating to test physical security without causing damage or raising alarms​​.

Conclusion:

Option B, tailgating into the facility during a busy time, is the best attack plan to gain access to the facility in an authorized physical assessment.

=================

=================

SearchSploit is a command-line interface for Exploit-DB that allows testers to quickly search for known exploits based on software name and version.

With Apache 2.2.3, lighttpd 1.4.32, and MySQL, the tester can plug these into SearchSploit to identify vulnerabilities, matching the goal of finding quick attack paths with limited time.

Other tools:

msfvenom: Payload generator, not a search tool.

sqlmap: SQLi exploitation tool, useful for web apps with SQLi, but requires validation of such a vuln first.

BeEF: Browser exploitation framework, not relevant here.

CompTIA PenTest+ Reference:

PT0-003 Objective 2.2 & 2.5: Exploit and identify attack paths.

SearchSploit and Exploit-DB usage are recommended tools in CompTIA’s resources.

To perform credentialed scans on an Active Directory (AD) server, the scanner requires high-level access to retrieve system configuration, patch levels, and user rights. A Domain Administrator account ensures full visibility into domain resources and permissions, which is essential for a complete vulnerability assessment.

From the CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-003 Objectives – Domain 2.0: Information Gathering and Vulnerability Identification:

“Credentialed scans require administrative-level access on target systems to provide detailed insights into software versions, missing patches, and security settings.”

When considering efficiency and security for exfiltrating sensitive data, the chosen method must ensure data confidentiality and minimize the risk of detection. Here’s an analysis of each option:

Use steganography and send the file over FTP (Option A):

Steganography hides data within other files, such as images. FTP is a protocol for transferring files.

Drawbacks: FTP is not secure as it transmits data in clear text, making it susceptible to interception. Steganography can add an extra layer of obfuscation, but the use of FTP makes this option insecure.

Compress the file and send it using TFTP (Option B):

TFTP is a simple file transfer protocol that lacks encryption.

Drawbacks: TFTP is inherently insecure because it does not support encryption, making it easy for attackers to intercept the data during transfer.

Split the file in tiny pieces and send it over dnscat (Option C):

dnscat is a tool for tunneling data over DNS.

Drawbacks: While effective at evading detection by using DNS, splitting the file and managing the reassembly adds complexity. Additionally, large data transfers over DNS can raise suspicion.

Encrypt and send the file over HTTPS (Answer: D):

Encrypting the file ensures that its contents are protected during transfer. HTTPS provides a secure, encrypted channel for communication over the internet.

Advantages: HTTPS is widely used and trusted, making it less likely to raise suspicion. Encryption ensures the data remains confidential during transit.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) is a client-side attack where an attacker injects malicious scripts into a web page viewed by other users. When executed in a browser, it can steal session cookies, perform unauthorized transactions, or execute malicious actions on behalf of the victim.

Option D (Cross-site scripting) is correct because XSS can manipulate client-side input validation to execute unauthorized transactions.

Option A (Privilege escalation) is incorrect because it involves gaining higher privileges on a system, not attacking input validation in a web application.

Option B (DOM injection) is incorrect because DOM-based attacks manipulate browser-side JavaScript but are not necessarily used for unauthorized transactions.

Option C (Session hijacking) is incorrect because session hijacking requires capturing a valid user session, whereas XSS can steal session tokens for this purpose.

Containers (e.g., Docker, Kubernetes) require specialized scanning tools to detect vulnerabilities.

Trivy (Option B):

Trivy is an open-source vulnerability scanner designed specifically for containers and Kubernetes environments.

It scans container images, repositories, and running containers for known vulnerabilities (CVEs).

During a penetration test, one of the critical steps for maintaining access and covering tracks is to clear evidence of the attack. Manipulating data to hide activities on an internal server involves ensuring that logs and traces of the attack are removed. Here's a detailed explanation of why clearing the Windows event logs is the best method for this scenario:

Understanding Windows Event Logs: Windows event logs are a key forensic artifact that records system, security, and application events. These logs can provide detailed information about user activities, system changes, and potential security incidents.

Why Clear Windows Event Logs:

Comprehensive Coverage: Clearing the event logs removes all recorded events, including login attempts, application errors, and security alerts. This makes it difficult for an investigator to trace back the actions performed by the attacker.

Avoiding Detection: Penetration testers clear event logs to ensure that their presence and activities are not detected by system administrators or security monitoring tools.

Method to Clear Event Logs:

Use the built-in Windows command line utility wevtutil to clear logs. For example:

shell

Copy code

wevtutil cl System

wevtutil cl Security

wevtutil cl Application

These commands clear the System, Security, and Application logs, respectively.

Alternative Options and Their Drawbacks:

Modify the System Time: Changing the system time can create confusion but is easily detectable and can be reverted. It does not erase existing log entries.

Alter Log Permissions: Changing permissions might prevent new entries but does not remove existing ones and can alert administrators to suspicious activity.

Reduce Log Retention Settings: This can limit future logs but does not affect already recorded logs and can be easily noticed by administrators.

Case References:

HTB Writeups: Many Hack The Box (HTB) writeups demonstrate the importance of clearing logs post-exploitation to maintain stealth. For example, in the "Gobox" and "Writeup" machines, maintaining a low profile involved managing log data to avoid detection​​​​.

Real-World Scenarios: In real-world penetration tests, attackers often clear logs to avoid detection by forensic investigators and incident response teams. This step is crucial during red team engagements and advanced persistent threat (APT) simulations.

In conclusion, clearing Windows event logs is a well-established practice for hiding activities during a penetration test. It is the most effective way to remove evidence of the attack from the system, thereby maintaining stealth and ensuring that the tester's actions remain undetected.

=================

In a pin tumbler lock, the key interacts with a series of pins within the lock cylinder. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

Components of a Pin Tumbler Lock:

Key Pins: These are the pins that the key directly interacts with. The cuts on the key align these pins.

Driver Pins: These are pushed by the springs and sit between the key pins and the springs.

Springs: These apply pressure to the driver pins.

Plug: This is the part of the lock that the key is inserted into and turns when the correct key is used.

Cylinder: The housing for the plug and the pins.

Operation:

When the correct key is inserted, the key pins are pushed up by the key’s cuts to align with the shear line (the gap between the plug and the cylinder).

The alignment of the pins at the shear line allows the plug to turn, thereby operating the lock.

Why Pins Are the Correct Answer:

The correct key aligns the key pins and driver pins to the shear line, allowing the plug to turn. If any pin is not correctly aligned, the lock will not open.

Illustration in Lock Picking:

Lock picking involves manipulating the pins so they align at the shear line without the key. This demonstrates the critical role of pins in the functioning of the lock.

=================

In network penetration testing, the initial steps involve gathering information to build an understanding of the network's structure, devices, and potential entry points. The process generally follows a structured approach, starting from broad discovery methods to more specific identification techniques. Here's a comprehensive breakdown of the steps:

Host Discovery (Answer: C):

Objective: Identify live hosts on the network.

Tools & Techniques:

Ping Sweep: Using tools like nmap with the -sn option (ping scan) to check for live hosts by sending ICMP Echo requests.

ARP Scan: Useful in local networks, arp-scan can help identify all devices on the local subnet by broadcasting ARP requests.

nmap -sn 192.168.1.0/24

 References:

The GoBox HTB write-up emphasizes the importance of identifying hosts before moving to service enumeration​​.

The Forge HTB write-up also highlights using Nmap for initial host discovery in its enumeration phase​​.

 Service Discovery (Option A):

Objective: After identifying live hosts, determine the services running on them.

Tools & Techniques:

Nmap: Often used with options like -sV for version detection to identify services.

nmap -sV 192.168.1.100

 References:

As seen in multiple write-ups (e.g., Anubis HTB and Bolt HTB), service discovery follows host identification to understand the services available for potential exploitation​​​​.

 OS Fingerprinting (Option B):

Objective: Determine the operating system of the identified hosts.

Tools & Techniques:

Nmap: With the -O option for OS detection.

nmap -O 192.168.1.100

 References:

Accurate OS fingerprinting helps tailor subsequent attacks and is often performed after host and service discovery, as highlighted in the write-ups​​.

 DNS Enumeration (Option D):

Objective: Identify DNS records and gather subdomains related to the target domain.

Tools & Techniques:

dnsenum, dnsrecon, and dig.

dnsenum example.com

Metadata extraction allows attackers to collect sensitive information from digital files.

EXIF (Exchangeable Image File Format) (Option A):

EXIF metadata contains camera details, GPS coordinates, timestamps, and software versions used to edit the file.

Attackers use tools like ExifTool to extract metadata for reconnaissance.

Encoding to Evade DLP:

Encoding (e.g., Base64) transforms data into a format that may bypass data loss prevention (DLP) tools.

DLP solutions often look for specific patterns (e.g., sensitive keywords, file headers) and may not recognize encoded data.

Why Not Other Options?

B (Compression): Compression reduces file size but does not typically bypass DLP detection mechanisms.

C (Encryption): Encrypted data is detectable by DLP tools, though its contents may not be readable.

D (Obfuscation): While obfuscation hides intent, encoding is more effective for bypassing automated detection.

CompTIA Pentest+ References:

Domain 3.0 (Attacks and Exploits)