SY0-701 CompTIA Security+ Exam 2026 Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

The scenario describes legacy, business-critical devices with minimal vendor support that must be segmented and closely monitored. This strongly matches embedded systems commonly found in manufacturing environments (e.g., industrial machinery controllers, sensors, ICS/SCADA components). The Study Guide defines embedded systems as: “Embedded systems are computer systems that are built into other devices. Industrial machinery, appliances, and cars are all places where you may have encountered embedded systems.” Manufacturing organizations often can’t easily replace or patch these systems because they have long lifecycles and may depend on specialized firmware/RTOS and proprietary integrations. The same guide warns that legacy/unsupported platforms create risk due to lack of vendor security patches and recommends compensating controls: “Lack of support implies that no new security patches… will be released… In cases where the organization simply must continue using an unsupported operating system, best practice dictates isolating the system as much as possible… and applying as many compensating security controls as possible, such as increased monitoring and implementing strict network firewall rules.”

That guidance directly supports the question’s “segmented and monitored closely” language. Workstations typically have stronger patch/support options; core routers and DNS servers are important, but they are not usually described as embedded legacy devices with minimal vendor support in a manufacturing context.

A strong authentication policy should enforcepassword length(e.g., minimum of 12-16 characters) andcomplexity(mix of uppercase, lowercase, numbers, and symbols). These measures significantlyreduce the risk of brute-force attacks.

Least privilege (C)relates to access control, not authentication policies.

Something you have (D)andbiometrics (F)pertain to multi-factor authentication (MFA) but are not password policy requirements.

Input validation is a primary control for preventing SQL injection. SQL injection occurs when an attacker submits malicious database commands through application input fields, URL parameters, cookies, or forms. If the application fails to validate and handle input properly, the attacker’s input may be interpreted as part of a SQL query. Strong input validation rejects unexpected characters, enforces type and length restrictions, and allows only properly formatted values. It should also be paired with parameterized queries and prepared statements. DNS hijacking involves manipulation of DNS resolution, not application input. Time-of-check vulnerabilities are race-condition issues. Sideloading involves installing software outside an approved repository. Therefore, SQL injection is the vulnerability most directly prevented by input validation.

================

Separation of duties is the best description because the person developing the change is not allowed to independently approve or merge that change into the code base. This divides responsibility between development and approval, reducing the risk of unauthorized, unsafe, or malicious changes entering production. Change management is related, but the specific control described is the separation between creating a change and authorizing its implementation. Vulnerability remediation is the process of fixing security weaknesses, which is not the focus here. Collusion prevention is not the main concept; separation of duties can reduce fraud risk, but it cannot fully prevent collusion. Security+ treats separation of duties as an administrative control that supports integrity, accountability, and controlled change.

Hacktivists are individuals or groups who use hacking to promote a political agenda, social cause, or philosophical beliefs. Their primary motivation is not personal gain but rather to draw attention to, or protest against, perceived injustices or causes.

The correct answer is A. Agent-based.

Agent-based web filtering uses software installed directly on the endpoint. Because the filtering agent runs on the laptop, it can enforce web filtering policies whether the employee is inside the office or working remotely. This avoids the need to configure additional access back to the corporate network, such as forcing all remote web traffic through an internal proxy or VPN.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. Centralized proxy

A centralized proxy can provide web filtering, but remote users would typically need to route traffic through the corporate network or proxy service. The question specifically says the organization does not want to configure additional network access.

C. URL scanning

URL scanning checks URLs for malicious or suspicious content, but it is a filtering technique rather than the best deployment type for enforcing web filtering on laptops both inside and outside the office.

D. Content categorization

Content categorization classifies websites by type, such as gambling, social media, malware, or adult content. However, it does not describe how filtering is enforced for laptops both on and off the corporate network.

Therefore, the best answer is agent-based web filtering.

A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Based on the logs, it seems that the host that originated the infection is 192.168.10.22. This host has a suspicious process named svchost.exe running on port 443, which is unusual for a Windows service. It also has a large number of outbound connections to different IP addresses on port 443, indicating that it is part of a botnet.

The firewall log shows that this host has been communicating with 10.10.9.18, which is another infected host on the engineering network. This host also has a suspicious process named svchost.exe running on port 443, and a large number of outbound connections to different IP addresses on port 443.

The other hosts on the R & D network (192.168.10.37 and 192.168.10.41) are clean, as they do not have any suspicious processes or connections.

Hashing (C)is aone-way cryptographic functionthat produces afixed-length digestrepresenting the original data. If the file changes—even by one bit—the hash will change, making it ideal for verifyingdata integrity.

While encryption protectsconfidentiality, and masking/obfuscation protectdata visibility, onlyhashing ensures integrity.

A tabletop exercise is a simulated scenario that tests the effectiveness of a security incident response plan. It involves gathering the relevant stakeholders and walking through the steps of the plan, identifying any gaps or issues that need to be addressed. A tabletop exercise is a good way to validate the documentation created by the security manager and ensure that the team is prepared for various types of security incidents.

A Secure Web Gateway (SWG) protects users by filtering unwanted software/malware from user-initiated web traffic and enforcing corporate and regulatory policy compliance. This technology allows the company to secure remote users ' data and web traffic without relying on a VPN, making it ideal for organizations supporting remote work.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study materials, particularly in the domain of network security and remote access technologies​​.

File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) is specifically designed to detect and prevent unauthorized changes to critical system files, configuration files, registry entries, binaries, and logs. According to CompTIA Security+ SY0-701, FIM creates a cryptographic baseline (usually via hashing) of protected system files. Any attempt to modify, add, or delete protected files immediately triggers an alert, enabling rapid detection of tampering—whether caused by malware, insider threats, or misconfigurations.

NIDS (A) monitors network traffic, not system-level modifications. DLP (B) prevents unauthorized data exfiltration, not system-file tampering. NAC (C) controls device access to the network but does not protect system files.

FIM is a core tool for ensuring system integrity in compliance frameworks such as PCI-DSS, which explicitly requires organizations to monitor critical system files. By preventing unauthorized changes to system-level data and alerting administrators to suspicious activity, FIM provides a strong defensive mechanism against malware, ransomware, and configuration drift.

Thus, FIM is the correct answer.

" Group Policy Objects (GPOs) are a feature of Microsoft Windows Active Directory that allow administrators to centrally manage and configure settings across multiple systems in an efficient manner. When a vulnerability such as SMBv1 (Server Message Block version 1) is identified onmultiple servers, GPOs can be used to disable this outdated and insecure protocol across all affected systems simultaneously. By creating a GPO to enforce a policy that disables SMBv1, the organization can ensure consistent remediation without manually configuring each server individually, making it the most efficient solution for domain-joined environments. "

Open service ports directly contribute to an organization’s attack surface because they provide potential entry points that attackers can probe, exploit, or abuse. In the context of the Security+ SY0-701 objectives, the attack surface is defined as the sum of all possible points where an attacker can attempt to enter or extract data from a system. Each open port corresponds to a service or application that is listening for incoming connections, and if that service is unnecessary, misconfigured, unpatched, or weakly protected, it becomes a viable attack vector.

Option D is correct because open ports may expose services that do not need to be accessible, especially if proper access controls, firewall rules, or network segmentation are not in place. For example, leaving management interfaces, legacy services, or test services open can allow attackers to perform reconnaissance, banner grabbing, credential attacks, or exploitation of known vulnerabilities. The SY0-701 study guide emphasizes the principle of minimizing attack surface by disabling unused services, closing unnecessary ports, and applying the principle of least functionality.

Option A is incorrect because endpoint antivirus tools are not responsible for identifying or managing open network ports at an architectural level. Option B is partially true but incomplete; while open ports can allow remote access, not all open ports are remote entry points, and the question asks for the best explanation of how attack surface increases. Option C is incorrect because open ports do not inherently enable updates and, in fact, often increase risk rather than reduce it.

In summary, open service ports increase attack surface by exposing services that attackers can target. Proper port management, firewall enforcement, and regular vulnerability scanning are critical controls emphasized in Security+ SY0-701 to reduce exposure and limit unauthorized access.

A firewall policy is a set of rules that defines what traffic is allowed or denied on a network. A firewall policy should be carefully designed and tested before being implemented, as a misconfigured policy can cause network disruptions or security breaches. A common best practice is to test the policy in a non-production environment, such as a lab or a simulation, before enabling the policy in the production network. This way, the technician can verify the functionality and performance of the policy, and identify and resolve any issues or conflicts, without affecting the live network. Testing the policy in a non-production environment would prevent the issue of the ‘deny any’ policy causing several company servers to become unreachable, as the technician would be able to detect and correct the problem before applying the policy to the production network.

Documenting the new policy in a change request and submitting the request to change management is a good practice, but it would not prevent the issue by itself. Change management is a process that ensures that any changes to the network are authorized, documented, and communicated, but it does not guarantee that the changes are error-free or functional. The technician still needs to test the policy before implementing it.

Disabling any intrusion prevention signatures on the ‘deny any’ policy prior to enabling the new policy would not prevent the issue, and it could reduce the security of the network. Intrusion prevention signatures are patterns that identify malicious or unwanted traffic, and allow the firewall to block or alert on such traffic. Disabling these signatures would make the firewall less effective in detecting and preventing attacks, and it would not affect the reachability of the company servers.

Including an ‘allow any’ policy above the ‘deny any’ policy would not prevent the issue, and it would render the ‘deny any’ policy useless. A firewall policy is processed from top to bottom, and the first matching rule is applied. An ‘allow any’ policy would match any traffic and allow it to pass through the firewall, regardless of the source, destination, or protocol. This would negate the purpose of the ‘deny any’ policy, which is to block any traffic that does not match any of the previous rules. Moreover, an ‘allow any’ policy would create a security risk, as it would allow any unauthorized or malicious traffic to enter or exit the network. References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 204-205; Professor Messer’s CompTIA SY0-701 Security+ Training Course, video 2.1 - Network Security Devices, 8:00 - 10:00.

Recovery Time Objective (RTO)defines themaximum acceptable downtimebefore business operationsmust be restored. It helps organizations set expectations for recovery speed and prioritize system restoration accordingly.

A (likelihood of an incident and cost)relates to risk assessment, not RTO.

B (roles and responsibilities)falls underincident response planning, not RTO.

C (state of restored systems)is covered byRecovery Point Objective (RPO), not RTO.

Creating a VLAN for Wi-Fi-enabled environmental sensors is the most likely and appropriate action. Security+ SY0-701 recommends network segmentation for IoT and sensor devices to reduce attack surface and limit lateral movement. A dedicated VLAN isolates sensors from critical systems while allowing controlled access to data collectors or management platforms.

Adding items to a risk register (A) documents risk but does not provide protection. Physically air gapping (C) contradicts the requirement for Wi-Fi connectivity. Configuring TLS 1.2 (D) is beneficial for data-in-transit protection but does not address network-level isolation and blast-radius reduction.

Thus, B: Create a VLAN for the sensors best aligns with secure design.

If cadets are using company phone numbers to make unsolicited calls, and the logs confirm the numbers are not being spoofed, it suggests that the SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) server ' s security settings might be weak. This could allow unauthorized access or exploitation of the company ' s telephony services, potentially leading to misuse by unauthorized individuals.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study materials, especially on SIP security and common vulnerabilities​​.

A partially known environment is a type of penetration test where the tester has some information about the target, such as the IP address, the operating system, or the device type. This can help the tester focus on specific vulnerabilities and reduce the scope of the test. A partially known environment is also called a gray box test1.

The most important security concern when using legacy systems is the lack of vendor support. Without support from the vendor, systems may not receive critical security patches and updates, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation. This lack of support can result in increased risk of security breaches, as vulnerabilities discovered in the software may never be addressed.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study materials, particularly in the context of risk management and the challenges posed by legacy systems​​.

Posting hashes allows users to verify the integrity of downloaded files. As outlined in Security+ SY0-701, a cryptographic hash (e.g., SHA-256) produces a fixed-length digest unique to the file’s contents. Users can compute the hash of the downloaded file and compare it to the published value; a match confirms the file has not been altered.

Certificates (B) establish identity and trust but do not directly verify file integrity post-download unless combined with signing workflows. Algorithms (C) are general methods, not verification artifacts. Salting (D) is used with password hashing and is irrelevant here.

Therefore, A: Hashes is the correct choice.

SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems commonly manage industrial equipment, including PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers). Historically, SCADA environments often lack encryption for management traffic due to legacy equipment and protocols. This makes SCADA the most likely environment where unencrypted PLC management traffic can be observed.

SAE, or Simultaneous Authentication of Equals, is the correct answer. SAE is used with WPA3-Personal and replaces the weaker pre-shared key exchange approach used in earlier WPA versions. Its major security benefit is resistance to offline dictionary and brute-force attacks after over-the-air capture. With older WPA/WPA2-PSK handshakes, an attacker could capture the handshake and repeatedly test guessed passwords offline. SAE changes the authentication exchange so captured traffic is not useful in the same way for mass offline guessing. WIPS can detect or prevent wireless intrusions, but it does not directly strengthen the password authentication exchange. SSO is an identity convenience mechanism, and WPS is a risky setup feature historically associated with PIN brute-force weaknesses.

===============

When multiple Wireless Access Points (WAPs) are using similar frequencies with high power settings, it can cause channel overlap, leading to interference and connectivity issues. This is likely the reason why mobile users are unable to access the internet in the lobby. Evaluating and adjusting the channel settings on the WAPs to avoid overlap is crucial to resolving the connectivity problems.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study materials, particularly the domain on Wireless and Mobile Security, which covers WLAN deployment considerations​​.

The act described is espionage, where classified information is stolen and provided to adversaries or unauthorized parties, usually for political, military, or strategic advantage.

Data exfiltration (B) is the technical act of stealing data but doesn’t specify motivation. Financial gain (C) or blackmail (D) could be motivations but are not clearly indicated here.

Espionage is a classic threat actor motivation outlined in the Threats domain【6:Chapter 2†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

A backout plan provides a documented procedure to revert or undo a change if it fails or causes issues, helping to restore the environment quickly and prevent extended downtime. Having a backout plan in place minimizes impact during failed changes.

User notification (A) informs users but does not prevent failures. Change approval (B) and risk analysis (C) occur before the change and cannot fix issues after failure.

Backout planning is a best practice in Change Management covered in Security Program Management【6:Chapter 16†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】

Rules of engagement are the detailed guidelines and constraints regarding the execution of information security testing, such as penetration testing. They define the scope, objectives, methods, and boundaries of the test, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the testers and the clients. Rules of engagement help to ensure that the test is conducted in a legal, ethical, and professional manner, and that the results are accurate and reliable. Rules of engagement typically include the following elements:

The type and scope of the test, such as black box, white box, or gray box, and the target systems, networks, applications, or data.

The client contact details and the communication channels for reporting issues, incidents, or emergencies during the test.

The testing team credentials and the authorized tools and techniques that they can use.

The sensitive data handling and encryption requirements, such as how to store, transmit, or dispose of any data obtained during the test.

The status meeting and report schedules, formats, and recipients, as well as the confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements for the test results.

The timeline and duration of the test, and the hours of operation and testing windows.

The professional and ethical behavior expectations for the testers, such as avoiding unnecessary damage, disruption, or disclosure of information.

Supply chain analysis, right to audit clause, and due diligence are not related to the terms of a test with a third-party penetration tester. Supply chain analysis is the process of evaluating the security and risk posture of the suppliers and partners in a business network. Right to audit clause is a provision in a contract that gives one party the right to audit another party to verify their compliance with the contract terms and conditions. Due diligence is the process of identifying and addressing the cyber risks that a potential vendor or partner brings to an organization.

References = https://www.yeahhub.com/every-penetration-tester-you-should-know-about-this-rules-of-engagement/

https://bing.com/search?q=rules+of+engagement+penetration+testing

The best answer is A. MTBF.

MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) is a reliability metric that measures the average time a system or component operates before failing. Since the question specifically mentions past availability incidents and asks for a value that helps choose technology while considering reliability, MTBF is the most relevant metric.

A higher MTBF generally indicates more reliable technology and helps justify investment decisions when selecting systems intended to reduce outages and improve availability.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. RTORecovery Time Objective is the target amount of time to restore service after an outage. It is important for disaster recovery planning, but it does not directly measure reliability.

C. ALEAnnualized Loss Expectancy estimates expected yearly financial loss from a risk. It is useful for risk-based investment decisions, but the question specifically emphasizes availability incidents and reliability, which points more directly to MTBF.

D. RPORecovery Point Objective measures acceptable data loss in time. It applies to backup and recovery strategy, not system reliability.

From a Security+ standpoint, when evaluating technologies for availability and reliability, MTBF is the strongest metric among these options.

Confidentiality is primarily improved by preventing unauthorized parties from viewing data while it travels across untrusted networks. A Virtual Private Network (VPN) addresses this by creating a protected tunnel between endpoints, commonly using tunneling technologies such as IPSec or TLS for secure communications. The Study Guide explains the purpose of VPNs for remote access as: “A virtual private network (VPN) is a way to create a virtual network link across a public network that allows the endpoints to act as though they are on the same network.” It also notes the practical security value of full-tunnel VPNs when traversing untrusted networks: “A full-tunnel VPN sends all network traffic through the VPN tunnel, keeping it secure as it goes to the remote trusted network… [and] is a great way to ensure that traffic sent through an untrusted network… remains secure.”

Why the other options are less correct for confidentiality: Firewalls control traffic flow but do not inherently encrypt remote communications end-to-end; extensive logging improves detection/forensics, not confidentiality; and IDS detects suspicious activity but doesn’t prevent eavesdropping on the connection. For confidentiality of remote connections, VPNs (implemented with secure tunneling like TLS/IPSec) are the best answer.

According to the CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, data subjects are the individuals whose personal data is collected, processed, or stored by an organization. Data subjects have certain rights and expectations regarding how their data is handled, such as the right to access, correct, delete, or restrict their data. Data subjects are different from data owners, who are the individuals or entities that have the authority and responsibility to determine how data is classified, protected, and used. Data subjects are also different from data processors, who are the individuals or entities that perform operations on data on behalf of the data owner, such as collecting, modifying, storing, or transmitting data. Data subjects are also different from data custodians, who are the individuals or entities that implement the security controls and procedures specified by the data owner to protect data while in transit and at rest.

ReferencesCompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, Chapter 2: Data Security, page 511

Input validation is most directly used to reduce prompt injection attacks against AI chatbots. Prompt injection occurs when a user enters crafted instructions designed to override, bypass, or manipulate the chatbot’s intended system instructions. By validating, filtering, constraining, and sanitizing user input, an organization can prevent malicious instructions from being interpreted as trusted commands. Model manipulation is broader and may include poisoning or adversarial techniques beyond simple input validation. Bias is mainly addressed through training data governance, testing, and model evaluation. Hallucinations are inaccurate or fabricated AI outputs, usually reduced through grounding, retrieval controls, and output verification. Therefore, for a chatbot, input validation best maps to preventing prompt injection.

================

Input validation is a security technique that checks the user input for any malicious or unexpected data before processing it by the application. Input validation can prevent various types of attacks, such as injection, cross-site scripting, buffer overflow, and command execution, that exploit the vulnerabilities in the application code. Input validation can be performed on both the client-side and the server-side, using methods such as whitelisting, blacklisting, filtering, sanitizing, escaping, and encoding. By including regular expressions in the source code to remove special characters from the variables set by the forms in the web application, the organization adopted input validation as a security technique. Regular expressions are patterns that match a specific set of characters or strings, and can be used to filter out any unwanted or harmful input. Special characters, such as $, |, ;, & , `, and ?, can be used by attackers to injectcommands or scripts into the application, and cause damage or data theft. By removing these characters from the input, the organization can reduce the risk of such attacks.

Identify embedded keys, code debugging, and static code analysis are not the security techniques that the organization adopted by making this addition to the policy. Identify embedded keys is a process of finding and removing any hard-coded keys or credentials from the source code, as these can pose a security risk if exposed or compromised. Code debugging is a process of finding and fixing any errors or bugs in the source code, which can affect the functionality or performance of the application. Static code analysis is a process of analyzing the source code without executing it, to identify any vulnerabilities, flaws, or coding standards violations. These techniques are not related to the use of regular expressions to remove special characters from the input.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 375-376; Professor Messer’s CompTIA SY0-701 Security+ Training Course, video 4.1 - Vulnerability Scanning, 8:00 - 9:08; Application Security – SY0-601 CompTIA Security+ : 3.2, 0:00 - 2:00.