EDGE-Expert EDGE Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies (EDGE Expert) Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

In EDGE, the Base Case is a standardized benchmark used to calculate utility cost savings, reflecting typical resource consumption for a building in its location and typology. The term "virtual energy" in EDGE refers to the energy required for heating, cooling, lighting, and other systems, modeled as if the building operates under typical conditions without efficiency measures. The EDGE User Guide explains how utility costs are calculated: "The Base Case for utility costs includes the cost of virtual energy, which represents the modeled energy consumption for the building type in the absence of efficiency measures, alongside water consumption, using localtariffs to estimate financial impacts" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.3: Using the EDGE App). Option B, includes the cost of virtual energy, aligns with this approach, as the Base Case accounts for all modeled energy use to establish a baseline for savings. Option A (excludes the cost of virtual energy) is incorrect, as virtual energy is a core component of the Base Case: "Virtual energy in EDGE is the theoretical energy use calculated for the Base Case, including heating, cooling, and lighting, and its cost is always included in utility cost calculations" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.4: Cost Savings Calculations). Option C (excludes the cost of virtual energy only in homes) and Option D (includes the cost of virtual energy only in homes) are also incorrect, as the treatment of virtual energy is consistent across all typologies: "The Base Case methodology, including the inclusion of virtual energy costs, applies uniformly to all building types in EDGE, whether homes, hotels, or offices, to ensure a fair comparison of savings" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.3: Using the EDGE App). The EDGE Methodology Report further clarifies: "Utility costs in the Base Case are derived from virtual energy and water consumption, reflecting typical usage patterns for the building type and location, ensuring that savings calculations are comprehensive and include all relevant energy demands" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.4: Cost Savings Calculations). This consistent inclusion of virtual energy costs across all typologies makes Option B the correct answer.

The issuance of certificates in the EDGE certification process is a defined responsibility assigned to specific roles. The EDGE Certification Protocol states: "The EDGE Preliminary Certificate, awarded at the design stage, is issued by the EDGE Certification Provider after the Auditor submits a recommendation for certification based on the design audit. The Certification Provider reviews the Auditor’s report and, if compliant, issues the certificate" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.3: Certification Decision). Option C, Certification Provider, aligns with this process, as entities like GBCI are responsible for issuing certificates. Option A (Auditor) is incorrect, as Auditors only recommend certification: "The Auditor’s role is to provide a recommendation, not to issue the certificate" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor). Option B (Expert) is also incorrect, as Experts advise on design, not certification: "EDGE Experts assist with project design and self-assessment, not certification issuance" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Expert). Option D (Operations and Management Team) is wrong, as this team supports the overall program, not individual certifications: "The EDGE Operations and Management Team oversees program development, not certificate issuance" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.3: Program Structure). Thus, the Preliminary Certificate is issued by the Certification Provider (Option C).

The EDGE software uses a Base Case to establish a benchmark for resource consumption, tailored to local conditions. The EDGE Methodology Report explains how the Base Case is constructed: "The Base Case for external wall materials in hotels is determined using data from market surveys of typical building practices in the project’s country, supplemented by national building performance codes where available. This ensures the baseline reflects local construction norms and regulatory standards" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 3.1: Base Case Determination). Option A matches this description by referencing typical building practices and national codes. Option B incorrectly refers to global practices and international codes, which EDGE does not use, as the software prioritizes local context. Option C, focusing on corporate specifications, is not part of the Base Case methodology, as the Base Case is standardized, not project-specific. Option D, involving local suppliers or accreditation, is irrelevant to how EDGE determines the Base Case, which relies on broader market data rather than supplier-specificinformation.

The EDGE Standard defines specific project types eligible for certification levels, including EDGE Advanced, which requires at least 40% energy savings. The EDGE Certification Protocol specifies: "EDGE Advanced certification is available for new constructions that achieve a minimum of 40% energy savings compared to the base case, applicable to building typologies such as homes, hotels, offices, hospitals, retail, and schools" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.3: Certification Levels). Option A, new constructions, aligns with this scope, as EDGE focuses on new buildings across supported typologies. Option B, green lease agreements, is not a building type and is outside EDGE’s certification framework. Option C, infrastructure constructions, and Option D, parks and landscape projects, are also not covered under EDGE typologies, as confirmed by the EDGE User Guide: "EDGE certification applies to new buildings and major renovations of specific typologies, excluding infrastructure or landscape-only projects" (EDGE User Guide, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Certification). Thus, only new constructions qualify for EDGE Advanced certification.

Lamp efficiency in EDGE is a key factor in reducing energy consumption for lighting, a critical green building design strategy. The EDGE User Guide defines lamp efficiency: "In EDGE, a moreefficient lamp is one that provides higher lumens per watt, meaning it produces more light output (lumens) for the same electrical input (watts). This metric, known as luminous efficacy, is used to evaluate lighting efficiency measures like EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures). Option A, more lumens/watt, directly aligns with this definition, as it indicates greater efficiency in converting electricity to light. Option B (lower watts/m²) refers to lighting power density, which is a design metric, not a lamp characteristic: "Watts/m² is a measure of lighting power density for a space, not the efficiency of an individual lamp" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations). Option C (longer life) relates to durability, not efficiency: "Lamp life affects maintenance costs but is not a direct measure of energy efficiency in EDGE" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures). Option D (lower wattage) alone does not indicate efficiency, as a lamp with lower wattage but poor light output would be less efficient: "Lower wattage must be paired with adequate lumens to improve efficiency" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations). Thus, more lumens/watt (Option A) describes a more efficient lamp.

During a site visit for post-construction certification, the EDGE Auditor relies on specific tools to verify compliance. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols specify: "The primary resource for an EDGE Auditor during a site visit is the EDGE Auditor’s checklist, which provides a structured list of items to verify, including the implementation of selected measures, alignment with the self-assessment, and compliance with EDGE standards" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.4: Site Audit Procedures). Option C, EDGE Auditor’s checklist, matches this description as the key resource guiding the audit process. Option A (EDGE software) is a tool for assessment, not a resource for the site visit: "The EDGE software is used for self-assessment and desk audits, not directly during site visits" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option B (roof insulation U-value) and Option D (Window to Wall Ratio) are specific data points the Auditor may verify, not primary resources: "U-values and WWR are elements to check, not tools for the Auditor" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.4: Site Audit Procedures). The checklist ensures all aspects of the project are systematically reviewed, making it the primary resource (Option C).

The roles and responsibilities in the EDGE certification process are clearly defined to ensure a streamlined audit process. The EDGE Certification Protocol explicitly assigns the responsibility for providing documentation to support green building measures: "The EDGE Client is responsible for providing a full set of documentation to support each green building measure selected in the project assessment. This includes drawings, specifications, manufacturer’s data sheets, and any other evidence required by the Auditor to verify compliance with the EDGE standard during both the design and post-construction stages" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process). Option A, the Client, directly aligns with this requirement, as the Client (typically the project owner or developer) is the primary party submitting the project for certification and must provide all necessary evidence. Option B (the Facility Manager) is incorrect because the Facility Manager’s role is operational, not related to certification documentation: "Facility Managers may assist with operational data for EDGE Zero Carbon certification but are not responsible for providing design or construction documentation" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.3: Certification Levels). Option C (the Building Inspector) is also incorrect, as this role is external to the EDGE process and not involved in certification: "Building Inspectors ensure compliance with local codes, not EDGE requirements" (EDGE User Guide, Glossary). Option D (the project design team) may prepare documentation, but the responsibility lies with the Client to submit it: "While the design team often prepares technical documents, it is the Client’s responsibility to compile and provide them to the Auditor as part of the certification process" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Client). The EDGE User Guide further reinforces this by stating: "The Client must ensure all supporting documentation is complete and accessible to the Auditor to avoid delays in the certification process" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.2: Documentation Requirements). Therefore, the Client (Option A) is responsible for providing the full set of documentation for the audit.

In hot climates, reducing heat gain through building envelopes is a key strategy for energy efficiency, as emphasized in EDGE’s green building design principles. The EDGE User Guide discusses solar reflectivity (measured by the Solar Reflectance Index, SRI) for walls and roofs, stating: "Higher SRI values indicate greater reflectivity, which reduces heat absorption and lowers cooling energy demand in hot climates. For walls in hot climates, an SRI of 0.7 or higher is recommended to maximize energy savings" (EDGE User Guide, Section 3.5: Passive Design Strategies). The options provided are 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.7. Since 0.7 is the highest SRI value among the choices, it reflects the most solar radiation, thereby reducing the cooling load andimproving energy efficiency in a hot climate, as per EDGE’s guidance. Options A, B, and C have lower SRI values and would result in greater heat absorption, increasing energy use for cooling.

The EDGE measure EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas focuses on reducing energy consumption through the use of efficient lighting. The EDGE User Guide specifies the requirements for this measure: "To claim EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas, at least 90% of the lamps in internal areas must be energy-efficient, such as LED or CFL, with a luminous efficacy of at least 80 lumens per watt. This threshold ensures significant energy savings while allowing for minimal exceptions in specific areas" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures). Option C, 90%, directly matches this requirement. Option A (70%) and Option B (80%) are below the threshold, thus not qualifying for the measure. Option D (100%) exceeds the minimum requirement, but EDGE allows for flexibility with a 90% threshold to accommodate practical constraints: "A 90% requirement balances practicality with energy savings, recognizing that some areas may require specialized lighting" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations). Therefore, the minimum percentage to claim EEM22 is 90% (Option C).

The EDGE App Results Bar displays key outputs of the software analysis after a project is modeled. The EDGE User Guide details the contents of the Results Bar: "The EDGE App Results Bar provides a summary of the project’s performance, including percentage savings in energy, water, and embodied energy in materials, as well as the incremental cost, payback period, and carbon emissions reduction" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.4: Interpreting EDGE Results). Option C, incremental cost, is explicitly mentioned as part of the Results Bar, representing the additional cost of implementing green measures. Option A (building type) and Option B (occupant use) are inputs specified by the user during project setup, not outputs in the Results Bar, as noted: "Building type and occupant use are input parameters, not displayed in the Results Bar" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option D (climate conditions) is also an input parameter (selected via location), not an output: "Climate conditions are derived from the selected location and are not shown in the Results Bar" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 3.2: Climate Data Inputs). Thus, incremental cost (Option C) is the correct parameter found in the Results Bar.

The EDGE framework strictly prohibits Auditors from engaging in roles that could compromise their independence, such as providing design consultancy on the same project they are auditing. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols address this scenario explicitly: "An EDGE Auditor must not accept any role in the design development of a project they are auditing, as this creates a conflict of interest by blurring the lines between consultancy and independent verification. If the Client requests the Auditor to take on a design role, the Auditor should decline and may refer the Client to another qualified professional who is not involved in the audit process" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option B, refer the Client to an associate within the organization who works in another department, but is qualified and available to carry out the work, aligns with this guidance, as it maintains the Auditor’s independence while helping the Client find a suitable replacement. Option A (resign from the audit role) is an overreaction, as the request itself does not compromise the Auditor’s position unless accepted: "The Auditor is not required to resign unless they have already engaged in a conflicting role, which can be avoided by declining the request" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.1: Audit Process). Option C (accept the additional commission) is unethical, as it violates conflict-of-interest rules: "Accepting a design role on a project being audited undermines the Auditor’s impartiality, as they would be auditing theirown work, which is strictly prohibited" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process). Option D (refer the Client to an associate working with the Auditor on the EDGE audit) is also incorrect, as this associate is already involved in the audit, creating a potential conflict: "Referring the Client to someone involved in the same audit does not resolve the conflict of interest, as the audit team must remain independent from design activities" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). The EDGE User Guide reinforces this principle: "Auditors must maintain strict separation from design roles to ensure an unbiased audit, and should assist the Client by referring them to independent professionals if needed" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.5: Working with EDGE Auditors). Thus, referring the Client to a qualified associate in another department (Option B) is the correct action.

The post-construction stage in EDGE certification requires evidence to confirm that the efficiency measures claimed in the design stage have been implemented as specified. For window glazing, which affects energy efficiency through its U-value (thermal transmittance) and SHGC (Solar Heat Gain Coefficient), the EDGE Certification Protocol provides clear requirements: "At the post-construction stage, the Client must provide manufacturer’s data sheets for the window glazing measure, showing the make and model, U-value, and SHGC of the installed glass, to confirm that the glazing matches the specifications claimed in the self-assessment and meets the energy efficiency requirements" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.4: Post-Construction Requirements). Option C, manufacturer’s data sheets showing the make and model, U-value, and SHGC of the installed glass, directly matches this requirement, as it provides the specific technical data needed to verify compliance. Option A (design building elevations marking the window glass specifications) is relevant at the design stage, not post-construction: "Design elevations are required at the preliminary stage to show intended glazing specifications, not after construction" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option B (bill of quantities with specifications highlighted) is insufficient on its own, as it may not provide detailed technical data: "Bills of quantities may support purchase verification, but manufacturer’s data sheets are required for technical specifications like U-value and SHGC" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.4: Post-Construction Requirements). Option D (window schedule showing major glass types) is helpful but not sufficient, as it lacks the detailed technical data: "Window schedules may indicate glass types, but they do not replace the need for manufacturer’s data sheets with U-value and SHGC at post-construction" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.2: Documentation Requirements). The EDGE User Guide further clarifies: "For glazing measures, post-construction evidence must confirm the installed product’s performance through manufacturer’s data sheets, ensuring alignment with the design-stage claims" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.1: Insulation Measures). Thus, manufacturer’s data sheets (Option C) are required at the post-construction stage.

The preliminary certification stage requires specific documentation to verify the implementation of efficiency measures like Insulation for Cold Storage Envelope. The EDGE Certification Protocol outlines the evidence requirements: "For measures involving insulation, such as Insulation for Cold Storage Envelope, the Client must provide drawings at the preliminary certification stage that specify the U-value of the installed insulation to demonstrate compliance with the measure’s requirements. The U-value must be lower than the Base Case to qualify for savings" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option C, drawings showing the U-value specification of the cold storage envelope, directly aligns with this requirement. Option A (calculations of Coefficient of Performance) is irrelevant, as COP applies to HVAC systems, not insulation: "COP is used for chillers, not insulation measures" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures). Option B (manufacturer's data sheets for the HVAC system) is also unrelated, as the measure focuses on the envelope, not HVAC: "HVAC documentation is not required for insulation measures" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option D (purchase receipts showing the U-value) is more relevant at the post-construction stage: "Purchase receipts are typically required at the post-construction stage to confirm installation, while drawings suffice for design-stage verification" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.4: Post-Construction Requirements). Thus, drawings with U-value specifications (Option C) are required at preliminary certification.

The Coefficient of Performance (COP) is a critical metric in EDGE for assessing the energy efficiency of chillers, a common green building design element. The EDGE Methodology Report defines COP for electrical chillers: "The Coefficient of Performance (COP) of an electrical chiller is defined as the ratio of thermal output (cooling provided, measured in kW) to electrical input (power consumed, measured in kW). A higher COP indicates greater efficiency, as more cooling is produced per unit of electricity" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics). Option B, thermal output / electrical input, matches this definition directly. Option A (thermal output / thermal input) is incorrect, as it applies to heat-driven systems like absorption chillers, not electrical ones. Option C (electrical input / thermal output) inverts the ratio, representing the inverse of COP. Option D (electrical output / electrical input) is irrelevant, as chillers produce thermal output, not electrical output. The EDGE User Guide reinforces this: "For air-cooled and water-cooled chillers, COP is calculated as thermal output divided by electrical input to evaluate energy efficiency" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures).

Air-cooled chillers are a type of HVAC system commonly evaluated in EDGE for their energy efficiency in green building design. The EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0 outlines the components of air-cooled chillers in the context of energy efficiency measures. According to the EDGE User Guide (Version 2.1), air-cooled chillers differ from water-cooled chillers by not requiring a cooling tower or associated water-based components like a condenser pump. The guide states: "Air-cooled chillers consist of a compressor, air-cooled condenser, thermal expansion valve, and evaporator, which work together to provide cooling by rejecting heat directly to the ambient air" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures). Option A includes a cooling tower and condenser pump, which are specific to water-cooled chillers. Option D mentions a water-cooled condenser, which is incorrect for air-cooled systems. Option C includes a chilled water pump, which is not a core component of the chiller itself but part of the broader system. Option B accurately lists the compressor, condenser (air-cooled, implied), thermal expansion valve, and evaporator, aligning with the EDGE description of air-cooled chiller components.

The EDGE certification process assigns clear responsibilities to various stakeholders to ensure a smooth and accountable process. The EDGE Certification Protocol defines the role of the ProjectOwner (also referred to as the EDGE Client): "The Project Owner, as the EDGE Client, is responsible for the entire project within the EDGE certification system. This includes providing all necessary project documentation (e.g., drawings, specifications, and self-assessments), ensuring access to the site for audits, and paying the audit and certification fees as required by the Certification Provider" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.1: Roles and Responsibilities). Option C, Project Owner, directly aligns with this comprehensive responsibility. Option A (EDGE Expert) is incorrect, as the Expert’s role is advisory: "The EDGE Expert provides consultancy services, assisting with documentation and measure selection, but the ultimate responsibility for submission and payment lies with the Project Owner" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Expert). Option B (EDGE Auditor) is also incorrect, as the Auditor’s role is to verify compliance, not manage the project: "The EDGE Auditor conducts independent audits and is not responsible for project management, documentation provision, or fee payments" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor). Option D (EDGE Certification Provider) is responsible for issuing certificates and overseeing the process, not managing the project: "The EDGE Certification Provider, such as GBCI, reviews the Auditor’s recommendation and issues certificates, but does not manage the project or pay fees" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.3: Certification Decision). The EDGE User Guide further reinforces this: "The Project Owner must coordinate all aspects of the certification process, ensuring documentation is complete, site access is granted for post-construction audits, and all fees are paid to the Certification Provider in a timely manner" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.1: Project Preparation). This holistic responsibility makes the Project Owner (Option C) the correct answer.

The EDGE App relies on location-specific climate data to calculate resource savings, but not all cities are listed. The EDGE User Guide provides guidance for such cases: "If the project city is not listed in the EDGE App, the user should choose the closest city to the project location that is available in the database. If necessary, the user can edit the climate data (e.g., temperature, humidity) to better reflect the project’s actual conditions, ensuring accurate calculations" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option B, choose the closest city and edit the climate data if necessary, directly matches this protocol. Option A (write to EDGE Certifier and wait) is incorrect, as this is not a required step: "Users are not required to request new cities; they can proceed by selecting the closest city" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option C(select any city in the same climate zone globally) is too broad and inaccurate: "Choosing a city from a different region, even in the same climate zone, may lead to incorrect assumptions about local practices and climate" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 3.2: Climate Data Inputs). Option D (choose the capital city) is also incorrect unless it is the closest: "The capital city should only be selected if it is the nearest available option in the database" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Thus, the correct protocol is to choose the closest city and edit climate data (Option B).

The role of an EDGE Expert is well-defined within the EDGE framework to clarify their responsibilities and qualifications. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols provide a precise description: "An EDGE Expert is an individual accredited by the EDGE Certifier (such as GBCI or other authorized certification bodies) who can serve as a consultant to project teams, advising on the selection of green building measures, preparing the self-assessment in the EDGE software, and guiding the project toward certification" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Expert). Option B, an individual accredited by the EDGE Certifier who can serve as a consultant, directly matches this definition. Option A (a consultant who can issue a preliminary EDGE certificate) is incorrect, as Experts do not issue certificates: "Only the EDGE Certification Provider can issue a preliminary certificate, not the EDGE Expert" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.3: Certification Decision). Option C (an individual who can serve as both an auditor and a consultant upon EDGE Committee approval) is also incorrect, as this violates conflict-of-interest rules: "An individual cannot serve as both an EDGE Expert and Auditor on the same project, even with committee approval, to avoid conflicts of interest" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option D (an individual accredited by the EDGE Operations and Management Team) is wrong, as accreditation is handled by the Certifier, not the Operations team: "The EDGE Operations and Management Team oversees the program, while accreditation of Experts is managed by the EDGE Certifier" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.3: Program Structure). The EDGE User Guide further supports this: "EDGE Experts are accredited professionals who consult on projects, having passed the EDGE Expert exam administered through the Certifier" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.4: Working with EDGE Experts). Thus, Option B best describes an EDGE Expert.

EDGE Auditors must adhere to strict protocols ensuring that all claimed measures are supported by verifiable evidence, especially during audits. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols state: "If a claimed measure, such as water-efficient faucets, lacks supporting documentation like specifications or manufacturer’s data sheets, the Auditor must exclude the measure from the project assessment. The Auditor is not permitted to test equipment, substitute evidence, or mandate replacements, as their role is to verify, not rectify, the Client’s submission" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.2: Evidence Verification). Option A, exclude the faucets from the project, aligns with this protocol, as the lack of specifications prevents verification. Option B (test the faucets’ flow rates) is incorrect, as Auditors cannot conduct tests: "Auditors are not responsible for testing equipment; they must rely on provided documentation" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option C (require the owner to replace the faucets) oversteps the Auditor’s role: "Auditors cannot mandate changes to the project; they assess what is submitted" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option D (find a product with the same parameters) is also prohibited: "Auditors cannot substitute or assume evidence on behalf of the Client" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.2: Evidence Verification). Thus, the Auditor should exclude the faucets (Option A).