Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud Security Engineer Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Enable the compute.restrictXpnProjectLienRemoval organization-level policy constraint:

This constraint prevents users from removing liens from Shared VPC host projects.

By enabling this constraint, you ensure that the Shared VPC host project cannot be accidentally deleted, as liens prevent deletion without proper authorization.

Apply this constraint via the Google Cloud Console or using the gcloud command-line tool.

To meet data residency requirements on Google Cloud, the recommended option is to use Organization Policy Service constraints. This service allows you to define and enforce specific constraints across your organization, including constraints related to the geographical location where data is stored.

Organization Policy Service constraints allow administrators to enforce policies that restrict resources to specific locations. For instance, you can set policies to ensure that all storage buckets, databases, and other data resources reside within specific geographic boundaries. This helps in complying with data residency requirements.

References

Organization Policy Service documentation

Google Cloud Data Residency

https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/packet-mirroring

Packet Mirroring clones the traffic of specified instances in your Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) network and forwards it for examination. Packet Mirroring captures all traffic and packet data, including payloads and headers.

o ensure that users can only access the data in a BigQuery table during working hours, you can assign the BigQuery Data Viewer role with an IAM condition that specifies the allowed access times. This method leverages IAM Conditions, which allow you to define and enforce time-based access policies. Here's how to do it:

Identify the BigQuery Table: Determine which BigQuery table(s) require restricted access.

Create an IAM Policy with Conditions: Define an IAM policy that includes a condition for time-based access. You can do this using the Google Cloud Console, gcloud command-line tool, or directly editing the IAM policy JSON.

Specify Working Hours: In the IAM condition, specify the time frame during which access is allowed. For example, you can set access to be allowed from 9 AM to 5 PM on weekdays.

Assign the Role with Conditions: Apply the policy to the users or groups who need access. Ensure that the condition is correctly attached to the BigQuery Data Viewer role.

Example using gcloud:

gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding [PROJECT_ID] \

--member=user:[USER_EMAIL] \

--role=roles/bigquery.dataViewer \

--condition=expression="(request.time.getFullYear() == 2024) && (request.time.getDayOfWeek() in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) && (request.time.getHours() >= 9) && (request.time.getHours() < 17)",title="Working hours condition",description="Access limited to working hours"

References

Google Cloud IAM Conditions

Google Cloud BigQuery IAM Roles

To ensure end-user access is only allowed if the traffic originates from a specific known good CIDR and to utilize GCP's native SYN flood protection, you can use the following product:

VPC Firewall Rules: By configuring VPC firewall rules, you can control traffic to and from your instances based on IP address, protocol, and port. You can set rules to only allow traffic from a specific CIDR block, ensuring that only authorized traffic can reach your application.

Additionally, Google Cloud Platform provides built-in protections against SYN flood attacks, which are a type of DDoS attack. These protections are part of the underlying infrastructure and do not require additional configuration.

Using VPC firewall rules will help you comply with the internal requirement of allowing access only from a specific CIDR and provide the necessary SYN flood DDoS protection.

References

Google Cloud VPC Firewall Rules

Google Cloud DDoS Protection

To enhance the security of your microservices architecture on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and ensure that only approved container images are deployed, implementing Binary Authorization is a robust solution.​

Option A: Enforcing Binary Authorization in your GKE clusters ensures that only container images that meet your organization's security policies are deployed. By integrating container image vulnerability scanning into your Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipeline, you can assess images for known vulnerabilities before they are deployed. Binary Authorization can be configured to use these vulnerability scan results to make policy decisions, effectively preventing the deployment of insecure images. This approach leverages managed services provided by Google Cloud, ensuring scalability and compliance with security standards.​

Option B: Developing custom organization policies to restrict deployments to images within a specific Artifact Registry project helps in controlling the source of images but does not inherently assess the security posture of those images. Without integrated vulnerability scanning and enforcement mechanisms, this approach may not fully mitigate the risk of deploying vulnerable images.​

Option C: Building a system using third-party vulnerability databases and custom scripts requires significant maintenance and may not integrate seamlessly with GKE. This approach can be error-prone and lacks the efficiency of managed services designed for this purpose.​

Option D: Automatically deploying new images upon successful CI/CD builds ensures rapid deployment but does not address the need for security assessments of the images. While setting up firewall rules is good practice, it does not prevent the deployment of potentially vulnerable images.​

Therefore, Option A is the most effective approach, as it utilizes Google Cloud's managed services to enforce security policies and integrate vulnerability assessments directly into the deployment process, ensuring that only approved and secure container images are deployed to your GKE clusters.​

To manage IAM permissions efficiently for a large engineering team with different levels of access in development and production environments, follow these steps:

Create Separate Folders:

Create a folder for the development environment.

Create a folder for the production environment.

This allows you to organize projects and apply different policies and permissions to each environment.

Navigate to IAM & Admin in the GCP Console.

Select "Folders" from the left-hand menu.

Create a new folder named "Development".

Create a new folder named "Production".

Create Google Groups:

Create Google Groups for different teams within the engineering department (e.g., Development Team, Production Team).

This helps in managing permissions centrally.

Use the Google Admin Console to create groups.

Add relevant engineers to each group.

Assign Permissions at the Folder Level:

Assign appropriate IAM roles to the Google Groups at the folder level.

For example, grant Viewer role to the Development Team group for the development folder.

Grant Editor or more restrictive roles as required for the Production Team group for the production folder.

Select the development folder.

Go to the "Permissions" tab.

Click on "Add" and enter the email address of the Development Team Google Group.

Assign the "Viewer" role.

Repeat for the production folder, assigning appropriate roles to the Production Team Google Group.

By following these steps, you create a clear separation between development and production environments and manage permissions efficiently using Google Groups and folders.

Google Cloud IAM Documentation

Google Cloud Resource Manager Documentation

https://cloud.google.com/access-transparency Access approval Explicitly approve access to your data or configurations on Google Cloud. Access Approval requests, when combined with Access Transparency logs, can be used to audit an end-to-end chain from support ticket to access request to approval, to eventual access.

This approach allows you to control network traffic at the folder level. By attaching external IP addresses to the VMs in scope, you can ensure that the VMs have a unique, routable IP address for outbound connections. Then, by defining and applying a hierarchical firewall policy at the folder level, you can enforce that egress connections are limited to the specified IP range and only from the specified VPC network.

Setting up a Shared VPC allows you to create a centrally managed network that spans multiple projects. Here's how you can achieve this while ensuring separation of duties:

Create a Host Project:

Create a project that will act as the host project for your Shared VPC.

Configure Shared VPC:

In the host project, enable the Shared VPC feature.

Create Service Projects:

Create separate service projects for different teams, such as developers and other stakeholders.

Assign Roles:

Security Team: Grant the Compute Network Admin role. This allows the security team to manage network resources, such as firewall rules, subnets, and routes.

Developers: Share the host project’s network with the service projects. Assign roles like Compute Instance Admin to developers in the service projects, enabling them to create and manage VM instances without altering network configurations.

Firewall Management:

The security team will define and manage firewall rules within the host project, ensuring consistent and secure network policies.

Benefits:

Separation of Duties: Security teams handle networking, and developers focus on application deployment and management.

Centralized Control: Network policies are centrally managed, ensuring compliance and security.

Scalability: Easy to add new projects and teams without compromising the overall network security.

References

Google Cloud VPC Documentation

Managing Resources with Shared VPC

Objective: Ensure VMs can access Cloud Storage without reaching the public internet.

Solution: Enable Private Google Access on the VPC network, allowing VMs with only internal IP addresses to access Google APIs and services privately.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Go to the VPC Network section.

Step 3: Select the relevant VPC network and subnet.

Step 4: Enable Private Google Access for the subnet.

Private Google Access ensures that instances can access Google APIs and services (such as Cloud Storage) over a private network connection, without requiring a public IP address.

"The service evaluates all changes and remote access attempts to detect runtime attacks in near-real time." : https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/docs/concepts-container-threat-detection-overview This has nothing to do with KNOWN security Vulns in images

Understand Organization Policies:

Organization policies allow you to enforce restrictions on Google Cloud resources to adhere to your organization’s security and compliance requirements.

Policies can be set at the organization, folder, or project level, with project-level policies able to override higher-level policies unless explicitly prevented.

Identify the Policy Constraint:

The specific constraint in question is likely constraints/compute.vmExternalIpAccess, which controls whether VMs can have external IP addresses.

Check Policy Overwrites:

Navigate to the Organization Policies page in the Google Cloud Console.

Check the policy settings at the project level under the affected folder to see if there is an override in place with an 'allow' value.

This override would permit the creation of VMs with external IP addresses despite the higher-level restriction.

Resolve the Policy Conflict:

If an override is found, remove or modify the project-level policy to align with the organizational policy denying external IP addresses.

Communicate with project administrators to ensure they understand and comply with the overarching security policies.

The problem requires exposing a sensitive AI model endpoint internally (strictly isolated from the internet) to a defined list of projects within the organization.

Internal Exposure and Isolation: An "internal Application Load Balancer" is suitable for exposing services within your VPC network, ensuring they are not accessible from the internet.

Private Service Connect (PSC): This is the key technology for securely and privately exposing services from one VPC network (the service producer, where the model is) to other VPC networks (the service consumers, the defined list of projects) within the same or different organizations. PSC allows consumers to access services using internal IP addresses, with traffic remaining on Google's private network. You can configure a service attachment that points to the internal load balancer, and then permit specific consumer projects to connect to this service attachment.Extract Reference: "Private Service Connect is a capability of Google Cloud networking that allows consumers to access managed services privately from inside their VPC network. Similarly, it allows managed service producers to host these services in their own separate VPC networks and offer a private connection to their consumers." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Private Service Connect | VPC" - https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/private-service-connect)

Extract Reference: "Private Service Connect endpoints are internal IP addresses in a consumer VPC network that can be directly accessed by clients in that network. Endpoints are created by deploying a forwarding rule that references a service attachment or a bundle of Google APIs." (Google Cloud Documentation: "About Private Service Connect | VPC" - https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/private-service-connect)

Extract Reference: "Private Service Connect can be used to access managed services that are owned by Google, third-party software as a service (SaaS) companies, or other teams within the consumer's own company. Both published services and Google APIs can be targets of Private Service Connect." (Google Cloud Documentation: "About Private Service Connect | VPC" - https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/private-service-connect)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Shared VPC and central firewall rules: While Shared VPC centralizes network management, it does not provide a direct managed service exposure mechanism like PSC for a model endpoint to specific projects. It's more about sharing subnets and network resources. Administering all firewall rules centrally would also not meet the need for exposing only this specific model to a defined list of projects in a managed, private service pattern.

B. Activate Private Google Access (PGA): Private Google Access allows VMs without external IP addresses to access Google APIs and services (like Cloud Storage, BigQuery, etc.) privately from within their VPC network. It's for consuming Google services, not for exposing custom services hosted in a Google Cloud project to other projects.

D. External Application Load Balancer + Cloud Armor: An "external Application Load Balancer" exposes the service to the internet. While Cloud Armor can restrict access based on IP addresses, it still involves internet exposure, which contradicts the "strictly isolated from the internet" requirement. Restricting to "Google Cloud IP addresses" doesn't guarantee access only to a defined list of projects and still exposes the service externally.

Therefore, creating an internal Application Load Balancer and exposing it via Private Service Connect is the most suitable and secure solution for this scenario.

Objective: Ensure private communication between application tiers in different GCP Organizations.

Solution: Use VPC peering to enable private communication without traversing the public internet.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the VPC Network Peering page.

Step 3: Create a new VPC peering connection in the project hosting the application tier.

Step 4: Specify the VPC network in the other organization (hosting the storage tier) to peer with.

Step 5: Accept the peering request in the other project.

Step 6: Configure the necessary routes and firewall rules to allow traffic between the peered VPC networks.

VPC peering allows you to connect two VPC networks privately and directly, ensuring that traffic between them does not traverse the public internet.

The problem's critical requirements are: centralized collection of all audit logs (including Data Access logs) from a production folder to a central BigQuery dataset, with long-term retention, and most importantly, the ability to intercept and override any project-level log sinks to prevent duplicate storage or misrouting.

Aggregated Log Sink at Folder Level: To centralize logs from all current and future projects within the "production folder," an aggregated sink configured at the folder level is the correct approach. Logs generated in child projects will flow up to the folder level and be matched by this sink.

Extract Reference: "Aggregated exports allow you to export logs from multiple Google Cloud projects, folders, or your entire organization. An aggregated export can include all logs from all included resources, or you can use queries to include only specific logs." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Route logs to supported destinations | Cloud Logging" - https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export/aggregated_exports)

Intercepting Sink (--intercept-logs / overrideDestinations): This is the crucial feature to meet the "intercept and override" requirement. When an aggregated sink is configured as an "intercepting" sink, any log entries that match its filter are immediately routed to its destination and are not processed by any lower-level sinks (e.g., project-level sinks). This ensures that logs are not inadvertently routed elsewhere and prevents duplicate storage.

Extract Reference: "An intercepting sink is an aggregated sink that, if it includes the overrideDestinations field set to true, stops matched log entries from propagating to lower-level sinks in the Cloud Logging resource hierarchy." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Route logs to supported destinations | Cloud Logging" - https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export/aggregated_exports)

BigQuery Destination and IAM Permissions: BigQuery is specified as the long-term retention destination. The sink's writer_identity (a service account automatically created for the sink) needs appropriate IAM permissions (e.g., BigQuery Data Editor or BigQuery User) on the target BigQuery dataset to write logs.

Inclusion Filter for Audit Logs: An inclusion filter is necessary to ensure only the required audit logs, including Data Access logs (logName:"cloudaudit.googleapis.com" OR logName:"data_access"), are routed.

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Standard aggregated log sink... Logs Bucket Writer: A standard aggregated sink does not intercept or override lower-level sinks. Also, Logs Bucket Writer role is for Cloud Logging buckets, not BigQuery. The correct role would be for BigQuery.

B. Log sink in each production project: This is not a centralized solution and would require manual configuration for every project, which is inefficient and error-prone for "all current and future projects." It also doesn't provide any override mechanism.

C. Aggregated log sink at the organization level... configure a log view: While an organization-level sink offers broad centralization, if the requirement is specifically for a production folder and not the entire organization, a folder-level intercepting sink is more targeted. A log view is for displaying logs, not for routing or overriding. The --include-children flag is implied for aggregated sinks but doesn't provide the intercepting behavior.

Therefore, creating an intercepting aggregated log sink at the production folder level, configured to send audit logs to BigQuery, is the precise solution to meet all the stated requirements, especially the crucial "intercept and override" condition.

De-identifying sensitive data Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) can de-identify sensitive data in text content, including text stored in container structures such as tables. De-identification is the process of removing identifying information from data. The API detects sensitive data such as personally identifiable information (PII), and then uses a de-identification transformation to mask, delete, or otherwise obscure the data. For example, de-identification techniques can include any of the following: Masking sensitive data by partially or fully replacing characters with a symbol, such as an asterisk (*) or hash (#). Replacing each instance of sensitive data with a token, or surrogate, string. Encrypting and replacing sensitive data using a randomly generated or pre-determined key. When you de-identify data using the CryptoReplaceFfxFpeConfig or CryptoDeterministicConfig infoType transformations, you can re-identify that data, as long as you have the CryptoKey used to originally de-identify the data. https://cloud.google.com/dlp/docs/deidentify-sensitive-data

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The critical requirements are:

De-identify PII (protect individual privacy).

Retain original format and consistency (analytical integrity).

Avoid full irreversible deletion (the process must be reversible/re-identifiable).

Sensitive Data Protection (SDP), also known as Cloud DLP, is Google Cloud's specialized service for discovering, classifying, and de-identifying sensitive data. The specific de-identification technique that meets the need to retain the original format and consistency is Format-Preserving Encryption (FPE).

Extracts:

"Sensitive Data Protection supports several types of tokenization, including transformations that can be reversed, or 're-identified.'" (Source 5.3)

"Pseudonymization by replacing with cryptographic format preserving token (CryptoReplaceFfxFpeConfig)... Preserves format... Reversible transformations can be reversed to re-identify the sensitive data using the content.reidentify method." (Source 5.3)

"Format Preserving Encryption (FPE) is an encryption algorithm that preserves the format of the original data set, but it replaces it with tokens that have no inherent meaning or value... FPE ensures the ciphertext maintains the same format (length, number of hyphens, etc.) as the original plaintext." (Source 5.1)

FPE is necessary for analytical integrity when the structure/format (e.g., 9-digit SSN, 16-digit credit card number) is required for processing in downstream systems.