IIA-CIA-Part1 IIA Internal Audit Fundamentals Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

Employing the use of data analytics tools to sort, analyze, and detect anomalies in the data best demonstrates due professional care by the internal auditor. This approach allows for efficient and effective review of large volumes of data, enabling the auditor to identify patterns and irregularities that may indicate fraudulent transactions, while also adhering to the principles of competence and due care outlined in the IIA's standards.

IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

According to IIA standards, if nonconformance with the Standards affects the internal audit activity's ability to fulfill its professional responsibilities or meet stakeholder expectations, the internal audit activity should disclose the nonconformance and its impact. This is essential for maintaining transparency and accountability, ensuring that all stakeholders are informed of the internal audit's effectiveness and areas needing improvement.

IIA Standard 1322 - Disclosure of Nonconformance, which outlines requirements for disclosing the results of quality assurance and improvements, particularly concerning nonconformance.

Escalating unresolved high-risk issues to senior management and the board is in line with IIA guidance, which underscores the importance of ensuring that significant audit findings are addressed appropriately to protect the organization’s interests​​.

According to IIA guidance, the internal audit activity should refrain from indicating conformance with the Standards until all areas of nonconformance identified in a quality assessment have been addressed and the chief audit executive has confirmed this to the audit committee. This ensures that the internal audit activity only claims conformance when it fully meets the Standards, maintaining the credibility of the audit function.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, and guidance on external quality assessments.

The scenario that best illustrates the concept of due professional care is when an internal auditor establishes engagement objectives, reviews processes systematically, and assures process owners that all significant risk events were identified and tested using a disciplined approach. This scenario reflects adherence to the standard of due professional care which mandates that internal auditors must apply the care and skill expected of a reasonably prudent and competent auditor.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, particularly those standards related to due professional care.

According to the Standards set by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), an internal audit activity may report conformance with the Standards even if it has not been in existence for more than five years provided that it has conducted periodic self-assessments and meets the other necessary criteria of the IIA standards. External assessments are required at least once every five years, but conformance can still be reported if internal assessments are conducted in the interim.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

According to IIA guidance, the internal audit activity can consult on CSR program design and implementation, serve as an advisor on CSR governance and risk management, and identify and mitigate risks to help meet the CSR program objectives. These roles enable the internal audit to add value through both advisory and assurance services regarding CSR, aligning with their expertise in governance, risk management, and control.

IIA guidance on the role of internal auditing in corporate social responsibility; Standards on advisory services.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting is largely voluntary, unlike financial reporting which is typically required by law. Organizations choose to engage in CSR activities and reporting to demonstrate their commitment to ethical behavior and sustainable business practices. This aspect of CSR highlights the discretionary nature of these initiatives and their reporting, aligning with the current understanding in corporate governance and sustainability circles.

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards

If the internal audit activity accepts a request to determine appropriate risk management responses for management, it would impair its independence. The role of internal audit is to provide assurance and consulting services, but not to take on management responsibilities such as making decisions on risk responses. Doing so would compromise the objectivity and independence required of the internal audit function. References: The IIA’s International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards), specifically Standard 1100 - Independence and Objectivity, and Standard 1112 - Chief Audit Executive Roles Beyond Internal Auditing.

The primary objective when implementing a risk management framework is to enhance an organization's confidence in achieving its strategy. A risk management framework helps an organization identify, assess, and manage risks that could impact its ability to achieve strategic objectives. By systematically managing risks, the organization can make informed decisions, allocate resources more effectively, and improve its overall resilience, thus increasing confidence in achieving its strategic goals.

COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Performance.

The IIA’s Practice Guide on Risk Management.

The 'adaptability culture' within an organization is best described as one that emerges in environments requiring quick response and high-risk decision-making. This type of culture is agile, allowing an organization to adapt rapidly to new challenges, market demands, or technological changes.

Robert E. Quinn and Kim S. Cameron's "Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture", which outlines different types of organizational cultures and their characteristics.

According to IIA guidance, the practice by the chief audit executive (CAE) that best enhances the organizational independence of the internal audit activity is meeting privately with the board at least annually. This practice ensures that the internal audit activity can operate independently of management and directly report and discuss significant matters with the board, which is critical for maintaining its independence and objectivity.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

CQUESTION NO: 88

Which of the following statements is true regarding electronic funds transfer (EFT)?

A. EFT is a popular mechanism for improving efficiency, but results in less internal control.

B. EFT significantly reduces the risk of fraud by eliminating the need for authorizations.

C. EFT eliminates payment delays due mostly to the introduction of automated cash controls,

D. EFT makes use of numerous automated controls, but is still vulnerable to fraudulent accounting entries.

Answer: D

Electronic funds transfer (EFT) makes use of numerous automated controls, which improve efficiency and reduce the risk of some types of fraud. However, it is still vulnerable to fraudulent accounting entries, such as those arising from overriding existing controls or exploiting security weaknesses. Therefore, while EFT systems incorporate significant controls, they do not completely eliminate the risk of fraud.References: Best practices and guidelines on electronic funds transfer from financial management and information systems security sources.

Prior to the commencement of an IT audit, the ability to assess the potential for fraud risk and identifying common types of fraud associated with the engagement is a required competency for internal auditors. Understanding the specific fraud risks inherent in IT systems and processes is essential for effectively auditing these areas, particularly in detecting and preventing fraud.

IIA's Competency Framework for Internal Auditors

In consulting engagements, according to the IIA's Standards, a work program is not required but may be developed. This allows internal auditors flexibility to design an approach that best fits the nature of the consulting engagement.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards), particularly the standards related to consulting activities.

The internal audit activity is best positioned to monitor the organization's risk mitigations. This role involves regularly reviewing and assessing the effectiveness of risk management processes and controls that management has implemented to mitigate identified risks. This monitoring function is a key component of the internal audit's assurance services.

IIA Standard 2120 - Risk Management

The board of directors is responsible for setting the risk appetite of the organization. They define the level and type of risk the organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its goals and objectives. This strategic role ensures that the organization's risk management framework aligns with its long-term vision and governance structure.

IIA guidance on governance and risk management

Conformance with The IIA's Code of Ethics is mandatory for internal auditors because it provides the basis for stakeholder trust and confidence in the validity of the profession of internal auditing and the internal audit activity's findings. Ethical behavior in internal auditing ensures that auditors are trusted by those who rely on their conclusions, advice, and information, thereby enhancing the integrity and credibility of the audit results.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

A characteristic typical of the internal audit activity is that it responds to the needs and desires of senior management and the board, but remains independent of the areas under review. This ensures that while internal audit activities are aligned with the strategic priorities of the organization, they maintain an unbiased stance that is critical for effectively assessing risk and control processes.

IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

To manage the impairment caused by an internal auditor's personal relationship affecting audit impartiality, a functional audit committee should be utilized. The audit committee is responsible for ensuring the independence and objectivity of the internal audit function. This committee can take actions such as reassigning the audit task, reviewing the affected audit work, or instituting additional oversight for audits in that area.

The IIA's Standards on objectivity and conflicts of interest (specifically standards relating to managing impairments to independence and objectivity).

In the accounts payable function, the most likely fraud scenario involves the creation of fictitious vendors. This fraud can lead to improper disbursements where payments are made to non-existent entities, effectively siphoning money out of the organization. This type of fraud is easier to execute in accounts payable compared to other functions because it can involve relatively straightforward manipulations of vendor master files and payment processes. Such schemes can result in significant financial losses and are a common concern for internal auditors reviewing accounts payable controls.

IIA Practice Guide on Accounts Payable Risks and Controls.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) publications on common fraud schemes.

Input controls are designed to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and validity of data entered into a business application. These controls can include validation checks, input masks, and error detection methods that verify data at the point of entry. Whether data is entered directly by staff, remotely by business partners, or through web-enabled applications, input controls help maintain the integrity of the data by preventing errors and unauthorized input. These controls are crucial in maintaining data quality and integrity in any business application.

The IIA’s Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) on Information Technology Controls.

COBIT 5 Framework on Information and Technology Governance.

The IIA guidance specifies that the chief audit executive (CAE) should communicate the results of the quality assurance and improvement program (QAIP) to senior management and the board. This includes providing a written conformance statement that indicates whether the internal audit activity conforms to the IIA’s International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. This practice ensures transparency and accountability in the internal audit function and helps stakeholders understand the level of adherence to professional standards.

IIA Standard 1320: Reporting on the Quality Assurance and Improvement Program

IIA Practice Guide: Quality Assurance and Improvement Program

According to the IIA guidance on using the maturity model for assessing an organization's risk management program, a key activity to examine is "Monitor and Review." This element evaluates how well the organization continues to monitor its risk environment and reviews the effectiveness of risk management strategies over time. It is crucial for ensuring that risk management adapts to changes and continues to align with organizational objectives.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - Guidance on Risk Management Maturity Models

According to the stakeholder theory of corporate social responsibility (CSR), employees are considered key stakeholders and are often referred to as the organization's best assets and a primary responsibility. This view is in contrast to the shareholder-centric model that prioritizes shareholders' needs above all else. Stakeholder theory argues that long-term success is achieved by managing and balancing the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the community. References: Theories and frameworks on stakeholder theory in CSR, which emphasize the importance of considering various stakeholders in business decisions.

An internal auditor assigned to review an area for which they previously had operational responsibilities demonstrates an impairment to internal audit independence. This scenario presents a self-review threat, where the auditor might be biased, consciously or unconsciously, in their evaluation of controls and operations due to their previous involvement. References: IIA Standard 1130: Impairment to Independence or Objectivity.

Internal audit fraud prevention and detection activities are the best example of an ongoing independent monitoring activity among the options provided. These activities are designed to be independent of the management and are critical in continuously monitoring and identifying potential fraudulent activities within the organization.

IIA standards on fraud and monitoring

When the chief audit executive (CAE) is responsible for risk management, it is essential to maintain the independence and objectivity of the internal audit activity. Therefore, the oversight of the internal audit activity's assurance over risk management should be assigned to a party outside of the internal audit activity. This ensures that there is no conflict of interest and that the internal audit function can provide unbiased assurance on risk management processes.

The IIA’s Standards, particularly Standard 1112 on Chief Audit Executive Roles Beyond Internal Auditing.

The IIA’s Practice Guide on Independence and Objectivity.

The most important factor in the internal audit activity’s independence specified in an internal audit charter is the description of the internal audit activity's reporting structure. This element defines to whom the chief audit executive reports functionally and administratively, which is critical to ensuring the independence and objectivity of the internal audit function from management and other potential sources of bias.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing on independence and objectivity.

The board manages the process of developing, approving, and executing the strategic plan of the organization to ensure adequate governance. This responsibility includes aligning the strategic plan with the organization's goals and monitoring its execution, which is a key governance role.

Corporate governance principles; IIA guidance on the role of the board in strategic planning.