IIA-CIA-Part1 IIA Internal Audit Fundamentals Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

According to IIA guidance on the quality assurance and improvement program:

Monitoring of the internal audit activity’s performance must indeed be ongoing to ensure continuous improvement.

All aspects of the internal audit activity should be evaluated, not just selected parts.

IIA Standard 1300 - Quality Assurance and Improvement Program

The primary benefit of an effective professional development program for internal auditors is that it enhances their business acumen. By continuously improving their knowledge and skills, internal auditors become better equipped to understand and evaluate the complex business processes they audit. This enhancement allows them to provide more valuable insights and recommendations to the organization. Professional development programs cover a wide range of topics, including industry trends, emerging risks, and new auditing techniques, all of which contribute to the auditors' ability to perform their duties effectively.

The IIA Standards: Standard 1230 – Continuing Professional Development: "Internal auditors must enhance their knowledge, skills, and other competencies through continuing professional development."

COSO Framework: Emphasizes the importance of ongoing professional development to ensure effective internal control and risk management.

According to the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) guidance, the nature and scope of assurance and consulting services provided by the internal audit function should be clearly delineated in the internal audit charter. The charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity's purpose, authority, and responsibility, setting the scope within which the internal audit team operates.

The IIA's International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF), specifically the guidance related to internal audit charters.

Top of Form

To encourage and maintain internal audit objectivity, it is crucial for internal auditors to have an independent reporting line, preferably directly to the audit committee. This policy helps minimize potential biases or influences from management and ensures that audit findings are communicated openly and transparently without fear of repercussion or conflict of interest, thereby safeguarding the objectivity of the audit function.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

When an internal auditor encounters a situation where a former colleague works in the department being audited, declaring a conflict of interest and handing over the engagement to another auditor is the best way to ensure objectivity. This approach avoids any potential biases that might arise from personal connections and ensures the credibility and integrity of the audit process are maintained.

The IIA’s Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and Code of Ethics.

For consulting engagements, the criteria used to evaluate governance, risk management, and controls are determined jointly by internal auditors and the management. This is distinct from assurance engagements, where criteria are set independently by the auditor to assess whether an organization’s components are functioning as intended and to evaluate compliance with policies and procedures. This distinction emphasizes the collaborative nature of consulting engagements in contrast to the independent nature of assurance engagements.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

Control activities are indeed carried out by first-line (operational management) and second-line (risk management and compliance functions) to mitigate risks. These activities are key components of an organization's internal control system, designed to address and manage risks identified across the organization. Internal auditors do not implement control activities; instead, they assess the adequacy and effectiveness of these controls.

COSO Framework on Internal Control and IIA guidance on control activities.

In a consulting engagement regarding a debt collections process, an internal auditor would primarily focus on advising management on streamlining the recording of accounts receivable. This action aims to add value by providing expert advice to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the process, consistent with the IIA’s guidelines on the role of internal auditors in consulting activities.

IIA Standard 1000 - Purpose, Authority, and Responsibility

Being denied access to necessary information such as expenditure and budget reports because they are considered confidential affects the authority of the internal audit activity. Authority, as granted by the audit charter, should include unrestricted access to all records and data required by the audit team to perform its duties effectively. Limitations on access impair the audit's scope and the auditors' ability to conduct thorough and complete audits. References: IIA Standard 1110: Organizational Independence, which stresses the importance of internal auditors having appropriate and unrestricted access to information.

A significant threat to internal audit objectivity arises when the chief audit executive reports directly to the chief financial officer, especially if the CFO previously led the internal audit activity. This reporting relationship can undermine the independence necessary for objective audits, as the CFO might influence the scope or outcome of audit engagements to suit certain financial reporting outcomes or to cover previous decisions made while in charge of internal audit.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing on independence and objectivity.

The best step for the chief audit executive (CAE) to take when determining that the internal audit activity lacks adequate independence is to request that the board restructure the reporting line to ensure the CAE has unrestricted access to the board. This action will help to enhance the independence and objectivity of the internal audit activity by ensuring that the CAE reports functionally to the board, which is a key aspect of maintaining organizational independence.

The IIA Standards: Standard 1110 – Organizational Independence: "The chief audit executive must report to a level within the organization that allows the internal audit activity to fulfill its responsibilities. The chief audit executive must confirm to the board, at least annually, the organizational independence of the internal audit activity."

IIA Practice Guide: "Independence and Objectivity": Discusses the importance of reporting lines and organizational structure in maintaining the independence of the internal audit activity.

An example of an application control specifically involves the software or system used to process information. A two-stage authentication process to access customer information is an application control because it involves the authentication mechanisms within the application software to secure access to sensitive data. This control helps in verifying the identity of users and ensuring that access to critical data is restricted to authorized personnel only.

IT Governance Institute’s COBIT Framework.

The duties that should not be performed by the same person to ensure adequate segregation of duties include recording cash receipts and preparing bank reconciliations. Combining these duties in one individual can lead to potential fraud or errors not being detected within the cash management processes.

Common principles of internal control regarding segregation of duties, aimed at preventing fraud and errors by ensuring no one individual has control over all aspects of a financial transaction.

Requesting advances against a monthly salary frequently, as in option C, could indicate financial stress or potentially dubious financial management behaviors. This situation could heighten an auditor's professional skepticism regarding potential fraud due to possible motives or incentives to commit fraud.

Internal Auditing Standards and professional guidelines on fraud risk awareness and assessment.

Due professional care required of internal auditors includes considering the cost of assurance in relation to potential benefits. This reflects the need to balance resource expenditure against the significance and risk of the audit area, ensuring that audit efforts are both efficient and effective. This principle is a fundamental aspect of professional judgment and prudent decision-making in internal auditing.

IIA Standard on Due Professional Care.

The most effective technique for an internal auditor during interviews is to appear confident but not arrogant, as per option D. This approach helps maintain professionalism and facilitates open communication, which is crucial for gathering accurate information. This technique aligns with the IIA's guidelines on effective communication and professionalism during audit engagements. The other options could potentially lead to misunderstandings or might not create an environment conducive to honest and clear communication.

IIA Practice Advisory on Interviewing Techniques

According to guidance on corporate responsibility and sustainability, the primary reason to implement environmental and social safeguards within an organization is to achieve and maintain sustainable development. These safeguards help ensure that the organization's operations do not adversely affect the environment or society, supporting long-term sustainability goals, which is a core aspect of modern corporate governance and ethics.

Sustainability and environmental management guidance from international standards such as ISO 14001 and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).

The most effective risk management strategy for a manufacturer experiencing regular fluctuations in the price of electrical power, which impacts the bottom line, would be to use a forward contract for bulk power purchases. This strategy allows the manufacturer to lock in power prices for a future period, thus reducing the risk associated with price volatility and providing more predictable cost planning.

Risk management strategies in operations and finance, as discussed in business management and internal auditing literature, which advocate using financial instruments like forward contracts to hedge against price fluctuations.

The appropriate role for the internal audit activity is assisting the organization in maintaining effective controls. The internal audit function provides an independent and objective assessment of whether the organization’s risk management, control, and governance processes are adequate and functioning effectively. Implementing new controls or ensuring key risks are managed falls outside the typical scope of internal audit responsibilities, which are primarily advisory and evaluative, not operational.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

A risk assessment process is a crucial precondition for developing an effective system of internal controls. It helps identify and analyze risks relevant to achieving the organization’s objectives, thereby informing the design and implementation of appropriate controls to mitigate those risks. This foundational step ensures that the internal controls are aligned with the specific risk landscape of the organization.

COSO Framework on Internal Control, Principle Related to Risk Assessment

Competency assessment tools are designed to evaluate the internal audit team’s skills and identify areas needing improvement. IIA standards recommend regular assessments to ensure the audit team is sufficiently skilled to perform effective audits​​.

The skillset that the chief audit executive should utilize to manage a situation where there is a disagreement and conflict during a closing meeting of a procurement audit is the ability to manage conflict. This skill is crucial to resolve disputes, ensure mutual understanding, and maintain professional relationships, which are key in achieving constructive outcomes from audit engagements.

IIA guidance on professional skills for internal auditors, which emphasizes conflict management as essential for dealing with disagreements during audits effectively.

The most effective way a chief audit executive (CAE) can demonstrate to the board that the internal audit team has the necessary skills to achieve its annual goals is through a competency assessment. This assessment measures and documents the collective skills and knowledge within the internal audit activity, ensuring they align with the requirements of the audit plan and the organization's objectives. Competency assessments can identify gaps and provide a basis for training and development, making it an essential tool for demonstrating capability.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

A legitimate response to the prospective client under these circumstances would be to decline the engagement due to lack of specific competencies or make arrangements to obtain assistance from a competent IT auditing expert. These options ensure that the internal audit activity maintains its professional competence and integrity by only undertaking engagements where they can provide or ensure the required level of expertise.

IIA standards on professional competence and due care, which stipulate that internal auditors must have or obtain the necessary knowledge and skills to perform their tasks effectively, and if not, they should decline the engagement or seek expert assistance.

In consulting engagements, the needs and expectations of the engagement client are a greater consideration compared to assurance engagements. This is because consulting engagements are typically more advisory in nature and specifically tailored to provide value and improve an organization's operations based on the client's requirements. In assurance engagements, the focus is more on the independent assessment against criteria or standards, which does not vary based on client needs to the same extent.

IIA Practice Advisory on Consulting Services

The most effective type of fraud test for looking for possible fictitious vendors would be running checks to uncover post office box addresses that match employee addresses. This test directly targets a common tactic used in vendor fraud schemes, where employees might set up fictitious vendor accounts and direct payments to themselves via P.O. boxes.

IIA resources on auditing for fraud, which often discuss various methods for detecting fictitious vendors, including address comparisons.

Posting the organization's code of conduct on its website is a strategy to mitigate cultural risk by promoting transparency and establishing a clear set of behavioral expectations for both employees and stakeholders. This helps in shaping a positive organizational culture where ethical behavior is encouraged and deviations from expected conduct are minimized. By making the code of conduct publicly available, the organization demonstrates its commitment to integrity and ethical behavior, which can enhance trust and accountability. References: The IIA’s International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards), specifically Standard 2110 - Governance, and COSO’s Internal Control - Integrated Framework.

Developing a risk and control model for an engagement should take into account the specific characteristics, processes, and risks of the organization being audited. Tailoring the model ensures that the controls are relevant and effective for the specific context of the organization, leading to a more accurate and useful audit outcome. References:

IIA's International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF), particularly on risk-based auditing and control frameworks.

Obtaining insurance to protect against losses due to bad weather conditions is a strategy of risk sharing. Risk sharing involves transferring a portion of the risk to another party, often through mechanisms like insurance, hedging, or outsourcing. By obtaining insurance, an organization transfers the financial impact of adverse weather conditions to the insurer, thereby sharing the risk.

Risk avoidance (A) involves eliminating the risk entirely by not engaging in the activity that generates the risk. Risk reduction (B) refers to actions taken to decrease the likelihood or impact of the risk. Risk acceptance (C) means acknowledging the risk and deciding to bear the consequences without taking steps to mitigate it.

ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management – Guidelines

COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework