GH-900 Microsoft GitHub Foundations Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Forking a repository on GitHub is a common practice, especially when contributing to open-source projects or when you want to build on existing work. Here are the two main reasons for forking a repository:

B. To propose changes to the base repository:

One of the primary reasons for forking a repository is to make changes or improvements that you can later propose to the original repository (often called the "upstream" repository). This is typically done through a pull request. By forking the repository, you get your own copy of the project where you can freely experiment, make changes, and then propose those changes back to the original project.

C. To create a new repository based on an existing one:

Forking is also used to create a new repository that is a copy of an existing one. This allows you to work on the project independently of the original repository, effectively creating a new direction for the project or using it as a starting point for a different purpose. This is particularly useful for customization, experimentation, or when you want to build something different while still leveraging the existing codebase.

Explanation of Other Options:

A. To create an issue or open a discussion:

This is incorrect because creating an issue or opening a discussion can be done directly on the original repository without needing to fork it. Forking is unnecessary for these actions.

D. To create a new branch to develop a new feature:

While creating a new branch is related to development, it does not require a fork. Branches are typically created within the same repository to work on new features. Forking is used when you need an entirely separate copy of the repository.

Given this information, the correct answers are B and C.

Git is a widely-used version control system that has several defining features:

Distributed Version Control:

Git is a distributed version control system, meaning that every developer has a full copy of the entire repository, including its history, on their local machine. This enables greater flexibility, as work can be done offline and each user has access to the full project history.

Open Source Software:

Git is open-source, meaning its source code is freely available for use, modification, and distribution. This fosters a large community of users and contributors who continuously improve the software.

Efficiency with Large Projects:

Git is designed to handle projects of any size with speed and efficiency. It can manage large codebases and many contributors without significant performance degradation, making it suitable for everything from small personal projects to large, complex software systems.

Incorrect Options:

Option B is incorrect because Git is not a sequential version control system, nor is it inherently tied to cloud-based services. GitHub, GitLab, and other platforms offer cloud hosting for Git repositories, but Git itself is a version control tool.

Option C is incorrect because Git is not limited to small projects; it is designed to scale efficiently, and the other features mentioned are only partial descriptions of Git's capabilities.

Option D is incorrect because Git is not a centralized version control system; it is distributed. Additionally, Git is open-source, not proprietary, and is used for projects of all sizes.

GitHub Actions are automated workflows that can be triggered by various events on GitHub. Some common events that trigger workflows include pushes to a repository, creation of issues, and comments on discussion posts.

Triggering GitHub Actions:

Option D (Pushing to a GitHub repository) is correct because this is one of the most common triggers for CI/CD workflows.

Option F (Creating an Issue) is correct because issues are commonly used as triggers for workflows, such as automatically assigning a label or notifying a team.

Option A (Adding a comment to a discussion post) is correct because actions can be triggered by activity on discussion posts, including comments.

Incorrect Options:

Option B (Creating a new repository) is incorrect because this action typically does not trigger workflows within a specific repository.

Option C (Committing a change to a local git repository) is incorrect because GitHub Actions are triggered by events on the GitHub platform, not by local commits.

Option E (Disabling a GitHub runner) is incorrect because it is related to the environment where actions are executed, not a trigger for workflows.

The "Pinned Repositories" section of a GitHub user profile displays repositories that were personally selected to be highlighted by the user. Users can choose which repositories they want to feature prominently on their profile, regardless of recent activity, star count, or organizational ownership.

=================

In GitHub, issues and pull requests (PRs) are essential tools for managing work and collaboration in a project. Assigning individuals to these issues or PRs is a way to indicate responsibility for addressing the issue or completing the PR.

Anyone with write permissions to the repository:

Users who have write permissions to a repository can be assigned to issues and pull requests. Write permissions allow users to push changes to the repository, create branches, and modify issues and pull requests. Assigning them to an issue or PR ensures they are recognized as responsible for the task.

Anyone who has commented on the Issue or pull request:

GitHub allows you to assign issues or pull requests to users who have already engaged with the discussion by commenting on it. This feature is particularly useful for quickly assigning tasks to those who are already involved in the conversation.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because having an enterprise GitHub account alone does not necessarily grant the ability to be assigned to issues or PRs. Permission to assign is based on repository-specific roles and permissions.

Option C is incorrect because not all personal GitHub accounts can be assigned to issues or PRs. The user needs either write permissions to the repository or must have commented on the issue or PR.

A user's GitHub profile typically includes public information such as a personal biography, profile picture, and a list of public repositories. More sensitive information, like email addresses and passwords, is not publicly displayed.

Personal Biography and Profile Picture:

Option A is correct because these are standard elements displayed on a user's public GitHub profile. This information is meant to provide a brief introduction to the user and their interests or skills.

Incorrect Options:

Option B is incorrect because public SSH keys may be associated with a user's account but are not displayed by default on the profile page.

Option C is incorrect because private repositories are not listed on a public profile.

Option D is incorrect because a user's email address and password are private information and not displayed on their public profile.

GitHub Flow is a simple, yet powerful, branching strategy that is widely used in modern software development. It emphasizes collaboration and flexibility.

GitHub Flow:

Option C is correct because GitHub Flow is a lightweight workflow designed for safe experimentation and collaboration. It involves creating branches for new features or fixes, opening pull requests for review, and merging changes back into the main branch after approval.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because GitHub Flow uses a single main branch, not multiple primary branches.

Option B is incorrect because GitHub Flow is not specifically designed around releases; it is more focused on continuous development and integration.

Option D is incorrect because GitHub Flow is not strict or linear; it encourages branching and pull requests rather than direct changes on the main branch.

A GitHub repository serves as a collaborative space where developers can share and manage code files, track changes, and store revision history. It is much more than just a folder or simple tool; it is a comprehensive version control system that allows teams to collaborate effectively on codebases. Repositories enable developers to work together, manage contributions, review code, and maintain a complete history of every change made to the project.

=================

On GitHub, certain actions automatically subscribe you to conversations so that you receive notifications about further activity in that thread.

Opening a Pull Request or Issue:

Option C is correct because when you open a pull request or issue, you are automatically subscribed to the conversation and will receive notifications for any updates.

Commenting on a Thread:

Option D is correct because commenting on an issue or pull request automatically subscribes you to that thread, ensuring you are notified of further comments or changes.

Being Assigned to an Issue or Pull Request:

Option E is correct because when you are assigned to an issue or pull request, you are automatically subscribed to notifications related to it.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because pushing a commit to the default branch does not automatically subscribe you to conversations.

Option B is incorrect because being added as a repo admin does not automatically subscribe you to specific conversations unless you engage with them.

GitHub Projects is a newer, more powerful version of project management within GitHub, offering enhanced features over the classic version.

Multiple Layout Views:

Option A is correct because GitHub Projects supports multiple views, such as board, table, and timeline views, allowing users to visualize their work in different ways according to their needs.

Insights:

Option B is correct because GitHub Projects provides insights and analytics, enabling teams to track progress and make data-driven decisions.

Incorrect Options:

Option C is incorrect because while GitHub Copilot is a tool for code suggestions, it is not directly integrated with GitHub Projects as a feature.

Option D is incorrect because both GitHub Projects and GitHub Projects Classic can be connected to third-party tools, so it is not an exclusive advantage of the newer GitHub Projects.

In GitHub, when viewing the list of projects for an organization, a user can identify a GitHub Projects template by selecting the Templates tab. This tab specifically lists available templates that can be used to create new projects based on predefined structures and workflows.

=================

GitHub Teams, as part of GitHub’s paid plans, offers additional features and capabilities compared to GitHub Free, particularly for organizations.

GitHub Teams Benefits:

Option B is correct because GitHub Teams provides advanced security features like SAML single sign-on for secure authentication, as well as increased minutes for running GitHub Actions, which are essential for continuous integration and deployment workflows.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because private repositories and advanced tools are features available, but the key differentiator in this context is the SAML SSO and additional GitHub Actions minutes.

Option C is incorrect because while expanded storage and priority support are valuable, SAML SSO and increased GitHub Actions minutes are more central to the differences between GitHub Free and GitHub Teams.

Option D is partially correct, but since the question asks for the best reason, Option B provides the most critical features that differentiate GitHub Teams from GitHub Free.

After 30 minutes of inactivity, a GitHub Codespace will time out. This is designed to conserve resources when the Codespace is not being actively used. The session will be paused, and you'll need to reconnect to resume your work. However, the Codespace is not deleted, and any unsaved changes might not be lost but should be committed or saved to prevent data loss.

=================

GitHub Desktop is a graphical interface that allows users to interact with GitHub repositories. It simplifies certain Git operations without the need for command-line usage.

GitHub Desktop Capabilities:

Option C is correct because GitHub Desktop allows users to add local repositories to their GitHub account, clone repositories from GitHub to their local machine, and manage repositories effectively.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because GitHub Desktop does not support creating or managing issues directly; this is done through the GitHub web interface.

Option B is incorrect because reviewing and approving pull requests is also managed through the GitHub web interface.

Option D is incorrect because commenting on discussions is done on the GitHub platform, not through GitHub Desktop.

Option E is incorrect because GitHub Desktop does not integrate with office suite software.

When multiple README files exist in different locations within a GitHub repository, the README.md file located in the root directory of the repository will be displayed first by default. This file serves as the main documentation for the repository and is automatically rendered on the repository's home page.

Root Directory:

Option C is correct because the README.md file in the root directory is prioritized and displayed first on GitHub. This is the standard behavior for how GitHub presents documentation.

Incorrect Options:

Option A (.github) is incorrect because while a README.md file in the .github directory might be used for certain configurations, it is not the first to be displayed.

Option B (/src) is incorrect because the README.md in the src directory is not prioritized over the root.

Option D (/docs) is incorrect because documentation in the /docs folder is typically secondary to the root README.md.

To highlight a post at the top of the Discussions page on GitHub, you can Pin the discussion. Pinning a discussion ensures it remains prominently visible at the top of the list, making it easier for others to find and participate in that discussion. This is particularly useful for important announcements or frequently referenced topics.

=================

Two recommended ways to improve the discoverability of a repository on GitHub are:

B. Create a README file describing the repository: A well-written README file provides essential information about the project, such as what it does, how to use it, and how to contribute. This is often the first thing potential users or contributors will see, making it critical for discoverability.

D. Add topics to classify the repository: Adding topics to your repository helps classify it under specific categories, making it easier for others to find it through GitHub’s search and exploration features. Topics act like tags, helping to connect your project with users interested in similar subjects.

Registering a repository with GitHub search and adding labels are not applicable actions for improving discoverability in the broader sense.

=================

Organization owners on GitHub have control over how GitHub Actions can be used within their organization. They can enforce restrictions to ensure security and compliance with organizational policies.

Allow Actions That Use Self-Hosted Runners:

Option A is correct because organization owners can configure the usage of self-hosted runners, allowing greater control over the environment where actions are run.

Allow Specified Actions:

Option C is correct because organization owners can allow only specific actions to run, adding a layer of security by limiting actions to those that have been vetted.

Allow Actions by Marketplace Verified Creators:

Option D is correct because organization owners can choose to allow actions created by GitHub Marketplace verified creators, ensuring that only trusted actions are used.

Incorrect Options:

Option B is incorrect because GitHub Actions are not designed to be run directly from a Codespace; Codespaces are for development environments.

Option E is a valid choice, but since the prompt asks for only three answers, it is not included in this response.

In GitHub Flow, creating a new branch is a key step in the development process that allows for isolated development of new features or fixes without affecting the main codebase.

Experimenting with New Features or Fixes:

Option C is correct. The primary purpose of creating a new branch in the GitHub flow is to provide a safe space to experiment with new features or fixes. This allows developers to work on changes independently and only merge them into the main branch after they have been reviewed and approved.

Incorrect Options:

Option A (To create a backup of the main branch) is incorrect because branches are not typically used for backups; they are for active development.

Option B (To capture information about an issue) is incorrect because issues are tracked separately; branches are for code changes.

Option D (To incorporate changes from a review) is incorrect because incorporating changes is done during the pull request process, not when creating a branch.