SC-900 Microsoft Security Compliance and Identity Fundamentals Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Microsoft’s shared-responsibility model states that the cloud provider secures the cloud, while the customer secures what they put in the cloud. The Azure Security documentation explains: “Regardless of the type of deployment, you always retain responsibility for your data, endpoints, accounts, and access management.” This applies to IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS, so statement 3 is Yes because the organization is always accountable for the security of information and data.

For SaaS, Microsoft describes that customers “don’t manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure—including network, servers, operating systems, or even individual application capabilities” and that the provider handles service maintenance and updates. In SaaS, tasks like patching or applying service packs to the application code are owned by the service provider, while the customer focuses on data, identity, and access. Therefore, statement 1 is No.

For IaaS, Microsoft notes the provider manages the physical estate: “Microsoft is responsible for the physical hosts, network, and datacenter facilities,” while the customer configures and secures the guest OS, applications, and network controls within their subscription. Thus, managing the physical network is the cloud provider’s duty, making statement 2 Yes.

These SCI principles are foundational to Microsoft Learn/Docs guidance on Azure’s shared responsibility: provider—“security OF the cloud”; customer—“security IN the cloud,” with data protection always remaining the customer’s responsibility.

In Microsoft’s Security, Compliance, and Identity portfolio, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (formerly Microsoft Cloud App Security) integrates directly with Microsoft Entra Conditional Access to provide Conditional Access App Control—Microsoft’s real-time session control. Microsoft’s documentation describes this capability as enabling organizations to “monitor and control user sessions in real time” and to “protect downloads, restrict uploads, block copy/paste and print, and apply access or session policies” for sanctioned and unsanctioned applications. The enforcement is achieved through a reverse-proxy session that is invoked by Conditional Access policy decisions, allowing continuous inspection and dynamic controls after authentication.

By contrast, other options in the list do not offer real-time session enforcement via Conditional Access. Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) focuses on just-in-time role activation, approval workflows, and access reviews for privileged accounts—not session control of app usage. Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides cloud security posture management and workload protection across Azure, multicloud, and hybrid resources—again, not Conditional Access–based user session governance. Microsoft Sentinel is a SIEM/SOAR solution used for ingestion, detection, investigation, and response; it does not apply Conditional Access policies to control user sessions. Therefore, the service that can use Conditional Access policies to control sessions in real time is Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps through Conditional Access App Control.

Microsoft’s Zero Trust guidance defines three core principles: “Verify explicitly, use least-privileged access, and assume breach.” In Microsoft’s SCI learning content and Zero Trust overview, the model is described as one that “treats every access attempt as though it originates from an open, untrusted network” and therefore requires explicit verification using all available signals (identity, device health, location, data sensitivity, and anomalies). This directly confirms the first statement as true: Verify explicitly is a guiding principle.

The same guidance states organizations must “assume breach”—designing controls so that if an attacker is already inside, blast radius is minimized through segmentation, Just-In-Time/Just-Enough-Access, continuous monitoring, and rapid detection and response. Microsoft’s Zero Trust materials repeatedly explain to “assume attackers are present” and to “contain and remediate” through defense-in-depth controls, which validates the second statement as true.

Finally, Zero Trust rejects perimeter-based implicit trust. Microsoft clarifies that the model does not rely on a trusted internal network protected by a firewall; instead it “never trusts, always verifies,” continuously enforcing policy regardless of network location (on-premises or internet). Therefore, the statement that Zero Trust assumes a firewall secures the internal network from external threats is false because Zero Trust presumes no inherent safety from being “inside” the network and requires continuous verification and least-privileged access everywhere.

In Microsoft’s SCI guidance, encryption at rest is defined as protecting data when it is stored on a disk or other persistent media. Microsoft describes it as controls that “help safeguard your data to meet your organizational security and compliance commitments by encrypting data when it is persisted,” distinguishing it from protections for data in transit. Within Azure and Microsoft 365, examples include Azure Disk Encryption for IaaS VMs (using BitLocker for Windows and DM-Crypt for Linux), server-side encryption for storage accounts, and Transparent Data Encryption for databases. A virtual machine’s OS and data disks encrypted with BitLocker or DM-Crypt are canonical cases of at-rest encryption because the encryption keys protect the physical media; the data becomes unreadable if the disks are accessed outside the authorized context. By contrast, site-to-site VPN, HTTPS web sessions, and encrypted email protect data in transit—they secure network communications but do not encrypt the data where it is stored. Therefore, among the options provided, encrypting a virtual machine disk is the correct example of encryption at rest in Microsoft’s security model.

Biometrics templates are stored locally on a device. Reference:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-overview

In Microsoft Defender for Cloud, the metric that represents the overall security health of your Azure subscription is secure score. Microsoft’s documentation explains: “Secure score provides an aggregated view of your security posture across your subscriptions and resources. It’s based on security recommendations; addressing those recommendations improves your score.” Defender for Cloud calculates secure score by assessing controls and recommendations mapped to standards, then weighting them by risk and importance: “Each recommendation contributes to the secure score. Completing remediation steps increases the score and reduces risk.” This single percentage view lets security teams quickly gauge how well current configurations and protections align with Microsoft’s security best practices and regulatory mappings. Other elements surfaced in Defender for Cloud—like “resource health,” “status of recommendations,” or “completed controls”—are components and statuses that feed into or relate to the scoring model, but the overall subscription security health indicator presented and tracked over time is secure score.

In Microsoft 365, Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policies are designed to “help you identify, monitor, and automatically protect sensitive information” across services such as Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, OneDrive, and Microsoft Teams. Microsoft’s guidance explains that DLP uses sensitive information types—including built-in classifiers like Credit Card Number—to detect when content matches a defined pattern and then enforce protective actions. With DLP, you can create rules that trigger when email messages contain customer lists with credit card numbers, and choose actions to block the message, restrict access, or notify and educate users via policy tips and incident reports. Microsoft further notes that DLP “prevents the accidental sharing of sensitive information,” can require user justification to override, and supports granular conditions (e.g., number of matches, recipients internal vs. external) to ensure that only risky transmissions are stopped. By applying a DLP policy to Exchange with the Credit Card Number sensitive info type, an organization can block or quarantine outbound mail that includes those numbers, thereby reducing regulatory and data-exposure risk. Other options listed—retention policies, conditional access, and information barriers—serve different purposes (data lifecycle, access/authentication conditions, and restricting communication between groups) and do not inspect message contents for sensitive data. Hence, DLP policies are the correct control to restrict sending emails that contain customer lists and associated credit card numbers.

Microsoft 365 Advanced Audit is a capability of the Microsoft Purview audit solution that enhances auditing by adding additional high-value audit events, extended retention (up to one year by default, longer with add-ons), and intelligent insights. Microsoft documentation explains that Advanced Audit provides Exchange-specific events such as “MailItemsAccessed” and “SearchQueryInitiated”, which log when users access mailbox items and when they initiate a search in Exchange (including Outlook on the web). These records include who performed the action, when it occurred, the client/app used, and other metadata that helps investigations and forensics.

Advanced Audit is not a billing tool; billing information is handled separately in Microsoft 365 admin/billing portals and isn’t part of the audit schema. Likewise, audit logs do not expose message content; they capture activity metadata (actor, operation, workload, timestamp, and parameters) rather than the actual body of emails or file contents. The purpose is to improve auditability and investigation without revealing user content. Therefore, statements about viewing billing details or email contents are No, while identifying mailbox search actions (e.g., a user using the Outlook on the web search bar) is Yes, because Advanced Audit includes the SearchQueryInitiated (Exchange) event that records such activity.

Microsoft’s Identity Protection provides risk-based detections and automated policies—not group management. Microsoft Learn explains that Identity Protection “uses detections to identify potential vulnerabilities affecting your organization’s identities” and exposes user risk and sign-in risk for policy decisions. It does not support adding users to groups by “risk level”; group membership is handled by static or dynamic rules based on directory attributes, while risk is a transient signal surfaced to policies.

Identity Protection includes specific detections such as “Leaked credentials”, where Microsoft’s threat intelligence finds credentials “on the dark web or other dumps,” and flags the affected account as risky. This directly confirms the ability to detect whether credentials have been exposed publicly.

For enforcement, Identity Protection policies and Conditional Access can require stronger authentication when risk is present. The documentation states that you can configure policies to “require multi-factor authentication for sign-ins assessed as risky” and use Conditional Access conditions like User risk or Sign-in risk with the grant control Require multi-factor authentication. Thus, Identity Protection signals can invoke MFA based on risk, but they do not place users into groups.

Microsoft documents describe Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management (PIM) as the service that delivers approval-based, time-limited elevation to privileged roles. Official guidance states: “Privileged Identity Management (PIM) enables you to manage, control, and monitor access to important resources in Microsoft Entra ID, Azure, and Microsoft 365.” PIM specifically supports just-in-time and time-bound activations: “PIM provides just-in-time privileged access to Microsoft Entra roles and Azure resources” and “allows you to make access time-bound by setting start and end dates.” It also supports approval workflows: “You can require approval to activate privileged roles, and designate approvers to receive and approve requests.” Additional controls include “require multi-factor authentication to activate, provide a justification, and ticket number,” and auditing: “PIM records all activations and changes for review and alerting.”

By contrast, Microsoft Entra ID Protection focuses on risk detections and automated remediation, not role elevation workflows. Conditional Access enforces access policies at sign-in and session but does not provide approval-based role activation. Access Reviews help you “review and attest to continued access” but do not supply just-in-time elevation. Therefore, the Microsoft Purview/Entra feature that implements approval-based, time-bound role activation is Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management (PIM).

(CIEM) solution. CIEM is a security technology category that helps organizations manage identity and access permissions across multi-cloud environments, including Microsoft Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP).

According to Microsoft’s official Security, Compliance, and Identity (SCI) training and documentation (especially relevant in SC-300 and SC-900 learning paths):

“Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is a CIEM solution that provides comprehensive visibility and control over permissions for all identities and resources across multicloud environments.”

Key features of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management as a CIEM include:

Discovery of over-privileged accounts and unused permissions.

Enforcement of the principle of least privilege.

Detailed permissions analytics and reporting.

Support for Azure, AWS, and GCP environments.

This solution is designed to address the growing risk of identity sprawl and permission misuse in cloud platforms, which traditional identity governance or SIEM tools do not address effectively.

Incorrect Options:

CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management) focuses on cloud misconfiguration, not identity permissions.

SIEM (e.g., Microsoft Sentinel) aggregates logs/events for threat detection, not entitlement visibility.

XDR (e.g., Microsoft Defender XDR) is focused on detection and response across endpoints, identities, and data—not entitlement management.

✅ Therefore, the correct and Microsoft-verified classification is: a cloud infrastructure entitlement management (CIEM) solution.

Microsoft Cloud App Security (now Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps) is Microsoft’s CASB that “discovers and controls shadow IT,” integrates with identity and endpoint signals, and enforces data protection in SaaS and custom apps. SCI materials describe three core use cases relevant here: (1) Discovery and control of shadow IT by analyzing network logs and app usage, rating risk, and applying governance—matching A. (2) Protect sensitive information hosted anywhere in the cloud via policies such as DLP, information protection label awareness, and integration with apps through API connectors—matching C. (3) Prevent data leaks to noncompliant apps and limit access to regulated data using Conditional Access App Control and session controls that can block download, apply protections, or monitor in real time—matching E. In contrast, secure connections to Azure virtual machines are provided by Azure Bastion, not the CASB (eliminating B), and pass-through authentication to on-premises apps is delivered by Azure AD features such as Azure AD Application Proxy or PTA (not Cloud App Security), eliminating D.

In Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Threat Trackers (also known as threat analytics in the security portal) surface curated intelligence on prevailing and emerging cyberthreats, giving security teams insight into current campaigns, affected regions, and recommended actions. Threat Explorer (Explorer/Real-time detections) is the investigation workspace that provides near real-time visibility into detected phishing, malware, and other malicious email content, allowing analysts to identify, filter, and analyze recent threats and take remediation actions (e.g., purge messages). Anti-phishing protection is configured via anti-phishing policies and uses machine learning and impersonation settings (user and domain impersonation) to detect and block impersonation attempts and other phishing techniques in Exchange Online. Together, these capabilities map directly to the statements: Trackers = intelligence on active threats, Explorer = real-time analysis and reporting, and Anti-phishing = detection of impersonation.

In Microsoft’s Security, Compliance, and Identity guidance, Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is configured from the compliance portal (formerly called the Microsoft 365 Compliance Center, now Microsoft Purview compliance portal). Microsoft’s documentation states that DLP is administered from the compliance experience: “Use data loss prevention (DLP) policies in the Microsoft Purview compliance portal to help identify, monitor, and automatically protect sensitive items” across Microsoft 365 workloads. It further specifies where you create policies: “To create a DLP policy, go to the Microsoft Purview compliance portal > Data loss prevention > Policies and choose Create policy.” The portal provides policy templates, locations, and rules that “help prevent the inadvertent sharing of sensitive information” and enable “policy tips and automatic remediation actions” (such as restricting access, auditing, or blocking).

By contrast, the Microsoft 365 admin center is for tenant administration and licensing, not DLP policy authoring. The Microsoft Endpoint Manager admin center (Intune) manages device and app protection policies, not Microsoft 365 DLP policies. The Microsoft 365 Defender portal surfaces security alerts and investigations but does not host the creation workflow for DLP policies. Therefore, when the requirement is to create a DLP policy, Microsoft directs administrators to the Microsoft 365 Compliance center (Microsoft Purview compliance portal) where the DLP solutions and policy creation wizard reside.

Microsoft sets out clear privacy principles for Microsoft 365 and Microsoft cloud services. In Microsoft’s privacy commitments, Microsoft states that customers control their data: “You control your data.” Microsoft also pledges transparency about data practices: “We are transparent about data collection and use.” These two commitments are among the core privacy principles articulated across Microsoft 365 privacy and Microsoft Purview documentation, which emphasize customer choice, clear explanations of data processing, and admin capabilities to access, export, and delete data. Additional Microsoft privacy principles often listed alongside these include security of your data, strong legal protections, no content-based targeting, and benefits to you, but the key point for this question is that Control and Transparency are explicitly called out as privacy principles.

By contrast, shared responsibility is not a privacy principle; it is a cloud security model used in Azure/Microsoft cloud guidance. That model explains that security is a shared responsibility between Microsoft (for the cloud infrastructure) and the customer (for their data, identities, endpoints, and configurations). It describes how duties are divided for protecting services and workloads, not a privacy promise to end users. Therefore, the correct selections are Yes for Control and Transparency, and No for Shared responsibility.

Box 1: Yes

The MailItemsAccessed event is a mailbox auditing action and is triggered when mail data is accessed by mail protocols and mail clients.

Box 2: No

Basic Audit retains audit records for 90 days.

Advanced Audit retains all Exchange, SharePoint, and Azure Active Directory audit records for one year. This is accomplished by a default audit log retention policy that retains any audit record that contains the value of Exchange, SharePoint, or AzureActiveDirectory for the Workload property (which indicates the service in which the activity occurred) for one year.

Box 3: yes

Advanced Audit in Microsoft 365 provides high-bandwidth access to the Office 365 Management Activity API.

To on-board Azure Sentinel, you first need to connect to your security sources. Azure Sentinel comes with a number of connectors for Microsoft solutions, including Microsoft 365 Defender solutions, and Microsoft 365 sources, including Office 365, Azure AD, Microsoft Defender for Identity, and Microsoft Cloud App Security, etc.

Microsoft Secure Score for Devices

Artikel

12.05.2022

3 Minuten Lesedauer

Applies to:

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Plan 2

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

Microsoft 365 Defender

Some information relates to pre-released product which may be substantially modified before it's commercially released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.

To sign up for the Defender Vulnerability Management public preview or if you have any questions, contact us (mdvmtrial@microsoft.com).

Already have Microsoft Defender for Endpoint P2? Sign up for a free trial of the Defender Vulnerability Management Add-on.

Configuration score is now part of vulnerability management as Microsoft Secure Score for Devices.

Your score for devices is visible in the Defender Vulnerability Management dashboard of the Microsoft 365 Defender portal. A higher Microsoft Secure Score for Devices means your endpoints are more resilient from cybersecurity threat attacks. It reflects the collective security configuration state of your devices across the following categories:

Application

Operating system

Network

Accounts

Security controls

Select a category to go to the Security recommendations page and view the relevant recommendations.

Turn on the Microsoft Secure Score connector

Forward Microsoft Defender for Endpoint signals, giving Microsoft Secure Score visibility into the device security posture. Forwarded data is stored and processed in the same location as your Microsoft Secure Score data.

Changes might take up to a few hours to reflect in the dashboard.

In the navigation pane, go to Settings > Endpoints > General > Advanced features

Scroll down to Microsoft Secure Score and toggle the setting to On.

Select Save preferences.

How it works

Microsoft Secure Score for Devices currently supports configurations set via Group Policy. Due to the current partial Intune support, configurations which might have been set through Intune might show up as misconfigured. Contact your IT Administrator to verify the actual configuration status in case your organization is using Intune for secure configuration management.

The data in the Microsoft Secure Score for Devices card is the product of meticulous and ongoing vulnerability discovery process. It is aggregated with configuration discovery assessments that continuously:

Compare collected configurations to the collected benchmarks to discover misconfigured assets

Map configurations to vulnerabilities that can be remediated or partially remediated (risk reduction)

Collect and maintain best practice configuration benchmarks (vendors, security feeds, internal research teams)

Collect and monitor changes of security control configuration state from all assets

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/privileged-identity-management/pim-configure

Privileged Identity Management provides time-based and approval-based role activation to mitigate the risks of excessive, unnecessary, or misused access permissions on resources that you care about. Here are some of the key features of Privileged Identity Management: Provide just-in-time privileged access to Azure AD and Azure resources Assign time-bound access to resources using start and end dates Require approval to activate privileged roles Enforce multi-factor authentication to activate any role Use justification to understand why users activate Get notifications when privileged roles are activated Conduct access reviews to ensure users still need roles Download audit history for internal or external audit Prevents removal of the last active Global Administrator role assignment