PMI-ACP PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP) Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

The correct answer is B – Review the project vision statement.

A shared vision ensures that the team and stakeholders are aligned on the purpose, value, and expected outcomes of the product. In Agile, the vision statement guides product development and ensures that decisions made during iterations are grounded in stakeholder needs.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“A clear product vision guides the team and stakeholders in understanding the product’s purpose and desired outcomes. The product vision promotes alignment and provides a foundation for ongoing decisions.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.1 – Vision)

Mike Griffiths also emphasizes:

“A product vision helps ensure everyone is heading in the same direction. It’s critical to regularly revisit this vision to maintain alignment with stakeholders and the evolving product strategy.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 3 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Why the other options are incorrect:

A (kick-off meetings) may help in initial orientation but doesn’t sustain alignment over time.

C contradicts Agile’s preference for lightweight documentation and ongoing collaboration.

D is general process alignment—not specific to stakeholder engagement.

Answer: B

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

The purpose of the daily standup (or daily coordination meeting) is to help the development team stay aligned with the sprint goal and actively manage any risks or impediments that may be blocking progress. It allows the team to quickly discuss their progress, share potential issues, and identify dependencies that could affect the sprint's success. The focus is on team collaboration and ensuring that everyone is on track.

The correct answer is A – Cross-train some members in the automation framework to broaden their capacity with that skill. Agile teams are cross-functional and self-organizing. Cross-training helps build resilience, reduce skill bottlenecks, and ensure continuous delivery without unnecessary delays or dependence.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Cross-training improves team performance and flexibility. Agile encourages developing T-shaped skills—broad knowledge across functions and deep knowledge in one.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 4.3 – Team Performance and Cross-Functionality)

Mike Griffiths explains:

“High-performing agile teams actively cross-train to address skill gaps and reduce dependencies. This enhances velocity and self-sufficiency.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 4 – Team Performance)

Incorrect options:

B undermines team self-management and is not the PO’s responsibility.

C delays the needed skill improvement.

D sacrifices quality and value.

Answer: A

────────────────────────────────────

The correct answer is C – Ensure the team captures the technical dependencies as issues within the backlog and prioritize based on value optimization. In Agile, technical considerations are factored into backlog refinement and sprint planning. Dependencies should be visualized and managed as part of adaptive planning while still striving to deliver maximum value.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Backlog items with technical dependencies should be identified and addressed collaboratively. Agile teams balance value with feasibility and technical constraints to optimize delivery.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Backlog Refinement and Adaptive Planning)

Mike Griffiths explains:

“While business value drives prioritization, technical constraints influence the ordering of stories. Agile planning is adaptive; dependencies and delivery risks are identified early and managed through backlog reordering.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Incorrect options:

A may discard valuable features unnecessarily.

B risks accumulating technical debt and incomplete work.

D shifts responsibility away from the team and PO unnecessarily.

Answer: C

────────────────────────────────────

The correct answer is D — The team should reevaluate time and cost estimates to reflect the latest understanding of the work effort.

Agile supports progressive elaboration and adaptive planning. When actual effort consistently exceeds estimates, it signals a need to recalibrate estimation practices. The team should revisit their velocity, estimation techniques, and potentially re-estimate upcoming work with improved understanding.

PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile uses adaptive planning, where teams update estimates based on new information. This supports better forecasting and risk management.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Estimation and Velocity)

Mike Griffiths:

“Estimation accuracy improves over time. Agile teams regularly inspect estimation practices and adjust based on historical data and team maturity.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

—

In Scrum, responsibilities are distributed among the product owner, scrum master, and development team to ensure clear accountability and efficient value delivery.

The product owner manages the product backlog, ensures alignment with business goals, and defines the priorities for the team.

The scrum master facilitates the Scrum process, removes impediments, and ensures adherence to Agile principles.

The development team owns the sprint backlog and is responsible for incremental delivery toward the sprint goal.

This division of responsibilities ensures that each role focuses on their core areas, fostering transparency, collaboration, and value-driven development.

Iteration reviews (or sprint reviews) are designed to demonstratecompleted, potentially shippable product increments. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.3 Sprint Review and Acceptance), the purpose of the iteration review is toshowcase work that meets the Definition of Done (DoD)and to receivestakeholder feedback. Demonstrating incomplete or in-progress stories can mislead stakeholders about progress and reduce trust in the team.

Mike Griffiths in thePMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Value-Driven Delivery)emphasizes the importance of showing only completed work to maintain transparency and clarity in stakeholder communication.

Option Ais correct: only completed stories should be demoed to ensure expectations are managed effectively.

Option BandCare not part of the typical iteration review agenda unless explicitly required.

Option Dis incorrect, as it blurs the line between done and in-progress work.

Spikes are meant forexperimentation and learning, not guaranteed outcomes. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.2 Spikes), if a spike does not lead to a clear solution, the team can extend or reframe it, especially when aiming for asustainable long-term solution. Agile supportsencouraging experimentationand learning from failure.

Mike Griffiths (PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 7: Problem Detection and Resolution) recommends adapting when a spike’s results are inconclusive—redefining the scope and collaborating as a teamincreases the chance of a valuable outcome.

Option Bis correct: it continues learning and promotes team collaboration.

Option Aundercuts team ownership.

Option Cprioritizes a short-term fix and undermines agile values.

Option Dis not needed at this early stage—root cause analysis is better for recurring or systemic issues.

To support quick feature delivery while maintaining quality, the best approach is to automate integration, testing, and deployment activities. This aligns with the principles of Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD), which streamline processes and reduce the manual effort required to test and deploy software. This approach can help the team to quickly release features with confidence that they meet quality standards, reducing manual errors and speeding up the delivery cycle.

A spike is a time-boxed research activity used in Agile to explore uncertainties or unknowns, such as dependencies in this case. If the product owner is unsure about the risks related to migrating to a new version of a database, they can request a spike from the team. This will allow the team to investigate the dependencies, assess potential risks, and gather the necessary information to move forward with the user story. This helps reduce uncertainty and makes it easier to make informed decisions about the next steps.

In the context of the chatbot's post-release complaints about edge cases in query responses, User Acceptance Testing (UAT) is the most critical step to avoid such situations. UAT ensures that the chatbot meets the stakeholder's needs and expectations, which would have included verifying its behavior with real users under real-world scenarios. This step would identify any edge case issues and make sure the chatbot is aligned with business goals before going live.

Agile promotestransparency through information radiators, such as task boards, burndown charts, and Kanban boards. These tools are designed to make real-time progress visible to all stakeholders. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 7.1: Communications)andMike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 4: Stakeholder Engagement), stakeholders should be directed to thesereal-time, transparent sources of truth.

Option Bis correct: using an information radiator promotes transparency and reduces dependency on individuals.

Option Ais inappropriate—standups are for the team.

Option CandDare manual approaches that reduce transparency and don't scale.

Distributed or remote teams are common in modern agile environments. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 4.4 Working with Distributed Teams)and thePMBOK® Guide (6th Edition, Section 10.1), the agile practitioner mustenable effective collaboration among all team members regardless of location. The guide recommends usingvideo conferencing, collaborative workspaces, shared boards, and communication toolsto simulate the benefits of co-location.

Mike Griffiths, in hisPMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 3: Team Performance), supports the use ofcollaboration toolsto foster team cohesion and support agile values like communication and transparency, even when teams cannot be physically co-located.

Option Ais correct: collaboration tools bridge the gap in distributed environments.

Option BandDpromote siloing or team hierarchy, which undermines agile unity.

Option Cmoves away from agile values by emphasizing documentation over interaction.

Gold-plating—adding extra features not requested or prioritized—is ananti-patternin agile. Agile emphasizesdelivering the highest-priority features first, and product changes should always go through theProduct Ownerfor prioritization and validation.

According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.1: Backlog and Value Delivery)andMike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Value-Driven Delivery), when capacity is available, the team should pull more storiesfrom the prioritized backlog, ensuring that all work aligns with stakeholder-defined value.

Option Dis correct: confirm backlog priority and use time to delivercustomer-prioritized value.

Option Asupports scope creep.

Option Bis partially correct but doesn’t optimize the time to deliver value.

Option Cperpetuates gold-plating and undermines value alignment.

Planning Pokeris a well-known estimation technique where team members use numbered cards (usually Fibonacci series) to estimatestory point valuesbased on relative size. It’s aconsensus-based estimation method, as described in thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.2: Estimation Techniques)andMike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Estimating Techniques).

Option Dis correct:Planning Pokeris explicitly designed for estimating stories in terms of points.

Option A (Parametric)is more common in traditional (predictive) planning.

Option B (One-to-one comparison)refers to relative sizing without collaboration.

Option C (Affinity)is another agile technique but typically used forgrouping stories into size buckets, not direct story point consensus estimation.

The correct answer is C — Facilitate team brainstorming of the risks resulting from complexity for the risk register.

Technical complexity introduces risks that must be identified and managed early. Agile leaders support teams by facilitating collaborative risk identification, not by dictating solutions. Brainstorming sessions help surface concerns and lead to proactive mitigation strategies.

PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Risks are best identified through team collaboration. Facilitated risk identification sessions encourage broad participation and lead to better awareness and ownership of potential issues.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 7.3 – Risk Management)

Mike Griffiths:

“In agile projects, technical risks are treated early. Collaborative identification and visibility are key to creating a risk-adjusted delivery plan.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 6 – Problem Detection and Resolution)

Incorrect options:

A is valid long-term, but brainstorming comes first for awareness.

B limits risk planning to a fixed period (Sprint 0), which may not be enough.

D promotes innovation but not structured risk identification.

Answer: C

—

This situation introduces technical uncertainty. In agile, such scenarios are best addressed byspikesorincremental implementationandearly feedback. ThePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.2 Spikes and Experimentation)suggests that uncertain work should be prototyped, tested early, and shown during sprint reviews for feedback and learning.

Mike Griffiths in thePMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 7: Problem Detection and Resolution)recommends testing high-risk integrations early and iteratively, rather than over-planning.

Option Dis correct: developing, testing, and demonstrating early minimizes risk and aligns with agile principles.

Option Aleans toward waterfall-style planning and over-documentation.

Option Bincorrectly assumes non-functional requirements are less valuable—they’re critical in many systems.

Option Cmay delay necessary architectural work and increase risk.