PMI-ACP PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP) Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

In agile, work is considered “done” only when it meets the agreed-uponDefinition of Done (DoD), which includes all aspects like coding, review, testing, and documentation. If there's disagreement about completion, thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.3 Sprint Review and Acceptance)recommends revisiting and aligning the DoD between the team and product owner.

Mike Griffiths in hisPMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Value-Driven Delivery)explains that without aclear and shared Definition of Done, misunderstandings about completion status can occur, especially with quality-related tasks like testing.

Option Ais correct because aligning on the DoD resolves current and future misunderstandings.

Option Bintroduces unnecessary escalation.

Option Cpostpones resolution and does not solve the core issue.

Option Dincorrectly assumes testing isn’t part of the story’s completion criteria.

Step 1: Identify Remaining MVP Story Points

The backlog lists the MVP-related stories that are not yet started:

Accessibility – color blind → 4 story points

Increase security → 21 story points

Add AI chatbot → 5 story points

Total remaining MVP story points = 4 + 21 + 5 = 30

Step 2: Consider Velocity and Sprint Progress

The risk register mentions a reduction of 1 story point per sprint from sprints 4 through 6 due to the holiday schedule.

If we assume the team's normal velocity is 10 story points per sprint (hypothetically), it would drop to 9 story points per sprint for sprints 4-6.

Step 3: Calculate Completion Sprint

If the team normally completes 10 story points per sprint, they would require approximately 3 sprints (Sprint 7, Sprint 8, and Sprint 9) to complete the remaining 30 story points.

The presence of asingle point of knowledgeis a significant risk in agile teams. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 4.3.3: Team Structure and Cross-functionality)andMike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 3: Team Performance), agile teams shouldavoid role silosand promoteknowledge sharing. Adding another database administrator helps with bothworkload distributionandknowledge retentionthrough pairing or mentoring.

Option Cis correct: it ensuresredundancy and knowledge spread, reducing project risk.

Option Adoes not address knowledge transfer or team development.

Option Bremoves the knowledge resource, worsening the risk.

Option Dlimits knowledge-sharing and still creates a bottleneck.

The correct answer is D – Understand the impediments and facilitate issue resolution to enable the team to succeed.

The Agile Project Manager (or Scrum Master) acts as a servant leader by removing impediments and coaching the team toward improvement. Instead of dictating action or adjusting timeboxes, the right approach is to facilitate problem-solving and help the team meet its sprint goal.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“The Scrum Master works to remove impediments and support the team’s progress. They do not give commands but instead facilitate improvement.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.2 – Roles and Responsibilities)

Mike Griffiths affirms:

“Agile leaders remove roadblocks and create an environment where the team can succeed. They support rather than direct.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 6 – Problem Detection and Resolution)

Other options are inappropriate:

A is command-and-control, not servant leadership.

B violates timebox principles of Scrum.

C misplaces responsibility for testing onto customers.

Answer: D

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

The correct answer is A – Explore options for increasing knowledge in the next iteration's backlog.

One of the key principles of Agile is continuous learning and improvement. When the team identifies a skills gap during a retrospective, the appropriate response is to turn that learning need into actionable items in the upcoming backlog. This can include training, pairing, spikes, or experimenting in a time-boxed way during the next iteration.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Teams should regularly inspect their tools, practices, and outcomes and incorporate improvement actions into their backlog. Continuous learning is a shared responsibility.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 3.5 – Retrospectives & Section 6.2 – Coaching the Agile Team)

Mike Griffiths also supports this:

“Improvement actions should be planned, prioritized, and implemented like any other work. Skills development should be addressed through backlog items such as training, spikes, or pairing.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 7 – Continuous Improvement)

Why the other options fall short:

B adds scope mid-sprint, which violates Agile principles (sprint backlog should remain stable).

C may be viable long-term, but doesn’t address the team's agreed goal of learning the tool.

D brings in an external expert rather than empowering the team to grow their capabilities.

Answer: A

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

The correct answer is A — Teach the team the appropriate agile principle, obtain consensus, and drive adoption.

Agile values “working software over comprehensive documentation.” However, this does not mean eliminating all documentation, but rather focusing on documentation that delivers value.

PMI Agile Practice Guide states:

“Agile teams should regularly question whether the work being done adds value, including documentation. If documentation does not serve a current need or stakeholder, it should be minimized or eliminated.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 2.2 — Agile Manifesto)

Mike Griffiths further supports this in his exam prep book:

“Agile team members are encouraged to surface inefficiencies and suggest improvements. This is an example of continuous improvement and shared responsibility.”

Option A aligns with both the Agile Manifesto and the principle of team empowerment. Options B, C, and D either avoid accountability or introduce hierarchy that agile teams seek to minimize.

Answer: A

=================================

The root cause of the issue seems to be a focus on process and planning meetings, which may be impacting the team's ability to deliver effectively. Implementing Kanban, which emphasizes a pull system and focuses on continuous delivery without overwhelming the team with unnecessary meetings, allows for smoother workflow and can address bottlenecks. It helps the team focus more on value delivery rather than rigid planning and process constraints, thus potentially improving the quality and reducing unnecessary delays.

As a servant leader, it is important to address the root cause of the disruption, which in this case is the director's repeated visits and distracting conversations. Coaching the company director on agile practices and good communication helps them understand the need to minimize interruptions and foster a productive environment for the team. This approach will help align the director's behavior with Agile principles, ensuring that the team can focus on delivering value without unnecessary distractions. By educating the director, the servant leader can improve overall team dynamics and project efficiency.

The VP plays a key role in shaping the organizational culture and setting expectations for how projects are managed. By coaching the VP on the benefits and expectations of adopting Agile, the agile team member can help the VP understand how Agile can lead to more flexibility, collaboration, and faster delivery of value. This coaching will ensure that the VP is aligned with the Agile transformation, which in turn will influence the broader teams and managers to adopt the necessary mindset and practices for Agile to be effective across the organization.

To assessprocess efficiency, agile teams usevalue stream mappingto identifywaste, delays, and non-value-adding steps. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.5 Process Analysis and Value Stream Mapping), value stream analysis helps determine how efficiently a process converts inputs into valuable outputs, making it ideal for supporting customer inquiries on operational performance.

Mike Griffiths (PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 7: Continuous Improvement) reinforces the value of usingvalue stream mappingfor both software development processes and operational workflows to increase transparency and drive improvements.

Option Bis correct: reviewing thevalue streamprovides a structured way to evaluate efficiency.

Option AandDare important for team improvement and performance but don’t focus onprocess activity efficiency.

Option Crelates tovalue prioritization, not operational efficiency.

The correct answer is A – Refocus the sprint review meetings to demonstrate working software and seek feedback on the product.

Sprint reviews are designed to showcase the completed product increment to stakeholders and receive feedback. The primary goal is to validate that the work delivered provides value to the customer—not to present technical details. Demonstrating working software is one of the core tenets of Agile.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Sprint reviews are working sessions designed to elicit feedback and foster collaboration. Teams demonstrate completed work and adjust the backlog based on stakeholder input.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Value Delivery)

Mike Griffiths confirms:

“The output of every iteration should be potentially shippable product. The sprint review is for stakeholders to see that output and provide feedback to inform future development.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 2 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Other options explained:

B may be helpful, but it doesn’t solve the immediate issue of misaligned sprint reviews.

C misunderstands the purpose of the sprint review—it’s not about architecture.

D changes the audience instead of correcting the approach.

Answer: A

══════════

The product owner should ensure that the stakeholder has easy access to relevant project data by utilizing the information radiator. An information radiator is a visual display of important project information, such as progress, financials, and key metrics. By giving the stakeholder access to this information, they can get the data they need without disrupting the team's workflow or waiting for specific requests. The scrum master can help facilitate this process by making sure the relevant data is readily available and visible.

Agile promotescross-team collaboration and shared understanding of goals, especially when dependencies exist. ThePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 4.3.1: Team Collaboration and Alignment)recommends usingvision alignment and shared objectivesto reduce silos and improve coordination. Avision-sharing sessionensures that all teams understand thebusiness context and mutual interdependencies, helping build accountability and improve collaboration.

Option Bis correct: shared vision fosters alignment and commitment.

Option Ais punitive and against agile values of collaboration.

Option Cdisrupts team stability and should not be a first step.

Option Daddresses the symptom (delivery delay) but not theroot cause(lack of shared vision/accountability).

Security features are typically considerednon-functional requirements (NFRs), which should be captured in theproduct backlogand prioritized accordingly. As per thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.1: Product Backlog)andMike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Value-Driven Delivery), any requested functionality—whether business- or system-level—must beclearly defined as a backlog itemso the team can plan for it.

Option Ais correct: security requirements should beadded to the backlog and prioritizedlike other features.

Option Bmay come later if implementation is unclear, but first, the work must be defined and logged.

Option CandDrepresent clarification steps but don’t directlysupport implementationas backlog management does.

The correct answer is D — Explain to the team the importance of reducing team size by reducing specializations and bottlenecks and that every team member plays an equal part.

Agile promotes cross-functional, self-organizing teams where all members are responsible for delivering a working product increment. Avoiding specialized silos reduces bottlenecks and improves overall flow. Everyone contributes based on team needs, not personal preferences or status.

PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile teams minimize individual silos by encouraging cross-functional collaboration. Everyone contributes to the team goal, even if the task is outside their core skillset.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 6.1 – Team Composition)

Mike Griffiths:

“Specialization often becomes a bottleneck in agile teams. Agile promotes generalizing specialists—team members who are willing to stretch outside their expertise to help the team meet its goals.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 4 – Team Performance)

Incorrect options:

A promotes a command-and-control model—contrary to Agile servant leadership.

B reinforces silos and inefficiency.

C contradicts Agile’s emphasis on team ownership.

Answer: D

—

The correct answer is D – Planning poker.

Planning poker is a consensus-based estimation technique commonly used in Agile projects. During this technique, team members discuss user stories, clarify details, and independently assign story points. The facilitator (often the Scrum Master) ensures balanced participation. This process encourages team collaboration and reduces estimation bias.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Planning poker is a common estimation technique where team members discuss the story, then individually provide estimates using a card deck, reaching consensus over multiple rounds.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Estimation Techniques)

Mike Griffiths adds:

“Planning poker is based on Wideband Delphi and allows teams to converge on estimates through discussion and consensus. It is particularly useful for relative estimation of story points.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Why other options are incorrect:

A (Lessons learned) applies to retrospective activities, not estimation.

B (Wideband Delphi) is the foundation of planning poker but is more formal and anonymous.

C (Formal point counting) is not a standard Agile estimation technique.

Answer: D

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

Agile emphasizesjust enough detailto start work and adapt through ongoing conversation. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.2 Requirements and User Stories), stories should beclear enough for estimation and discussion, but not over-specified. The INVEST model (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable) supports this.

Mike Griffiths in thePMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Adaptive Planning)reiterates that stories should not contain exhaustive detail up front; rather, they evolve throughcollaborative dialoguewith the product owner.

Option Cis correct because it supports collaboration and adaptive planning.

Option AandBlead to over-specification and undermine agility.

Option Daddresses testing but doesn’t resolve confusion about appropriate story detail.

To improve collaboration, it's essential that the team members understand the importance of the project vision statement and feel empowered to contribute. Setting clear expectations ensures that all participants know the purpose of the meeting and their role in contributing. By encouraging everyone to share their ideas and perspectives, the team can reach a consensus or at least acknowledge differing views in a constructive way. This fosters a collaborative environment where team members feel their input is valued.

The correct answer is D – Ask the team to estimate the amount of rework needed so that adjustments can be made to both the project and release plan.

Agile planning is adaptive and iterative. New information, including required rework, must be integrated into updated estimates and plans. Agile teams frequently replan based on the realities of work-in-progress.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

══════════════════════════════════════════════════