8013 PRMIA PRM Exam 1: Finance Foundations Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

A total return swap allows an investor or a financial institution to gain exposure to an asset or a portfolio without actually having to go long in those positions. The counterparty provides the return from the exposure and receives LIBOR plus a spread in exchange. Effectively, the counterparty has funded the investor's position for a fixed interest rate, therefore a TRS is essentially a funding arrangement. However, the structure of a TRS may also have other consequences that are relevant for tax and accounting - the assets under a TRS are not held on the balance sheet of the investor receiving the total return. Statement I is correct as the TRS helps gain an exposure without having to fund the position with cash.

Repos are useful for shorting corporate bonds. The investor desirous of shorting a corporate bond would sell the bond in the market, and immediately borrow the bond from someone else using a repo to deliver to the party he has sold the bond to. Repos are used extensively to cover short bond positions, and therefore statement II is correct.

Statement III is not correct as counterparty risk continues to exist with a TRS. The counterparty may fail to provide the agreed returns, and the risk exists.

Statement IV is correct as the bank that borrows funds using a repo continues to hold the underlying assets on its balance sheet. Therefore Choice 'd' is the correct answer.

'In store' delivery is for delivery in a standardized location, and the buyer is handed a 'warrant' that allows him to pick the goods up. This is the cheapest means of physical delivery. The other prices will be higher as they involve more costs for the seller who has to get the goods on board a ship, or to the docks, or insurance and freight as well. Choice 'c' is the correct answer.

The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is published by the British Bankers' Association (BBA). The BBA polls the rates offered by at least eight banks drops the top and bottom quartile, and averages the middle two quartiles of the rates to arrive at the LIBOR.

The most loss the fund manager can bear without facing a margin call is the loss that will make his margin balance account no lower than $4,000. This means he can have a loss of upto $1,000 before a margin call is triggered, implying that prices can fall by $10 per ounce (=$1,000/100 ounces per contract) without triggering a margin call. The margin call will be to top the margin up to the $5,000 initial margin.

A cash or nothing call is one that pays a fixed amount if the underlying exceeds a certain threshold, or nothing. An asset or nothing call is the same as the cash or nothing call except that instead of paying a fixed amount, it 'pays' the asset. Therefore the payoff profile of a long asset or nothing call has the same payoff as a long cash or nothing call and a long vanilla call.

This is best considered by building payoff diagrams which will show how the two positions are economically equivalent. Choice 'd' is the correct answer, and the rest are not.

Since the equity portfolio has a beta of 1.5, we need to sell short enough number of futures contracts as to have $1 x 1.5 = $1.5m short in notional. The value of one S&P futures contract is 1000 x 250 = $250,000, and therefore in order to be short $1.5m, we need to sell 6 contracts.

Since AUD 1 = USD 0.6831, and USD 1 = SEK 8.1329, AUD 1 = SEK 8.1329*0.6831 = 5.5556.

It is important to remember how exchange rates are generally quoted. Most exchange rates are quoted in terms of how many foreign currencies does USD 1 buy. Therefore, a rate of 99 for the JPY means that USD 1 is equal to JPY 99. However, there are four major world currencies where the rate quote convention is the other way round - these are EUR, GBP, AUD and NZD. For these currencies, the FX quote implies how many US dollars can one unit of these currencies buy. So a quote of "1.1023" for the Euro means EUR 1 is equal to USD 1.1023 and not the other way round.

When calculating cross rates, it is important to pay attention to how the rates are quoted. This particular question is quoted in a very straightforward way because it specifies exactly what the rate means, eg by saying USD/AUD it clarifies that the rate is the number of USDs per AUD. If the question is not clear, remember how exchange rates are quoted - all are against 1 USD, except for EUR, GBP, AUD and NZD where it is the other way round.

Choice 'd' is the correct answer. Continuously compounded returns are given by the log of S2/S1. The expression (S2 - S1)/S1 gives discrete returns, not continuously compounded returns.

Note that the question is only asking for the return over the given time period, not annualized returns. So t is not relevant here. If we had to find annualized returns, and t were expressed in years, then the annualized return would have been (1/t)*ln(S2/S1).

Also refer to the tutorial on interest rates and compounding for more information on continuously compounded rates.

A 'hard call protection' means the bond cannot be called until a certain date, regardless of what the share price is. Therefore statement I is false. Also note that a 'soft call protection' means that a bond can be called only if the share price reaches a certain threshold.

It is advantageous for the issuer to call its convertible securities when the share price exceeds the conversion price - because these shares can instead be sold in the market at the higher share price than the lower conversion price. Statement II is true.

When the issuer's share price is very high, the convertible bond trades at a discount to the share price because it is almost certain to be called by the issuer and be redeemed at par. Therefore statement III is right. Statement IV is incorrect because convertible bonds need to pay less coupon than equivalent non-convertible bonds because of the value of the option embedded in them.

For fixed income portfolios where standard cash flow discounting models are not available, duration calculations are based upon estimated price moves in response to a change in rates. Recall that we define duration as the percentage change in price expected for a 1% change in yield. In this case, we have three price points known to us:

Line | Price | Yield

a | $102 | r - 45bps

b | $100 | r

c | $ 97 | r + 45bps

(where r is the current yield)

The change in price from line a to line c is $102m - $97m = $5m. We use the middle point, ie $100m, to calculate the percentage change. Therefore the percentage change in price is $5m/$100m = 5%.

The change in yield between lines a and c is 90 basis points [=(r+45bps) - (r-45bps)]. In other words, the change in price is 5% for a 90 bps change in yield. So the duration can be calculated as 5/(90/100) = 5.56. The other answers are incorrect.

The value of Bond 1 is $900,000 and the value of Bond 2 is $1,100,000, or their respective weights in the portfolio are 45% and 55% respectively. The combined duration is the weighted average of their individual durations, ie (45% x 5) + (55% x 10) = 7.75 years

The buyer of a cap who is primarily interested in protecting against a rise in interest rates and does not mind losing some of the gains if interest rates were to fall can reduce her costs by selling a floor with a lower strike rate. Selling a cap would further expose her to the risk of rising rates, exactly what she is trying to protect herself against, and reducing the strike rate for the cap will actually increase the cost of the cap. Similarly, increasing the time period to which the cap applies will also increase the cost of the cap.

On-the-run bonds yield less, and therefore are priced higher than similar off-the-run bonds. The difference in their pricing reflects the fact that on-the-run bonds are more liquid than off-the-run bonds. Therefore statements I and II are correct. Bonds are on-the-run when they are issued, and change hands frequently, and over time as they become 'seasoned', newer bonds take their place as on-the-run bonds making them off-the-run.

Strips are zero coupon instruments, and do not carry any coupon. Therefore statement III is not correct.

A lower bid-ask or bid-offer spread indicates lower transaction costs and is a result of greater liquidity. A higher bid-ask spread results for less liquid securities. Therefore statement IV is not correct.

A traditional collateralized debt obligation (CDO) involves the complete transfer of securities to an SPV, which then issues notes or securities to investors. Therefore Choice 'd' is the correct answer.

A synthetic CDO achieves the same result as a traditional CDO, but uses credit derivatives to synthetically create the same economic effect as a traditional CDO.

A credit default swap is a derivative instrument that pays in the event of the occurrence of agreed credit events. The arrangement described in the question is not a credit default swap purchase. n-th to default swap arrangements are similar to CDSs, but on a portfolio with the first 'n' losses being covered by the swap.

In terms of beta, his exposure is $10m*0.7 = $7m. This exposure is long.  In order order to neutralize his long exposure, he needs to have an equal an identical short position with the same beta as this long position (of course, in the short direction).  We need to figure out how many contracts will have a beta equal to his held position.  (The beta of a futures contract is slightly different from 1 when compared to spot, but in the absence of other information in the question it is always okay to assume that the beta of the futures contract is 1.  Such precision does not matter because of other errors such as rounding etc that cannot be anyway done away with.)

He needs to short futures contracts on the index with $7m in notional value. The value of each contract is currently 1000*250 =$250,000. He therefore needs to short $7m/$250,000 = 28 contracts to become market or beta neutral.

Notional principals are not exchanged at the start and the end of an FRA. In fact, if the notional principals were to be exchanged, it would increase credit risk and not decrease it by introducing settlement risk. Therefore Choice 'd' is incorrect.

All other choices correctly describe various aspects of an FRA.

A short position in a fixed rate bond and a long position in an FRN has the effect of paying fixed and receiving floating. The floating received offsets the floating payment on the borrowing, leaving the borrower with just a fixed rate outflow. Therefore the combination identified in statement I can be used to achieve the objective of paying fixed.

A collar is equivalent to a long position in an interest rate cap combined with a short position in an interest rate floor. This has the effect of setting a range within which the investor's borrowing rate will vary. In the case where the cap and floor rates are the same, the combination of a collar and a long FRN effectively produces an outcome where the holder of such positions pays a fixed rate. Therefore, an interest rate collar can be used to convert the fixed payment to a floating rate payment. [Example: Assume current interest rate is 3%, and therefore the borrower has a liability of 3% on the FRN. Assume that the borrower now buys a collar at the strike rate of 4%. Now the borrower receives 0% (=Max(3 % -4%, 0)) on the cap part of the collar, and pays 1% on the floor part of the collar (=Max(4% - 3%, 0)). The net borrowing cost therefore is 3% paid on the FRN plus 1% paid on the collar, equal to 4%. Now if interest rates rise to say 6%, the borrower pays 6% on the FRN, and receives 2% from the collar (=Max(6% - 4%, 0) - Max(4% - 6%, 0)), creating a net cost of 6% - 2% = 4%.

A collar is often issued with an FRN to convert floating flows to fixed. Therefore combination II is an acceptable choice.

A short position in a fixed rate bond and a short position in an FRN produces a cash flow that does not produce a net fixed cash outflow when combined with the borrowing. Therefore statement III is not a valid combination.

An interest rate swap where the investor pays fixed and receives floating, when combined with a floating payment on an FRN leaves a net fixed payment, Therefore statement IV is a valid way to achieve the borrower's objective.

Statement I is correct - since forward prices are determined as (Spot - PV of dividends)*e^(rt), an increase in dividends will reduce forward prices.

Statement II is incorrect as forward prices will be determined by near term interest rates, specifically by the borrowing rate for the period of the contract, and will stay unchanged if near term interest rates do not change.

Statement III is incorrect. Futures exchanges require both buyers and sellers to deposit initial margins as prices can move adversely for either of them.

Statement IV is incorrect, as the margin deposited when a contract is entered into is called initial margin. Margin calls thereafter resulting from movements in prices are called variation margin.

Statement V is incorrect. Most futures exchanges distinguish between hedgers and speculators and require different margins from each.

Statement VI is incorrect. Interest rate futures behave almost identically to their bond counterparts, and carry both duration and convexity.

Standard deviation of this portfolio can be calculated as SQRT(4000^2*20%^2 + 6000^2*25%^2 + 2*0.6*4000*6000*20%*25%), which is equal to $2,081. Choice 'a' is the correct answer. The other answers are incorrect.