8013 PRMIA PRM Exam 1: Finance Foundations Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

The bond equivalent yield for a treasury bill can be calculated as [(Future value - Present value)/Present value x 365/days to maturity]. In this case this works out to ($100-$98)/$98 * 365/90 = 8.28%

[Why do we use 365 days and not 360? And is there a different way to calculate treasury bill yields?

The answer to this question is that there are alternate ways to calculate these yields. For the exam, I would suggest that you calculate according to one method, see if you get an answer that matches, and pick that. I found the below on the NY Fed's website - a very clear example: (http://newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed28.html)

The Discount Yield Method

The following formula is used to determine the discount yield for T-bills that have three- or six-month maturities:

Discount yield = [(FV - PP)/FV] * [360/M]

FV = face value

PP = purchase price

M = maturity of bill. For a three-month T-bill (13 weeks) use 91, and for a six-month T-bill (26 weeks) use 182

360 = the number of days used by banks to determine short-term interest rates (the investment yield method is based on a calendar year: 365 days, or 366 in leap years).

Example

What is the discount yield for a 182-day T-bill, auctioned at an average price of $9,659.30 per $10,000 face value?

Discount yield = [(FV - PP)/FV] * [360/M]

FV = $10,000 PP = $9,659.30 M = 182

Discount yield = [(10,000) - (9,659.30)] / (10,000) * [360/182]

Discount yield = [340.7 / 10,000] * [1.978022]

Discount yield = .0673912 = 6.74%

For the 13-week bill, the same formula would be used, dividing 360 by a maturity of 91 days rather than 182 days.

The Investment Yield Method

When comparing the return on investment in T-bills to other short-term investment options, the investment yield method can be used. This yield is alternatively called the bond equivalent yield, the coupon equivalent rate, the effective yield and the interest yield.

The following formula is used to calculate the investment yield for T-bills that have three- or six-month maturities:

Investment yield = [(FV - PP)/PP] * [365 or 366/M]

Example

What is the investment yield of a 182-day T-bill, auctioned at an average price of $9,659.30 per $10,000 face value?

Investment yield = [(FV - PP)/PP] * [365/M]

FV = $10,000 PP = $9,659.30 M = 182

Investment yield = [(10,000 - 9,659.30) / (9,659.30)] * [365/182]

Investment yield = [340.70] / 9,659.30] * [2.0054945]

Investment yield = .0707372 = 7.07%

For the 13-week bill, the same formula can be used, dividing 365 (or 366) by a maturity of 91 days.

Once the price of the stock exceeds $100, the investor would forego any additional gains as the call would be exercised. Therefore the maximum gain to the investor is $10, plus the premium earned, which is $3, making for a maximum gain of $13.

In the event the stock price declines, the investor would lose on his long stock position an amount equal to the decline, less any premium earned. The worst case price for a stock is 0, and in this case the investor would lose his $90 in the stock, offset by $3 in premiums earned (the written call would expire worthless), thereby limiting his total loss to $87.

Choice 'c' is therefore the correct answer.

Forward currency rates can be calculated as Spot rate x (1 + rate in domestic currency)/(1 + rate in foreign currency), where the spot rate is the 'direct' rate. Direct rates are rates that are expressed as the number of domestic currency units that it takes to buy 1 unit of the foreign currency. In this case, considering the US the domestic currency, then the forward rate is given by 0.7 * 1.02/1.035 = 0.6899. Therefore Choice 'b' is the correct answer.

When using a futures contract to hedge a position, the correct way to determine the number of futures contracts to use is to use the following formula. This adjusts for the 'tailing the hedge' adjustment required as a result of the daily settlement feature of futures contracts.

Minimum Variance Hedge Ratio x Dollar Value of Position / Dollar Value of Single Futures Contract

When using forward contracts to hedge a position, no adjustment to tail the hedge is required (as settlement happens only at the end), and the number of units of the exposure when compared to the number of units per contract should be used. The formula in the case of forward contracts is:

Minimum Variance Hedge Ratio x Units in Position Held / Units in Single Futures Contract

In practice however, the difference between the above two formulae is de-minimis; and for the exam you should be okay to use either of the above two to determine the number of contracts - unless the question is directed to testing your knowledge of the 'tailing the hedge' adjustment.

The yield to maturity for a bond trading at par will be identical to its coupon. Therefore the yield to maturity for this bond will be 5%

When hedging one fixed income security with another, the question as to how much of the hedge to buy (or sell) (ie the hedge ratio) for a given primary position is determined by their respective basis point values, which in turn are determined by their duration. Therefore, when hedging a long maturity bond with a PV01 of $3 with a short maturity bond that has a PV of $1, we will need to buy 3 times the notional value of the short maturity bond to achieve the same sensitivity to interest rates as the longer maturity bond. Additionally, we may also expect the interest rates on the hedge to move differently from the interest rates on the primary instrument being hedged, and this needs to be accounted for as well as part of the hedge ratio calculation. This is called the yield beta and is calculated as change in yield for primary position/change in yield for the hedge security.

The hedge ratio is determined both by the yield beta and the BPVs of the two securities.

In this case, the yield beta is 1 (as the question speaks of a parallel shift in the yield curve, ie all rates rise or fall together), and the ratio of the BPVs is 5/8. Therefore she should sell 5/8 x 1,000,000 = $625,000 of the 30 year bond.

Choice 'b' is the correct answer.

Straddles and strangles are strategies that would benefit from sharp movement in option prices, regardless of direction. These comprise a long call and a long put, which would benefit regardless of whether prices rise or fall. The only time they would lose money would be when prices stay constant.

A collar would gain when stock prices fall, and not when they rise. Since our investor does not have a view on the direction of the movement, this strategy will not work for him.

A butterfly spread or a condor would gain when prices stay range-bound, so that cannot be a useful strategy.

Therefore Choice 'd' is the correct answer.

Average rate options will be the most cost effective in this scenario as they are cheaper than vanilla options. Writer extendible options on commodities will be even more expensive, and correlation products are irrelevant to the manufacturing company's hedging needs.

According to the dividend discount model, the spot share prices represent the present value of all the future cash flows from the stock. If held till perpetuity, this becomes an annuity equal to the dividend, growing at its expected growth rate. Therefore Choice 'a' is the correct answer. Choice 'c' would represent the total market cap, and not the value per share that the question asks.

The transformation line represents the various possible combinations of the 'risky bundle' and the risk free asset. Investors can choose different combinations of the risky and risk-free asset depending upon their risk appetite. The transformation line meets the y-axis (portfolio returns) at the point equal to the risk free rate. Choice 'a' is the correct answer and the rest are incorrect.

The highest possible transformation line, ie the transformation line with the maximum slope, is the transformation line joining the risk free rate on the y-axis and the portfolio with the maximum Sharpe ratio on the efficient frontier. This line is called the 'capital markets line'. Investors can pick any point on this line according to their risk appetite, and doing so would maximize the return they can obtain for their desired level of risk. The capital markets line is tangential to the efficient frontier. The Sharpe ratio stays constant throughout the CML.

Remember that the transformation line and the capital markets lines are different from each other - there is only one CML for an efficient frontier, whereas there can be multiple transformation lines.

A protective put is a put option purchased to protect against the fall in value of a long position. If the price of the underlying in respect of the long position goes down, the put options helps limit losses. If the price of the underlying goes up, the premium paid on the puts is lost but the investor gets to keep the entire upside from the rise in the price.

Therefore statements I, III and IV are correct. Statement II is not correct as any decline in the value of the underlying is offset by the gain from the put, which is the entire idea behind a protective put.

Treasury bills are short-term government securities with maturities ranging from a few days to 52 weeks. Bills are sold at a discount from their face value, and do not carry a coupon.

The tax advantage of debt is an important input into a decision on the financial structure of a firm. Increasing debt increases the fixed expenses of a business that must be paid out of current cash flows, thereby increasing the cost of financial distress. CFOs consider the volatility of their earnings, outlook for the future and the possibility of financial distress at varying levels of debt, so that certainly is an input into the debt-equity tradeoff. Holding higher levels of equity increases financial flexibility for financing new investments or acquisitions, and depending upon their plans for such activities, they may decide to hold a certain level of equity versus debt.

The agency costs of equity refer to the cost to shareholders arising from the management acting in its own interest rather than that of shareholders - and this is irrelevant to a decision on capital structure. Therefore Choice 'd' is the correct answer.

Interest rate caps are effectively call options on an underlying interest rate that protect the buyer of the cap against a rise in interest rates over the agreed exercise rate. As with options, the premium on the cap depends upon the volatility of the underlying rates as one of its variables. A floor is the exact opposite of a cap, ie it is effectively a put option on an underlying interest rate that protects the buyer of the floor against a fall in interest rates below the agreed exercise rate. Therefore statements I and II are correct.

A cap protects a borrower against a rise in interest rates beyond a point, and a floor protects a lender against a fall in interest rates below a point.

A collar is a combination of a long cap and a short floor, the idea being that the premium due on the cap is offset partly by the premium earned on the short floor position. Therefore a collar is less expensive than a cap or a floor.

Caps, floors and collars provide a hedge against interest rate risks. Therefore statement III is correct too. However. they do not always provide protection against spreads changing, as the rate other than the one referenced by the cap or the floor may change causing the spread to change. Therefore statement IV is incorrect.

A fixed for floating interest rate swap would be the most appropriate to the company's needs. It will allow it to receive a fixed rate (which will offset the fixed payment it has to make on the loan) and pay a floating rate which it expects will be lower than the fixed rates. Choice 'a' is the correct answer.

Answer:

A portfolio loses its delta neutrality if the delta of the portfolio changes but the underlying hedge is unchanged. The portfolio that will require the most rebalancing will be one whose delta changes by larger amounts in response to a given change in the price of the underlying. The sensitivity of the changes in delta in response to changes in the price of the underlying is measured by gamma. The higher the gamma, the more the portfolio will go out of delta neutrality given a change in the price of the underlying. Therefore Choice 'b' is the correct answer.

A portfolio with a low gamma will maintain its delta over a larger price range for the underlying, and is therefore likely to require less frequent rebalancing. The absolute level of the delta itself does not matter, what matters is the gamma. Vega is irrelevant to the delta hedging decision. Therefore the other choices are incorrect.

The forward rate from year 2 to year 3 in this case can be derived as =(1.05^3/1.04^2) - 1, or 7.03%. All other answers are incorrect.

A utility function provides a description of an individual or a firm's risk attitude. It expresses how risk seeking or risk averse they are. The utility function would provide for changes between risk seeking and risk averse behavior, for example, as an individual becomes richer, he may seek (or shun) risk more than before. A utility function incorporates all of this, and a logarithmic utility function is represented by u(x) = ln(x).

The highest possible transformation line, ie the transformation line with the maximum slope, is the transformation line joining the risk free rate on the y-axis and the portfolio with the maximum Sharpe ratio on the efficient frontier. This line is called the 'capital markets line'. Investors can pick any point on this line according to their risk appetite, and doing so would maximize the return they can obtain for their desired level of risk. The capital markets line is tangential to the efficient frontier. The Sharpe ratio stays constant throughout the CML. Therefore statement IV is not true, while the rest are.