C_TS422_2023 SAP Certified Associate - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Production Planning and Manufacturing Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

In SAP S/4HANA, planning strategies (material master, MRP 3 view, Strategy Group) determine how production aligns with demand. The scenario describes a pure make-to-stock (MTS) environment where goods are produced based on forecasts (planned independent requirements, PIRs) and held in stock, with excess customer orders not affecting the production program:

Make-to-stock production (10)(D): Strategy 10 uses PIRs (entered via MD61) to drive production, and finished goods are stocked (goods receipt via CO15). Sales orders (VA01) are fulfilled from stock, and excess demand beyond the forecast does not trigger additional production or consume PIRs—it’s handled separately (e.g., via backorder or rejection). Thisensures the production program remains stable, based solely on the forecast.

Assembly processing with production orders (82)(A) is a make-to-order (MTO) strategy tied to sales orders, not forecasts.Planning with final assembly (40)(B) allows sales orders to consume PIRs, potentially impacting production if demand exceeds the forecast.Planning without final assembly (50)(C) plans subassemblies based on PIRs, with final assembly triggered by sales orders, also affecting production. Strategy 10 meets the requirement per SAP’s MTS planning logic.

In SAP S/4HANA, the validity of a bill of material (BOM) (transaction CS01/CS02) can be restricted as follows:

By plant(B): BOMs are plant-specific by default (field: Plant in CS01). A BOM created for one plant (e.g., 0001) is not valid in another (e.g., 0002) unless copied or extended (CS07), limiting its applicability to the specified plant.

By period(C): The BOM header (CS02) includes "Valid From" and "Valid To" dates, restricting its use to a specific time range. MRP and production orders only select BOMs valid on the required date, allowing versioning or phase-outs (e.g., engineering changes via ECM).

By material type(A) influences which materials can be included in a BOM (e.g., FERT for finished goods), but it doesn’t limit the BOM’s validity—it’s a material attribute.By material status(D) (material master, Basic Data) can block a material from use, but it affects the material, not the BOM’s validity directly. This aligns with SAP’s BOM management rules.

The material type in SAP S/4HANA (selected in MM01, configured via OMS2) defines a material’s properties and behavior:

Which document types and class categories are allowed(A): Material type determines which business documents (e.g., purchase orders, production orders) can be created and which classification categories (e.g., batch, variant) apply. For example, "FERT" allows production orders, while "NLAG" (non-stock) restricts inventory documents (configured in Logistics - General > Material Master > Define Attributes of Material Types).

Which material master screens appear and in which sequence(C): Material type controls the views available in the material master (e.g., MRP for "FERT," no Sales view for "ROH") and their order, based on Customizing (OMS2, field selection and view sequence). This tailors the interface to the material’s purpose.

Plant-specific and plant-independent statuses(B) are managed via material status (Basic Data view), not material type—type defines broader attributes.Whether produced in-house or procured(D) is set by the Procurement Type (MRP 2 view), not directly by material type, though type may imply defaults (e.g., "ROH" for procurement). This is per SAP’s material type definition.

In SAP S/4HANA PP/DS, achieving a feasible production plan under capacity constraints involves:

Determine a time period with available capacity on the planning board(C): Using the DS Planning Board (/SAPAPO/CDPS0), planners can visually identify periods with free capacity on resources and manually or automatically schedule orders into those slots, ensuring feasibility.

Increase the capacity supply in a time-phased interval(D): In the work center (CR02, Capacity tab) or PP/DS resource (/SAPAPO/RES01), you can define additional capacity (e.g., shifts, overtime) for specific time intervals via capacity variants, allowing more orders to fit within constraints.

Form optimum sequences to reduce setup times(E): Using heuristics (e.g., SAP_PP_020) or the PP/DS Optimizer, you can sequence operations on resources to minimize setup times (defined in routing, CA02), maximizing throughput and resolving capacity bottlenecks.

Execute an infinite planning run(A) ignores capacity constraints, creating an unfeasible plan requiring later adjustment—not a solution.Reduce the planning time interval(B) (e.g., horizon in /SAPAPO/CDPSC11) limits scope but doesn’t address capacity directly. This is per SAP’s PP/DS capacity planning strategies.

In SAP S/4HANA repetitive manufacturing,line loadinginvolves planning production quantities and capacities across production lines. Options include:

Run MRP with quota arrangement(B): MRP (MD01/MD02) with a quota arrangement (MEQ1, marked MRP-relevant) distributes production quantities across multiple production lines (production versions) based on predefined quotas (e.g., 60% Line A, 40% Line B). This plans quantities and implicitly considers capacity via the linked work centers, visible inMF50.

Run PP/DS heuristics for repetitive manufacturing(D): PP/DS heuristics (e.g., SAP_PP_002 in /SAPAPO/CDPSB0) plan both quantities (e.g., creating planned orders) and capacities (e.g., finite scheduling on production lines) for REM scenarios. This integrates detailed scheduling with line loading, optimizing resource use.

Assign planned orders manually in the planning table(A) (MF50) adjusts existing quantities but doesn’t inherently plan capacities—it’s a manual tweak.Run MRP with automatic selection of production version(C) selects one version (e.g., via alphanumeric order), planning quantities but not dynamically balancing capacities across lines. This is per SAP’s REM planning options.

In SAP S/4HANA Advanced Planning (PP/DS),peggingis a key concept that links supply (receipts) to demand (issues) across the production structure. It is defined as:

An evaluation that is ordered according to the bill-of-material structure of all related products and represents the relationship between the receipt and the issue elements(A): Pegging (visible in /SAPAPO/RRP3 or Product View) assigns receipt elements (e.g.,planned orders, stock) to issue elements (e.g., sales orders, dependent requirements) based on the BOM hierarchy. It follows the BOM structure (top-down or bottom-up) to ensure each demand is covered by a specific supply, maintaining traceability and sequence (e.g., fixed or dynamic pegging).

Option B (overstock situations) relates to stock analysis, not pegging’s core purpose. Option C (network structure) is inaccurate—pegging uses BOM, not a network, and focuses on assignment, not just coverage. Option D (shortages) is a result of planning, not pegging’s definition, which is about linking, not identifying gaps. This aligns with SAP’s PP/DS pegging documentation.

In SAP S/4HANA, the MRP planning file (table MDVM, visible via MD05) tracks changes that trigger MRP to re-evaluate a material’s planning situation. Entries are created when:

Changing the procurement type in the product master(C): The procurement type (material master, MRP 2 view, field: Procurement Type) determines whether a material is produced in-house ("E"), procured externally ("F"), or both ("X"). Changing it (e.g., via MM02) affects how MRP generates planned orders or purchase requisitions, so an entry is added to the planning file (e.g., NETCH or NETPL indicator) to prompt recalculation.

Changing the stock in inventory management(D): Any stock change (e.g., goods receipt via MIGO, goods issue via MB1A) updates the available stock (MD04). This triggers an MRP planning file entry because it alters the net requirements calculation, requiring MRP (MD01/MD02) to reassess supply versus demand.

Changing the delivery address in transportation management(A) affects logistics execution (e.g., shipment documents), not MRP planning directly—no entry is created.Changing the storage bin in warehouse management(B) (e.g., via LT10) is a WM-level movement that doesn’t impact MRP unless stock quantity changes, which falls under (D). This is per SAP’s MRP planning file logic.

Engineering Change Management (ECM) in SAP S/4HANA (transaction CC01/CC02) manages changes to objects like BOMs, routings, and materials with a structured process:

To save multiple changes for an object(C): ECM allows multiple changes (e.g., to a BOM’s components) to be grouped under one change number (field: Change Number in CS01). These changes are saved and applied together on a specified date (Valid From), ensuring coordinated updates across objects.

To monitor document object changes(D): ECM tracks changes to objects (e.g., materials, BOMs) linked to a change number, providing an audit trail (transaction CC03, History tab). This monitors who changed what and when, supporting compliance and traceability.

To monitor document table changes(A) is vague—“document” likely means BOM or routing, but ECM focuses on object changes, not table-level monitoring (e.g., database logs).To enable integration into a sales order(B) is incorrect—ECM integrates with production or procurement, not directly with sales orders (VA01). This is per SAP’s ECM functionality.

In SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, thetabular planning tablefor capacity planning (transaction CM22) offers chart-based views to analyze capacity:

Capacity requirements chart(B): This chart (accessible in CM22, graphical view) displays the capacity requirements (e.g., in hours) for operations across work centers over time, showing demand against available capacity to identify overloads or gaps.

Work center capacities chart(D): This chart shows the available capacity of work centers (defined in CR02, Capacity tab) over a time period, allowing planners to compare it with requirements and adjust dispatching (e.g., visible in the capacity overview tab).

Order (pool) chart(A) represents undispatched orders in the pool (e.g., in CM21), not a specific tabular chart type in CM22, which focuses on dispatched operations.Orders (dispatched) chart(C) isn’t a distinct chart—dispatched orders are part of the requirements chart. This is per SAP’s capacity planning table documentation.

In SAP S/4HANA’sgraphical planning table(e.g., CM21 or PP/DS Planning Board, /SAPAPO/CDPS0), inserting an operation withforward planning direction(start from a fixed date and schedule forward) at a specific time on a work center with an existing operation:

The new operation is inserted at the desired time; the previously dispatched operation is moved forward(C): With forward scheduling (configured in the strategy profile, e.g., /SAPAPO/CDPSC11, Planning Direction: Forward), the system inserts the new operation at the specified time (e.g., via drag-and-drop). To maintain capacity feasibility, the previously dispatched operation is shifted forward (later in time) to avoid overlap, respecting the work center’s finite capacity (CR02, "Relevant to Finite Scheduling" checked).

Options A and B (leaving the existing operation unchanged) would violate finite scheduling rules, causing overlaps. Option D (moving backward) contradicts forward planning, which schedules from the start point onward. This is per SAP’s dispatching behavior in graphical tools.

When a new MRP-relevant material in SAP S/4HANA supports both in-house production and external procurement (procurement type "X" in the MRP 2 view), MRP defaults to a specific behavior unless overridden by additional settings (e.g., source list, quota arrangement). By default,the MRP run assumes in-house production(B). This is because SAP’s standard logic prioritizes in-house production (procurement type "E") over external procurement ("F") when both are possible,unless a valid source of supply (e.g., scheduling agreement, contract) explicitly directs it to external procurement.

Option A is incorrect because external procurement requires a source list or quota arrangement to take precedence. Option C is false, as quotations are not a prerequisite for MRP planning; they are optional for external procurement. Option D is also incorrect—MRP will plan the material automatically based on its master data, not require interactive planning. This behavior is documented in SAP’s MRP processing rules.

In SAP S/4HANA PP/DS,mode selectionrefers to choosing between alternative production modes(combinations of resources and recipes) within detailed scheduling (e.g., /SAPAPO/CDPS0 or heuristics). It is used:

When alternative resources are used within one operation(B): In the PP/DS resource (mapped from work center, CR02) and operation (routing, CA02), modes define different resource options (e.g., Machine A vs. Machine B) for the same operation. Mode selection (configured in the PPM or PDS, /SAPAPO/RES01) allows PP/DS to pick the best resource based on availability, priority (Mode Priority field), or cost during scheduling.

Several operations for one product(A) involves operation sequencing, not mode selection.Several production versions(C) (MRP 4 view) define BOM/routing combinations at the material level, not within an operation.Multiple planned orders in parallel(D) relates to resource loading, not mode-specific choices. This is per SAP’s PP/DS scheduling options.

SAP S/4HANA offers automation options to streamline production order processing:

You can use trigger points to automatically create rework orders via confirmations(A): Trigger points (configured in routing via CA02, Extras > Trigger Points) are events linked to operations. For example, a trigger point can be set to create a rework order (order type defined in Customizing) automatically when a confirmation (e.g., CO11N) indicates a quality issue, enhancing process efficiency.

You can use mass processing to set production orders to technically complete(B): Transaction COHV (Mass Processing of Production Orders) allows users to select multiple orders and execute the "Technically Complete" function (TECO), automating status updates without manual intervention per order.

The production scheduling profile(C) (Customizing: Production > Shop Floor Control > Master Data > Define Production Scheduling Profile) controls scheduling and confirmation settings but cannot automatically set orders to "Technically Complete"—this requires manual or mass action.Mass processing to read PP master data(D) is not a standard function—COHV updates order data, not reads master data for automation. This is per SAP’s production automation features.

In SAP S/4HANA PP/DS, restricting planners to specific resources for planning is achieved through:

Use a resource group(A): Resource groups (defined in /SAPAPO/RES_GROUP or Customizing) aggregate specific resources (e.g., work centers from CR02 flagged for PP/DS). Planners can be assigned to a resource group via authorization profiles (PFCG),limiting their planning scope in tools like the Planning Board (/SAPAPO/CDPS0) or Product View (/SAPAPO/RRP3) to only those resources, ensuring controlled access.

Use a planning group(B) isn’t a standard PP/DS term—MRP groups exist in classic MRP, but not for resource restriction in PP/DS.Use a propagation range(C) (in /SAPAPO/CDPSC11) defines the scope of planning changes (e.g., horizon), not resource access.Use a planning area(D) (e.g., in APO) organizes data but doesn’t restrict resource-specific planning—it’s more for data segmentation. Resource groups align with SAP’s PP/DS security model.

In SAP S/4HANA repetitive manufacturing, the production line is represented by a work center, and this is maintained in:

Production version(B): The production version (material master, MRP 4 view, transaction C223) links a material to a specific production line by referencing a work center (via the routing or rate routing). The "Production Line" field explicitly identifies the work center used for repetitive production, tying it to the planning table (MF50).

Routing(D): In repetitive manufacturing, a rate routing (transaction CA21) or standard routing (CA01) defines the operations and assigns the work center (field: Work Center) thatrepresents the production line. This work center is then referenced in the production version for planning and execution.

Production cost collector(A) (transaction KKF6N) collects costs for repetitive production but doesn’t define the work center—it uses the production version’s data.Repetitive manufacturing profile(C) (Customizing, transaction OSP2) controls REM settings (e.g., backflushing), not the specific work center assignment. This is per SAP’s REM master data setup.

For a make-to-order (MTO) scenario in SAP S/4HANA without forecasting, where components have different procurement behaviors:

Choose planning strategy 20 (Make-to-Order) and select the corresponding Individual/Collective indicator(D): Strategy 20 (material master, MRP 3 view, Strategy Group: 20) is pure MTO, where production is triggered by sales orders (VA01) without PIRs—fitting the "no forecasting" requirement. TheIndividual/Collective indicator(material master, MRP 4 view, field: Ind./Coll.) is set to "1" (Individual Requirements) for the component procured per sales order, generating separate dependent requirements per order, and "2" (Collective Requirements) for the component procured jointly, aggregating requirements across all orders into a single planned order or requisition.

Planning strategy 50 (Planning without final assembly)(A, C) relies on PIRs for subassemblies, conflicting with the "no forecasting" condition.Mixed MRP indicator(B, C) (MRP 4 view) applies to mixed MTS/MTO scenarios (e.g., strategy 11), not pure MTO, and doesn’t address the individual/collective split directly. Strategy 20 with the indicator meets SAP’s MTO configuration standards.

Phantom assemblies in SAP S/4HANA (special procurement type 50, material master MRP 2 viewor BOM item) are virtual components not physically stocked—their BOM is exploded directly into the higher-level assembly. Benefits include:

To simplify the structure of bills of material(A): By treating a group of components as a phantom (e.g., a kit), the BOM avoids an extra level of assembly, reducing complexity in planning and documentation (e.g., one BOM level instead of two).

To reduce the number of changes required in bills of material(B): Changes to a phantom’s components (CS02) automatically propagate to all higher-level BOMs using it, minimizing maintenance effort compared to updating separate subassembly BOMs.

To make the assignment of components easier(D): In production orders (CO01), phantom components are directly assigned to the parent operation, simplifying goods issue and confirmation by eliminating subassembly steps.

To reduce the number of material masters(C) is incorrect—phantoms still require a material master with type (e.g., HALB) and procurement key 50, so the count remains unchanged.To increase the number of planning levels(E) is false—phantoms reduce planning levels by bypassing subassembly production. This is per SAP’s phantom assembly usage.

In SAP S/4HANA, sub-items in a BOM (transaction CS01/CS02) are detailed breakdowns of a component (e.g., for variable-size items or complex assemblies), accessed via the Sub-Item tab. The maintainable data includes:

Quantity(A): The sub-item quantity (field: Sub-Item Quantity) specifies the amount of the sub-component required per unit of the parent item (e.g., 2 meters of a pipe). This ensures accurate material planning and consumption in production orders.

Installation point(C): The installation point (field: Installation Point) indicates where the sub-item is installed within the assembly (e.g., a specific position in a machine). This is critical for technical documentation and assembly instructions.

Status(B) applies to the BOM header or main item (e.g., Active/Inactive), not sub-items, which inherit the parent’s status.Scrap percentage(D) is maintained at the main item level (Item Data, Scrap field) or in the material master, not at the sub-item level, as sub-items detail usage, not waste. This is per SAP’s BOM sub-item structure.

Material Requirements Planning (MRP) in SAP S/4HANA calculates net requirements to determine material shortages or surpluses by comparing the available stock and scheduled receipts against requirements. During this calculation, MRP considers existingproduction orders(A) because they represent firm commitments to produce materials, and their quantities directly influence the availability of components and finished goods. Similarly,planned orders (firmed)(B) are included as they are confirmed planning proposals that have been manually or automatically fixed, ensuring they are treated as reliable supply elements in the net requirement calculation.

Planned orders (unfirmed)(C) are not considered firm receipts because they are still tentative and subject to change during subsequent MRP runs, so they are excluded from the net calculation unless firmed.ATP (Available-to-Promise) quantities(D) are used in availability checks for sales orders, not directly in MRP’s net requirement calculation, which focuses on stock and scheduled receipts rather than promise-based quantities. This aligns with SAP’s MRP logic as outlined in the SAP S/4HANA Production Planning documentation, emphasizing firm supply elements.