2V0-17.25 VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Administrator Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

The documentation clarifies the scenario when a password is changed outside of VCF Operations: “ When an error occurs, for example after a password expires, you must manually reset the password in the component product. After you reset the password in a component, you must remediate the password in VCF Operations. ” “Password Rotation” is different—it “ allows you to orchestrate the rotation ” of stored credentials (a planned, VCF-driven change), not reconcile an externally altered password. Therefore, after the direct password change in vCenter, the correct recovery step in VCF Operations is to use Remediate password to synchronize credentials and restore management from VCF Operations.

===========

The requirement is to ensure DNS records are created only when a domain name is provided.

Since the blueprint includes a custom property for domainName, the correct conditional logic in the event subscription must validate that this property is not null.

Adding the condition:

event.data.customProperties[ ' domainName ' ] != null

ensures the workflow executes only when the domain name is provided.

Option B validates hostname instead of domain name.

Option A controls workflow blocking, not conditional execution.

Option C relates to cleanup, not creation condition validation.

According to the VCF 9.0 Operations and vSAN Integration Guide, performance metrics in the vSAN Cluster Performance widget are only available when the vSAN Performance Service is enabled. The documentation states:

“The vSAN Performance Service must be enabled in vCenter Server for each vSAN cluster to collect and visualize performance statistics in VCF Operations. Without this service, performance dashboards and widgets will not display data.”

Option A (Support Insight) relates to telemetry with VMware, not performance widgets.

Option B (Cloud proxy as Collector) is required for general collection but not specific to vSAN widget visibility.

Option C (SMART data collection) provides disk health analytics, not cluster-level performance stats.

Option D is correct, because enabling the vSAN Performance Service ensures that VCF Operations receives and displays data in the vSAN Performance dashboards.

Therefore, the administrator must enable the vSAN Performance Service for all vSAN clusters in vCenter.

The Container Storage Interface (CSI) is a Kubernetes-standard interface that allows container orchestration platforms to provision and manage storage systems.

The VMware documentation explains:

“The CSI driver enables Kubernetes clusters to dynamically provision and manage persistent volumes backed by vSphere storage.”

CSI is necessary because:

Containers are ephemeral by nature, but applications often require persistent storage for stateful workloads.

CSI enables dynamic provisioning, attach/detach, resizing, and snapshot operations for persistent volumes.

Incorrect options:

CSI does not replace all third-party interfaces (A).

CSI does not merely detect storage (B).

Ephemeral storage (C) is handled natively by container runtimes and does not require CSI.

Therefore, CSI is necessary because it provides persistent storage functionality to containers .

Istio Service Mesh provides built-in capabilities for managing service-to-service communication within Kubernetes environments.

The Istio documentation highlights default capabilities including:

Service discovery (C): Automatic detection and routing between services.

Mutual TLS (mTLS) encryption (E): Secure communication between services by default.

Istio does not provide:

Multi-cluster backup/restore (A) — handled by tools such as Velero.

Cluster conformance validation (B).

Advanced container runtime (D) — container runtime is handled by container engines such as containerd.

Thus, the correct answers are Service discovery and Connection encryption .

Resetting identity management in VCF requires removal of existing identity configurations, including external identity providers and the Identity Broker configuration. The VCF documentation states that to reset identity services, administrators must remove the SSO configuration, including broker settings, and then reconfigure SSO.

Option B ensures complete cleanup of identity integrations.

Option C re-establishes identity management with the correct configuration.

Disabling (D) or reverting (E) is not a supported reset method. Leaving provisioned users/groups (A) would not fully reset identity management.

Document reference (VCF 9.0):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → Observability and Monitoring Architecture

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → VCF Operations and VCF Operations for Logs

The VCF Automation documentation defines its primary use cases as:

Self-Service Catalog – “ VCF Automation Service Broker provides a catalog for developers and operators to request services and blueprints. ”

Application Dependency Mapping – achieved through integration with VCF Operations for Networks. The guide highlights: “ Developers can discover application relationships and map dependencies through automated workflows in VCF Automation. ” Alerting (A) is handled by VCF Operations, not Automation. VPC implementation (B) and Private AI (D) are supported solutions but not direct Automation use cases. Therefore, the correct answers are C (Self-Service Catalog) and E (Application Dependency Mapping) .

The VCF Health feature “ provides a central location for monitoring the health of your environment ,” including the ability to track “ vCenter Server instances ,” “ ESXi hosts ,” and “ NSX deployments .” Health monitoring includes connectivity, configuration, and critical services status, surfacing alerts for remediation. The documentation’s scope statements make clear that VCF Health targets the infrastructure components —vCenter, ESXi, and NSX—rather than the VCF Operations applications themselves (for example, Fleet Management or Logs). Therefore, the correct monitored components are ESX hosts , vCenter Server , and NSX .

The VCF 9.0 Architecture Guide outlines valid principal storage options for the management domain. It states: “ The management domain must be deployed using vSAN, NFS, or Fibre Channel (FC). Supported protocols include NFSv3 and VMFS on FC. ” vSAN (including OSA) is the default recommended option, but NFSv3 and VMFS on FC are also supported for environments where external storage arrays are required.

NVMe/TCP and vVols are not supported for the initial management domain’s principal storage. vVols may be used in workload domains after deployment, but they are not a supported foundation for the management domain. Therefore, the three correct storage solutions for the first management workload domain are: VMFS on FC, NFSv3, and vSAN OSA .

vSphere Supervisor leverages the Cluster API (CAPI) open-source project to manage the lifecycle of Kubernetes clusters.

Cluster API provides declarative APIs to create, scale, upgrade, and manage Kubernetes clusters. The VMware documentation states:

“VMware Kubernetes Service uses Cluster API components to provision and manage Tanzu Kubernetes clusters on vSphere.”

Incorrect options:

Kubeadm (A) is a Kubernetes bootstrap tool but not the lifecycle engine used by Supervisor.

Contour (B) is an ingress controller.

Grafana (C) is a visualization and monitoring tool.

Thus, the correct answer is Cluster API .

The Storage Overview dashboard in VCF Operations provides consolidated visibility into storage resources, including:

vSAN datastores

VMFS datastores

NFS datastores

Capacity utilization

Performance metrics

Health indicators

The VCF documentation states:

“The Storage Overview dashboard provides a unified view of storage capacity, performance, and health across vSAN and non-vSAN datastores.”

Other options are not suitable:

VCF Health (A) focuses on component health (vCenter, NSX, ESXi).

Data Protection & Recovery (B) covers backup and DR insights.

Diagnostic Findings (C) highlights detected issues but not comprehensive storage inventory.

Thus, the correct location is the Storage Overview dashboard.

The VCF 9.0 Upgrade Documentation clearly outlines a staged upgrade sequence: “ The upgrade to VCF 9.0 begins with the SDDC Manager upgrade. Only after SDDC Manager is upgraded to 9.0 are the other component bundles (vCenter, ESXi, NSX, Operations) made available for download and application. ”

This design ensures SDDC Manager is compatible with the lifecycle operations required for the rest of the environment. If SDDC Manager is not upgraded first, it cannot process or display other bundles. Offline repositories (A), proxy servers (B), or ASYNC tools (C) do not affect the bundle visibility order. Therefore, the correct answer is D. SDDC Manager must be upgraded first.

In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, the integration of operations management is centralized within VCF Operations (formerly known as vRealize Operations/VMware Aria Operations). Specifically, the Diagnostics feature is designed to proactively maintain the health of the VCF stack.

According to the VCF 9.0 administration guidelines, Diagnostics in VCF Operations (often powered by integrated tools like VMware Skyline or dedicated diagnostic probes) allows administrators to trigger a scan of the environment against a database of known issues, Knowledge Base (KB) articles, and security vulnerabilities.

VCF Operations Diagnostics: This tool automates the discovery of risks by analyzing logs and configuration data. It specifically maps the current environment ' s build versions against the VMware Security Advisory (VMSA) database and known bug reports to highlight relevant vulnerabilities directly within the VCF management interface.

Why others are incorrect: While the VMware Security Advisory website (A) contains the information, it is an external resource and not a tool within the VCF environment used to automatically identify issues relevant to that specific deployment. Fleet Management (B) and VCF Health (D) focus on lifecycle management (LCM) and general service availability (UP/DOWN status), whereas " Diagnostics " is the specific functional area for vulnerability and known-problem matching.

The VCF 9.0 Automation Guide – Content Sharing Policies describes how to control catalog item visibility. Administrators create Content Sharing Policies to restrict which groups can see specific catalog items.

Steps required for this scenario:

Create a new Content Sharing Policy (D): This policy governs catalog item access.

Add the catalog item to the new policy (B): The Mobile Application Backend blueprint must be explicitly added.

Configure the scope as Project → FitnessTrackerApp (C): This ensures the catalog restriction applies only within the FitnessTrackerApp project.

Add the FTA_LeadDevelopers Group (F): Grants visibility only to this group, fulfilling the requirement that only Lead Developers initially see the item.

Incorrect options:

Deployment Limit Policy (A) controls resource limits, not catalog visibility.

FTA_Developers (E) should not be included, as the requirement is Lead Developers only.

Organization scope (G) would expose the item to all projects, which violates the requirement.

Thus, the administrator must configure a Content Sharing Policy , add the catalog item, scope it to the FitnessTrackerApp project, and restrict it to the Lead Developers group.

When converging an existing vSphere environment into VCF, certain architectural requirements must be satisfied.

The VCF 9.0 Convergence Guide states that:

The vCenter Server must be running on a cluster it manages (self-managed cluster) to allow SDDC Manager to take ownership during convergence.

Incorrect options:

Baselines (A) are not required; in fact, VCF requires image-based lifecycle management after convergence.

VDS version 7.0 (C) is not a documented prerequisite.

NSX (D) is not required prior to convergence; NSX can be deployed during workload domain bring-up.

Therefore, the required prerequisite is:

vCenter Server VM must be hosted on a cluster it manages.

In VMware vSphere with Supervisor (used within VCF), a vSphere Namespace allows administrators to define resource quotas for Kubernetes workloads.

The vSphere documentation specifies that administrators can configure limits on:

CPU resources

Memory resources

Storage capacity

These quotas control the maximum resources that workloads deployed within the namespace can consume.

Incorrect options:

The number of containers (A) is managed at the Kubernetes level, not directly as a namespace resource quota in vSphere.

The number of services (D) is a Kubernetes object count limit, not a vSphere namespace resource limit.

Thus, the three configurable resource limitations are CPU, Memory, and Storage .

When using Fibre Channel (FC) as the principal storage type for a workload domain in VMware Cloud Foundation, storage must already be provisioned and visible to all participating ESXi hosts.

The VCF documentation specifies that for VMFS on FC deployments:

Storage LUNs must be created on the SAN.

The LUNs must be zoned and presented to all ESXi hosts.

Hosts must be able to detect the presented LUNs before domain creation.

Incorrect options:

SSD disks (A) are required for vSAN, not Fibre Channel.

Port binding (B) is required for iSCSI, not FC.

A VMkernel interface for storage (D) is required for IP-based storage (NFS/iSCSI), not Fibre Channel.

Therefore, the key prerequisite is ensuring LUNs are presented to all ESXi hosts .

The VCF 9.0 Operations Guide – Views and Reports explains the four types of views available for custom dashboards:

Object Relationship View: Displays dependencies and hierarchy between objects (for example, VMs, hosts, datastores) but does not provide exportable tabular data.

Scoreboard View: Provides a high-level KPI visualization of a few key objects but is not intended for large tabular exports.

List View (Correct): Displays tabular data across many objects, such as CPU, memory, and disk metrics for VMs. The guide states: “List views are useful when you want to compare metrics across multiple objects and can be exported to CSV for further analysis.”

Trend View: Focuses on historical data and growth over time, but export to CSV is not its primary purpose.

Because the security team requires both tabular comparison of VM resource usage and the ability to export the data to CSV , the List View is the only option that meets both requirements.