IAPP AIGP Practice Test Questions Answers

What is the technique to remove the effects of improperly used data from an ML system?

All of the following are penalties and enforcements outlined in the EU Al Act EXCEPT?

Why is it important that conformity requirements are satisfied before an AI system is released into production?

CASE STUDY

A global marketing agency is adapting a large language model ( " LLM " ) to generate content for an upcoming marketing campaign for a client ' s new product: a hard hat designed for construction workers of any gender to better protect them from head injuries.

The marketing agency is accessing the LLM through an application programming interface ( " API " ) developed by a third-party technology company. They want to generate text to be used for targeted advertising communications that highlight the benefits of the hard hat to potential purchasers. Both the marketing agency and the technology company have taken reasonable steps to address Al governance.

The marketing company has:

•           Entered into a contract with the technology company with suitable representations and warranties.

•           Completed an impact assessment on the LLM for this intended use.

•           Built technical guidance on how to measure and mitigate bias in the LLM.

•           Enabled technical aspects of transparency, explainability, robustness and privacy.

•           Followed applicable regulatory requirements.

•           Created specific legal statements and disclosures regarding the use of the Al on its client ' s advertising.

The technology company has:

•           Provided guidance and resources to developers to address environmental concerns.

•           Build technical guidance on how to measure and mitigate bias in the LLM.

•           Provided tools and resources to measure bias specific to the LLM.

•           Enabled technical aspects of transparency, explainability, robustness and privacy.

•           Mapped and mitigated potential societal harms and large-scale impacts.

•           Followed applicable regulatory requirements and industry standards.

•           Created specific legal statements and disclosures regarding the LLM. including with respect to IP and rights to data.

The marketing company and its tech provider have taken reasonable steps to govern the AI’s use, including legal disclosures, impact assessments, and bias mitigation. However, the company wants to takeone more stepto improve governance and reduce risks related to ongoing oversight and accountability.

While the marketing agency took steps to mitigate its risks, the best additional step would be to:

CASE STUDY

Please use the following answer the next question:

A local police department in the United States procured an Al system to monitor and analyze social media feeds, online marketplaces and other sources of public information to detect evidence of illegal activities (e.g., sale of drugs or stolen goods). The Al system works by surveilling the publicsites in order to identify individuals that are likely to have committed a crime. It cross-references the individuals against data maintained by law enforcement and then assigns a percentage score of the likelihood of criminal activity based on certain factors like previous criminal history, location, time, race and gender.

The police department retained a third-party consultant assist in the procurement process, specifically to evaluate two finalists. Each of the vendors provided information about their system ' s accuracy rates, the diversity of their training data and how their system works. The consultant determined that the first vendor’s system has a higher accuracy rate and based on this information, recommended this vendor to the police department.

The police department chose the first vendor and implemented its Al system. As part of the implementation, the department and consultant created a usage policy for the system, which includes training police officers on how the system works and how to incorporate it into their investigation process.

The police department has now been using the Al system for a year. An internal review has found that every time the system scored a likelihood of criminal activity at or above 90%, the police investigation subsequently confirmed that the individual had, in fact, committed a crime. Based on these results, the police department wants to forego investigations for cases where the Al system gives a score of at least 90% and proceed directly with an arrest.

When notifying an accused perpetrator, what additional information should a police officer provide about the use of the Al system?