L4M6 CIPS Supplier Relationships Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

In the context of the IT equipment industry,Technologicalfactors are paramount. The rapid pace of technological advancement influences product development, supply chain processes, and market competitiveness. Utilizing the STEEPLED framework, technological considerations would significantly impact the company's supply chain strategy.

As per the CIPS Intelligence Hub:

"STEEPLED analysis is a strategic planning methodology that can be used across all business functions to discover, evaluate, organise, and track external risk."

— CIPS Intelligence Hub: Using STEEPLED analysis to develop your supply chain

Legitimate reasons for contract termination under CIPS guidelines include failure to perform duties and serious breaches of contract terms. Ordering errors or changes in stakeholder needs are not valid termination grounds unless explicitly stated in the contract. This protects both parties from unjustified termination risks.

Explanation

Legislative changes wouldn't affect rivalry in a market as all suppliers would be equally as affected, the same with supply chain disruptions. Factors which do affect rivalry include; industry growth and decline, product differences, brand identity, switching costs, diversity of competitors and exit barriers. These are listed on p.41

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Conduct regular audits’. This is explained on p.153. You wouldn’t do an appraisal on a supplier in a partnership relationship as both parties are equal. Threatening a partner isn’t good for the relationship and a damages clause would be used in a contractual relationship rather than a partnership.

Explanation

A PIN is a ‘prior information notice’ – it is sent out before the ITT to let suppliers know that an opportunity is coming up and they should look out for it. See p 72 “supplier identification- public sector” for more details.

Explanation

This is an example of poor-communication. The information was not passed from the person who signed the contract to the staff on site who were to do the cleaning. See p.158 on communication issues.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Partnerships between buyers and suppliers are often driven by:

High Spend:Significant expenditure justifies the investment in developing a closer relationship to achieve cost savings and efficiencies.

Critical Products:Items that are essential to the buyer's operations necessitate a reliable and collaborative supplier relationship.

Technical Complexity:Complex products benefit from joint development efforts, shared expertise, and coordinated problem-solving.

Conversely, commodities and markets with many suppliers typically lend themselves to transactional relationships rather than partnerships.

Explanation

This is a bottleneck supplier- refer to the Kraljic matrix on p.20; these types of supplier hold a monopoly in the marketplace and provide low-value items. There are lots of questions on Kraljic in the exam - do revise this topic and ensure you understand each of the four quadrants of the matrix

The relationship reflects a partnership due to the strategic alignment, resource sharing, and focus on long-term growth, even without a formal contract. CIPS highlights that partnerships are based on trust and collaboration.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Collaborative partnering relationships are characterized by high levels of trust, mutual objectives, shared information, and long-term commitment. Among the options provided:

Co-destiny: This represents the highest level of collaboration, where both parties' futures are closely linked, and decisions are made jointly for mutual benefit.

Strategic alliance: This involves a formal agreement between organizations to pursue shared objectives while remaining independent entities.

These relationship types are positioned on the collaborative end of the relationship spectrum, emphasizing joint efforts and shared success.

Explanation

The correct answer is power, role and person. This is part of Hardyman's Cultural Types on p.169 (there are four- the other one is task). There's quite a few questions on this in the exam, so it's worth doing some additional research on this prior to the exam as the study guide doesn't provide much detail on this.

Explanation

In a monopoly there is only one supplier- therefore their power is strong. Buyers in this market are price takers and their power is weak. There is generally a strong barrier to entry into a monopoly market so the threat of new entrants is low. There is no rivalry. There are many questions in the exam on Porter's 5 Forces - see p. 39

Drivers for partnership include a high spend with the supplier, criticality of the product, and technical complexity. These factors encourage collaboration for cost efficiency, quality improvement, and risk management. Partnerships are less likely when there are many suppliers or the product is a commodity, as competition and standardization reduce the need for close collaboration.

Explanation

The correct answers are; The marketplace has become more volatile, Working together will create synergies and The need to improve performance to satisfy the end customer. Further Drivers ofPartnership Sourcing can be found on p.127. The other answers are incorrect as entering a partnership won’t protect intellectual property rights- in fact that’s one of the big risks of entering into a partnership. Partnerships won’t increase costs and lead-times, they’re likely to decrease them.

Explanation

The Kraljic model "plays a key part in category management" p.19 of the textbook. Category Management = the spend in an organisation, broken down into categories of related products (e.g. IT, facilities management, marketing). Each of these categories could be plotted on the Kraljic Matrix.

Explanation

It can be difficult for buyers in the private sector to build relationships with suppliers because of rules that state competitive tenders must be undertaken every few years (within the EU this is usually every 4). This means that both parties aren’t as invested in developing the relationship as it’s possible the contact will end shortly. Competitive tendering is a requirement in the public sector to ensure value for money for taxpayers. See p.79 for further details. There are no rules stating Public Sector organisations can’t have good relationships with suppliers, and in fact most will have good relationships with their current suppliers- the issue is that neither party can get too invested in the relationship as everyone knows it may end shortly. There are rules, however, against entering into Partnership relationships (which is discussed in chapter 3).

Explanation

STEEPLE is what is used to analyse the macro-environment; the factors are; social, technological, economic, environmental, political, legislative and ethical. Details of this can be found on p.43-44

Competitive dialogue is the most appropriate method for complex, high-value procurements where requirements cannot be fully defined at the outset. This process allows dialogue with shortlisted bidders to refine specifications and negotiate solutions before awarding. CIPS states that this procedure is particularly suited for projects requiring flexibility, multiple negotiation phases, and innovative input from suppliers.

Explanation

Carter's 10 Cs are a way to qualify (aka shortlist) a supplier. See p.11 for more details on this and p.10 for the stages of the relationship cycle.