IFC CSI Investment Funds in Canada (IFC) Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

The Do Not Call List (DNCL) is a national registry of personal telephone numbers that consumers can register to reduce the number of unsolicited telemarketing calls they receive. Telemarketers are required to subscribe to the DNCL and avoid calling the numbers on the list, unless they have an exemption. One of the exemptions is for existing business relationships, which means that a telemarketer can call a consumer who has purchased a product or service from them or their employer within the last 18 months, or who has made an inquiry or application within the last six months. Therefore, Kendrick is still eligible to contact Chandra, who is an existing client of Oak Solid Financial, even if she is on the DNCL registry. However, Kendrick must respect Chandra’s right to request that he stop calling her and remove her number from his contact list.

Canadian Investment Funds Course, Chapter 1: The Canadian Financial Services Industry1, National Do Not Call List - Canada.ca2

In a mutual fund dealer, the chief compliance officer (CCO) is the person responsible for establishing and maintaining compliance policies and procedures as well as monitoring and assessing compliance by the dealer and its representatives. The CCO must report to the board of directors or senior management of the dealer and must meet certain proficiency requirements, such as passing the Mutual Fund Dealers Compliance Exam. The CCO is also accountable to the securities regulators and self-regulatory organizations for any compliance issues or breaches. References: Guide to Broker-Dealer Registration

The S&P 500 is the appropriate benchmark for researching the largest listed public companies in the US market. The feedback from the document provides:

"Index: S&P 500, Description: The 500 largest publicly held companies that trade on U.S. markets, Performance uses: U.S. equity funds."

While comparing Fund Facts of the different mutual funds, Simone points out that not only are the fund management expenses different but so are the investor profiles for each fund. This behaviour from Simone is ethical because it shows that she is providing accurate and complete information to Pierre and helping him make an informed decision based on his personal circumstances and objectives4. Fund Facts is a document that summarizes key information about a mutual fund, such as its investment objectives, risks, fees, performance history, and investor rights5. By comparing Fund Facts of different mutual funds, Simone can help Pierre understand how each fund differs in terms of its suitability, costs, and potential returns. The other behaviours from Simone are unethical because they do not serve Pierre’s best interests or comply with professional standards. Simone’s ability to keep her knowledge current on competitors’ investment offerings does not necessarily show that she is putting her client’s interest first. She may have other motives for researching other funds, such as trying to persuade Pierre to stay with her dealer’s funds or finding new opportunities for herself4. Knowing Pierre does not like that her dealer’s funds have trailer fees, she chooses not to discuss the relationship between trailer fees and MER while making comparisons. This behaviour is unethical because it is misleading and omits relevant information that Pierre should know before investing4. Trailer fees are fees paid by the fund manager to the dealer for the ongoing services provided by the dealer and its advisors to unitholders5. Trailer fees are part of the management expense ratio (MER), which is the total cost of running and distributing a fund expressed as a percentage of its assets5. Trailer fees and MERs affect the net returns of a fund and may create conflicts of interest between the advisor and the client5. When comparing her dealer’s own mutual funds to the one Pierre discovered, Simone emphasizes the importance of similar net rates of return and minimizes the significance of management expense ratios (MERs). This behaviour is unethical because it is biased and does not present a balanced view of the pros and cons of each fund4. Net rates of return are not the only factor to consider when evaluating a fund’s performance. MERs are also important because they reduce the fund’s gross returns and may indicate how efficiently the fund is managed5. A fund with a lower MER may have an advantage over a fund with a higher MER, all else being equal5. References: Unit 2: Know Your Client, What’s a good MER fee plus 3 strategies to avoid high fees - Bellvest

 Moving the DEF Bond Fund to the RRSP would be more tax-efficient than moving any of the other funds. This is because bond funds generate interest income, which is fully taxable at the investor’s marginal tax rate in a non-registered account. By moving the bond fund to an RRSP, Darryl can defer paying taxes on the interest income until he withdraws it from the RRSP. Moving the GHI Global Equity Fund to the RRSP (B) would not be tax-efficient, as global equity funds generate foreign income and dividends, which are subject to foreign withholding taxes in an RRSP. Moving $20,000 from each of the three funds to the RRSP © would not be tax-efficient, as it would trigger capital gains taxes on all three funds in proportion to their returns. Moving the ABC Canadian Equity Fund to the RRSP (D) would not be tax-efficient, as Canadian equity funds generate Canadian dividends, which are eligible for a dividend tax credit in a non-registered account. By moving the Canadian equity fund to an RRSP, Darryl would lose this tax advantage and pay taxes on the dividends at his marginal tax rate when he withdraws them from the RRSP.

Dave invested in a U.S.-dollar denominated mutual fund. Even though the unit price increased (US$15 → US$16), he lost money when converted back to Canadian dollars. This loss was caused by fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar, not the fund’s performance itself.

This is a clear example of exchange rate (currency) risk.

The market value of a perpetual preferred share is calculated by dividing the annual dividend by the yield of similar shares. Annual dividend = $0.25 × 4 = $1.00. Price = $1.00 / 0.035 = $28.57. The feedback from the document states:

"The current market value of a perpetual preferred share is calculated by dividing the annual dividend in dollars by the annual yield currently offered on preferred shares of a similar level of risk. In this case, the share would be valued as: ($0.25 × 4) / 0.035 = $28.57."

When an investor purchases a mutual fund, the price is based on the next NAVPS (Net Asset Value Per Share) calculated after the order is entered. Orders placed before 4:00 p.m. ET are priced at that day’s closing NAV; orders after 4:00 p.m. are priced using the next business day’s NAV.

Since the order was placed at 2:30 p.m. ET, today’s NAV applies.

The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company’s ability to pay its short-term obligations with its current assets. A higher current ratio indicates that the company has more current assets than current liabilities, which means it can meet its short-term obligations more easily. A lower current ratio indicates that the company has less current assets than current liabilities, which means it may face liquidity problems or default risk. Therefore, the information given in the question indicates that Truesteel is better able to meet its short-term financial obligations than Strongco. The current ratio does not necessarily reflect the profitability, market outlook, or debt financing of the companies. References: Current Ratio Explained With Formula and Examples, Current Ratio Formula, Current ratio

The Strategic Investment Planning (SIP) process is a four-step process that helps advisors to create and deliver customized investment plans for their clients. The four steps are:

Clarify Client Status, Problems and Opportunities: This step involves gathering information about the client’s personal and financial situation, goals, risk tolerance, and investment knowledge. The advisor also identifies the client’s problems and opportunities, such as tax issues, estate planning needs, or market trends.

Identify Strategies and Present the Plan: This step involves analyzing the information collected in the previous step and developing strategies to address the client’s problems and opportunities. The advisor also presents the plan to the client, explaining the rationale, benefits, costs, and risks of the proposed strategies. This is the stage where Sonya mentions factors such as inflation, interest rates, and rates of return, as they are relevant to the investment approaches she is offering to Elijah.

Implement the Plan: This step involves executing the agreed-upon strategies with the client’s consent. The advisor also ensures that the necessary documentation and transactions are completed.

Monitor and Update: This step involves reviewing the performance of the plan and making adjustments as needed. The advisor also communicates with the client regularly and updates the plan according to any changes in the client’s situation or goals.

Canadian Investment Funds Course (CIFC) Study Guide, Chapter 2: The Sales Process, Section 2.3: The Strategic Investment Planning (SIP) Process, page 2-81

Strategic Investment Planning Process - IFSE Institute2

To make a suitable recommendation, Solomon needs to identify how the proposed investment is in alignment with the investor’s profile and holdings. A suitable recommendation is one that meets the investor’s needs, goals, risk tolerance, time horizon, and personal circumstances. It also considers the investor’s existing portfolio and how the new investment would affect its diversification, performance, and risk. Therefore, option C is correct regarding what Solomon needs to do to make a suitable recommendation. The other options are not correct or sufficient to make a suitable recommendation. Option A is false because mutual fund costs are important regardless of the past fund performance, as they reduce the net returns and compound over time. Option B is false because relying on the risk rating of the mutual fund is not enough to offer an investment solution, as it does not reflect the investor’s return expectations, liquidity needs, tax situation, or personal preferences. Option D is false because matching the past rates of return of the mutual fund with what is the anticipated rate of return is not a reliable way to make a recommendation, as past performance does not guarantee future results and may not be consistent with the investor’s risk tolerance or time horizon. References: [Suitability | GetSmarterAboutMoney.ca], [Mutual Fund Fees | GetSmarterAboutMoney.ca], [Risk Rating | GetSmarterAboutMoney.ca]

 B is correct because assessing historical differences in the rate of return per unit of risk of similar mutual funds helps a Dealing Representative to compare the performance and risk-adjusted returns of different mutual funds and select the most suitable one for a client’s risk tolerance and investment objectives. Comparing historical rates of return between different types of mutual funds (A) does not account for the risk involved in each type of fund. Referencing the fund code for each mutual fund that is being compared © does not provide any information about the fund’s characteristics, features, or suitability. The rights a client has if there is a desire to cancel the purchased mutual fund (D) are not relevant for determining a suitable mutual fund for a client.

Adele has a high-risk profile and an excellent understanding of equities. Therefore, it would be appropriate for Danny to recommend growth funds. However, since Adele has $1,000,000 to invest, it would be prudent to diversify her investments and invest equally in all 3 funds. This way, she can benefit from the exposure to different regions and sectors, and reduce the impact of market fluctuations on her portfolio. Based on the table, all 3 funds have the same 5-year annualized returns net of MER, which is 15%. However, they have different MERs and Sharpe ratios. The MER is the fee charged by the fund manager for managing the fund, and the Sharpe ratio is a measure of risk-adjusted return. A lower MER means a lower cost for the investor, and a higher Sharpe ratio means a higher return per unit of risk. Therefore, investing equally in all 3 funds would allow Adele to achieve a balanced trade-off between cost and performance. References:

Canadian Investment Funds Course (CIFC) Study Guide, Chapter 4: Mutual Funds, Section 4.2: Types of Mutual Funds, page 4-6

Canadian Investment Funds Course (CIFC) Study Guide, Chapter 5: Fixed-Income Securities, Section 5.5: Risk-Return Trade-Offs, page 5-14

Sharpe Ratio Definition - Investopedia

Loss aversion bias causes investors to hold onto unprofitable investments due to a stronger desire to avoid losses than to seek gains. The feedback from the document states:

"Loss aversion bias states that people generally feel a stronger impulse to avoid losses than to acquire gains. Loss aversion can prevent people from unloading unprofitable investments, even when they see little to no prospect of a turnaround."

Money market funds invest in short-term securities that generate interest income, and their unit value remains constant (typically $10), preventing capital gains. The feedback from the document states:

"All returns earned on money market funds are considered interest earnings and are taxed as interest income. Since money market funds invest only in money market securities that pay interest, no other type of income can be earned. Because the value of the units of a money market fund is constant ($10), no capital gains can be made on the sale of units of the fund."

A tax trap is a situation where an investor buys a mutual fund just before its ex-dividend date and ends up paying taxes on the distributions that they receive shortly after. This reduces their after-tax return and erodes their capital. To avoid the tax trap, it is advisable to buy the mutual fund after the ex-dividend date, when the fund’s net asset value (NAV) drops by the amount of the distribution. This way, the investor does not receive any taxable income and preserves their capital. Therefore, you should advise Charlie to purchase the Sentinel Canadian Equity Fund after December 20, when the fund goes ex-dividend.

Canadian Investment Funds Course, Unit 8, Section 8.2; 4; 5; 6

A registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) is a type of tax-deferred account that allows individuals to save for retirement. Contributions to an RRSP are deductible from taxable income, which means that they reduce the amount of income tax payable for the year. The amount of tax savings from an RRSP contribution depends on the individual’s marginal tax rate, which is the tax rate applied to the next dollar earned. Leira has a marginal tax rate of 45% and may deduct $5,000 in RRSP contributions on her income tax return. If she decides to use her available deduction and assuming this does not reduce her taxable income to a lower tax bracket, by how much will it reduce her tax payable? To answer this question, we can use the following formula: $$(Tax savings = RRSP contribution \times Marginal tax rate)

A pension adjustment (PA) is the amount that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) assigns to your pension plan each year to reflect the value of the pension benefits that you earned. The PA reduces your registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) contribution room for the following year by the same amount. The PA ensures that all taxpayers have access to comparable tax assistance, regardless of the type of pension plan they participate in. You will receive a PA whether you are in a defined contribution or a defined benefit pension plan, but the calculation of the PA will differ depending on the type of plan. (Canadian Investment Funds Course, Chapter 8, Section 8.2)

Canadian Investment Funds Course, Chapter 8, Section 8.2: Retirement Savings Plans and Pension Plans

Investopedia: Pension Adjustment: Definition and Types of Plans1

PlanEasy: What Is A Pension Adjustment?2