PT0-003 CompTIA PenTest+ Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Shoulder surfing es el método más efectivo en este contexto. Cuando los ejecutivos trabajan en lugares públicos como trenes, un atacante puede visualizar sus pantallas sin ser detectado para recopilar datos confidenciales.

Credential harvesting requiere phishing o explotación directa. Bluetooth spamming y MFA fatigue no aplican directamente en un entorno de observación física.

Referencia: PT0-003 Objective 2.1 – Social engineering and physical observation methods.

To ensure that reverse shell payloads are no longer running, it is essential to actively terminate any implanted malware or scripts. Here’s why option A is correct:

Run Scripts to Terminate the Implant: This ensures that any reverse shell payloads or malicious implants are actively terminated on the affected hosts. It is a direct and effective method to clean up after a penetration test.

Spin Down the C2 Listeners: This stops the command and control listeners but does not remove the implants from the hosts.

Restore the Firewall Settings: This is important for network security but does not directly address the termination of active implants.

Exit from C2 Listener Active Sessions: This closes the current sessions but does not ensure that implants are terminated.

References from Pentest:

Anubis HTB: Demonstrates the process of cleaning up and ensuring that all implants are removed after an assessment​​.

Forge HTB: Highlights the importance of thoroughly cleaning up and terminating any payloads or implants to leave the environment secure post-assessment​​.

=================

In the final report for a penetration test engagement, the section that most likely contains details on the impact, overall security findings, and high-level statements is the executive summary. Here’s why:

Purpose of the Executive Summary:

It provides a high-level overview of the penetration test findings, including the most critical issues, their impact on the organization, and general recommendations.

It is intended for executive management and other non-technical stakeholders who need to understand the security posture without delving into technical details.

Contents of the Executive Summary:

Impact: Discusses the potential business impact of the findings.

Overall Security Findings: Summarizes the key vulnerabilities identified during the engagement.

High-Level Statements: Provides strategic recommendations and a general assessment of the security posture.

Comparison to Other Sections:

Quality Control: Focuses on the measures taken to ensure the accuracy and quality of the testing process.

Methodology: Details the approach and techniques used during the penetration test.

Risk Scoring: Provides detailed risk assessments and scoring for specific vulnerabilities but does not offer a high-level overview suitable for executives.

=================

In a pin tumbler lock, the key interacts with a series of pins within the lock cylinder. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

Components of a Pin Tumbler Lock:

Key Pins: These are the pins that the key directly interacts with. The cuts on the key align these pins.

Driver Pins: These are pushed by the springs and sit between the key pins and the springs.

Springs: These apply pressure to the driver pins.

Plug: This is the part of the lock that the key is inserted into and turns when the correct key is used.

Cylinder: The housing for the plug and the pins.

Operation:

When the correct key is inserted, the key pins are pushed up by the key’s cuts to align with the shear line (the gap between the plug and the cylinder).

The alignment of the pins at the shear line allows the plug to turn, thereby operating the lock.

Why Pins Are the Correct Answer:

The correct key aligns the key pins and driver pins to the shear line, allowing the plug to turn. If any pin is not correctly aligned, the lock will not open.

Illustration in Lock Picking:

Lock picking involves manipulating the pins so they align at the shear line without the key. This demonstrates the critical role of pins in the functioning of the lock.

=================

Search engine enumeration refers to using advanced search operators (e.g., Google Dorking) to find sensitive or misconfigured data exposed publicly on the internet. In this case, the administrator inadvertently posted firewall configuration details, and a tester likely used specific search queries to discover this data.

According to the CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-003 Official Study Guide (Chapter 3 – Passive Reconnaissance and OSINT):

“Search engine enumeration, often using dorking techniques, can uncover publicly available but sensitive data, such as configuration files, credentials, or documents unintentionally published online.”

BAS (Breach and Attack Simulation) tools are specifically designed to emulate multiple TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) used by adversaries. These tools can simulate various attack vectors in a controlled manner to test the effectiveness of an organization's security defenses and response mechanisms. Here’s why option A is the best choice:

Controlled Testing Environment: BAS tools provide a controlled environment where multiple TTPs can be tested without causing unintended damage to the internal systems and servers. This is critical when the threat-modeling team indicates potential impacts on internal systems.

Comprehensive Coverage: BAS tools are designed to cover a wide range of TTPs, allowing the penetration tester to simulate various attack scenarios. This helps in assessing the reactions (alerted, blocked, and others) by the client's security tools comprehensively.

Feedback and Reporting: These tools provide detailed feedback and reporting on the effectiveness of the security measures in place, including which TTPs were detected, blocked, or went unnoticed. This information is invaluable for the threat-modeling team to understand the current security posture and areas for improvement.

References from Pentest:

Anubis HTB: This write-up highlights the importance of using controlled tools and methods for testing security mechanisms. BAS tools align with this approach by providing a controlled and systematic way to assess security defenses​​.

Forge HTB: Emphasizes the use of various testing tools and techniques to simulate real-world attacks and measure the effectiveness of security controls. BAS tools are mentioned as a method to ensure comprehensive coverage and minimal risk to internal systems​​.

Conclusion:

Using a BAS tool to test multiple TTPs allows for a thorough and controlled assessment of the client's security tools' effectiveness. This approach ensures that the testing is systematic, comprehensive, and minimally disruptive, making it the best choice.

=================

By running the command findstr /SIM /C:"pass" *.txt *.cfg *.xml, the penetration tester is trying to enumerate secrets.

Command Analysis:

findstr: A command-line utility in Windows used to search for specific strings in files.

/SIM: Combination of options; /S searches for matching files in the current directory and all subdirectories, /I specifies a case-insensitive search, and /M prints only the filenames with matching content.

/C:"pass": Searches for the literal string "pass".

***.txt .cfg .xml: Specifies the file types to search within.

Objective:

The command is searching for the string "pass" within .txt, .cfg, and .xml files, which is indicative of searching for passwords or other sensitive information (secrets).

These file types commonly contain configuration details, credentials, and other sensitive data that might include passwords or secrets.

Other Options:

Configuration files: While .cfg and .xml files can be configuration files, the specific search for "pass" indicates looking for secrets like passwords.

Permissions: This command does not check or enumerate file permissions.

Virtual hosts: This command is not related to enumerating virtual hosts.

Pentest References:

Post-Exploitation: Enumerating sensitive information like passwords is a common post-exploitation activity after gaining initial access.

Credential Discovery: Searching for stored credentials within configuration files and documents to escalate privileges or move laterally within the network.

By running this command, the penetration tester aims to find stored passwords or other secrets that could help in further exploitation of the target system.

=================

A rootkit is a type of malicious software designed to provide an attacker with unauthorized access to a computer system while concealing its presence. Rootkits achieve this by modifying the host’s operating system or other software to hide their existence, allowing the attacker to maintain control over the system without detection.

Definition and Purpose:

Rootkits are primarily used to gain and maintain root access (administrative privileges) on a system.

They disguise themselves as legitimate software or integrate deeply into the operating system to avoid detection.

Mechanisms of Action:

Kernel Mode Rootkits: These operate at the kernel level, which is the core of the operating system, making them very powerful and hard to detect.

User Mode Rootkits: These run in the same space as user applications, intercepting and altering standard system API calls to hide their presence.

Bootkits: These infect the Master Boot Record (MBR) or Volume Boot Record (VBR) and load before the operating system, making them extremely difficult to detect and remove.

Detection and Prevention:

Detection Tools: Tools like RootkitRevealer, Chkrootkit, and rkhunter can help in identifying rootkits.

Prevention: Regular system updates, use of strong antivirus and anti-malware solutions, and integrity checking tools like Tripwire can help in preventing rootkit infections.

Real-World Examples:

Sony BMG Rootkit: In 2005, Sony BMG included a rootkit in their digital rights management (DRM) software on music CDs. The rootkit hid files and processes, leading to a major scandal when it was discovered.

Stuxnet: This sophisticated worm included a rootkit component to hide its presence on infected systems, making it one of the most infamous examples of rootkit use in a cyber attack.

References from Pentesting Literature:

In "Penetration Testing - A Hands-on Introduction to Hacking" by Georgia Weidman, rootkits are discussed in the context of post-exploitation, where maintaining access to the compromised system is crucial.

Various HTB write-ups, such as the analysis of complex attacks involving multiple stages of exploitation, often highlight the use of rootkits in maintaining persistent access.

Step-by-Step ExplanationReferences:

Penetration Testing - A Hands-on Introduction to Hacking

HTB Official Writeups on sophisticated attacks

=================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Session fixation occurs when an application accepts a session identifier provided by the client (or set before authentication) and continues to use that same identifier after the user authenticates. In this scenario the server issues the same cookie value both before and after login, indicating the session ID is set pre-authentication and not rotated/renewed on successful authentication — a classic session fixation vulnerability. An attacker could force or coerce a victim to use a known session ID, then log in and hijack the authenticated session.

Why not the others:

A. JWT manipulation: Would involve JSON Web Tokens (signed tokens with predictable structure); the cookie shown has no JWT structure.

B. Cookie poisoning: Usually refers to unauthorized modification of cookie contents to change application behavior — not the primary issue here.

D. Collision attack: Cryptographic collision attacks are not relevant to identical session cookies before/after login.

CompTIA PT0-003 Mapping:

Domain 3.0 Attacks and Exploits — web application session management vulnerabilities (session fixation, improper session handling).

Configuring and Registering a Service:

Registering a malicious service ensures that it starts automatically with the system, providing persistence even after reboots.

This method is stealthier than others and is commonly used in advanced persistent threat (APT) scenarios.

Why Not Other Options?

B (Remote desktop software): Installing such software is noisy and can easily be detected by monitoring tools.

C (User logon script): While it provides persistence, it is less reliable and more detectable than a system service.

D (Kerberoasting): This is a credential-stealing technique and does not establish persistence.

CompTIA Pentest+ References:

Domain 3.0 (Attacks and Exploits)

Domain 4.0 (Penetration Testing Tools)

When developing a phishing campaign, the tester should first use social media to gather information about the targets.

Social Media:

Purpose: Social media platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter provide valuable information about individuals, including their job roles, contact details, interests, and connections.

Reconnaissance: This information helps craft convincing and targeted phishing emails, increasing the likelihood of success.

Process:

Gathering Information: Collect details about the target employees, such as their names, job titles, email addresses, and any personal information that can make the phishing email more credible.

Crafting Phishing Emails: Use the gathered information to personalize phishing emails, making them appear legitimate and relevant to the recipients.

Other Options:

Shoulder Surfing: Observing someone’s screen or keyboard input to gain information, not suitable for gathering broad information for a phishing campaign.

Recon-ng: A tool for automated reconnaissance, useful but more general. Social media is specifically targeted for gathering personal information.

Password Dumps: Using previously leaked passwords to find potential targets is more invasive and less relevant to the initial stage of developing a phishing campaign.

Pentest References:

Spear Phishing: A targeted phishing attack aimed at specific individuals, using personal information to increase the credibility of the email.

OSINT (Open Source Intelligence): Leveraging publicly available information to gather intelligence on targets, including through social media.

By starting with social media, the penetration tester can collect detailed and personalized information about the targets, which is essential for creating an effective spear phishing campaign.

=================

The tester identified an HTTPS downgrade attack (e.g., SSL stripping). The best mitigation is to enforce HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security).

HSTS (Option A):

HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) ensures that the browser always uses HTTPS, preventing downgrade attacks.

Example header:

Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Given an insecure wireless network (e.g., open or poorly secured Wi-Fi), a practical initial access technique is to capture or poison name resolution/authentication requests from client systems once they are on that network. Responder is designed to perform LLMNR/NBT-NS/MDNS poisoning and capture NTLM authentication attempts and other credential material on a local network segment. On an insecure Wi-Fi network an attacker can either join the network or run a rogue AP and then run Responder to capture credentials from connected clients — a typical and effective initial-access method in such scenarios.

Why not the others:

B. Metasploit — a general exploitation framework; useful after finding a vulnerable service, but not specifically the most-likely initial tool on an insecure Wi-Fi.

C. Netcat — a raw TCP/UDP utility (listeners/shells); useful post-exploitation but not for capturing broadcast name resolution requests.

D. Nmap — a scanner to discover hosts/ports; helpful reconnaissance, but not directly used to capture credentials on a local insecure wireless segment.

CompTIA PT0-003 Mapping: Wireless/host-based attacks and network credential-capture techniques (evil twin/rogue AP and LLMNR/NetBIOS poisoning).

===========

The OSSTMM (Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual) is a comprehensive framework for security testing that includes 14 components in its life cycle. Here’s why option B is correct:

OSSTMM: This methodology breaks down the security testing process into 14 components, covering various aspects of security assessment, from planning to execution and reporting.

OWASP MASVS: This is a framework for mobile application security verification and does not have a 14-component life cycle.

MITRE ATT&CK: This is a knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques but does not describe a 14-component life cycle.

CREST: This is a certification body for penetration testers and security professionals but does not provide a specific 14-component framework.

References from Pentest:

Anubis HTB: Emphasizes the structured approach of OSSTMM in conducting comprehensive security assessments​​.

Writeup HTB: Highlights the use of detailed methodologies like OSSTMM to cover all aspects of security testing​​.

Conclusion:

Option B, OSSTMM, is the framework that breaks the life cycle into 14 components, making it the correct answer.

=================

The vulnerability in question is XML External Entity (XXE) injection, which occurs when an application processes XML input containing external entities that access files on the server or external resources.

Disabling External Entities:

The root cause of the issue is the application's ability to process external entities (). Disabling external entities entirely prevents XXE attacks.

This can be achieved by properly configuring the XML parser (e.g., in Java, disable DocumentBuilderFactory.setFeature("http://apache.org/xml/features/disallow-doctype-decl ", true)).

Why Not Other Options?

A (chmod o-rwx): File permission hardening may reduce the impact of a successful attack but does not mitigate XXE at the parser level.

B (Review logs): Reviewing logs is a reactive measure, not a prevention mechanism.

D (WAF): A WAF may block some malicious requests but is not a reliable mitigation for XXE vulnerabilities embedded in legitimate XML input.

CompTIA Pentest+ References:

Domain 3.0 (Attacks and Exploits)

OWASP XXE Prevention Cheat Sheet

A false positive occurs when a vulnerability scan incorrectly flags a security issue that does not exist or is not exploitable in the context of the application. Here's the reasoning:

Definition of Command Injection:Command injection vulnerabilities occur when user-controllable data is passed to an interpreter or command execution context without proper sanitization, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary commands.

Code Analysis:

The response variable is defined as a constant (const), which implies its value is immutable during runtime.

The response is not sourced from user input nor used elsewhere, meaning there is no attack surface or exploitation pathway for an attacker to influence the content of response.

Scanner Misclassification:Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools may flag vulnerabilities based on patterns (e.g., .innerHTML usage) without assessing the source and flow of data, resulting in false positives.

Final Classification:Since the response variable is static and unchangeable, the flagged issue is not exploitable. This makes it a false positive.

CompTIA Pentest+ References:

Domain 3.0 (Attacks and Exploits)

Domain 4.0 (Penetration Testing Tools)

OWASP Static Code Analysis Guide

When needing to scan a large network for open ports quickly, the choice of tool is critical. Here’s why option B is correct:

masscan: This tool is designed for high-speed port scanning and can scan entire networks much faster than traditional tools like Nmap. It can handle large ranges of IP addresses and ports with high efficiency.

Nmap: While powerful and versatile, Nmap is generally slower than masscan for scanning very large networks, especially when speed is crucial.

Burp Suite: This tool is primarily for web application security testing and not optimized for network-wide port scanning.

hping: This is a network tool used for packet crafting and network testing, but it is not designed for high-speed network port scanning.

References from Pentest:

Luke HTB: Highlights the use of efficient tools for large-scale network scanning to identify open ports quickly​​.

Anubis HTB: Demonstrates scenarios where high-speed scanning tools like masscan are essential for large network assessments​​.

=================

The tool and command provided by option B are used to perform passive DNS enumeration, which can uncover subdomains associated with a domain. Here’s why option B is correct:

amass enum -passive -d comptia.org: This command uses the Amass tool to perform passive DNS enumeration, effectively identifying subdomains of the target domain. The output provided (subdomains) matches what this tool and command would produce.

nslookup -type=SOA comptia.org: This command retrieves the Start of Authority (SOA) record, which does not list subdomains.

nmap -Pn -sV -vv -A comptia.org: This Nmap command performs service detection and aggressive scanning but does not enumerate subdomains.

shodan host comptia.org: Shodan is an internet search engine for connected devices, but it does not perform DNS enumeration to list subdomains.

References from Pentest:

Writeup HTB: Demonstrates the use of DNS enumeration tools like Amass to uncover subdomains during external assessments​​.

Horizontall HTB: Highlights the effectiveness of passive DNS enumeration in identifying subdomains and associated information​​.

=================

The given statements are actionable steps aimed at improving security. They fall under the recommendations section of a penetration test report. Here’s why option D is correct:

Recommendations: This section of the report provides specific actions that should be taken to mitigate identified vulnerabilities and improve the overall security posture. Implementing a WAF, upgrading operating systems, and implementing a secure SDLC are recommendations to enhance security.

Executive Summary: This section provides a high-level overview of the findings and their implications, intended for executive stakeholders.

Attack Narrative: This section details the steps taken during the penetration test, describing the attack vectors and methods used.

Detailed Findings: This section provides an in-depth analysis of each identified vulnerability, including evidence and technical details.

References from Pentest:

Forge HTB: The report's recommendations section suggests specific measures to address the identified issues, similar to the given statements​​.

Writeup HTB: Highlights the importance of the recommendations section in providing actionable steps to improve security based on the findings from the assessment​​.

Conclusion:

Option D, recommendations, is the correct section where the given statements would be found in a penetration test report.

=================