SY0-701 CompTIA Security+ Exam 2025 Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

The most appropriate method is to use aGroup Policy Object (GPO) with time-of-day restrictions (A). This is a native capability in Windows environments that allows administrators to controlwhen users are allowed to log into domain-joined systems.

This aligns withDomain 3.1: Given a scenario, apply identity and access management (IAM) concepts, especially under“Access controls (e.g., time-based restrictions, GPOs, least privilege).”

 Analysis is the incident response activity that describes the process of understanding the source of an incident. Analysis involves collecting and examining evidence, identifying the root cause, determining the scope and impact, and assessing the threat actor’s motives and capabilities. Analysis helps the incident response team to formulate an appropriate response strategy, as well as to prevent or mitigate future incidents. Analysis is usually performed after detection and before containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned. References = CompTIA Security+ Study Guide with over 500 Practice Test Questions: Exam SY0-701, 9th Edition, Chapter 6, page 223. CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives, Domain 4.2, page 13.

Detailed Explanation:Host isolation ensures that a device is separated from the network, preventing it from accessing or being accessed by other network resources. This is typically achieved by quarantining the device. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 4: Security Operations, Section: "Isolation and Containment"​​.

Environmental variables store configuration settings, paths, and other system-related information that applications and processes use. If an attacker gains access to these variables, they could manipulate them to alter application behavior, gain unauthorized access, or escalate privileges.For example, an attacker could modify the PATH variable to execute malicious programs instead of legitimate ones. This can significantlyincrease the scope and impact of an exploited vulnerability, making it a major security concern.

The correct answer is having privileged access to client systems and becoming a target for attackers, which directly reflects a major risk discussed in the Security+ SY0-701 domain of Security Program Management and Oversight, specifically within third-party and supply chain risk management. Supply chain service providers often require elevated or privileged access to an organization’s systems to perform maintenance, monitoring, software updates, or support services. This level of access significantly expands the organization’s attack surface.

When a vendor has privileged access, attackers may target the service provider as an indirect path into the primary organization. This type of compromise is especially dangerous because malicious activity may appear legitimate, using trusted credentials and authorized connections. The Security+ study guide emphasizes that third-party compromises can bypass traditional perimeter defenses, making them particularly difficult to detect and contain. As a result, vendors can unintentionally introduce vulnerabilities even if the organization’s internal security controls are strong.

The other options do not directly introduce a security vulnerability. Delayed hardware shipments affect availability and project timelines but do not create a security weakness. Outsourcing customer service may introduce privacy or compliance concerns, but it does not inherently create a technical vulnerability unless combined with poor access controls. Failing to encrypt internal databases is an internal security failure, not a supply chain issue caused by a service provider.

From a Security+ perspective, managing this risk requires strong contractual controls, least-privilege access, continuous monitoring, and audit rights. Organizations must treat vendors as extensions of their own environment. Therefore, privileged access held by a supply chain provider—and the increased likelihood of that provider being targeted—is the most accurate explanation of how a supply chain service provider can introduce a security vulnerability.

Monolithic code architecture significantly limits an organization’s ability to benefit from containerization. Containers are designed to package and run small, modular, loosely coupled services, often following a microservices architecture. CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 explains that containers enhance security by reducing attack surface, improving isolation, and allowing granular patching—but only when applications are designed to support this model.

Monolithic applications bundle all components (UI, business logic, database access) into a single large codebase. This makes it difficult to isolate functions into separate containers, apply least privilege, or patch individual components without redeploying the entire application. As a result, security improvements such as rapid updates, minimal images, and fine-grained access controls are harder to achieve.

Regulatory compliance (A) may add requirements but does not inherently block container use. Patch availability (B) affects maintenance but not architecture suitability. Kernel version (C) can be a constraint, but modern container platforms manage kernel compatibility effectively.

Because containers are best suited for modular applications, monolithic code is the primary limitation, making D the correct answer.

A backout plan provides a documented procedure to revert or undo a change if it fails or causes issues, helping to restore the environment quickly and prevent extended downtime. Having a backout plan in place minimizes impact during failed changes.

User notification (A) informs users but does not prevent failures. Change approval (B) and risk analysis (C) occur before the change and cannot fix issues after failure.

Backout planning is a best practice in Change Management covered in Security Program Management【6:Chapter 16†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】

AnSLA (D)or Service Level Agreement is a formal contract that definesperformance standards, includingresponse times, escalation procedures, uptime guarantees, and other service-related metrics.

This is referenced inDomain 5.2: Explain the importance of managing third-party riskunder“Agreements (e.g., SLA, NDA, MOU/MOA, BPA).”

Masking is a method to secure credit card data that involves replacing some or all of the digits with symbols, such as asterisks, dashes, or Xs, while leaving some of the original digits visible. Masking is best to use when a requirement is to see only the last four numbers on a credit card, as it can prevent unauthorized access to the full card number, while still allowing identification and verification of the cardholder. Masking does not alter the original data, unlike encryption, hashing, or tokenization, which use algorithms to transform the data into different formats.

Data classification is required before implementing a Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solution because DLP policies depend on identifying and categorizing sensitive data to monitor, block, or encrypt it accordingly.

Data destruction (A) and sanitization (B) remove data, and masking (D) obscures data but classification is foundational for DLP effectiveness.

Data classification is emphasized in Security Program Management and Data Protection topics【6:Chapter 16†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

Effective change management requires structured planning, testing, review, approval, deployment, and rollback capabilities. According to CompTIA Security+ SY0-701, one of the most critical components of change management is having a backout plan, which allows the organization to safely revert changes if the update or patch causes issues, operational disruption, or security instability. A proper backout plan reduces downtime, maintains system availability, and protects against unexpected failures.

Approving a change after deployment (A) violates standard change management protocols. Approval must occur before live implementation. Using a spreadsheet (C) is not considered an effective or secure change management mechanism. Automatic bypassing of change controls (D) is dangerous, even for security patches, because changes must be tested to avoid service outages or unintended vulnerabilities.

Therefore, the best description of effective change management is B: Having a backout plan when a patch fails.

= A change control request is a document that describes the proposed change to a system, the reason for the change, the expected impact, the approval process, the testing plan, the implementation plan, the rollback plan, and the communication plan. A change control request is a best practice for applying any patch to a production system, especially a high-priority one, as it ensures that the change is authorized, documented, tested, and communicated. A change control request also minimizes the risk of unintended consequences, such as system downtime, data loss, or security breaches. References = CompTIA Security+ Study Guide with over 500 Practice Test Questions: Exam SY0-701, 9th Edition, Chapter 6, page 235. CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives, Domain 4.1, page 13.

Detailed Explanation:

Sanctions imposed for non-compliance can include fines, legal actions, and loss of business licenses. These pose a significant financial and reputational risk to organizations. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 5: Security Program Management, Section: "Regulatory Compliance Risks"​​.

Detailed Explanation:A version control tool, such as Git, tracks changes made to code, maintains history, and allows developers to manage and revert to earlier versions when needed. This ensures accountability and control over modifications. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 3: Security Architecture, Section: "Version Control and Documentation"​​.

To identify the exactcommand or input usedduring a SQL injection attack, theapplication log (B)is the most relevant. It records inputs, errors, and processing activities within the application layer.

UnderDomain 2.1, CompTIA emphasizes reviewingapplication logsto detect indicators of malicious activity, includingweb application attackslike SQL injection.

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) enables organizations to automate the provisioning, configuration, and deployment of servers through machine-readable scripts rather than manual processes. SY0-701 emphasizes IaC as a key component of DevOps and secure deployment pipelines. By using IaC, server builds become repeatable, standardized, version-controlled, and much faster.

This directly addresses the company's goals:

Better control: IaC ensures predictable, consistent configuration across all servers.

Standardization: Scripts eliminate drift by applying identical configurations.

Lower build time: Automation significantly accelerates server creation and eliminates manual intervention.

IoT (A) refers to Internet-connected smart devices and is unrelated to server deployment. PaaS (C) offers development platforms but does not automate infrastructure builds. ICS (D) refers to industrial control systems, not IT server architecture.

Therefore, the only correct architecture that meets all objectives is IaC, a foundational technology for modern automated infrastructure.

Before applying any updates or patches to a production VM, especially one with a 99% uptime SLA, it is crucial to first take a snapshot of the VM. This snapshot serves as a backup that can be quickly restored in case the update causes any issues, ensuring that the system can be returned to its previous state without violating the SLA. This step mitigates risk and is a standard best practice in change management for critical systems.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study materials, focusing on change management and backup strategies​​.