SY0-701 CompTIA Security+ Exam 2026 Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

Detailed Explanation:Load balancing improves application availability by distributing traffic across multiple servers. If one server fails, traffic is automatically routed to other available servers with minimal intervention. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 3: Security Architecture, Section: " High Availability Solutions " ​​.

To limit the potential impact on the log-in database in case of a breach, the security team would most likely recommend hashing. Hashing converts passwords into fixed-length strings of characters, which cannot be easily reversed to reveal the original passwords. Even if the database is breached, attackers cannot easily retrieve the actual passwords if they are properly hashed (especially with techniques like salting).

Tokenization is used to replace sensitive data with a token, but it is more common for protecting credit card data than passwords.

Obfuscation is the process of making data harder to interpret but is weaker than hashing for password protection.

Segmentation helps isolate data but doesn ' t directly protect the contents of the login database​​.

The log entries show repeated attempts to access directories using patterns such as ../, which is a common directory traversal attack technique. Directory traversal (or path traversal) aims to access files and directories outside the web server ' s root directory by manipulating file paths. The ../ sequence is used to move up one directory level, which attackers exploit to try and retrieve sensitive files.

Full-disk encryption (FDE) protects the contents of storage media, which is a classic data-at-rest control. The Study Guide explains the “three situations” relevant to confidentiality—at rest, in transit, and in use—and then specifically ties disk encryption/FDE to protecting stored data: “Data at rest, or stored data, is that which resides in a permanent location awaiting access… Examples… hard drives…” It then describes FDE as an encryption method applied to disks: “Full-disk encryption (FDE) is a form of encryption where all the data on a hard drive is automatically encrypted, including the operating system and system files… In the case of loss or theft, FDE can prevent unauthorized access to all data on the hard drive.”

That is exactly the definition of protecting data at rest—it is intended to prevent disclosure if a laptop/workstation is lost, stolen, or the drive is removed. This is not masking (hiding parts of fields), not data in transit (network encryption like TLS/VPN), not obfuscation (making code hard to understand), and not data sovereignty (jurisdiction/location requirements). Therefore, deploying FDE on workstations is a data-at-rest protection strategy.

Because the organization performs the risk assessment each year, it is being done on a regular, scheduled interval. In Security+ terminology, that makes it a recurring risk assessment, not ad hoc, one-time, or continuous. The Study Guide differentiates these modes and states: “Recurring risk assessments are performed at regular intervals, such as annually or quarterly.” This matches the scenario exactly (annually = each year).

To avoid confusion with the other options: a one-time assessment is described as a “point-in-time view” performed when the organization wants a snapshot (often tied to a specific need), while ad hoc assessments are triggered by a specific event or situation (like a new project or significant change). In contrast, the key distinguishing factor of recurring is the planned cadence used to “track the evolution of risks over time” and ensure risk management adapts. The guide also notes continuous risk assessment involves ongoing monitoring and analysis, often supported by automated scanning and frequent updates, which is different from a once-per-year schedule. Therefore, the annual assessment described is best classified as recurring.

 A cold site is a type of backup data center that has the necessary infrastructure to support IT operations, but does not have any pre-configured hardware or software. A cold site is the cheapest option among the backup data center types, but it also has the longest recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) values. A cold site is suitable for scenarios where the cost-benefit is the primary requirement and the RTO and RPO values are not very stringent. A cold site can take up to two days or more to restore the normal operations after a disaster. References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 387; Backup Types – SY0-601 CompTIA Security+ : 2.5, video at 4:50.

Posting hashes allows users to verify the integrity of downloaded files. As outlined in Security+ SY0-701, a cryptographic hash (e.g., SHA-256) produces a fixed-length digest unique to the file’s contents. Users can compute the hash of the downloaded file and compare it to the published value; a match confirms the file has not been altered.

Certificates (B) establish identity and trust but do not directly verify file integrity post-download unless combined with signing workflows. Algorithms (C) are general methods, not verification artifacts. Salting (D) is used with password hashing and is irrelevant here.

Therefore, A: Hashes is the correct choice.

Intellectual property is a type of data that consists of ideas, inventions, designs, or other creative works that have commercial value and are protected by law. Employees in the research and development business unit are most likely to use intellectual property data in their day-to-day work activities, as they are involved in creating new products or services for the company. Intellectual property data needs to be protected from unauthorized use, disclosure, or theft, as it can give the company a competitive advantage in the market. Therefore, these employees receive extensive training to ensure they understand how to best protect this type of data. References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 90; Professor Messer’s CompTIA SY0-701 Security+ Training Course, video 1.2 - Security Concepts, 7:57 - 9:03.

FIM stands for File Integrity Monitoring, which is a method to secure data by detecting any changes or modifications to files, directories, or registry keys. FIM can help a security administrator track any unauthorized or malicious changes to the data, as well as verify the integrity and compliance of the data. FIM can also alert the administrator of any potential breaches or incidents involving the data.

Some of the benefits of FIM are:

It can prevent data tampering and corruption by verifying the checksums or hashes of the files.

It can identify the source and time of the changes by logging the user and system actions.

It can enforce security policies and standards by comparing the current state of the data with the baseline or expected state.

It can support forensic analysis and incident response by providing evidence and audit trails of the changes.

Ongoing vendor monitoring is a critical component of third-party risk management (TPRM) and focuses on continuously validating that vendors maintain required security controls throughout the lifecycle of the relationship. According to CompTIA Security+ SY0-701, the most effective ongoing monitoring method is conducting assessments to verify compliance with security requirements. These assessments may include periodic security questionnaires, audits, penetration test results, SOC reports, or compliance attestations that are independently validated.

Option A, requiring a new MSA for each project, is a contractual activity, not a monitoring mechanism. Option B—accepting self-attestation without verification—introduces risk and is specifically discouraged in SY0-701 because it lacks assurance. Option D, reviewing SLAs at contract start, is a one-time activity and does not provide continuous oversight.

Ongoing assessments allow organizations to detect control drift, identify new risks, and ensure vendors remain compliant with evolving regulatory and security expectations. This proactive approach is essential for managing supply chain risk and protecting organizational data.

Therefore, the correct answer is C: Conducting assessments to verify compliance with security requirements.

A firewall policy is a set of rules that defines what traffic is allowed or denied on a network. A firewall policy should be carefully designed and tested before being implemented, as a misconfigured policy can cause network disruptions or security breaches. A common best practice is to test the policy in a non-production environment, such as a lab or a simulation, before enabling the policy in the production network. This way, the technician can verify the functionality and performance of the policy, and identify and resolve any issues or conflicts, without affecting the live network. Testing the policy in a non-production environment would prevent the issue of the ‘deny any’ policy causing several company servers to become unreachable, as the technician would be able to detect and correct the problem before applying the policy to the production network.

Documenting the new policy in a change request and submitting the request to change management is a good practice, but it would not prevent the issue by itself. Change management is a process that ensures that any changes to the network are authorized, documented, and communicated, but it does not guarantee that the changes are error-free or functional. The technician still needs to test the policy before implementing it.

Disabling any intrusion prevention signatures on the ‘deny any’ policy prior to enabling the new policy would not prevent the issue, and it could reduce the security of the network. Intrusion prevention signatures are patterns that identify malicious or unwanted traffic, and allow the firewall to block or alert on such traffic. Disabling these signatures would make the firewall less effective in detecting and preventing attacks, and it would not affect the reachability of the company servers.

Including an ‘allow any’ policy above the ‘deny any’ policy would not prevent the issue, and it would render the ‘deny any’ policy useless. A firewall policy is processed from top to bottom, and the first matching rule is applied. An ‘allow any’ policy would match any traffic and allow it to pass through the firewall, regardless of the source, destination, or protocol. This would negate the purpose of the ‘deny any’ policy, which is to block any traffic that does not match any of the previous rules. Moreover, an ‘allow any’ policy would create a security risk, as it would allow any unauthorized or malicious traffic to enter or exit the network. References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 204-205; Professor Messer’s CompTIA SY0-701 Security+ Training Course, video 2.1 - Network Security Devices, 8:00 - 10:00.

This describes a watering hole attack, where an attacker compromises a website frequently visited by the target group and delivers malicious payloads, such as automatic downloads.

XSS (A) injects scripts into web pages, typosquatting (C) involves fake websites with misspelled URLs, and buffer overflow (D) exploits memory but does not involve website compromise with automatic downloads.

Watering hole attacks are well-known web-based threats covered in SY0-701【6:Chapter 2†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

This scenario describes a bug bounty program, which invites external security researchers to responsibly identify and report vulnerabilities in an organization’s systems. CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 defines bug bounty programs as structured initiatives that reward researchers for discovering and disclosing security flaws before they can be exploited by malicious actors.

Bug bounty programs extend security testing beyond internal teams and provide continuous, real-world testing of public-facing assets. They are particularly effective for identifying zero-day vulnerabilities, logic flaws, and edge-case issues that automated tools may miss.

Red teaming (B) is a controlled, internal or contracted adversarial exercise, not an open invitation. Open-source intelligence (C) involves gathering publicly available information, not vulnerability reporting. Third-party information sharing (D) refers to sharing threat intelligence, not soliciting vulnerability reports.

Because the CISO is inviting the broader security community to report vulnerabilities, the correct answer is A: Bug bounty.

A Host-based Intrusion Prevention System (HIPS) acts as a preventive control by actively blocking threats and a detective control by monitoring and alerting to suspicious activities on endpoints.

TheCommon Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)is astandardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities. It provides a numerical score (0-10) based on factors such asexploitability, impact, and complexity, helping security analystsprioritize remediation efforts based on risk.

Business impact analysis (A)helps identifycritical business functionsbut does not specificallyprioritize vulnerabilities.

Risk register (C)tracks identified risks but does not classify vulnerabilities.

Exposure factor (D)is used inquantitative risk assessmentbut is not an industry standard for vulnerability prioritization.

The best answer is A. Zero-day.

A zero-day vulnerability is a newly discovered vulnerability for which no patch or official fix is yet available. Because defenders have had zero days to fully remediate it, attackers may be able to exploit it before a vendor releases a patch.

The question specifically states that the vulnerability is new and does not have an available patch, which is the defining clue.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. XSSCross-site scripting is a specific web application attack type, not a description of whether a patch exists.

C. SQLiSQL injection is also a specific attack type, not the broader vulnerability status being asked about.

D. Buffer overflowBuffer overflow is a type of coding flaw, but again it does not specifically describe the condition of having no patch available.

From a Security+ perspective, when a vulnerability is newly identified and lacks a vendor fix, it is best described as a zero-day.

The correct answer is B. Air-gapped.

An air-gapped architecture physically or logically isolates systems from other networks, including the public internet and internal local networks. Because the devices cannot directly connect to the internet or local network, updates must be transferred manually, often using removable or portable media.

This aligns with CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 security architecture concepts involving segmentation, isolation, high-security environments, and protection of sensitive or critical systems.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Microservices

Microservices is an application architecture where software is broken into smaller independent services. It does not describe network isolation.

C. Software-defined networking

Software-defined networking separates the control plane from the data plane and allows centralized network management. It does not inherently require devices to be disconnected from the internet or local network.

D. Serverless

Serverless is a cloud computing model where the cloud provider manages the underlying infrastructure. It does not describe isolated firmware update architecture.

Therefore, the best answer is air-gapped.

The best answer is A. Data masking.

When production data is copied into a UAT (User Acceptance Testing) environment, sensitive information should be protected so that testers cannot view real confidential values such as personal data, account numbers, or other regulated information. Data masking replaces sensitive data with realistic but fictional or hidden values while preserving the format and usability of the data for testing.

This makes it ideal for non-production environments where the application still needs data that looks real, but the testing team should not be able to see actual sensitive information.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. Data tokenizationTokenization replaces sensitive values with tokens, but it is more commonly used to protect data in operational processing systems, such as payment environments. It is not the best fit here compared with masking for UAT visibility concerns.

C. Data obfuscationObfuscation is a broader term and can mean making data harder to understand, but data masking is the more precise and standard control for protecting test data from being viewed.

D. Data encryptionEncryption protects data at rest or in transit, but once authorized testers access and use the UAT system, the application may decrypt and display the data. That does not solve the problem of testers viewing sensitive values.

From a Security+ perspective, when moving production data into development, test, or UAT environments, the preferred control to prevent exposure of real sensitive data is data masking.

A service level agreement (SLA) is a type of agreement that defines the expectations and responsibilities between a service provider and a customer. It usually includes the quality, availability, and performance metrics of the service, as well as the time frame in which the provider needs to respond to service requests, incidents, or complaints. An SLA can help ensure that the customer receives the desired level of service and that the provider is accountable for meeting the agreed-upon standards.

Input validation is a primary control for preventing SQL injection. SQL injection occurs when an attacker submits malicious database commands through application input fields, URL parameters, cookies, or forms. If the application fails to validate and handle input properly, the attacker’s input may be interpreted as part of a SQL query. Strong input validation rejects unexpected characters, enforces type and length restrictions, and allows only properly formatted values. It should also be paired with parameterized queries and prepared statements. DNS hijacking involves manipulation of DNS resolution, not application input. Time-of-check vulnerabilities are race-condition issues. Sideloading involves installing software outside an approved repository. Therefore, SQL injection is the vulnerability most directly prevented by input validation.

================

A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Based on the logs, it seems that the host that originated the infection is 192.168.10.22. This host has a suspicious process named svchost.exe running on port 443, which is unusual for a Windows service. It also has a large number of outbound connections to different IP addresses on port 443, indicating that it is part of a botnet.

The firewall log shows that this host has been communicating with 10.10.9.18, which is another infected host on the engineering network. This host also has a suspicious process named svchost.exe running on port 443, and a large number of outbound connections to different IP addresses on port 443.

The other hosts on the R & D network (192.168.10.37 and 192.168.10.41) are clean, as they do not have any suspicious processes or connections.

The vulnerability should be documented in the risk register because it represents an identified risk that cannot be immediately remediated. A risk register tracks risk details such as description, owner, likelihood, impact, severity, mitigation strategy, acceptance status, review dates, and residual risk. Since the developers cannot patch the issue for six months, the organization needs formal visibility and accountability until remediation is possible. A patching schedule may track when updates are planned, but it does not fully document risk ownership and business impact. A vulnerability matrix may help prioritize technical findings, but it is not the central governance record. Change management procedures control changes, not long-term risk tracking.