SY0-701 CompTIA Security+ Exam 2026 Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

According to the CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, data subjects are the individuals whose personal data is collected, processed, or stored by an organization. Data subjects have certain rights and expectations regarding how their data is handled, such as the right to access, correct, delete, or restrict their data. Data subjects are different from data owners, who are the individuals or entities that have the authority and responsibility to determine how data is classified, protected, and used. Data subjects are also different from data processors, who are the individuals or entities that perform operations on data on behalf of the data owner, such as collecting, modifying, storing, or transmitting data. Data subjects are also different from data custodians, who are the individuals or entities that implement the security controls and procedures specified by the data owner to protect data while in transit and at rest.

ReferencesCompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, Chapter 2: Data Security, page 511

The best answer is A. Ensure the firewall data plane moves to fail-closed mode.

The key detail in this question is that the company prioritizes data confidentiality over transaction availability. In Security+ terms, when confidentiality is more important than keeping traffic flowing during a failure or security event, the preferred behavior is fail closed.

A fail-closed firewall blocks traffic if the device experiences a fault, failure, or security issue. This protects sensitive business data from being exposed or passed through an untrusted state. Even though this may interrupt business transactions, it aligns with the organization’s priority of protecting confidential information.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. Implement a deny-all rule as the last firewall ACL rule.This is a standard firewall best practice, but it does not specifically address what should happen in case a security event occurs.

C. Prioritize business-critical application traffic through the firewall.This focuses on availability and performance, not confidentiality.

D. Configure rate limiting between the firewall interfaces.Rate limiting may help with traffic control or DoS reduction, but it does not best address the requirement to prioritize confidentiality during a security event.

From the SY0-701 perspective, when asked to choose between keeping systems available and preventing unauthorized access or data exposure, fail closed is the best security-focused answer.

The best answer is C. Firewall logs.

The PowerShell command shown is suspicious because it uses:

-exec bypass to bypass PowerShell execution policy

IEX (Invoke-Expression) to execute downloaded content in memory

Net.WebClient.DownloadString() to retrieve a remote script from the IP address 176.30.40.50

The question asks which logs will help confirm an established connection to that IP address. The best source for confirming that network communication actually occurred is firewall logs, because they record allowed and blocked inbound or outbound network connections between systems and remote IP addresses.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. System event logsThese may show local operating system events, but they are not the best source for confirming a network connection to a specific external IP.

B. EDR logsEDR logs may show suspicious PowerShell execution and related behavior, and in some environments they may also show network activity. However, when the question specifically asks to confirm an established connection to a particular IP, firewall logs are the most direct and standard answer.

D. Application logsApplication logs generally track application-specific events and are not the best source for validating outbound network connections to a suspicious IP.

From a Security+ perspective, suspicious script execution should be correlated with network logs to validate command-and-control or malware download activity. That makes firewall logs the best choice.

ARO (Annualized Rate of Occurrence) is an analysis element that measures the frequency or likelihood of an event happening in a given year. ARO is often used in risk assessment and management, as it helps to estimate the potential loss or impact of an event. A company can use ARO to calculate the annualized loss expectancy (ALE) of an event, which is the product of ARO and the single loss expectancy (SLE). ALE represents the expected cost of an event per year, and can be used to compare with the cost of implementing a security control or purchasing an insurance policy.

The company most likely used ARO in making the decision to remove the coverage for ransomware attacks from its cyber insurance policy. The company may have estimated the ARO of ransomware attacks based on historical data, industry trends, or threat intelligence, and found that the ARO was low or negligible. The company may have also calculated the ALE of ransomware attacks, and found that the ALE was lower than the cost of the insurance policy. Therefore, the company decided to reduce the cost of its annual cyber insurance policy by removing the coverage for ransomware attacks, as it deemed the risk to be acceptable or manageable.

IMTTR (Incident Management Team Training and Readiness), RTO (Recovery Time Objective), and MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) are not analysis elements that the company most likely used in making the decision to remove the coverage for ransomware attacks from its cyber insurance policy. IMTTR is a process of preparing and training the incident management team to respond effectively to security incidents. IMTTR does not measure the frequency or impact of an event, but rather the capability and readiness of the team. RTO is a metric that defines the maximum acceptable time for restoring a system or service after a disruption. RTO does not measure the frequency or impact of an event, but rather the availability and continuity of the system or service. MTBF is a metric that measures the average time between failures of a system or component. MTBF does not measure the frequency or impact of an event, but rather the reliability and performance of the system or component.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 97-98; Professor Messer’s CompTIA SY0-701 Security+ Training Course, video 5.2 - Risk Management, 0:00 - 3:00.

Detailed Explanation:

Tokenization replaces sensitive data with non-sensitive surrogate values that retain the necessary format but are meaningless without access to the original data. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 3: Security Architecture, Section: " Data Masking and Tokenization " ​​.