SIE FINRA Securities Industry Essentials Exam (SIE) Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

A 1-for-3 reverse stock split means that shareholders will receive one new share for every three shares currently owned. Reverse splits reduce the number of shares outstanding while proportionally increasing the market price per share, leaving the investor’s overall market value (ignoring market reactions and rounding) essentially unchanged at the moment of the split. In this question, the investor owns 300 shares at $9.00 each. Dividing the share count by 3 results in 100 shares after the reverse split (300 ÷ 3 = 100). Because the split is reverse, the price is multiplied by 3 to keep the position value constant: $9.00 × 3 = $27.00 per share. Therefore, the investor will have 100 shares at $27.00, which is answer choice A.

You can also verify by checking the total value before and after the split. Before: 300 × $9.00 = $2,700. After: 100 × $27.00 = $2,700. This illustrates the central split principle tested on the SIE: stock splits and reverse splits change share count and per-share price, but do not inherently create gains or losses; instead, they adjust the number of shares and the price per share proportionally. Cost basis per share is adjusted accordingly (the total cost basis remains the same, but it is allocated across fewer shares at a higher per-share basis).

Reverse splits are often used by issuers seeking to raise the trading price per share (for example, to meet listing requirements), and the SIE commonly tests the mechanical impact on share quantity, market price, and cost basis.

When a firm acts in a principal capacity, it trades securities for its own account, buying or selling directly to or from its inventory. The firm’s role differs from an agency capacity, where it acts as an intermediary.

A is correct because principal capacity involves selling directly from the firm ' s inventory.

B, C, and D are incorrect because these scenarios describe agency transactions, where the firm facilitates trades between two parties.

The correct answer is D, All-or-none agreement. In an all-or-none underwriting, the investment bank agrees to sell all of the securities offered, but only if the entire offering (or a specified minimum amount) is sold. If that threshold is not met, the offering is canceled and investor funds are returned. Importantly, the underwriter is not obligated to purchase any unsold shares, which aligns directly with the question.

This differs from a best efforts offering (choice A), where the underwriter agrees only to use its best efforts to sell the securities but does not guarantee that any minimum amount will be sold. There is no requirement to meet a specific threshold for the offering to proceed.

A firm commitment (choice B) means the underwriter purchases the entire issue from the issuer and assumes the risk of selling it to the public, which contradicts the scenario since here the underwriter has no obligation for unsold shares.

A standby agreement (choice C) is typically used in rights offerings, where the underwriter agrees to purchase any shares not subscribed to by existing shareholders.

Thus, the key clues—minimum threshold requirement and no obligation for unsold shares—identify this as an all-or-none offering, making choice D correct.

Step by Step Explanation:

Common Stock: Holders of common stock typically have voting rights, which allow them to participate in decisions like electing the board of directors or approving major corporate actions.

Other Securities:

Preferred Stock: Usually does not carry voting rights.

Corporate and Convertible Bonds: Debt instruments, so they do not confer voting rights.

SEC Guide on Stock Voting Rights: SEC Voting Rights.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 emphasizes shareholder protection through governance standards, including requirements that a fund’s board include a minimum percentage of “uninterested” (independent) persons. The purpose is to reduce adviser dominance and mitigate conflicts that can arise when the fund’s adviser or affiliated parties effectively control oversight. “Uninterested” generally means the director has no material business relationship with the fund’s adviser, principal underwriter, or key affiliates that would compromise independent judgment. Therefore, the best description is D.

Choices A and B are plausible-sounding governance benefits, but they are not the regulatory intent being tested. The rule is not primarily about diversity of professional experience or broadening expertise; it is about independence from adviser influence. Choice C is too general and doesn’t capture the targeted problem: the Act’s board independence provisions are designed to ensure the board can objectively evaluate matters that directly affect shareholders, such as advisory contracts, fee arrangements, compliance oversight, and potential self-dealing.

On the SIE, this ties directly to the theme of conflicts of interest in investment companies. Mutual fund advisers are paid fees based on assets under management, creating incentives that might not always align with shareholders. Independent directors are intended to serve as a check by reviewing and approving key arrangements and providing meaningful oversight. The exam often connects this governance concept to broader investor protections: disclosure, fiduciary oversight, limitations on affiliated transactions, and the idea that fund boards should represent shareholder interests rather than adviser interests.

Bond fund net asset values generally decline when interest rates rise because the prices of existing bonds in the portfolio tend to fall. If a customer sells bond fund shares after rates have risen and the fund’s NAV has declined, the customer may receive less than the original investment. Choice B is correct. Choice A reverses the typical price-rate relationship. Choice C is incorrect because long-term bond funds are generally more exposed to interest rate risk than short-term bond funds. Longer maturities and longer durations produce greater price sensitivity to rate changes. Choice D is incorrect because bond fund NAVs fluctuate with the market value of portfolio holdings; they are not guaranteed to remain stable. The SIE outline requires knowledge of debt instruments, bond prices, yields, maturities, interest-rate risk, and the relationship between price and interest rates. It also includes open-end funds and net asset value under packaged products. This question integrates bond pricing mechanics with mutual fund NAV behavior. Reference: Understanding Products and Their Risks; Debt Instruments; Packaged Products; Investment Risks.

A marketing piece claiming FINRA “endorses” a broker-dealer is not permissible, so A is correct. FINRA is a self-regulatory organization that oversees broker-dealers; it does not “endorse” member firms as a marketing claim. Communications with the public must be fair and not misleading. Suggesting FINRA endorsement could mislead customers into thinking the regulator has approved the firm’s quality, products, or services, which conflicts with the disclosure-based framework and the principle that regulators do not provide merit-based approval of market participants.

Choice B is incorrect because principal approval does not make a misleading statement permissible. Principal approval is an internal supervisory step; it cannot legalize a false or misleading representation. Choice C is incorrect because FINRA does not provide written approvals to allow firms to claim endorsement; the concept itself is improper. Choice D is incorrect because the issue is not whether specific investments are mentioned; the misrepresentation is the claim of regulatory endorsement, which is misleading regardless of content.

SIE exam questions in this area test your ability to spot prohibited or misleading marketing language—especially anything implying government or regulator “approval,” “guarantee,” or “endorsement.” Similar logic applies to claims that the SEC approves a prospectus or the merits of an offering. The correct approach in communications is accurate, balanced disclosure—not implying that a regulator supports or recommends the firm.

NASAA is the North American Securities Administrators Association, and its membership is made up of state, provincial, and territorial securities regulators (in the U.S., primarily the state securities administrators). That makes C correct. On the SIE, NASAA is tested as the umbrella organization representing state-level regulators, which are responsible for enforcing state securities laws (“blue sky” laws), registering certain securities offerings when applicable, and registering/licensing investment adviser representatives and other participants under state jurisdiction.

Choice A is incorrect because broker-dealers are regulated entities, not NASAA members. Broker-dealers register with the SEC and are members of self-regulatory organizations like FINRA, but they are not “members of NASAA.” Choice B is incorrect because stock exchanges are marketplaces and are often SROs themselves, but they are not NASAA members. Choice D is incorrect because SROs (such as FINRA or MSRB) are not NASAA members; NASAA represents state-level governmental regulators, not self-regulatory organizations.

This question reinforces an important SIE framework: U.S. securities regulation is shared among federal regulators (SEC), self-regulatory organizations (FINRA, MSRB, exchanges), and state regulators. NASAA serves as a coordinating body for state regulators, promoting uniformity through model rules, policy coordination, investor education, and cooperation among jurisdictions. Understanding NASAA’s membership helps you correctly assign regulatory roles—especially when questions involve blue sky laws, state registration requirements, and state-level enforcement.

The correct answer is B, growth and has a long-term time horizon. Hedge funds are alternative investments that typically pursue aggressive growth strategies, such as leverage, short selling, derivatives, and arbitrage. These strategies can offer higher returns but also involve higher risk and volatility, making them suitable for investors with a long-term investment horizon who can tolerate potential losses.

Step-by-step, hedge funds often impose lock-up periods and limited liquidity, meaning investors cannot easily withdraw their funds in the short term. This makes them inappropriate for investors who may need quick access to their money, eliminating Choice D.

Choice A is incorrect because hedge funds are known for high fees, commonly structured as “2 and 20” (2% management fee and 20% performance fee). Therefore, they are not suitable for fee-sensitive investors.

Choice C is also incorrect because hedge funds do not guarantee principal protection and can experience significant losses. They are not designed for conservative income-seeking investors.

Thus, hedge funds are best suited for investors seeking capital appreciation, who understand the risks, accept high fees, and have a long-term perspective, making Answer B correct.

In a joint tenants-in-common account, each owner has a divisible ownership interest. Upon the death of one tenant-in-common, that owner’s portion does not automatically pass to the surviving co-owner. Instead, the deceased owner’s share becomes part of the deceased owner’s estate and is distributed according to the will or applicable estate law. Choice B is correct. Choice A would be true of a joint tenants with right of survivorship account, where the surviving joint owner receives the deceased owner’s interest automatically. Choice C is not the best answer because the question identifies the account registration as tenants in common, and transfer-on-death instructions do not override the basic rule stated in the answer choice without additional facts. Choice D is incorrect because the wife’s ownership portion is already determined by the account registration; the deceased husband’s portion goes to his estate. The SIE outline includes customer account registrations, including individual, joint, trust, custodial, partnership, corporate, and retirement accounts. This question tests the legal effect of the joint account registration. Reference: Section 3.2.2 Customer Account Registrations.

FINRA Rule 5130 restricts participation in IPOs for certain individuals (e.g., restricted persons) to prevent potential conflicts of interest. Restricted persons include employees of broker-dealers and their immediate family members.

C is correct because the president of a local bank is not considered a restricted person under FINRA Rule 5130.

A is incorrect because employees (registered or not) of broker-dealers are restricted.

B is incorrect because immediate family members of broker-dealer employees are restricted, even if unemployed.

D is incorrect because the immediate family of a registered representative is restricted.

Accounts held individually are subject to probate, which is the legal process of administering the decedent’s estate. Probate determines the distribution of assets according to the deceased’s will or state intestacy laws.

A is correct because individual accounts require probate to transfer assets.

B is incorrect because irrevocable trusts bypass probate.

C is incorrect because TOD accounts allow direct transfer of assets to named beneficiaries without probate.

D is incorrect because JTWROS accounts transfer ownership to the surviving account holder automatically.

Bond prices and yields move inversely. If the yield available on the bond rises from 5.00% to 5.25%, the market price of the bond has decreased. Current yield is calculated by dividing the bond’s annual interest payment by its current market price. Because the coupon payment is fixed, the only way the current yield rises is for the market price to fall. Choice B is correct. Choice A is incorrect because an increase in yield does not indicate a higher bond value; it indicates the opposite. Choice C is incorrect because the face value, or par value, of the bond does not change simply because market yield changes. Choice D is incorrect because the changed yield reflects a changed market price. The SIE outline specifically includes coupon value, par value, yield, and the relationship between bond price and interest rate. This question tests one of the most important fixed-income principles: fixed coupon plus lower price equals higher current yield; fixed coupon plus higher price equals lower current yield. Reference: Understanding Products and Their Risks; Debt Instruments; Yield; Relationship Between Price and Interest Rate.

A bullish investor expects the price of the underlying security to rise. Selling a put is a bullish options strategy because the put seller has the obligation to buy the stock if assigned. The strategy profits if the stock remains above the strike price and the option expires worthless, allowing the seller to keep the premium. Therefore, choice A is correct. Selling calls is generally a neutral-to-bearish strategy because the call writer benefits if the stock does not rise above the strike price. Selling stock reflects reducing or eliminating ownership and is not a bullish action. Selling stock short is bearish because the investor profits if the stock declines and can repurchase the shares at a lower price. The SIE outline requires knowledge of “puts and calls,” “hedging or speculation,” “covered vs. uncovered,” “exercise and assignment,” and “varying strategies.” It also includes “bearish and bullish” under trading strategies. This question integrates options directionality with investor market outlook. Reference: Section 2.1.3 Options; Section 3.1.1 Orders and Strategies.

The correct answer is A, Buying the stock. A short put position means the investor has sold (written) a put option and is obligated to buy the underlying stock at the strike price if the option is exercised. The primary risk is that the stock price falls significantly, forcing the writer to purchase shares at a price above market value.

Step-by-step, the best hedge is to own the underlying stock. If the investor already owns the stock, then being assigned on the short put simply results in acquiring more shares, which can offset losses or align with their investment strategy. More importantly, owning the stock reduces the overall directional risk exposure.

Choice B (selling short the stock) would increase risk because it creates a bearish position, which is inconsistent with the bullish/neutral nature of a short put. Choice C (selling another put) increases exposure and risk rather than hedging. Choice D (buying a call) does not effectively hedge downside risk from a falling stock price.

Thus, the most appropriate hedge for a short put is to buy or own the underlying stock, making Answer A correct.

The correct answer is D, YTM is less than coupon rate. When a bond is selling at a premium, it means the bond’s market price is above its par value. This occurs when the bond’s coupon rate is higher than prevailing market interest rates, making the bond more attractive to investors.

Step-by-step, premium bond relationships follow a consistent pattern:

Coupon rate > Current yield > Yield to maturity (YTM)

This happens because investors are paying more than par value for the bond but will only receive par at maturity. The excess paid (premium) reduces the overall return, causing the YTM to be the lowest yield measure.

Choice A is incorrect because a premium bond has a market value greater than par, not less. Choice B is incorrect because the coupon rate is always higher than current yield for premium bonds. Choice C is incorrect because the coupon rate is also higher than YTM, not lower.

Thus, the defining characteristic of a premium bond is that its yield to maturity is less than its coupon rate, making Answer D correct.

The correct answer is B, Capital appreciation. A partnership that invests in undeveloped land is typically focused on the expectation that the land will increase in value over time, rather than generating immediate income. Since undeveloped land does not produce rent or operating cash flow, there is little to no operational income, making choice A incorrect.

Additionally, accelerated depreciation (choice C) does not apply because land itself is not depreciable under tax rules. Depreciation applies to improvements like buildings, not raw land. Therefore, tax benefits associated with depreciation are not a primary objective of this type of investment.

Choice D, investment interest deduction, is not a primary investment goal but rather a potential tax consideration depending on how the investment is financed.

Investors in undeveloped land partnerships are typically speculating that the property will become more valuable due to factors such as urban expansion, zoning changes, infrastructure development, or increased demand. Once the land appreciates, it can be sold at a profit, generating capital gains.

Thus, the primary objective is long-term growth in value, making capital appreciation the correct answer.