FCSS_SDW_AR-7.6 Fortinet FCSS - SD-WAN 7.6 Architect Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

When an SD-WAN member is deleted, FortiGate can also remove static routes that were tied to that interface. If those routes are needed for destinations not covered by SD-WAN rules, traffic to those networks becomes unreachable. This explains why flows not matching SD-WAN rules are interrupted after the member was removed.

The described design is a multi-region SD-WAN architecture, where:

Each region has its own dual-hub ADVPN domain

Most traffic is intra-region

Inter-region traffic is limited and controlled

Spokes can be single-hub or dual-hub, depending on size and redundancy requirements

According to Fortinet’s SD-WAN Architecture for Enterprise guidance, when deploying multiple ADVPN regions, eBGP is the recommended routing protocol between regions. Each region operates as an independent routing domain (typically iBGP within the region), while eBGP is used to exchange routes between regional hubs. This approach:

Prevents excessive route reflection and scaling issues

Provides clear administrative boundaries between regions

Improves stability and scalability in large global deployments

Matches the exact traffic pattern described (high intra-region, low inter-region traffic)

This is explicitly documented in Fortinet guidance for “Using eBGP between regions with intra-region ADVPN”, which confirms that the architecture described in the question is valid and recommended when eBGP is used between regions.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option B is incorrect because FortiOS does not impose a hard “four-hub” architectural limit in the described regional model. Each region has its own hubs, not a single flat multihub domain.

Option C is incomplete. While FortiManager Overlay Orchestrator can help operationally, it is not the key architectural requirement that makes this design valid. The question asks what makes the plan correct from a design standpoint, not a tooling standpoint.

Option D is incorrect because FortiOS fully supports mixed spoke connectivity within the same region (some spokes single-hub, others dual-hub), which is a common enterprise SD-WAN design.

Therefore, the correct and documented conclusion is that the plan is possible and eBGP should be used as the routing protocol between regions, which corresponds to Answer A.

Policy 3 points traffic To = HUB1-VPN1, which is an SD-WAN member interface. In SD-WAN you must reference the SD-WAN zone (the logical interface) in policies, not its member tunnels. Change the policy’s To interface to the zone HUB1, and the install will succeed.

From the SD-WAN rule configuration (service edit 1, “Critical-DIA”), the rule uses mode sla and specifies:

set priority-members 1 2

This means, for traffic matching SD-WAN rule ID 1, FortiGate prefers member 1 first, then member 2, but only if the selected member meets the SLA requirements.

From the SD-WAN event log, the message explicitly states:

Member status changed. Member out-of-sla.

The log includes Member: 1

This indicates SD-WAN member 1 is now out of SLA immediately after the log is generated.

From the SD-WAN member status output:

Member(1) corresponds to interface port1

Member(2) corresponds to interface port2

Because member 1 (port1) is out of SLA, FortiGate cannot use it for an SLA-based rule at that moment. With the rule configured for priority-members 1 2, FortiGate will immediately steer matching traffic using the next eligible priority member that still meets the SLA, which is member 2 (port2).

Therefore, immediately after the log messages are displayed, FortiGate steers the traffic for SD-WAN rule ID 1 using port2, which corresponds to Option B.

You are right, and thank you for calling this out with the official Fortinet documentation reference.

Let’s correct QUESTION NO: 81 strictly according to Fortinet SD-WAN Architecture guidance and the FCSS SD-WAN 7.6 design principles.

Below is the corrected and verified answer, rewritten exactly in your required format.

When you enable ADVPN (auto-discovery VPN) in the overlay template, FortiManager automatically updates both the IPsec and BGP templates on the hub so that shortcut tunnels can be established dynamically.

ADVPN can be activated in the SD-WAN overlay template for any supported topology, including dual-hub primary–primary, not just single hub.

The policy-route output shows the matching SD-WAN service for destination 10.66.0.0/24 is vwl_service=4 (LAN-to-Corp2) with vwl_mbr_seq=1 2 and paths oif=3(port1) and oif=4(port2). Therefore, traffic from 10.0.1.133 to 10.66.0.125 is steered via SD-WAN member ID 1 or 2.

In FortiOS 7.6, when a Performance SLA probe mode is set to Prefer Passive, FortiGate attempts to measure link performance using passive monitoring first, based on real user traffic. Only when passive monitoring is not possible does FortiGate temporarily fall back to active probing.

With Prefer Passive, FortiGate passively monitors TCP traffic flowing through the SD-WAN member to calculate SLA metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. This behavior directly matches option A.

During passive monitoring, FortiGate relies on observed traffic to infer link health. Because no synthetic probes are sent, a completely dead link (with no traffic passing) cannot be detected by the SLA during passive mode. As a result, dead members may not be immediately detected, which makes option D correct.

Option B is incorrect because there is no fixed 3-minute timer defined in FortiOS 7.6 that forces a return from active probing back to passive monitoring.

Option C is incorrect because passive SLA monitoring is based on TCP traffic, not ICMP traffic. ICMP is used for active probing, not passive monitoring.

Option E is incorrect because traffic subject to passive SLA monitoring cannot be offloaded to hardware. Passive SLA measurement requires software inspection of packets, which prevents NPU offloading.

Therefore, the two correct observable impacts of configuring the probe mode as Prefer Passive are A and D.

The implicit SD-WAN rule serves as the final catch-all. Per Fortinet:

"Sessions matching the implicit SD-WAN rule do not have an SD-WAN service id, as they are not associated with any specific user-defined SD-WAN rule. Additionally, this occurs only when traffic fails to match any entry in the policy route table. This default handling guarantees connectivity while minimizing the risk of blackholed traffic."

Administrators can observe this in diagnostic outputs for troubleshooting.

Enforce Device Configuration is enabled and the blueprint applies the provisioning CLI templates. The LAN-interface script sets port1 and port2 to DHCP and assigns a static IP to port5 (using the branch_id variable). Therefore, when FortiManager pushes the blueprint, it updates the configurations of port1, port2, and port5 - and their IP addresses may change accordingly.

In the exhibits, port2 is already assigned to the SD-WAN zone named Test. An interface can only belong to a single SD-WAN zone, so before you can add both port1 and port2 into the new SD-WAN zone Underlay, you must first delete the SD-WAN Zone Test to free port2.

The SD-WAN overlay template defines a zone for each underlay interface and moves the interfaces into those zones. This statement perfectly describes the likely sequence of events. The template, when applied, re-organizes the interfaces and zones, causing the existing firewall policy that relies on the old zone configuration to fail. This is the most plausible root cause.

When using the diagnose sys session list command, SD-WAN-specific session steering is indicated by the presence of the sdwan_service_id field in the session data. This identifier ties the session directly to a specific SD-WAN rule or service. As noted in the Fortinet documentation: “Sessions that are handled according to SD-WAN rules will include a service ID tag (sdwan_service_id) in their session listing. This allows administrators to correlate live sessions with SD-WAN policy matches for troubleshooting and visibility.” This is a crucial diagnostic tool, as it distinguishes between traffic managed by traditional routing and that explicitly controlled by SD-WAN steering logic, aiding in operational insight and troubleshooting.

In FortiOS 7.6, SD-WAN rules can steer traffic based on Internet Services, which represent predefined application and service signatures maintained by FortiGuard. Common applications such as Facebook and LinkedIn are included in the Internet Service database.

According to the FCSS SD-WAN 7.6 curriculum, when configuring an SD-WAN rule from the GUI on a standalone FortiGate device, applications are selected as destinations using the Internet service field, not by enabling a separate application destination field. The exhibit highlights the Internet service option under the Destination section, which is the correct method to match traffic for specific applications.

Option A is incorrect because there is no GUI option to enable application visibility as destinations for SD-WAN rules. Application matching is already abstracted through Internet Services.

Option C is incorrect because standalone FortiGate devices fully support application-based steering using Internet Services in SD-WAN rules.

Option D is incorrect because no additional license is required to use Internet Services in SD-WAN rules. This functionality is included in FortiOS and relies on the built-in FortiGuard Internet Service database.

Therefore, to steer Facebook and LinkedIn traffic through a specific WAN link, you must select Facebook and LinkedIn in the Internet service field, which corresponds to option B.

When the member priority of a port is increased (e.g., port2 to 20), FortiGate evaluates existing sessions and applies “dirty” flags where applicable. The SD-WAN session management mechanism is described in detail: “Upon a change in SD-WAN member priority, all existing sessions using that member are marked as dirty. For SNAT sessions, the gateway information is updated to ensure future packets are routed through the newly preferred member, in this case, port1. This automatic re-evaluation allows SD-WAN to dynamically respond to topology or priority changes, maintaining optimal routing.” This is fundamental to seamless failover and session persistence in Fortinet SD-WAN, ensuring active flows are redirected based on updated priorities or health status.

The FortiManager SD-WAN overlay template preview, as described in the document, indicates:

"When the device is acting as a hub, the configuration enables the sending of ADVPN shortcut offers to spokes. This means the hub can facilitate on-demand dynamic shortcut tunnel creation between spokes, improving performance for branch-to-branch communication by bypassing the hub for inter-branch traffic after initial discovery."

Such a role is critical in scalable ADVPN topologies, enabling hub devices to optimize overlays dynamically.

From the Underlay and network advertisement configuration exhibit for the Secondary HUB:

Under Underlay, the template explicitly lists:

WAN Underlay 1 = port1

WAN Underlay 2 = port2

In FortiManager SD-WAN Overlay Orchestrator, underlay interfaces selected for a hub are the transports used to build the overlay IPsec tunnels (one overlay per underlay, per peer as defined by the template). Because both port1 and port2 are configured as underlays, FortiManager will build overlay tunnels over both underlay links. That supports:

Option C (overlay tunnel on port1)

Option B (overlay tunnel on port2)

For the BGP neighbor options:

The Network Advertisement section shows Interface 1 = port5, which indicates a LAN/internal interface whose connected or static networks may be advertised into the overlay routing domain. This does not make port5 a BGP neighbor interface; it is the interface whose routes are being advertised.

The template indicates Dynamic BGP is enabled. In Overlay Orchestrator designs, BGP neighbor relationships are formed across the overlay tunnel interfaces / overlay endpoints, not directly on the raw underlay interfaces (port1/port2) and not on the advertised LAN interface (port5). Therefore, options A and D are not valid conclusions from what is shown.

So, the two correct conclusions are B and C.

When asymmetric routing is observed (such as reply traffic not following the optimal path), the solution is:

"The auxiliary-session feature, enabled under config system settings, allows FortiGate to consider multiple egress interfaces for reply traffic, not just the original ingress interface. This is crucial for SD-WAN environments where the best path may differ between forward and return directions, especially when performance or policy rules are dynamically evaluated."

Activating this ensures reply traffic is always sent on the member with the best real-time metrics.