H12-831_V1.0 Huawei HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0 Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

BGP supports Equal-Cost Multipath (ECMP) forwarding when multiple eligible routes have compatible path attributes. The maximum load-balancing 2 command permits up to two qualifying BGP routes to participate in load balancing.

R1, R2, and R3 originate the same prefix within AS 65123. R4 and R5 receive routes through different EBGP peers, with the same AS_PATH value, making them eligible for multipath forwarding when the remaining attributes match.

R6 can receive corresponding IBGP advertisements from R4 and R5 and use two equal-cost paths.

R2, however, originates the prefix locally, so its locally imported route is preferred rather than installing two equivalent external alternatives.

Huawei ' s BGP implementation requires matching route attributes, including AS_PATH, for ordinary BGP load balancing. Therefore, the correct statements are B, C, and D.

================

BGP/MPLS IP VPN forwarding normally uses a two-level MPLS label stack consisting of an outer transport label and an inner VPN label.

The outer label identifies the Label Switched Path (LSP) through the provider backbone. It is commonly distributed through LDP.

The inner label identifies VPN-specific forwarding information at the egress PE and is advertised through MP-BGP with VPNv4 routing information.

When Penultimate Hop Popping (PHP) is enabled, the router immediately before the egress PE removes the outer transport label. The egress PE therefore receives the packet carrying the remaining VPN label.

Option B accurately describes this process.

Options A, C, and D incorrectly describe label distribution or the role of CE routers. CE devices do not ordinarily exchange provider VPN labels through BGP Update messages.

Therefore, A, C, and D are false.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0 Training Material.pdf

================

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the BGP and IS-IS Network Topology in the Question:

IS-IS Areas:

Area 49.0001 (Level-1 IS-IS): Contains R1, R2, R4, R5.

Area 49.0002 (Level-2 IS-IS): Contains R3, R6.

R2 acts as an ABR (Area Border Router) and redistributes routes between Level-1 and Level-2 using import-route isis level-2 into level-1.

BGP Route Reflection & Peering:

R2 and R5 are Route Reflectors (RRs).

iBGP peering is established among all routers (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6).

R1 and R4 import 192.168.1.0/24 into BGP, meaning this prefix will be advertised to all iBGP peers.

R3 and R6 import 192.168.2.0/24 into BGP, meaning this prefix will also be advertised to all iBGP peers.

Route Distribution Analysis:

A. The route 192.168.2.0/24 in the routing table of R4 has two next hops. ✅ (Correct)

R3 and R6 import 192.168.2.0/24 into BGP.

R2 and R5 (Route Reflectors) learn this route and reflect it to their clients (R1, R3, R4, R6).

R4 receives two valid paths to 192.168.2.0/24 via R2 and R5 (both iBGP peers).

Since both routes have the same BGP attributes and cost, they are installed as equal-cost paths in R4 ' s routing table.

✅ Statement A is correct: The routing table of R4 has two next hops for 192.168.2.0/24.

B. The routing table of R1 contains two equal-cost default routes. ❌ (Incorrect)

In an IS-IS Level-1-2 setup, default routes are usually provided to Level-1 routers from an ABR (like R2).

However, the question does not mention that R1 is receiving two default routes or that it is in an equal-cost multipath (ECMP) scenario.

R1 may have only one default route, depending on route preference and cost.

❌ Statement B is incorrect: The routing table of R1 does not necessarily contain two equal-cost default routes.

C. The routing table of R4 contains two equal-cost default routes. ❌ (Incorrect)

Similar to R1, R4 is also a Level-1 router in IS-IS.

If R4 were receiving default routes from multiple ABRs (R2 and R5), then it could have equal-cost paths.

However, there is no indication that R4 is receiving two default routes in this scenario.

❌ Statement C is incorrect: The routing table of R4 does not necessarily contain two equal-cost default routes.

D. The routing table of R1 contains the route 192.168.2.0/24. ✅ (Correct)

R3 and R6 import 192.168.2.0/24 into BGP.

R2 and R5 (Route Reflectors) reflect this route to their iBGP peers, including R1.

Since R1 is an iBGP client of R2 and R5, it will receive 192.168.2.0/24 and install it in its routing table.

✅ Statement D is correct: The routing table of R1 contains the route 192.168.2.0/24.

Final Conclusion:

✅ A. The route 192.168.2.0/24 in the routing table of R4 has two next hops.

❌ B. The routing table of R1 does not necessarily contain two equal-cost default routes.

❌ C. The routing table of R4 does not necessarily contain two equal-cost default routes.

✅ D. The routing table of R1 contains the route 192.168.2.0/24.

Thus, the correct answers are: A, D.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Key OSPF Concepts to Consider:

Area 1 is an NSSA (Not-So-Stubby Area):

NSSAs allow external routes but advertise them as Type-7 LSAs.

The ABR (R2) converts these Type-7 LSAs into Type-5 LSAs for the backbone (Area 0).

Area 2 is a Stub Area:

Stub areas do not allow external routes (Type-5 LSAs).

This means that R5 (inside Area 2) will NOT receive external routes like 10.0.4.4/32 or 10.0.4.0/24.

Effect of asbr-summary 10.0.4.0 255.255.255.0 on R1 and R3:

This command ensures that R1 and R3 will see a summarized route 10.0.4.0/24 instead of specific /32 routes.

Routing Table Analysis:

R1 (ABR for NSSA, with ASBR summary configured)

Connected to Area 1 (NSSA) and Area 0 (Backbone)

Since asbr-summary 10.0.4.0 255.255.255.0 is configured on R1, it contains both 10.0.4.4/32 (from R4) and the summarized 10.0.4.0/24.

✅ Matches Option 4: The routing table contains both 10.0.4.4/32 and 10.0.4.0/24.

R5 (Inside Area 2 - Stub Area)

Stub areas do not receive external routes (Type-5 LSAs).

Since R5 is inside a stub area, it does not contain 10.0.4.4/32 or 10.0.4.0/24.

✅ Matches Option 3: The routing table does not contain 10.0.4.4/32 or 10.0.4.0/24.

R2 (ABR between NSSA and Backbone, but no ASBR summary configured)

R2 converts Type-7 LSAs from R4 into Type-5 LSAs and advertises them into Area 0.

Since no ASBR summary is configured on R2, it only sees the specific external route 10.0.4.4/32 but not the summarized 10.0.4.0/24.

✅ Matches Option 1: The routing table contains 10.0.4.4/32 only.

R3 (Another ABR with ASBR summary configured)

R3 has asbr-summary 10.0.4.0 255.255.255.0 configured, which means it will summarize the external routes.

Instead of 10.0.4.4/32, R3 will only have the summarized 10.0.4.0/24 route.

✅ Matches Option 2: The routing table contains 10.0.4.0/24 only.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) and Root Bridge Selection

Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) is used to prevent loops in a Layer 2 network by electing a Root Bridge and determining a loop-free topology.

The Root Bridge is elected based on the lowest Bridge ID (BID), which consists of:

Priority Value (Lower is preferred, default is 32768).

MAC Address (Lower MAC wins in case of a tie).

The optimal forwarding path is chosen based on cost, which is usually determined by the link bandwidth.

Why the Path is Not Optimal?

The network engineer states that all links have the same cost, meaning that the STP Root Bridge election determines the topology rather than cost differences.

The fact that the path between PC1 and PC2 is suboptimal suggests that the Root Bridge may not be ideally placed.

Determining the Likely Root Bridge:

The Root Bridge is the switch with the lowest BID (priority + MAC).

All switches calculate the shortest path to the Root Bridge and place ports in either Forwarding or Blocking mode.

From the diagram, the traffic is flowing through SW2 → SW4 → SW3 instead of directly via SW2 → SW3.

This suggests that the Root Bridge is likely SW1 or SW4 because:

Root Bridges do not block any ports.

If SW1 or SW4 is the Root Bridge, the spanning tree topology might force the path to take a longer route.

Key Takeaways:

Root Bridge selection influences the entire Layer 2 forwarding path.

The lowest Bridge ID (priority + MAC) determines the Root Bridge.

If a suboptimal path is taken, the Root Bridge is likely placed in a location that forces certain links to block.

In this scenario, SW1 or SW4 is the most probable Root Bridge, forcing traffic through an unintended path.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology References:

Huawei HCIP-Datacom Official Certification Guide, Chapter on Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) and Root Bridge Selection.

Huawei Datacom Training Materials, Section on STP Convergence and Network Optimization.

Huawei Datacom Configuration Guide, Command Reference for STP Root Bridge Selection and Path Calculation.

OSPFv3 uses Router-LSAs to describe the routing topology of individual routers within an OSPF area.

Each OSPFv3 router originates a Router-LSA for every area to which its OSPFv3 interfaces belong. Router-LSAs contain information about link types, interface identifiers, neighboring routers, and link costs.

In the displayed topology, R1, R2, and R3 all participate in OSPFv3 Area 0. Because Router-LSAs have area flooding scope, each participating router receives the Router-LSAs generated by the other routers in that area.

Consequently, R2 ' s Area 0 link-state database contains Router-LSAs originated by R1, R2, and R3.

The three routers form one common OSPFv3 area, and no additional area or router is shown.

Therefore, the total number of Router-LSAs in the relevant LSDB is 3.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0 Training Material.pdf

================

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9) in OSPFv3

OSPFv3 uses the Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9) to advertise IPv6 prefixes associated with either:

A Router-LSA (Type 1) → Describes links and interfaces.

A Network-LSA (Type 2) → Advertises multi-access networks (if a Designated Router exists).

Each router generates one Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA to advertise its own IPv6 prefixes.

Prefix Analysis for Each Router

R1 ' s IPv6 Prefixes:

2000:12::1/64

2001:12::1/64

2002:12::1/64

2003:12::/64 (Shared link with R2)

Total Prefixes in R1’s Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA = 4

✅ R1 advertises four prefixes in its Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA.

R2 ' s IPv6 Prefixes:

2003:12::2/64 (Shared link with R1)

Total Prefixes in R2’s Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA = 1

✅ R2 advertises only one prefix in its Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA.

Checking Each Option:

✅ A. The Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA generated by R2 describes three prefixes. (❌ False, R2 only has one prefix).

✅ B. The Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA generated by R1 describes four prefixes. (✔ True, R1 has four prefixes).

✅ C. The Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA generated by R2 describes four prefixes. (❌ False, R2 only has one prefix).

✅ D. The Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA generated by R1 describes three prefixes. (❌ False, R1 has four prefixes).

Final Conclusion:

✅ B. The Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA generated by R1 describes four prefixes.

Thus, the correct answer is: B. The Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA generated by R1 describes four prefixes.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

1. Understanding MPLS TTL Processing

TTL (Time to Live) is an IP field that prevents routing loops by decrementing at each hop.

In an MPLS network, the TTL field can be processed in two modes:

Uniform Mode (Default Mode)

Pipe Mode (TTL is preserved in the MPLS domain)

2. TTL Processing in Pipe Mode

Pipe mode is used to prevent the MPLS backbone from affecting the TTL of an IP packet.

When an IP packet enters the MPLS domain, the original TTL is copied into the MPLS header.

Inside the MPLS network:

MPLS labels use their own TTL values, and the IP TTL is not decremented.

Each P router (transit router) decrements only the MPLS TTL, not the IP TTL.

When the packet leaves the MPLS domain (at PE2):

The original IP TTL is restored but decremented by 1 as it exits to CE2.

3. Analyzing the TTL Behavior in the Given Topology

Initial IP TTL from CE1 = 255

At PE1:

IP TTL remains 255 as it is copied into the MPLS label.

MPLS TTL starts at 255 (same as IP TTL).

At P Router:

MPLS TTL is decremented (255 → 254).

IP TTL remains unchanged (255) because of Pipe mode.

At PE2 (Egress Router):

IP TTL is restored and decremented by 1 (255 → 254).

Thus, the correct sequence is:

✅ IP TTL: 255 → 255 → 254

4. Evaluating the Answer Choices

Option

TTL Values

Correct?

Reasoning

A

255 → 254 → 252

❌ Incorrect

IP TTL should remain 255 inside MPLS

B

254 → 253 → 252

❌ Incorrect

IP TTL starts at 255, not 254

C

255 → 255 → 254

✅ Correct

IP TTL is preserved in pipe mode inside MPLS and decremented only at egress.

D

254 → 254 → 253

❌ Incorrect

Initial IP TTL should be 255, not 254

✅ Correct Answer: C. 255 → 255 → 254

Final Conclusion:

Pipe mode ensures that the MPLS domain does not affect the IP TTL while the packet is inside the MPLS network.

Only the egress PE (PE2) decrements the IP TTL before forwarding the packet to CE2.

Thus, the correct TTL sequence is 255 → 255 → 254.

Although network maintenance includes routine maintenance and troubleshooting, experience does not exempt maintenance personnel from following standardized operating guidelines.

Huawei requires maintenance personnel to comply strictly with operating and safety regulations. Maintenance work should include impact assessment, authorization, information collection, configuration or data backup, operation recording, fault verification, and preparation of recovery measures. These requirements apply even to highly skilled engineers because an undocumented or unauthorized operation can interrupt services or make recovery more difficult.

Therefore, the first part of the statement is acceptable, but the claim that experienced personnel may disregard operation guidelines makes the complete statement false. Huawei troubleshooting principles and maintenance precautions.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

To determine which statement is false, we need to analyze the IS-IS topology, the role of multi-topology, the IPv6 summary configuration, and the level-1-2 behavior of IS-IS routers. Let’s break it down step by step:

Understanding the IS-IS Topology and Levels:

IS-IS supports multiple levels: Level-1 (L1) for intra-area routing, Level-2 (L2) for inter-area routing, and Level-1-2 (L1-2) routers that can operate in both levels and connect L1 and L2 areas.

In the figure, R1 and R2 are configured as Level-1-2 routers, R3 is a Level-1-2 router, R4 is a Level-1 router, and R5 is a Level-1 router. The area borders are indicated by the system IDs (49.0001 for R4’s area and 49.0002 for R3 and R5’s area).

R4’s Loopback0 has the IPv6 address 2000::/128, which is a host route (a /128 prefix, representing a single address).

Multi-Topology IS-IS for IPv6:

Multi-topology IS-IS allows separate topologies for IPv4 and IPv6, ensuring that IPv6 routes are handled independently. Since multi-topology is enabled on all routers, IPv6 routes (like 2000::/128 on R4) are advertised and processed within the IPv6 topology.

This means that IPv6 routes, including the Loopback0 address of R4 (2000::/128), can be advertised across the IS-IS domain, subject to the level and summary configurations.

IPv6 Summary Configuration (2000::/64 level-1-2):

The command ipv6 summary 2000::/64 level-1-2 is configured in the IS-IS processes of R1 and R2. This command instructs R1 and R2 (as Level-1-2 routers) to summarize the IPv6 prefix 2000::/64 and advertise it to both Level-1 and Level-2 areas.

Summarization means that instead of advertising the more specific route (e.g., 2000::/128 from R4), R1 and R2 advertise the less specific summary route 2000::/64. This summary route covers the 2000::/128 address of R4’s Loopback0.

Since R1 and R2 are Level-1-2 routers, they can advertise this summary to both their Level-1 neighbors (like R4 and R3) and Level-2 neighbors (across areas).

Analyzing Each Statement:

A. The routing table of R1 contains the route 2000::/64.

True. R1 is a Level-1-2 router with the ipv6 summary 2000::/64 level-1-2 command configured. It advertises and installs the summary route 2000::/64 in its routing table, covering the more specific 2000::/128 from R4. Additionally, as a Level-1-2 router, R1 can learn and retain this route from its IS-IS neighbors.

B. The routing table of R2 contains the route 2000::/64.

True. Similar to R1, R2 is also a Level-1-2 router with the same summary command. It advertises and installs the 2000::/64 summary route in its routing table, covering R4’s 2000::/128.

C. The routing table of R3 contains the route 2000::/128.

False. R3 is a Level-1-2 router in area 49.0002, but it receives routes from R2 (a Level-1-2 router in area 49.0001). Because R1 and R2 are configured with the ipv6 summary 2000::/64 level-1-2 command, they advertise the summary route 2000::/64 to their neighbors, including R3. IS-IS prefers the most specific route, but the summary configuration ensures that the more specific 2000::/128 from R4 is not advertised beyond R1 and R2 unless explicitly allowed. Since R3 is in a different area and receives the summary 2000::/64 from R2, it does not have the more specific 2000::/128 route in its routing table. Therefore, this statement is false.

D. The routing table of R2 contains the route 2000::/128.

True. R2, as a Level-1-2 router, is directly connected to R4 (a Level-1 router) via the IS-IS topology. R4 advertises its Loopback0 address 2000::/128 to R2. Even though R2 is configured to summarize 2000::/64, it can still retain the more specific 2000::/128 route in its routing table because IS-IS allows routers to keep both summary and more specific routes, with the more specific route taking precedence for routing decisions.

Conclusion:

The false statement is C, as R3 does not contain the route 2000::/128 in its routing table. Instead, R3 receives the summary route 2000::/64 from R2 due to the summary configuration on R1 and R2.

References to HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology Documents:

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0, Section on IS-IS: Multi-Topology IS-IS for IPv6, Level-1 and Level-2 Operations, and Route Summarization.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0, Chapter on IPv6 Routing Protocols: IS-IS Configuration and Behavior, Including Summary Address Commands and L1/L2 Interactions.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

1. Understanding the Routing Issue

R1 and R4 are BGP routers and have an IBGP connection.

R2 and R3 are OSPF-only routers (they do not run BGP).

Networks 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.4.4.0/24 are advertised into BGP but not OSPF.

PC1 (10.1.1.1) and PC2 (10.4.4.1) need communication, but their networks are not known to OSPF routers R2 and R3.

To fix this, we need a method that ensures R2 and R3 learn the routes for 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.4.4.0/24.

2. Evaluating Each Answer Option

Option A: " Deploy policy-based routing on R1 and specify R2 as the next hop for traffic from PC1 to PC2. "

Incorrect.

Policy-Based Routing (PBR) does not solve the issue of missing routes in OSPF.

Even if R1 forwards traffic to R2, R2 does not know how to reach 10.4.4.0/24, causing packet drops.

A proper routing protocol solution is required instead of PBR.

Option B: " Deploy MPLS and LDP on R1 to R4 and establish LSPs for routes 1.1.1.1/32 and 4.4.4.4/32. "

Incorrect.

MPLS requires label-switched paths (LSPs) but does not distribute routing information itself.

The real problem is that R2 and R3 do not have routing entries for 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.4.4.0/24.

MPLS does not fix the missing route advertisement issue.

Option C: " Run BGP on R2 and R3, and establish full-mesh IBGP connections in AS 123. "

Correct.

If R2 and R3 run BGP, they can form IBGP sessions with R1 and R4 and learn routes 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.4.4.0/24 via BGP.

R2 and R3 would then be able to forward traffic correctly between PC1 and PC2.

This is a valid method to fix the issue.

Option D: " On R1 and R4, import routes 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.4.4.0/24 into OSPF. "

Correct.

By redistributing BGP routes into OSPF, R1 and R4 can ensure that R2 and R3 learn the missing networks (10.1.1.0/24 and 10.4.4.0/24) via OSPF.

This allows full reachability without running BGP on R2 and R3.

This is another valid method to fix the issue.

Final Answer:

✅ C and D are correct.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology References:

BGP and OSPF Route Redistribution

IBGP Full-Mesh Requirement and Route Propagation

How Policy-Based Routing Works and Its Limitations

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

1. Understanding the Hub-Spoke Network Model in MPLS VPN

Hub-Spoke (or Route Reflector) topology is used in MPLS Layer 3 VPNs where multiple spoke sites communicate through a central hub.

The Hub-PE acts as an intermediate BGP speaker and redistributes routes between spokes.

The challenge is preventing routing loops when exchanging routes between spokes.

2. Understanding the Role of Site of Origin (SoO) in BGP/MPLS VPNs

BGP Site of Origin (SoO) is a route attribute used to prevent routing loops in scenarios where a hub redistributes routes between spokes.

If a route originating from a spoke is advertised back to the same site, SoO prevents it from being re-learned.

The SoO value (e.g., 200:1) ensures that a site does not accept its own previously advertised prefixes.

3. Analyzing the Answer Choices

❌ A. [Hub-PE-bgp-VPN_out] peer x.x.x.x allow-as-loop (Incorrect)

The allow-as-loop command allows BGP to accept routes with its own AS number in the AS path.

This is NOT needed in a Hub-Spoke VPN because BGP routes are not being looped through the same AS.

❌ This is unnecessary for preventing loops in a Hub-Spoke VPN.

❌ B. [Hub-PE-bgp-VPN_in] peer x.x.x.x allow-as-loop (Incorrect)

Again, allow-as-loop is used when a router needs to accept its own AS number in the BGP AS path.

This is NOT the mechanism used for preventing loops in Hub-Spoke VPNs; SoO is used instead.

❌ This is not required in this scenario.

✅ C. [Hub-PE-bgp-VPN_in] peer x.x.x.x soo 200:1 (Correct Answer)

The correct way to prevent spoke routes from looping through the hub is to apply the Site of Origin (SoO) attribute.

This command ensures that if a route with SoO 200:1 is received, it is not advertised back to the same spoke.

✅ This is the correct answer.

❌ D. [Hub-PE-bgp-VPN_out] peer x.x.x.x soo 200:1 (Incorrect)

Applying SoO on outgoing routes is NOT effective because the hub should mark received routes and prevent loops when re-advertising them.

SoO should be applied on the inbound (received) routes at the Hub-PE, not outbound.

❌ This is not the correct implementation of SoO.

Final Conclusion:

✅ Correct Answer: C. [Hub-PE-bgp-VPN_in] peer x.x.x.x soo 200:1

❌ A. allow-as-loop is unnecessary in a Hub-Spoke MPLS VPN.

❌ B. allow-as-loop is not relevant here.

❌ D. SoO should be applied inbound, not outbound.

Thus, the correct answer is: C. [Hub-PE-bgp-VPN_in] peer x.x.x.x soo 200:1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

To determine the correct answers, we need to analyze OSPFv3 behavior and Inter-Area-Prefix LSAs (Type 3 LSAs).

1. Understanding OSPFv3 Inter-Area-Prefix LSAs (Type 3 LSAs)

Type 3 LSAs (Inter-Area-Prefix LSAs) are generated by an ABR (Area Border Router) to advertise networks between areas.

If a router in one area learns a prefix from another area, it generates a Type 3 LSA to advertise it further.

Stub areas (Area 1) do not allow external LSAs, including Type 3 LSAs for external routes.

NSSA areas (Area 3) accept external routes but redistribute them as Type 7 LSAs before being converted to Type 5 LSAs by an NSSA ABR.

2. Analyzing Each Answer Option:

✅ A. " The Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R1 and describes 2000::6/128 exists in Area 0. " → TRUE

R6 has 2000::6/128 in Area 2.

R2 is the ABR that brings this prefix into Area 0 as a Type 3 LSA.

R1, being in Area 0, learns this LSA from R2.

Thus, this statement is correct.

❌ B. " The Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R1 and describes 2000::6/128 exists in Area 3. " → FALSE

R1 is not an ABR for Area 3, so it does not generate an LSA for 2000::6/128 in Area 3.

Instead, R3 (the ABR between Area 0 and Area 3) would be responsible for propagating routes.

This statement is false.

❌ C. " The Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R2 and describes 2000::6/128 exists in Area 1. " → FALSE

Area 1 is a stub area and does not accept external LSAs (including Type 3 LSAs from other areas).

R2 cannot generate and send a Type 3 LSA for 2000::6/128 into Area 1.

This statement is false.

✅ D. " The Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R3 and describes 2000::6/128 exists in Area 2. " → TRUE

R3 is an ABR and learns 2000::6/128 from R2 (which originally learned it from R6 in Area 2).

Since Area 2 is a normal (non-stub, non-NSSA) area, Type 3 LSAs are allowed.

R3 generates and advertises this Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA for 2000::6/128 into Area 2.

Thus, this statement is correct.