Month End Sale - Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: xmaspas7

Easiest Solution 2 Pass Your Certification Exams

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Prepare effectively for your PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam certification with our extensive collection of free, high-quality practice questions. Each question is designed to mirror the actual exam format and objectives, complete with comprehensive answers and detailed explanations. Our materials are regularly updated for 2025, ensuring you have the most current resources to build confidence and succeed on your first attempt.

What should an organization demonstrate through documentation?

A.

That the complexity of processes and their interactions is documented

B.

That the distribution of paper copies is regularly complete

C.

That Its security controls are implemented based on risk scenarios

Scenario 5: OperazelT is a software development company that develops applications for various companies worldwide. Recently, the company conducted a risk assessment in response to the evolving digital landscape and emerging information security challenges. Through rigorous testing techniques like penetration testing and code review, the company identified issues in its IT systems, including improper user permissions, misconfigured security settings, and insecure network configurations. To resolve these issues and enhance information security, OperazelT implemented an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001.

In a collaborative effort involving the implementation team, OperazelT thoroughly assessed its business requirements and internal and external environment, identified its key processes and activities, and identified and analyzed the interested parties to establish the preliminary scope of the ISMS. Following this, the implementation team conducted a comprehensive review of the company's functional units, opting to include most of the company departments within the ISMS scope. Additionally, the team decided to include internal and external physical locations, both external and internal issues referred to in clause 4.1, the requirements in clause 4.2, and the interfaces and dependencies between activities performed by the company. The IT manager had a pivotal role in approving the final scope, reflecting OperazelT’s commitment to information security.

OperazelT's information security team created a comprehensive information security policy that aligned with the company's strategic direction and legal requirements, informed by risk assessment findings and business strategies. This policy, alongside specific policies detailing security issues and assigning roles and responsibilities, was communicated internally and shared with external parties. The drafting, review, and approval of these policies involved active participation from top management, ensuring a robust framework for safeguarding information across all interested parties.

As OperazelT moved forward, the company entered the policy implementation phase, with a detailed plan encompassing security definition, role assignments, and training sessions. Lastly, the policy monitoring and maintenance phase was conducted, where monitoring mechanisms were established to ensure the company's information security policy is enforced and all employees comply with its requirements.

To further strengthen its information security framework, OperazelT initiated a comprehensive gap analysis as part of the ISMS implementation process. Rather than relying solely on internal assessments, OperazelT decided to involve the services of external consultants to assess the state of its ISMS. The company collaborated with external consultants, which brought a fresh perspective and valuable insights to the gap analysis process, enabling OperazelT to identify vulnerabilities and areas for improvement with a higher degree of objectivity. Lastly, OperazelT created a committee whose mission includes ensuring the proper operation of the ISMS, overseeing the company's risk assessment process, managing information security-related issues, recommending solutions to nonconformities, and monitoring the implementation of corrections and corrective actions.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Which phase of information security policy development at OperazelT did NOT encompass all the necessary components?

A.

Risk assessment

B.

Policy construction

C.

Policy implementation

Following a repotted event, an Information security event ticket has been completed and its priority has been assigned. Then, the event has been evaluated to determine If it is an information security incident, which phase of the incident management has been completed?

A.

initial assessment and decision

B.

Detection and reporting

C.

Evaluation and confirmation

Scenario 5: Bytes iS a dynamic and innovative Company specializing in the design, manufacturing. and distribution Of hardware and software, with a focus On providing comprehensive network and supporting

services. It is headquartered in the vibrant tech hub of Lagos, Nigeria. It has a diverse and dedicated team, boasting a workforce of over 800 employees who are passionate about delivering cutting-edge solutions

to their Clients. Given the nati-jte Of its business. Bytes frequently handles sensitive data both internally and When collaborating With Clients and partners.

Recognizing the Challenges inherent in securely sharing data with clients. partners, and within its own internal operations. Bytes has implemented robust information security measures, They utilize a defined risk

assessment process, which enables them to assess and address potential threats and information security risks. This process ensures compliance with ISOflEC 27001 requirements, a critical aspect of Bytes'

operations.

Initially. Bytes identified both external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that impact its ability to achieve the intended information security management System Outcomes, External issues

beyond the company'S control include factors Such as social and Cultural dynamics, political. legal. normative, and regulatory environments, financial and macroeconomic conditions. technological developments,

natural factors, and competitive pressures. Internal issues, which are within the organization's control, encompass aspects like the company's culture. its policies, objectives, and strategies; govetnance structures.

roles, and responsibilities: adopted standards and guidelines; contractual relationships that influence processes within the ISMS scope: processes and procedures resources and knowledge capabilities; physical

infrastructure information systems. information flows. and decisiorwnaking processes; as well as the results of previous audits and risk assessments. Bytes also focused on identifying the interested parties

relevant to the ISMS understanding their requirements, and determining which Of those requirements will be addressed by the ISMS

In pursuing a secure digital environment, Bytes leverages the latest technology, utilizing automated vulnerability scanning tools to identify known vulnerable services in their ICT systems. This proactive approach

ensures that potential weaknesses are swiftly addressed. bolstering their overall information security posture. In their comprehensive approach to information security, Bytes has identified and assessed various

risks. During this process, despite implementing the security controls, Bytes' expert team identified unacceptable residual risks, and the team Currently faces uncertainty regarding which specific options to for

addressing these identified and unacceptable residual risks.

Based on scenario 5, certain residual risks were defined as unacceptable. Which risk treatment options should Bytes consider?

A.

Bytes should terminate the affected projects immediately

B.

Bytes should identify alternative risk treatment options

C.

Bytes should suspend all operations until risks are fully eliminated

Which of the following processes may involve increasing risk in order to pursue an opportunity?

A.

Risk analysis

B.

Risk treatment

C.

Risk identification

Scenario 10: CircuitLinking is a company specializing in water purification solutions, designing and manufacturing efficient filtration and treatment systems for both residential and commercial applications. Over the past two years, the company has actively implemented an integrated management system (IMS) that aligns with both ISO/IEC 27001 for information security and ISO 9001 for quality management. Recently, the company has taken a significant step forward by applying for a combined audit, aiming to achieve certification against both ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.

In preparation for the certification audit, CircuitLinking ensured a clear understanding of ISO/IEC 27001 within the company and identified key subject-matter experts to assist the auditors. It also allocated sufficient resources and performed a self-assessment to verify that processes were clearly defined, roles and responsibilities were segregated, and documented information was maintained. To avoid delays, the company gathered all necessary documentation in advance to provide evidence that procedures were in place and effective.

Following the successful completion of the Stage 1 audit, which focused on verifying the design of the management system, the Stage 2 audit was conducted to examine the implementation and effectiveness of the information security and quality management systems.

One of the auditors, Megan, was a previous employee of the company. To uphold the integrity of the certification process, the company notified the certification body about the potential conflict of interest and requested an auditor change. Subsequently, the certification body selected a replacement, ensuring impartiality. Additionally, the company requested a background check of the audit team members; however, the certification body denied this request. The necessary adjustments to the audit plan were made, and transparent communication with stakeholders was maintained.

The audit process continued seamlessly under the new auditor’s guidance. Upon audit completion, the certification body evaluated the results and conclusions of the audit and CircuitLinking's public information and awarded CircuitLinking the combined certification.

A recertification audit for CircuitLinking was conducted to verify that the company's management system continued to meet the required standards and remained effective within the defined scope of certification. CircuitLinking had implemented significant changes to its management system, including a major overhaul of its information security processes, the adoption of new technology platforms, and adjustments to comply with recent changes in industry legislation. Due to these substantial updates, the recertification audit required a Stage 1 assessment to evaluate the impact of these changes.

According to Scenario 10, the recertification audit activities at CircuitLinking included a Stage 1 audit. Is this acceptable?

A.

No, the stage 1 audit is only required for initial certification

B.

Yes, when there are significant changes to the management system, recertification audit activities may need to have a stage 1 audit

C.

No, the stage 1 audit is only required when unresolved nonconformities from the previous audit cycle remain and have not been adequately addressed

D.

No, stage 1 audits are only for new sites, not recertification

Scenario 7: Incident Response at Texas H&H Inc.

Once they made sure that the attackers do not have access in their system, the security administrators decided to proceed with the forensic analysis. They concluded that their access security system was not designed tor threat detection, including the detection of malicious files which could be the cause of possible future attacks.

Based on these findings. Texas H$H inc, decided to modify its access security system to avoid future incidents and integrate an incident management policy in their Information security policy that could serve as guidance for employees on how to respond to similar incidents.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

According to scenario 7, the team prevented a potential attack based on knowledge gained from previous incidents. Is this acceptable?

A.

No, before responding to an information security incident, an information security incident management policy must be established

B.

No, every information security incident is different, hence knowledge gained from previous incidents cannot prevent potential attacks

C.

Yes, in the absence of an information security incident management policy, lessons learned can be applied

Scenario 3: Socket Inc. is a dynamic telecommunications company specializing in wireless products and services, committed to delivering high-quality and secure communication solutions. Socket Inc. leverages innovative technology, including the MongoDB database, renowned for its high availability, scalability, and flexibility, to provide reliable, accessible, efficient, and well-organized services to its customers. Recently, the company faced a security breach where external hackers exploited the default settings of its MongoDB database due to an oversight in the configuration settings, which had not been properly addressed. Fortunately, diligent data backups and centralized logging through a server ensured no loss of information. In response to this incident, Socket Inc. undertook a thorough evaluation of its security measures. The company recognized the urgent need to improve its information security and decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001.

To improve its data security and protect its resources, Socket Inc. implemented entry controls and secure access points. These measures were designed to prevent unauthorized access to critical areas housing sensitive data and essential assets. In compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards, Socket Inc. implemented pre-employment background checks tailored to business needs, information classification, and associated risks. A formalized disciplinary procedure was also established to address policy violations. Additionally, security measures were implemented for personnel working remotely to safeguard information accessed, processed, or stored outside the organization's premises.

Socket Inc. safeguarded its information processing facilities against power failures and other disruptions. Unauthorized access to critical records from external sources led to the implementation of data flow control services to prevent unauthorized access between departments and external networks. In addition, Socket Inc. used data masking based on the organization’s topic-level general policy on access control and other related topic-level general policies and business requirements, considering applicable legislation. It also updated and documented all operating procedures for information processing facilities and ensured that they were accessible to top management exclusively.

The company also implemented a control to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access. The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, regulations, and the information classification scheme. Network segregation using VPNs was proposed to improve security and reduce administrative efforts.

Regarding the design and description of its security controls, Socket Inc. has categorized them into groups, consolidating all controls within a single document. Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information about information security threats and integrate information security into project management.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Based on scenario 3, did Socket Inc. comply with ISO/IEC 27001 organizational controls regarding its operating procedures?

A.

Yes, it did comply with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements

B.

No, operating procedures for information processing facilities should have been specifically provided to personnel who require them

C.

No, operating procedures for information processing facilities should have been exclusively available to the Information Technology Department or a similar unit within the company

Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly

Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.

Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management

Based on scenario 8. does SunDee comply with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements regarding the monitoring and measurement process?

A.

Yes. because the standard does not Indicate when the monitoring and measurement phase should be performed

B.

Yes, because the standard requires that the monitoring and measurement phase be conducted every two years

C.

No, because even though the standard does not imply when such a process should be performed, the company must have a monitoring and measurement process in place

An organization has decided to conduct information security awareness and training sessions on a monthly basis for all employees. Only 45% of employees who attended these sessions were able to pass the exam. What does the percentage represent?

A.

Measurement objective

B.

Attribute

C.

Performance indicator

Scenario 7: Incident Response at Texas H&H Inc.

Once they made sure that the attackers do not have access in their system, the security administrators decided to proceed with the forensic analysis. They concluded that their access security system was not designed tor threat detection, including the detection of malicious files which could be the cause of possible future attacks.

Based on these findings. Texas H$H inc, decided to modify its access security system to avoid future incidents and integrate an incident management policy in their Information security policy that could serve as guidance for employees on how to respond to similar incidents.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Based on scenario 7. what else should Texas H&H Inc. do when responding to the incident?

A.

Decide to stop using cloud services in order to eliminate the risk of similar incidents happening in the future

B.

Record and document the incident which serves as input for future corrective actions

C.

Communicate the updated Information security policy only to the top management of the company

Scenario 4: TradeB. a commercial bank that has just entered the market, accepts deposits from its clients and offers basic financial services and loans for investments. TradeB has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 Having no experience of a management [^system implementation, TradeB's top management contracted two experts to direct and manage the ISMS implementation project.

First, the project team analyzed the 93 controls of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and their objectives Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on three nonnumerical categories (low, medium, and high). They evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria and decided to treat only the high risk category They also decided to focus primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures by establishing a new version of the access control policy, implementing controls to manage and control user access, and implementing a control for ICT readiness for business continuity

Lastly, they drafted a risk assessment report, in which they wrote that if after the implementation of these security controls the level of risk is below the acceptable level, the risks will be accepted

What should TradeB do in order to deal with residual risks? Refer to scenario 4.

A.

TradeB should evaluate, calculate, and document the value of risk reduction following risk treatment

B.

TradeB should immediately implement new controls to treat all residual risks

C.

TradeB should accept the residual risks only above the acceptance level

Scenario 1:

HealthGenic is a leading multi-specialty healthcare organization providing patients with comprehensive medical services in Toronto, Canada. The organization relies heavily on a web-based medical software platform to monitor patient health, schedule appointments, generate customized medical reports, securely store patient data, and facilitate seamless communication among various stakeholders, including patients, physicians, and medical laboratory staff.

As the organization expanded its services and demand grew, frequent and prolonged service interruptions became more common, causing significant disruptions to patient care and administrative processes. As such, HealthGenic initiated a comprehensive risk analysis to assess the severity of risks it faced.

When comparing the risk analysis results with its risk criteria to determine whether the risk and its significance were acceptable or tolerable, HealthGenic noticed a critical gap in its capacity planning and infrastructure resilience. Recognizing the urgency of this issue, HealthGenic reached out to the software development company responsible for its platform. Utilizing its expertise in healthcare technology, data management, and compliance regulations, the software development company successfully resolved the service interruptions.

However, HealthGenic also uncovered unauthorized changes to user access controls. Consequently, some medical reports were altered, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical records. The company swiftly acknowledged and corrected the unintentional changes to user access controls. When analyzing the root cause of these changes, HealthGenic identified a vulnerability related to the segregation of duties within the IT department, which allowed individuals with system administration access also to manage user access controls. Therefore, HealthGenic decided to prioritize controls related to organizational structure, including segregation of duties, job rotations, job descriptions, and approval processes.

In response to the consequences of the service interruptions, the software development company revamped its infrastructure by adopting a scalable architecture hosted on a cloud platform, enabling dynamic resource allocation based on demand. Rigorous load testing and performance optimization were conducted to identify and address potential bottlenecks, ensuring the system could handle increased user loads seamlessly. Additionally, the company promptly assessed the unauthorized access and data alterations.

To ensure that all employees, including interns, are aware of the importance of data security and the proper handling of patient information, HealthGenic included controls tailored to specifically address employee training, management reviews, and internal audits. Additionally, given the sensitivity of patient data, HealthGenic implemented strict confidentiality measures, including robust authentication methods, such as multi-factor authentication.

In response to the challenges faced by HealthGenic, the organization recognized the vital importance of ensuring a secure cloud computing environment. It initiated a comprehensive self-assessment specifically tailored to evaluate and enhance the security of its cloud infrastructure and practices.

Based on scenario 1, what type of controls did HealthGenic decide to prioritize?

A.

Technical controls

B.

Administrative controls

C.

Managerial controls

Scenario 6: Skyver offers worldwide shipping of electronic products, including gaming consoles, flat-screen TVs. computers, and printers. In order to ensure information security, the company has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001.

Colin, the company's best information security expert, decided to hold a training and awareness session for the personnel of the company regarding the information security challenges and other information security-related controls. The session included topics such as Skyver's information security approaches and techniques for mitigating phishing and malware.

One of the participants in the session is Lisa, who works in the HR Department. Although Colin explains the existing Skyver's information security policies and procedures in an honest and fair manner, she finds some of the issues being discussed too technical and does not fully understand the session. Therefore, in a lot of cases, she requests additional help from the trainer and her colleagues

What is the difference between training and awareness? Refer to scenario 6.

A.

Training helps acquire certain skills, whereas awareness develops certain habits and behaviors.

B.

Training helps acquire a skill, whereas awareness helps apply it in practice

C.

Training helps transfer a message with the intent of informing, whereas awareness helps change the behavior toward the message

Scenario 3: Auto Tsaab, a Swedish Car manufacturer founded in and headquartered in Sweden, iS well-known for its innovation in the automotive industry, Despite this Strong reputation, the

company has faced considerable challenges managing its documented information.

Although manual methods of handling this information may have been sufficient in the past, they now pose substantial challenges. particularly in efficiency, accuracy, and scalability. Moreover, entrusting the

responsibility Of managing documented information to a single individual creates a critical vulnerability, introducing a potential single point Of failure within the organization's information management system,

To address these challenges and reinforce its commitment to protecting information assets, Auto Tsaab implemented an information security management system ISMS aligned with ISO/IEC 27001. This move

was critical 10 ensuring the security, confidentiality, and integrity of the companys information, particularly as it transitioned from manual to automated information management methods.

initially, Auto Tsaab established automated checking Systems that detect and Correct corruption. By implementing these automated checks, Auto Tsaab not only improved its ability to maintain data accuracy and

consistency but also significantly reduced the risk of undetected errors.

Central to Auto ISMS ate documented processes. By documenting essential aspects and processes Such as the ISMS scope, information security policy, operational planning and control, information

security risk assessment, internal audit. and management review. Auto Tsaab ensured that these documents were readily available and adequately protected. Moreover. Auto Tsaab utilizes a comprehensive

framework incorporating 36 distinct categories spanning products, services. hardware, and software. This framework. organized in a two-dimensional matrix with six rows and six columns, facilitates the

specification of technical details for components and assemblies in its small automobiles. underscoring the company's commitment to innovation and quality,

TO maintain the industry standards. Auto Tsaab follows rigorous protocols in personnel selection. guaranteeing that every team member is not only eligible but also well-suited for their respective roles within the

organization. Additionally, the company established formal procedures for handling policy violations and appointed an internal consultant to continuously enhance its documentation and security practices.

After committing to ISO/IEC 27001 adherence, was the documented information in Auto Tsaab’s information security management system managed in compliance with the standard?

A.

Yes, the company relied only on manual methods for managing documented information

B.

Yes, the company ensured that documented information was available and protected as needed

C.

Yes, the company delegated the responsibility of managing documented information to a single individual

Question:

Which of the following statements best represents The Open Security Architecture (OSA) framework?

A.

A framework that explains the functionality and technical controls of security, presenting a holistic view of crucial security concerns

B.

A framework that assists organizations in determining the objectives of developing their security architecture, focusing on the initial stages of security architecture

C.

A framework that helps organize enterprise architecture artifacts, including documents, specifications, and models, by considering the impact of these artifacts on various stakeholders

Scenario 10: CircuitLinking is a company specializing in water purification solutions, designing and manufacturing efficient filtration and treatment systems for both residential and commercial applications. Over the past two years, the company has actively implemented an integrated management system (IMS) that aligns with both ISO/IEC 27001 for information security and ISO 9001 for quality management. Recently, the company has applied for a combined audit to achieve certification against both ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.

In preparation, CircuitLinking ensured a clear understanding of ISO/IEC 27001, identified subject-matter experts, allocated resources, and gathered documentation to provide evidence of effective procedures. After passing Stage 1 (focused on verifying the design), Stage 2 was conducted to examine implementation and effectiveness. An auditor with a potential conflict of interest was replaced at the company’s request. The audit process continued, and the company was awarded certification.

During a later recertification audit, significant changes to the management system triggered a Stage 1 assessment to evaluate the impact.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

During the Stage 1 audit, the auditor assessed the design of CircuitLinking's management system. Is this approach recommended?

A.

Yes, during the Stage 1 audit, the auditor should assess the design of the management system

B.

No, during the Stage 1 audit, the auditor should assess the auditee's physical infrastructure

C.

No, during the Stage 1 audit, the auditor should assess the effectiveness of the management system

Scenario 8: SunDee is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, US. Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, SunDee places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. SunDee has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.

In preparation for the recertification audit, SunDee conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment, Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.

During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader.

SunDee's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvement. Decisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow-up action plans, which were then approved by top management.

In response to the review outcomes, SunDee promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its information security measures. Additionally, dashboard tools were introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities. Furthermore, SunDee embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes. The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Based on scenario 8, which of the following performance indicators was NOT established by SunDee?

A.

Information security cases

B.

Training

C.

ISMS weaknesses

The IT Department of a financial institution decided to implement preventive controls to avoid potential security breaches. Therefore, they separated the development, testing, and operating equipment, secured their offices, and used cryptographic keys. However, they are seeking further measures to enhance their security and minimize the risk of security breaches. Which of the following controls would help the IT Department achieve this objective?

A.

Alarms to detect risks related to heat, smoke, fire, or water

B.

Change all passwords of all systems

C.

An access control software to restrict access to sensitive files

Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.

After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS. However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site

However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body

Based on scenario 10. NetworkFuse did not conduct a self-evaluation of the ISMS before the audit. Is this compliant to ISO/IEC 27001?

A.

No, the auditee must review the requirements of clauses 4 to 10 before the conduct of a certification audit

B.

Yes, the standard indicates that the auditee shall rely only on internal audit and management review reports to prepare for the certification audit

C.

Yes, the standard does not require to conduct a self-evaluation before the audit but it is a good practice to follow

Copyright © 2014-2025 Solution2Pass. All Rights Reserved