Month End Sale - Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: xmaspas7

Easiest Solution 2 Pass Your Certification Exams

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

Prepare effectively for your PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam certification with our extensive collection of free, high-quality practice questions. Each question is designed to mirror the actual exam format and objectives, complete with comprehensive answers and detailed explanations. Our materials are regularly updated for 2025, ensuring you have the most current resources to build confidence and succeed on your first attempt.

Which of the following traits is NOT associated with an external audit?

A.

It is always conducted in a planned and timely manner

B.

It assesses the effectiveness and efficiency of ISMS

C.

It has no advisory role within the organization

Jane is a developer looking to deploy an application she created using a programming language supported by her cloud service provider. She does not need to manage the underlying infrastructure like servers or storage, but needs control over the application and its environment. Which cloud service model does Jane need?

A.

Infrastructure as a Service

B.

Platform as a Service

C.

Software as a Service

Scenario 4: UX Software, a company specializing in L.JXfUl design. QA and software testing. and mobile application development. recognized the need to improve its information security measures, As such. the

company implemented an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001- This strategic move aimed to enhance the confidentiality. availability, and integrity Of information shared internally and externally, aligning with industry

standards and best practices.

The integration of ISMS into UX Software's existing processes and ensuring that these processes are adjusted in accordance with the framework of ISMS signified an important milestone. underscoring the

organization'S commitment to information security. UX Software meticulously tailored these procedures to align with the ISMS framework, ensuring they ate contextually and culturally appropriate while avoiding

mismatches. This proactive stance reassured their employees and instilled confidence in their clients, ensuring the protection of sensitive data throughout their operations.

UX Software'S top management took action to define the Scope Of their ISMS to adhere to ISOflEC 27003 to drive this initiative forward. Sven, a key member Of the top management team at UX Software. assumed

the role of project sponsor. a critical position responsible for ensuring the execution of ISMS implementation with adequate resources. Sven's leadership was pivotal in steering the project towards compliance with

27001, thus elevating the organization's information security posture to the highest level-

In parallel with their dedication to information security. UX Software incorporated the technical specifications Of security controls within the justification section Of their Statement Of Applicability This approach

demonstrated their Commitment to meeting ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and ensured thorough documentation and justification Of Security controls, thereby Strengthening the overall Security framework Of the

organization. Additionally. UX Software established a committee responsible for ensuring the effectiveness of correctrve actions, managing the ISMS documented information, and continually improving the ISMS

while addressing nonconformities.

By implementing an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001, UX Software improved its information security and reinforced its position as a reliable partner. This dedication to information security serves as a testament to

UX Software's commitment to delivering high-quality software solutions while safeguarding the interests of its internal stakeholders and valued clients.

According to Scenario 4, UX Software decided to use the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27003 to define the scope of the ISMS. Is the scope defined in accordance with these guidelines?

A.

Yes, they defined the scope according to ISO/IEC 27003

B.

No, they should have followed a multi-step approach involving management representatives and refinement

C.

No, they should have determined the final scope first

A tech company has implemented a security measure to confirm the secure removal or overwriting of sensitive data and licensed software on equipment before disposal or reuse. What type of security control was implemented?

A.

Physical control

B.

Technological control

C.

Organizational control

Scenario 9: OpenTech provides IT and communications services. It helps data communication enterprises and network operators become multi-service providers During an internal audit, its internal auditor, Tim, has identified nonconformities related to the monitoring procedures He identified and evaluated several system Invulnerabilities.

Tim found out that user IDs for systems and services that process sensitive information have been reused and the access control policy has not been followed After analyzing the root causes of this nonconformity, the ISMS project manager developed a list of possible actions to resolve the nonconformity. Then, the ISMS project manager analyzed the list and selected the activities that would allow the elimination of the root cause and the prevention of a similar situation in the future. These activities were included in an action plan The action plan, approved by the top management, was written as follows:

A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department

The approved action plan was implemented and all actions described in the plan were documented.

Based on scenario 9. is the action plan for the identified nonconformities sufficient to eliminate the detected nonconformities?

A.

Yes, because a separate action plan has been created for the identified nonconformity

B.

No, because the action plan does not include a timeframe for implementation

C.

No, because the action plan does not address the root cause of the identified nonconformity

Scenario:

Evergreen tailored the format and naming convention of their information security policy to align with their internal structure and needs.

Question:

Is this acceptable?

A.

No – the policy must adhere to the predefined template set by ISO/IEC 27001

B.

Yes – the organization can determine the formats and names of these policy documents that meet the organization’s needs

C.

No – the policy format and naming conventions must be approved by an external auditor before being implemented

Scenario 10: ProEBank

ProEBank is an Austrian financial institution known for its comprehensive range of banking services. Headquartered in Vienna, it leaverages the city's advanced technological and financial ecosystem To enhance its security posture, ProEBank has implementied an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001. After a year of having the ISMS in place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001.

To prepare for the audit, the company first informed its employees for the audit and organized training sessions to prepare them. It also prepared documented information in advance, so that the documents would be ready when external auditors asked to review them Additionally, it determined which of its employees have the knowledge to help the external auditors understand and evaluate the processes.

During the planning phase for the audit, ProEBank reviewed the list of assigned auditors provided by the certification body. Upon reviewing the list, ProEBank identified a potential conflict of interest with one of the auditors, who had previously worked for ProEBank's mein competitor in the banking industry To ensure the integrity of the audit process. ProEBank refused to undergo the audit until a completely new audit team was assigned. In response, the certification body acknowledged the conflict of interest and made the necessary adjustments to ensure the impartiality of the audit team

After the resolution of this issue, the audit team assessed whether the ISMS met both the standard's requirements and the company's objectives. During this process, the audit team focused on reviewing documented information.

Three weeks later, the team conducted an on-site visit to the auditee’s location where they aimed to evaluate whether the ISMS conformed to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. was effectively implemented, and enabled the auditee to reach its information security objectives. After the on-site visit the team prepared the audit conclusions and notified the auditee that some minor nonconformities had been detected The audit team leader then issued a recommendation for certification.

After receiving the recommendation from the audit team leader, the certification body established a committee to make the decision for certification. The committee included one member from the audit team and two other experts working for the certification body.

The certification body’s final decision for certification was made by a committee that included one auditor from the audit team and two other experts.

Question:

Is this acceptable?

A.

No – the certification body must ensure that persons that make the decision for certification are different from those who carried out the audit

B.

No – the committee should have included only members from the audit team and not other experts that were not part of the audit

C.

Yes – the committee must include one member from the audit team and other individuals working for the certification body

Copyright © 2014-2025 Solution2Pass. All Rights Reserved