MSP-Practitioner PeopleCert MSP Practitioner, 5th edition Exam Free Practice Exam Questions (2026 Updated)

In MSP, threats are negative risks that could impact the programme adversely. Valid responses to threats include Avoiding, Accepting, or Reducing the risk to mitigate potential harm. However, “Enhance” is not a valid response for a threat because it implies increasing the likelihood or impact, which is contrary to risk management objectives.

The MSP Practitioner states: “Threats should be minimized not enhanced,” reinforcing the principle that risk responses should focus on reducing negative effects or avoiding risks altogether. Accepting a risk might be chosen when mitigation is impractical or cost-prohibitive but still requires monitoring.

Understanding and applying appropriate risk responses is vital to effective programme risk management and maintaining control over uncertainties that could derail delivery.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The Knowledge Theme in MSP 5th Edition covers the management of information, including how it is communicated to stakeholders to support the transformation. A core element of this theme is Stakeholder Engagement, which requires a structured approach to informing, involving, and influencing those affected by the programme's outcomes.

In the scenario described, the activity of making "internal and external announcements" to inform staff and customers about new contact details is a fundamental part of the programme's communication strategy. Option B is the correct answer because the Knowledge theme ensures that the right information reaches the right people at the right time. In MSP 5th Edition, communication is not just about broadcasting; it is about ensuring that the information provided (the new contact details) enables the successful adoption of the new capability (the rationalized call centre). Without this flow of knowledge, customers would be unable to access the service, and the benefit of "longer opening hours" would not be realized. This activity is a practical application of the theme's focus on information management and stakeholder communication to bridge the gap between delivering a technical capability and achieving a successful business outcome.

Programmes aimed at political and societal change face lower success probability when outcomes are vague or have long-term horizons that are difficult to define and measure. The MSP Practitioner explains: “Vaguely defined outcomes decrease probability of success.” Long-term societal effects are often uncertain and harder to control, thus reducing the clarity needed for successful programme management and delivery.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

In MSP 5th Edition, the 'Justification' and 'Benefits' themes emphasize that benefits must be measurable and expressed in a way that allows for objective assessment of the programme's value. When a CFO requests a Net Present Value (NPV) calculation, they are looking for a financial representation of the programme's worth. NPV is a financial metric used to represent the value of future cash flows in today's terms. Therefore, the benefits feeding into this calculation must be expressed in financial terms.

Option B is the correct answer because "cost savings" are tangible, financial benefits that can be directly used in an NPV calculation. In the context of the UU scenario, HR efficiencies leading to reduced staff costs provide a direct cash-flow impact. While Option C (additional sales) is also financial, it is often more speculative than cost savings. Option D uses a "cash proxy," which is a technique used in MSP to assign a monetary value to non-financial benefits (like customer satisfaction), but since the scenario specifically mentions HR efficiencies and cost-saving metrics are already available, a direct financial measure is preferred for a formal NPV. Option A is incorrect because non-financial measures (like brand reputation) cannot be directly included in an NPV formula without conversion. MSP 5th Edition stresses that the Business Case must be supported by a robust Benefit Realization Plan where financial benefits are clearly quantified to justify the investment.

The critical organizational elements in MSP include Corporate strategy, Delivery mechanisms for change, and the Business as usual environment. Delivery mechanisms for change refer to the structures and processes organizations use to implement and manage changes introduced by programmes. These elements are foundational to effective governance and ensure alignment with strategic objectives. Other options like Leading change and Stakeholder engagement are important but classified differently within MSP's framework.

One of the key outputs of the 'Defining the Programme' process is establishing the Governance Baseline. This baseline sets out the governance framework, including roles, responsibilities, controls, and decision-making structures that will apply throughout the programme lifecycle. Defining the governance baseline early ensures clear accountability and oversight, which is vital for managing complexity and risk in transformational change.

The MSP Practitioner explains that during 'Defining the Programme,' “Governance is baselined” to create a robust foundation for programme control. This process involves formalizing the authority of the Senior Responsible Owner (SRO), the programme board, and other governance roles, ensuring they are empowered to manage and oversee programme activities effectively. It also includes establishing reporting lines, approval mechanisms, and quality assurance controls to maintain programme integrity.

Without a clearly defined governance baseline, programmes risk poor decision-making, ambiguity in responsibility, and inconsistent oversight, which can lead to scope creep, misalignment with strategic goals, and failure to realize benefits. The governance baseline serves as a reference point against which programme performance and compliance can be measured, enabling corrective action when deviations occur.

In summary, the Governance Baseline is a critical control output that defines how the programme will be directed and controlled, safeguarding successful delivery and alignment with corporate strategy throughout the programme’s life.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

In the MSP 5th Edition, the principle of 'Lead with Purpose' is fundamental to ensuring that all stakeholders understand the "why" behind a programme's existence. This principle dictates that a programme must have a clear vision and a consistent direction, which is steered by senior leadership. According to the MSP 5th Edition guidance, leading with purpose means that those in leadership roles must be able to articulate the future state and the justification for the change. It is not merely about managing tasks; it is about providing the strategic narrative that justifies the transformation and the impact it will have on the organization and its people.

In the scenario provided, the CEngO is acting as a visible leader. The reason Option B is the correct application of this principle is that 'Lead with Purpose' focuses on the clarity of the Vision and the Strategic Objectives. By explaining "what changes are being made and why," the CEngO is ensuring that the staff—even those facing redundancy—understand the broader purpose of the programme. This transparency is essential for maintaining integrity and trust during a period of uncertainty. While providing support (Option A) is a critical part of stakeholder engagement and people management, the core of the 'Lead with Purpose' principle is the communication of the programme's intent and the rationale for the journey being undertaken. This principle ensures that the programme remains aligned with its desired outcomes and that leadership remains accountable for the direction of the change.

Decision Item

Document

Each project will have a change control authority... up to £5,000. Above this level... referred to a programme authority... over £10,000 to the CEO/CFO

Programme strategy: Decision-making approach

There is a low likelihood that legislation may be passed that allows customers to immediately switch utility providers without penalty

Risk register

'Return on investment' will be used at the programme level as the basis for calculating the profit or loss generated in relation to money invested

Decision register

Setting monetary thresholds for escalation and delegation is a "Decision-making approach" activity. Legislative uncertainty with a probability and impact is a Risk. Documenting the specific criteria or "basis" used for previous or current decisions belongs in the Decision Register.

When a viable Business Case does not emerge, seeking further funding is generally not considered a normal or effective response. The MSP Practitioner explicitly states that funding should not be increased without a credible justification, as this risks wasted resources on programmes unlikely to deliver benefits.

Instead, typical responses include redesigning a less ambitious Blueprint to reduce complexity or costs, closing the programme if it is no longer viable, or exploring alternative approaches to delivering the Blueprint that might improve feasibility and value realization.

The Business Case acts as a foundational control and justification mechanism, ensuring programmes only proceed with a clear strategic rationale and realistic benefit realization plan. Continuing to invest without a strong Business Case undermines governance principles and risks programme failure.

Therefore, while redesign or closure are pragmatic approaches, “Further funding is not provided in case of inability to find a viable business case,” reinforcing MSP’s disciplined approach to investment and risk management.

Both the Business Change Manager (BCM) and the Programme Manager share responsibility for aligning projects with benefits realization. The MSP Practitioner highlights that “Both roles are responsible for this task as projects are overseen by programme manager, and benefits are under BCM supervision.”

The Programme Manager ensures that project outputs are delivered on time, within scope, and aligned to programme objectives, while the BCM ensures that these outputs translate into tangible benefits once transitioned into operational use.

This dual responsibility ensures seamless coordination between delivery and realization functions, bridging the gap between project outputs and strategic outcomes. Without this collaboration, there is a risk of projects delivering outputs that fail to produce the intended business improvements.

Together, the Programme Manager and BCM form a critical partnership in MSP’s approach to ensuring benefits are fully realized, tracked, and maximized throughout and beyond the programme lifecycle.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

In MSP 5th Edition, a Risk is defined as an uncertain event or set of events that, should it occur, will have an effect on the achievement of objectives. The Risk Register is used to capture these uncertainties. It is vital to distinguish between a "risk" (uncertainty about the future) and an "issue" (something that has already happened or a current fact).

Option C represents a classic programme risk: there is uncertainty regarding the training requirements for a future project, which creates a potential threat to the timeline of Tranche 3. This uncertainty needs to be managed, analyzed, and mitigated, making it a perfect entry for the risk register.

Option A describes a planned outcome or benefit.

Option B describes the current "as-is" state (a fact).

Option D describes a project-level issue (staff sickness and delay) that the project manager expects to resolve. While it could be escalated, the inherent uncertainty regarding the future impact on Tranche 3 in Option C is a more fundamental programme-level risk that must be recorded and tracked.

All the options listed are correct. Benefits Management in MSP ensures the programme is aligned with strategic goals, understands both positive and negative impacts, and integrates closely with the transformational flow to realize benefits effectively. The MSP Practitioner confirms: "All of the options are correct," underscoring the comprehensive nature of benefits management across the programme lifecycle.

The statement that “Programme control defines reporting mechanism” is not true. While programme control encompasses refining delivery, managing ambiguity, and justifying programme continuation, defining the reporting mechanism is typically a management or communication function rather than a control function.

The MSP Practitioner clarifies: “Programme control deals with improving delivery, reducing ambiguity & bringing certainty and justifies continuance of programme,” focusing on the governance and decision-making controls rather than specific reporting structures.

Effective programme control ensures programmes remain viable and aligned with strategic objectives through structured oversight and governance processes.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

In MSP 5th Edition, the 'Deliver the capabilities' process is primarily concerned with the day-to-day coordination and management of the projects within a tranche. The Programme Manager is the role responsible for the setup, management, and delivery of the programme. A key part of this role is managing the dependencies between projects and across tranches to ensure that the capability delivered is coherent and remains aligned with the target operating model.

The concern raised by the Call Centre Manager is a classic dependency and risk management issue. The work in Tranche 1 (Employment Contracts) must be aligned with the future work in Tranche 2 (Web-based portal) to avoid the "rework" mentioned. According to the MSP framework, the Programme Manager is responsible for ensuring that project managers are aware of these interdependencies. They must facilitate the necessary communication between the functional business leads (like the Call Centre Manager) and the project teams. While the SRO (Option B) is ultimately accountable for the programme's success, the active management of these operational risks and the coordination of technical work to prevent waste falls squarely within the remit of the Programme Manager. The Programme Manager ensures that the design remains consistent across the tranches, thereby addressing the root cause of the manager's concern before it manifests as an actual issue.

Training, moving, and supporting operational units fall under business change and transition costs. These costs are related to the activities required to move from the current state to the future state, including training staff and supporting new operations. The MSP Practitioner clarifies: “Training and moving an operational unit is related to transition,” distinguishing these from capital costs (assets) and programme management costs.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

MSP 5th Edition advocates for the use of different delivery life cycles depending on the nature of the work. While some projects are best suited to a "linear" (waterfall) approach, others benefit from incremental or continual improvement (agile) approaches. Continual improvement is particularly effective when the outcome can be delivered in stages, allowing for feedback and refinement at each step.

Option D is the correct answer because the physical rollout of smart meters is a repetitive process that provides numerous opportunities for learning. By "installing new water meters gradually," the programme can apply lessons learned from the first set of installations to the next, improving efficiency, customer communication, and technical reliability as the rollout progresses. This is the essence of the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle within the transformational flow.

Option A (legal/contractual) usually requires a discrete, linear completion.

Option B (IT systems) often requires complex integration that might be incremental but is less about "continual improvement" of a repetitive rollout.

Option C is a R&D/product development activity.

Option D represents the best fit for an iterative, learning-based approach where the pace and quality of delivery are refined based on real-world operational feedback.

A Vision Statement is a succinct and compelling description of the desirable future state that the programme aims to achieve. It serves to inspire and align stakeholders around the intended outcomes and benefits. The MSP Practitioner outlines key characteristics of a Vision Statement, including that it must describe a desirable future and be concise to ensure clarity and focus.

Key benefits are often implicit within the Vision, providing a motivational overview without delving into detailed measurement or timelines.

However, the Vision Statement is NOT normally time-dependent. Time frames and milestones are introduced later in the programme planning stages, such as in the Business Case or Programme Plan. The MSP Practitioner explains: “Vision statement does not include time frames until programme is time bound in nature,” which means the Vision is more about 'what' will be achieved rather than 'when.'

This approach allows the Vision to remain stable even if timeframes or specific project plans evolve. The focus remains on the transformational goal, providing a constant reference point as the programme adapts to challenges and changes.

Therefore, including time-dependence in the Vision Statement could unnecessarily constrain the programme’s strategic focus or create misalignment if schedules shift.

Among the options, "Remaining aligned with corporate strategy" is identified as a core MSP programme management principle. The principles underpin the mindset and behaviors needed for successful programmes. Other options, like Quality and assurance management and Leadership and stakeholder management, fall under governance themes or transformational flow rather than principles.