PMP PMI Project Management Professional (2025 Version) Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

The project manager should address the issue directly and promptly with the team member involved. One-on-one dialogue helps reset behavioral expectations and maintains professional conduct when dealing with customers. It also shows leadership and reinforces team norms.

Option A may be necessary later but may embarrass the individual if done publicly.

Option C may show empathy but avoids addressing the issue.

Option D is too broad and doesn’t directly resolve the immediate behavior.

For a project in a remote rural area, especially one nearing completion, the most effective communication method with the local community would likely be through newspapers. This approach is suitable for reaching a broad audience in a locality where digital communication channels like social media or email may not be as accessible or frequently used. Newspapers are a traditional and reliable means of communication that can effectively convey important updates to all segments of the local population, including those who may not have access to or prefer not to use digital media.

The PMBOK® Guide emphasizes the need to tailor communication methods to the stakeholders’ needs and the context of the project1. It suggests that the format of communication should depend on the type of stakeholder, and various ways should be tailored to each group1. This is supported by the Professional in Business Analysis (PBA) reference materials, which advocate for the analysis of stakeholder needs and the selection of an engagement approach that best suits stakeholders’ needs for effective communication and collaboration2.

In the context of an agile project, when there is a shift in strategic objectives, it is crucial for the project manager to engage with the team to understand the implications of the change. Scheduling a meeting with the team allows for a collaborative assessment of the impact, enabling the team to adapt their current work and future iterations to align with the new strategic direction. This approach is consistent with agile principles, which emphasize team collaboration, responsiveness to change, and maintaining alignment with organizational goals123.

The answer is informed by resources on agile project management and the PMBOK® guide, which provide insights into managing strategic shifts in an agile project environment123.

In virtual and culturally diverse teams, inclusivity and engagement are best supported by agreed-upon team norms and working agreements. Ground rules that respect time zones, cultures, and communication styles foster equity and psychological safety.

PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition and the Agile Practice Guide both emphasize the importance of team agreements, team charters, and cultural awareness in virtual settings.

Option A is supportive but doesn’t address inclusion issues directly.

Option B adds bureaucracy and fragmentation.

Option D is one part of inclusion but not a complete solution.

 Acceptance criteria are essential in Agile methodologies to ensure that a feature meets the necessary conditions for user satisfaction and project objectives. By integrating the acceptance criteria review into the DoR, the project manager can ensure that each feature’s requirements are clearly understood before development begins. This approach aligns with the Agile principle of continuous collaboration and iterative improvement. Including associated tests in the DoD ensures that features are not only developed but also verified against the acceptance criteria before they are considered complete.

 Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a systematic process used to identify the source of a problem and find a solution that prevents the problem from returning. It involves a collaborative effort where all team members can contribute to identifying the root cause. Facilitating a meeting where everyone can share their ideas ensures a comprehensive analysis and that all potential contributing factors are considered1. References: = Root Cause Analysis Steps PMP Exam Guide1; Root Cause Analysis for Business Analysts2.

 In this scenario, the project manager should engage in negotiations to address the conflict of resource allocation. The PMBOK Guide suggests that project managers should possess negotiation skills to resolve such conflicts effectively. By negotiating, the project manager can work towards a solution that satisfies the needs of the operations department while also ensuring the SME’s contributions to the project are not lost, thus keeping the project on track.

The response is based on general project management principles as outlined in the PMBOK Guide and conflict resolution strategies that include negotiation, which are part of the PMP’s body of knowledge.

In distributed or virtual teams, poor communication and lack of effective collaboration tools can severely hinder progress. Before escalating to the sponsor or modifying the rollout strategy, the project manager should first assess the team's ability to collaborate and identify if technical or communication barriers are the root cause.

The PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition (Chapter on Team Performance Domain) emphasizes the need to support remote and distributed teams with adequate tools and processes. The Agile Practice Guide also recommends leveraging technology to bridge gaps in distributed agile teams.

Option A is premature without addressing the root cause.

Option B can backfire and does not solve collaboration issues.

Option D might be a long-term strategy but is not the first corrective step.

 In Agile project management, especially during sprints, it is crucial to address performance issues promptly and constructively. Informal verbal communication, such as a one-on-one conversation, is often the most effective way to handle such situations. This approach allows for immediate feedback and the opportunity to discuss any obstacles the team member may be facing, as well as potential solutions. It also helps maintain a positive team dynamic and prevents the issue from escalating12.

 According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, the project manager should lead and support the project team and collaborate with them to deliver the project outcomes. In this case, the project manager should meet with the project team to discuss the concerns and determine how to ensure the project’s deliverable can compete with the competitor’s, such as by incorporating customer feedback, enhancing the features, or applying the newest technology. The project manager should not perform a Kano analysis, as this is a technique to prioritize the customer requirements, not the competitor’s. The project manager should not meet with the development team only, as this may exclude other team members who may have valuable inputs. The project manager should not note this concern in the risk register and meet with the sales team only, as this may not address the root cause of the problem and may not involve the project team12. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 3: Project Performance Domain, Section 3.3: Lead the Team, Page 65; Chapter 4: Project Delivery, Section 4.2: Collect Requirements, Page 89.

To implement Agile practices effectively, the project lead should:

A: Introduce sprints and sprint reviews to support iterative planning and frequent inspection.

B: Establish team working agreements (ground rules) to improve self-management.

E: Foster full participation in daily stand-ups to promote collaboration and team accountability.

Option C is too restrictive; valuable issues can be parked and discussed after.

Option D goes against Agile principles, where the team self-manages and Scrum Master facilitates rather than delegates meeting leadership.

In an agile project management context, the scope is not fixed but is regularly reviewed and adapted based on stakeholder feedback and project progress12. The project manager should facilitate collaboration among sponsors, stakeholders, and the team to ensure a shared understanding of the product vision and to clarify expectations3. This approach aligns with the agile principle of welcoming changing requirements and focusing on customer collaboration over contract negotiation1. References:

"What Is Agile Project Management? | A Comprehensive Guide"1.

"What is Scope Management in Agile Project Management - BVOP"2.

"Iron Triangle Project Management | Atlassian"3.

 The project manager should schedule a meeting with the new team member to understand the proposed new method of testing. This approach aligns with the principles of agile methodologies, which prioritize individuals and interactions over processes and tools. It encourages open communication and collaboration within the team, which can lead to innovative improvements in the project’s processes. By learning about the new testing method, the project manager can evaluate its potential benefits and facilitate a discussion among the team members to decide whether to integrate this new method into their current practices.

The best approach in this situation is for the project manager to facilitate a discussion between the team members and the construction manager to address the cultural differences and seek solutions. This aligns with conflict resolution strategies that emphasize communication, understanding, and collaboration to resolve conflicts in a multicultural team setting12. By discussing the concerns openly, the project manager can help foster mutual understanding and respect among team members, which is crucial for team coordination and performance1.

In government-funded projects during political transitions, proactive stakeholder engagement is essential to maintain continuity. The project sponsor has the political influence and position to communicate with the incoming administration to highlight the project's progress, strategic value, and alignment with national/international goals.

According to the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition, managing stakeholder relationships and ensuring continuous support is critical in such scenarios.

Option A delays progress unnecessarily.

Option C supports documentation but not continuity.

Option D is passive and ignores risk mitigation.

When discrepancies arise between documented scope and current deliverables, the first step is to understand why and how they occurred. The project manager should work with the team to review the change history and clarify whether these changes were officially approved. This enables informed conversations with stakeholders and potential corrective action.

According to the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition (Measurement and Stakeholder Performance Domains), issue resolution starts with identification and root cause analysis before initiating change or communications actions.

Option A addresses communication frequency but not the root cause.

Option C is premature if a valid change was already made.

Option D may be done later but doesn’t resolve the current concern.

When a stakeholder identifies compliance-related gaps and issues and provides suggestions, it is crucial for the project manager to engage directly with the staff responsible for compliance. This allows for a detailed understanding of the issues, evaluation of the suggestions’ feasibility, and collaborative development of solutions to address the compliance gaps. It is a proactive approach that prioritizes resolving the issues promptly, which is essential given the legal and regulatory implications of compliance matters.

(Based on the PMBOK® Guide and standards from the Project Management Institute1, and the principles of addressing compliance issues as outlined in the Professional in Business Analysis materials2.)

When dealing with a micromanaging sponsor, it’s essential for the project manager to address the situation effectively. Here are some strategies for handling this type of sponsor:

1.Establish Clear Communication Channels:

oRegularly communicate with the sponsor to provide updates and seek input.

oSet up weekly sponsor meetings to discuss project progress, concerns, and critical decisions.

oAlign sponsor expectations by fostering a collaborative environment through proactive communication.

2.Set Clear Expectations and Boundaries:

oDefine the sponsor’s role and responsibilities clearly at the project outset.

oEnsure the sponsor understands the project manager’s authority and decision-making process.

oAddress the need for trust and delegation, emphasizing that micromanaging can hinder efficiency.

3.Understand the Root Cause:

oFind out why the sponsor feels the need to micromanage.

oExplore any legitimate reasons behind their behavior (e.g., past project failures, lack of confidence).

4.Educate the Sponsor:

oExplain the negative impact of micromanagement on team effectiveness and project progress.

oEmphasize that excessive oversight can slow down decision-making and implementation.

5.Agile Approach:

oConsider discussing an agile approach with the sponsor.

oAgile methodologies allow for flexibility, iterative development, and continuous feedback.

oHighlight how agile practices can simplify the project while maintaining scope and delivering value.

Remember that effective communication and collaboration are key to managing difficult sponsors. By addressing the micromanaging behavior and finding common ground, the project manager can create a more productive and supportive project environment.

In Agile, scope is flexible, and time and resources are generally fixed per sprint. Therefore, when scope seems unmanageable, prioritization is the correct approach. The Scrum team—including the Product Owner—must decide which items provide the most value and can fit within the sprint.

Option B aligns with Agile principles by focusing on value delivery and continuous negotiation. This maintains flexibility while aiming to achieve business objectives.

Option A contradicts Agile team principles by injecting resources mid-sprint.

Option C is partially correct but lacks the negotiation and prioritization step.

Option D contradicts Agile’s principle of team-driven planning and adaptive scope.

To estimate the savings using in-house resources, the project manager would apply the PERT formula to calculate the expected duration of the project. The PERT formula is ( TE = \frac{(O + 4M + P)}{6} ), where TE is the expected time, O is the optimistic time, M is the most likely time, and P is the pessimistic time1.

Given the optimistic term of 4 months, the most expected term of 5 months, and the pessimistic term of 6 months, the expected duration (TE) would be ( TE = \frac{(4 + (4 \times 5) + 6)}{6} = \frac{(4 + 20 + 6)}{6} = \frac{30}{6} = 5 ) months.

The total cost for in-house resources for 5 months would be:

Two engineers: ( 2 \times US$700 \times 5 = US$7,000 )

One project manager: ( US$1,600 \times 5 = US$8,000 )

Additional expenses: ( US$2,000 \times 5 = US$10,000 )

Total in-house cost: ( US$7,000 + US$8,000 + US$10,000 = US$25,000 )

The company paid US$60,000 to an external subcontractor last year. Therefore, the estimated savings would be: ( US$60,000 - US$25,000 = US$35,000 )

However, since the options provided do not include US$35,000, and the closest option to the calculated savings is US$40,000, the answer would be C. US$40,000. This discrepancy might be due to additional factors not accounted for in the question’s details, such as indirect costs or a margin of error in the estimates.