PMP PMI Project Management Professional (2025 Version) Free Practice Exam Questions (2025 Updated)

 In a hybrid project, the project manager is responsible for managing the expectations and requirements of all the stakeholders, both internal and external. The project manager also has the authority to approve or reject changes to the project scope, schedule, budget, and quality. Therefore, the team member should inform the stakeholder that the correct procedure for new requirements is to provide it directly to the project manager, who will then evaluate the impact of the change and decide whether to accept or reject it. This way, the team member can avoid being distracted from their work and maintain the productivity of the project. References:

Hybrid Project Management: What is it, Methodology & Software - Teamhood

What Is Stakeholder Management? - ProjectManager

 According to the PMBOK Guide, an iterative-based strategy is a release strategy that delivers the product incrementally over multiple iterations, each adding more functionality and value. This strategy allows the project team to obtain early feedback from the customers and stakeholders, and to adapt to changing requirements and priorities. In this scenario, the project manager should recommend an iterative-based strategy to maximize value by releasing the product to each country as it is finalized and ready for release in that country. This will help to meet the specific requirements of each country, and to deliver value faster and more frequently. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 19-20. PMP Questions page 515, question 515. PMP Practice Exam, question 4.

 A risk register is a tool to identify, document, monitor and resolve project risks. It is an essential part of the risk management process and should involve the participation of relevant stakeholders. Stakeholder engagement is a process of identifying, understanding and involving people who have a stake in the outcome of the project. Effective stakeholder engagement requires ongoing communication, consultation, and collaboration. Therefore, the best option for the project manager is to run the meeting with the available stakeholders and then follow up with each one of the absent stakeholders to get their input. This way, the project manager can ensure that the risk register is comprehensive, accurate and reflects the views and concerns of all stakeholders. Canceling the meeting and creating the risk register using the project documents (option A) is not a good option because it does not involve the stakeholders and may miss some important risks or perspectives. Continuing the meeting and sending the updated risk register to all stakeholders (option B) is also not a good option because it does not allow the absent stakeholders to provide their input or feedback on the risk register. Escalating the issue of stakeholders not attending the meeting to the project sponsor (option D) is not a good option either because it does not address the root cause of the problem and may create unnecessary conflict or resentment among the stakeholders. References:

1: Risk Register: A Project Manager’s Guide with Examples [2023] • Asana

2: 10 Principles Of Stakeholder Engagement | APM

3: What is Stakeholder Engagement, and Why is it Important for Strategic Planning?

To answer this question, we need to calculate the earned value (EV), the planned value (PV), and the actual cost (AC) of the project based on the given information. Then, we can compare them to determine the project status in terms of schedule and cost performance.

The earned value (EV) is the monetary value of the work completed so far. It can be calculated by multiplying the percent complete of the project by the budget at completion (BAC), which is the total approved budget for the project. The BAC can be obtained by adding the approved work package cost estimates, the contingency reserves, and the management reserves. In this case, the BAC is:

BAC=9500+500+(10%×500)=10550

The EV is then:

EV=50%×10550=5275

The planned value (PV) is the monetary value of the work that was planned to be completed by a certain date. It can be calculated by multiplying the planned percent of the project by the BAC. In this case, the PV is:

PV=40%×10550=4220

The actual cost (AC) is the monetary value of the work actually performed. It is given as:

AC=4500

To determine the project status, we can use the cost variance (CV) and the schedule variance (SV) formulas. The CV is the difference between the EV and the AC, and it indicates whether the project is under budget or over budget. A positive CV means the project is under budget, while a negative CV means the project is over budget. The CV is:

CV=EV−AC=5275−4500=775

The SV is the difference between the EV and the PV, and it indicates whether the project is ahead of schedule or behind schedule. A positive SV means the project is ahead of schedule, while a negative SV means the project is behind schedule. The SV is:

SV=EV−PV=5275−4220=1055

From the CV and SV values, we can conclude that the project is under budget and ahead of schedule. To find the percentage of deviation from the planned cost and schedule, we can use the cost performance index (CPI) and the schedule performance index (SPI) formulas. The CPI is the ratio of the EV to the AC, and it measures the cost efficiency of the project. A CPI greater than 1 means the project is under budget, while a CPI less than 1 means the project is over budget. The CPI is:

CPI=ACEV​=45005275​=1.17

The SPI is the ratio of the EV to the PV, and it measures the schedule efficiency of the project. A SPI greater than 1 means the project is ahead of schedule, while a SPI less than 1 means the project is behind schedule. The SPI is:

SPI=PVEV​=42205275​=1.25

From the CPI and SPI values, we can calculate the percentage of deviation from the planned cost and schedule by subtracting 1 and multiplying by 100. The percentage of deviation from the planned cost is:

(CPI−1)×100=(1.17−1)×100=17%

The percentage of deviation from the planned schedule is:

(SPI−1)×100=(1.25−1)×100=25%

Therefore, the project cost is 17% lower than planned, and the project schedule is 25% ahead of planned. Among the given options, the closest one is B. The project cost is 10% lower than planned.

According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the tools and techniques for the Plan Risk Management process is the review of lessons learned from previous projects. This helps the project manager to identify potential risks, causes, and responses for the current project. By studying and applying the lessons learned from the failed project, the project manager can avoid repeating the same mistakes and improve the project performance. This is also consistent with the principle of continuous improvement and organizational learning. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 397-398. PMP Sample Test Questions, question 3. Free PMP Exam Practice Questions, question 3. PMP Questions page 485, question 485.

 The project manager should plan for incremental and iterative delivery based on feedback from the marketing and sales team because this is an example of adaptive development approach, which is suitable for projects with high uncertainty and changing requirements. By delivering value in increments and iterations, the project manager can validate the assumptions and benefits of the project, and adjust the scope and direction as needed. This way, the project manager can address the stakeholders’ concerns and ensure that the project delivers the most efficient and effective sales channels for the organization. References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 18, section 1.2.3.2

PMI-PBA Guide, 1st edition, page 13, section 1.3.2.2

PMP Sample Test Questions, question 1

Free PMP Practice Exam Questions, question 1

PMP Questions page 484, question 484

The project manager should review the communications management plan and submit a change request if required. The communications management plan is a document that describes how the project information will be communicated to the stakeholders. It defines the communication requirements, methods, formats, frequency, and responsibilities for each stakeholder group. The project manager should review the communications management plan to understand the current communication expectations and agreements, and to identify any gaps or conflicts between the sponsor’s request and the key team members’ preferences. If the communications management plan needs to be updated to accommodate the sponsor’s request, the project manager should submit a change request and follow the change control process. Negotiating with the key team members to send a daily report and letting the sponsor know that the project cost will increase (option A) may be a possible solution, but it should be done after reviewing the communications management plan and submitting a change request if required. Recommending to the sponsor that performance of the project be reviewed once per week (option B) may not satisfy the sponsor’s needs and expectations, and may also contradict the communications management plan. Evaluating the capacity of each team member to attend daily meetings in person or virtually and reducing the time of each meeting (option D) may be a good practice, but it should also be done after reviewing the communications management plan and submitting a change request if required. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 377-378, section 10.1 Plan Communications Management

PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 474, question 474, answer and explanation

 According to the PMI, a hybrid approach is a combination of two or more project methodologies, such as waterfall and agile, to suit the needs of the project. A hybrid approach can offer flexibility, adaptability, and customer focus, while also maintaining some level of predictability, structure, and control. However, a hybrid approach can also pose some challenges, such as stakeholder resistance, misalignment, or confusion. Therefore, the project manager needs to address and remove any obstacles and blockers that may prevent the team from achieving their goals. Obstacles and blockers are issues or impediments that hinder or stop the team’s progress, such as lack of resources, unclear requirements, technical debt, conflicts, communication gaps, etc. The project manager should follow these steps to address and remove obstacles and blockers for the team:

Identify the obstacles and blockers by using various techniques, such as daily stand-up meetings, retrospectives, feedback sessions, surveys, etc.

Analyze the impact, root cause, and priority of the obstacles and blockers by using tools, such as issue logs, risk registers, impact analysis, root cause analysis, prioritization matrix, etc.

Develop and implement solutions to remove the obstacles and blockers by using methods, such as problem-solving, negotiation, escalation, delegation, collaboration, etc.

Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the solutions by using measures, such as team velocity, customer satisfaction, quality metrics, etc.

Communicate and report the status and results of the solutions to the relevant stakeholders, such as the team, the sponsor, the customer, etc.

By addressing and removing obstacles and blockers for the team, the project manager can improve the project performance, as well as the team’s productivity, quality, morale, and collaboration.

The other options are not the best choices, because:

Asking stakeholders to communicate with the project manager and not directly with the team would create a communication bottleneck, reduce transparency, and increase the risk of misunderstanding or miscommunication.

Empowering the team members to remove obstacles and blockers would be a good practice, but it would not be sufficient without the project manager’s support, guidance, and intervention, especially if the obstacles and blockers are beyond the team’s authority or capability.

Adding blockers to the issue log and risk management plan would be a necessary step, but it would not be enough without taking action to resolve them. Simply documenting the blockers would not help the team to overcome them or improve their performance. References:

Hybrid Project Management: What is it, Methodology & Software - Teamhood

Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success

Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers: How to Address and Remove Them

1.7. Address and remove impediments, obstacles, and blockers for the team - KnowledgeMap

1.7 Address and Remove Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers … - BrainBOK

This answer is based on the agile principle of responding to change over following a plan1. By reviewing the backlog and prioritizing the tasks, the project manager can deliver value to the customer faster and reduce the risk of rework. The other options are not aligned with agile principles, as they either delay the project, ignore the customer feedback, or cancel the project altogether. References: 1: Agile Manifesto

According to the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks of a business analyst is to “facilitate conflict resolution within the team to ensure that team members work effectively together” (Task 5.4). This implies that the project manager should also address any interpersonal issues that may affect the team performance and morale. By setting up a meeting with the distracted team member, the project manager can show empathy, listen to their concerns, and help them resolve any problems they may have. This is also consistent with the PMBOK® Guide, which states that “the project manager should manage conflict in a constructive manner, and help to develop a collaborative project team environment” (Section 9.4.2.3). References:

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Task 5.4

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 9.4.2.3

 According to the Agile Practice Guide, one of the principles of agile project management is to “reflect on how to become more effective, then tune and adjust behavior accordingly” (Section 2.1). This implies that the project manager should facilitate regular retrospectives, where the team can inspect their work processes, identify what went well and what can be improved, and plan actions for the next iteration. By conducting a focused retrospective, the project manager can help the team to discover the root cause of why they had to work extra hours, and find ways to avoid or mitigate it in the future. This is also consistent with the PMBOK® Guide, which states that “the project manager should use retrospectives to review the effectiveness of the project team and the project management approach” (Section 4.6.3.3). References:

Agile Practice Guide, Section 2.1

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 4.6.3.3

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should use a participatory approach to develop the project schedule, involving the team members who will perform the work1. This will increase the accuracy and reliability of the schedule estimates, as well as the commitment and ownership of the team2. Therefore, the best option is to organize a planning session with the development team and use their estimations to complete the schedule. Option B is incorrect because changing the delivery date for the project schedule based on the availability of a new contractor may not be feasible or acceptable to the stakeholders. Option C is incorrect because asking the sponsor to provide the desired completion date for project activities may not reflect the realistic effort and duration required to complete the work. Option D is incorrect because using expert judgment to estimate all of the tasks may not account for the variability and uncertainty of the work, and may not involve the input and feedback of the team members. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.1.2.5, p. 191 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.5.2.4, p. 218

 The new project manager should encourage participation in decision making and empower the team to improve their motivation and engagement. This is a key aspect of managing human resources in a project, as it fosters trust, collaboration, and ownership among the team members. The project manager should also communicate the project vision, goals, and expectations clearly and regularly to align the team and provide feedback and recognition. These actions can help the project manager to build a high-performing team and enhance the project performance.

The other options are not the best choices for the new project manager. Ensuring everyone performs their assigned tasks as planned may not address the root cause of the team’s lack of direction and enthusiasm. It may also imply a micromanagement style that can demoralize the team further. Organizing frequent team building sessions and updating the risk register are good practices, but they are not sufficient to improve the team’s morale and commitment. They should be complemented by other actions that involve and empower the team. Meeting with the project sponsor and proposing a corrective action for the project may be necessary if the project is facing serious issues, but it does not directly address the team’s situation. The project manager should first try to understand and resolve the team’s concerns before escalating them to the sponsor. References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.4, “Manage Project Team”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.4.2.3, “Interpersonal and Team Skills”

PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide: 2021 Exam Update, 10th Edition, Chapter 8, Section 8.3, “Managing Resources” 1

The project manager should update the change management plan to clarify the scope and process of change control for the project. The change management plan is a component of the project management plan that defines how changes will be monitored and controlled. It also specifies the level of authority needed to approve different types of changes. The project manager should ensure that the change management plan is aligned with the project scope statement and the contract terms and conditions. The project manager should not report the violation to the CCB, as this may escalate the issue unnecessarily and damage the relationship with the contractor. The project manager should not ask the quality control team to evaluate the modifications, as this may imply acceptance of the changes without proper authorization. The project manager should not request the engineering team to update the specifications, as this may create confusion and inconsistency in the project documentation. References:

PMP Exam Content Outline (2021), Domain I: People, Task 9: Support team performance, p. 81

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Sixth Edition, Chapter 4: Project Integration Management, Section 4.5.3.1: Change Management Plan, p. 1152

Professional in Business Analysis (PBA) Examination Content Outline (2018), Domain II: Planning, Task 4: Plan Requirements Change Control Process, p. 12

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the project steering committee is a group of senior stakeholders who provide strategic direction, guidance, and support to the project. The project steering committee is also responsible for resolving high-level issues and risks that may affect the project. In this scenario, the project manager should escalate the issue of funding access to the project steering committee, as they have the authority and influence to resolve it. The project steering committee can help to expedite the funding process, negotiate with the finance department, or find alternative sources of funding. This will help to avoid further delays and ensure the project can proceed with the procurement process. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 33-34. PMP Questions page 524, question 524. [Project Steering Committee: Roles and Responsibilities].

To ensure that the project acceptance criteria are met for all project deliverables, the project manager should include the expectations and needs of project stakeholders in the creation of the project acceptance criteria. This aligns with the best practices in project management, which emphasize the importance of understanding and incorporating stakeholder requirements to achieve project success. By doing so, the project manager can ensure that the deliverables will meet the agreed-upon standards and satisfy stakeholder needs, which is crucial for the acceptance of the project outcomes.

In the scenario where a key stakeholder is not approving project deliverables, it is crucial for the project manager to directly engage with the stakeholder to comprehend the reasons behind the delays. This aligns with the PMI’s guidance on stakeholder engagement, which suggests that understanding stakeholders’ concerns and expectations is essential for project success1. By meeting with the stakeholder, the project manager can clarify any misunderstandings, align expectations, and work collaboratively to address any issues impacting the approval of deliverables. This proactive approach is recommended over merely documenting the issue or seeking influence from others without first attempting to resolve the matter directly with the stakeholder involved23.

In an agile project with a fixed budget and aggressive timeline, it is crucial to prioritize the backlog effectively. The project manager should review the backlog items and decide which ones are essential to meet the project goals and deliver value. This involves evaluating each item’s impact on the project’s success and its alignment with the project’s objectives. By focusing on the most valuable activities, the project manager can ensure that the team’s efforts are directed towards tasks that will contribute most significantly to the project’s outcomes, even with limited time and resources234.

Monitoring cybersecurity compliance is a critical aspect of project management, especially when it is a mandatory requirement for a customer project. The Project Management Professional (PMP)® and PMBOK® Guide suggest that regular audits are an effective way to ensure compliance. These audits help in identifying any gaps in the cybersecurity measures and ensure that the project adheres to the required standards. Regular project audits provide a structured approach to assess, monitor, and document the compliance status of the project, which is essential for managing risks and maintaining the integrity of the project’s deliverables.

In the context of project management, when faced with delays in essential materials that impact the project schedule, it is advisable to explore alternative sourcing options. According to the PMBOK® Guide, project managers should consider various procurement strategies when project constraints arise, such as schedule delays due to external dependencies. Exploring local suppliers could potentially mitigate the risk of further delays and align with the procurement management plan, which is a key component of the overall project management plan. This approach is supported by the principles of stakeholder engagement and resource optimization, ensuring that the project’s objectives are met while adapting to changes in the project environment.

 The project manager should have conducted a thorough assessment of the team members’ competencies and skills in relation to the training content before enrolling them. This would involve analyzing the training material to ensure it aligns with the team members’ current skills and the tasks they are expected to perform. By doing so, the project manager could have ensured the training was appropriate and beneficial for the team members, thereby preventing the situation where the training felt too difficult and misaligned with their tasks2.

During the initiation phase of a project, the project manager and the team define the project idea, including project goals, scope, and resources1. If a potential risk, such as low construction productivity, is identified during a lessons learned sharing session, it should be added to the risk register1. The risk register is a document where all details of the identified risks are recorded. The project manager should then develop a mitigation strategy for site execution. This strategy could include various actions to address the risk, such as improving processes, providing additional training, or hiring additional resources. The goal is to reduce the impact of the risk on the project’s objectives. References: Asana Resources | Project management, 4 Phases of the Project Management Lifecycle Explained | Coursera

The best course of action for a project manager who is experienced in both predictive and adaptive approaches, when dealing with stakeholders familiar mostly with predictive projects, is to first understand the scope complexity and project magnitude. This initial step is crucial as it helps in determining the most suitable approach for the project at hand. A hybrid approach may be beneficial in some cases, but without a clear understanding of the project’s demands and challenges, it’s premature to decide on the methodology. The project manager should assess the project’s needs, evaluate the stakeholders’ familiarity with different methodologies, and consider the potential need for training if an adaptive approach is chosen. This approach aligns with the PMI’s guidance on tailoring the project management approach to the unique aspects of the project and the environment in which it operates.

The project manager should assess the influence and power of the employee to determine if they will add value to the project. This involves considering the employee’s experience, skills, and the relevance of their recommendation to the project’s objectives. The project charter, which has been recently approved, provides the project manager with the authority to make such assessments and decisions. It is important to align the employee’s capabilities and the project’s needs to ensure that their involvement will contribute positively to the project’s success.

 When a product owner requests the addition of a new mandatory feature during a sprint, it can disrupt the planned work and cause frustration within the team. The best course of action is to engage the product owner in prioritizing the product backlog with the project team. This collaborative approach ensures that the team understands the value and urgency of the new feature, aligns on the priorities, and adjusts their work plan accordingly. It also helps in managing the team’s workload and expectations, preventing overcommitment and potential burnout. By prioritizing the backlog together, the team can make informed decisions about what work to focus on during the sprint, ensuring that the most critical features are delivered first.

When faced with customer dissatisfaction, especially when no specific reasons are provided, it is important for the project manager to engage in a dialogue to understand the underlying concerns. Talking to the customer and the project team member separately allows the project manager to gather information from both sides, assess the situation, and determine the appropriate next steps. This approach is in line with the PMI’s guidelines on stakeholder engagement and conflict resolution, which emphasize the importance of communication and problem-solving in project management. It ensures that decisions are made based on a thorough understanding of the situation rather than a hasty reaction.

In the context of iteration planning and task selection, the project lead plays a crucial role in empowering team members to take on challenging tasks. Coaching is a key aspect of this support, as it involves guiding the team member through the process of understanding the tasks, assessing their own skills, and encouraging them to take ownership of the tasks they are interested in. This approach not only helps in personal development but also ensures that the team member is fully committed and has the confidence to tackle the challenges ahead.

 In an Agile environment, the project manager’s role is to lead the team, set the project goals and objectives, and ensure successful project delivery1. When a team that has been working together in a co-located setting is suddenly dispersed due to unforeseen circumstances, it can disrupt the team dynamics and impact the project’s progress2. To keep the team performing as effectively as possible, the project manager should provide the team with virtual collaboration software and training on the software to minimize disruption2. This approach enables the team to continue collaborating and communicating effectively, thereby maintaining their performance2. References: 2, 1

Managing interdependencies in a cross-organizational project, especially one that affects multiple business units and shares resources with other projects, requires a coordinated approach. The PMBOK Guide highlights the importance of identifying and engaging stakeholders who can influence the project’s outcomes1. In this scenario, program managers are typically responsible for overseeing the program’s overall direction and managing dependencies across projects within the program2. Consulting with program managers first can provide a comprehensive view of the program’s objectives, resources, and constraints, which is crucial for effectively managing interdependencies. References: Stakeholder Management - Project Management Institute; Project Stakeholder Management According to the PMBOK12.

 In an agile project environment, when faced with customer complaints regarding project stability and other critical issues, it is essential to engage the team in a collaborative problem-solving process. A brainstorming session is an effective way to gather collective insights and identify the root causes of the issues raised by the customer. This approach aligns with the agile principles of valuing individuals and interactions over processes and tools, and responding to change over following a plan. By involving the team in identifying problems and generating solutions, the project manager can ensure that the project’s direction is realigned with customer expectations and project goals1.

 When missing requirements specifications are identified during the design phase, the project manager should meet with the development team to review and assess the requirements. This collaborative approach ensures that all team members are aware of the discrepancies and can contribute to finding a solution. It is also aligned with the PMBOK® Guide’s emphasis on engaging stakeholders and maintaining open communication throughout the project lifecycle. By assessing the requirements with the team, the project manager can ensure that the project remains aligned with its objectives while addressing the gaps in the specifications.

When facing challenges with virtual team members being unable to join regular project update meetings, the immediate corrective action should involve direct communication with those team members to understand their constraints and revise the communications management plan accordingly. This approach is proactive and collaborative, aiming to find a feasible solution that accommodates the diverse locations and schedules of the team members, ensuring that everyone can participate in the project updates234.

The sprint retrospective is an integral part of the agile approach, providing an opportunity for the project team to inspect and adapt their processes. When the product owner has concerns about the sprint results, it is important to address these in a retrospective meeting. This allows the team to openly discuss what went well, what didn’t, and how they can improve in the next sprint. It’s a collaborative effort to enhance the quality and effectiveness of the team’s output and to ensure alignment with the product owner’s expectations12.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, effective communication with stakeholders is crucial for project success. The project manager should assess all project stakeholders to understand their information needs and preferences. This involves documenting their preferred methods of communication and the frequency with which they wish to receive updates. By doing so, the project manager ensures that all stakeholders are kept informed in a manner that suits them, which can help prevent issues like stakeholders not receiving progress updates123456.

In the context of virtual teams, it is essential for the project manager to actively manage communication and coordination issues. The PMBOK Guide and PMI’s resources on virtual teams emphasize the importance of addressing issues of cultural and personal diversity, communication, and coordination1. This includes reassessing the situation continually to identify and remove blockers that prevent effective communication and collaboration2. Implementing KPIs can be part of this process, but it is not a solution by itself if the underlying communication issues are not resolved. Terminating the contract or asking the contractor to solve the problem without the project manager’s involvement does not align with the proactive and engaged management approach recommended by PMI. References: Managing Virtual Teams for High Performance - Project Management Institute; Managing a Virtual Project Team - Project Times12.

When a project encounters a requirement for additional work that is not included in the initial project scope, such as environmental reinforcement work mandated by an authority, the project manager should initiate the organization’s change control process. This involves submitting a change request to document the new requirement and its impact on the project. The change control process is a formal mechanism to propose, review, and approve changes to the project scope, ensuring that all modifications are controlled and systematically integrated into the project management plan123. This approach is consistent with the PMI’s best practices for scope management and aligns with the principles of the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)®, which emphasize the importance of managing changes to requirements in a structured manner4567.

When a project manager is faced with conflicting stakeholder requirements, it is essential to engage in negotiations to reach a common agreement. This involves understanding the underlying needs and expectations of the stakeholders and finding a solution that aligns with the project’s objectives. The process should be collaborative, aiming to satisfy the business needs and ensuring that the project remains on track with its intended purpose. Effective conflict resolution techniques such as discussion, compromise, and expert opinion can be employed to facilitate this negotiation1234.

 In the context of Agile methodologies, such as Scrum, which is often used in conjunction with PMP practices, the daily standup meeting serves as a platform for team members to communicate progress and identify impediments to the sprint goal. When a delay is reported, especially one that involves an external vendor, it is crucial for the project manager to facilitate a resolution that does not disrupt the team’s workflow. The project manager should gather all necessary details from the team member to understand the issue fully and then work directly with the vendor to resolve it. This approach aligns with the principles of effective communication and vendor management, ensuring that the project manager has the information needed to address the problem without overburdening the team member with responsibilities that fall outside their scope.

According to the best practices in project management, when facing significant changes that impact project timelines, the project manager should first assess the situation with the project stakeholders. This involves analyzing the new circumstances, evaluating the potential impact on the project delivery, and exploring alternative solutions or adjustments to the project plan. Once a clear assessment is made, the project manager should then communicate the impact to the customer, providing them with the most accurate and updated information. This approach ensures that the customer is informed of the situation based on a thorough analysis and collaborative effort, rather than a hasty, unilateral decision by the project manager.

 In an agile project, daily standup meetings are crucial for maintaining open communication among team members. These meetings serve as a platform for team members to report on their progress, discuss any challenges they are facing, and understand the work being done by their peers. When these meetings are not consistently attended, it can lead to a lack of understanding of each other’s work, creating silos within the team. Regular attendance and active participation in daily standups are essential for fostering collaboration and ensuring that all team members are aligned and informed about the project’s progress.

In the Scrum framework, the traditional project schedule is replaced by a combination of the sprint plan and the product roadmap. The sprint plan outlines the work to be performed during the sprint, which typically lasts 2-4 weeks, and includes the sprint goal, the set of product backlog items selected for the sprint, plus the plan for delivering the product increment and realizing the sprint goal. The product roadmap provides a longer-term view of where the product is headed and the milestones along the way. It is a strategic document that outlines the vision, direction, priorities, and progress of the product over time.

In this scenario, the project manager should consider the delay as an opportunity due to the upcoming tax reduction on renewable energy products. By updating the risk register, the project manager can document this opportunity and plan how to leverage it, potentially reducing costs. This approach aligns with risk management practices that not only address threats but also identify and capitalize on opportunities that can benefit the project.

When a project manager identifies a risk with a high probability of occurring, the appropriate response is to monitor the risk closely. This involves asking the team to keep an eye on the risk and provide alerts if it becomes an issue. This approach is aligned with the proactive risk management practices advocated by PMI, where risks are continuously monitored and managed throughout the project lifecycle. It allows the project team to respond quickly to changes and implement risk response plans as necessary.

In a situation where the budget is very tight, the best course of action for a project manager is to continuously monitor the project’s budget and anticipate potential issues. This proactive approach allows the project manager to identify and address any financial concerns early on, preventing them from escalating into more significant problems. It aligns with the PMBOK® Guide’s principles of cost management, which emphasize the importance of planning, estimating, budgeting, and controlling costs to ensure that the project can be completed within the approved budget1.

 In a regulated environment that is expected to change, maintaining visibility of regulatory constraints while ensuring flexibility is crucial. A product backlog is a prioritized list of work for the development team that is derived from the roadmap and its requirements. It is the single source of requirements for any changes to be made to the product. The product backlog allows the project manager and the PMO to keep track of regulatory constraints and manage them as they change, ensuring that the team is always working on the most valuable tasks at any given time. This aligns with the agile approach to project management, which emphasizes adaptability and responsiveness to change, key aspects when dealing with regulatory environments.

The project manager should meet with the subject matter experts (SMEs) to assess the impact of the new regulation on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. The SMEs are the ones who have the knowledge and expertise to understand the implications of the new regulation and how it affects the project deliverables. The project manager should also involve the stakeholders, especially the project sponsor and the customer, in the assessment process to ensure their expectations and requirements are met. The project manager should then use the assessment results to determine the best course of action to address the change, such as modifying the project plan, requesting a change request, or escalating the issue to the appropriate authority. The project manager should follow the change management process as defined in the project management plan and the business analysis plan, and document the changes and their impacts in the project documents and the traceability matrix. The project manager should also communicate the changes and their impacts to the project team and the stakeholders, and obtain their buy-in and support.

The other options are not the best actions to take next, because they do not address the impact of the new regulation on the project objectives and deliverables. Consulting with the project sponsor to discuss a cost increase (option A) may be premature, as the cost impact may not be known until the assessment is done. Acquiring approval for an exception to the implementation of the new regulation (option B) may not be feasible or desirable, as it may compromise the compliance and quality of the project deliverables. Getting approval for the additional budget from the steering committee (option C) may also be premature, as the budget impact may not be known until the assessment is done. Moreover, the budget approval may not be sufficient to address the other impacts of the new regulation, such as scope, schedule, quality, and risk. References:

The PMI Guide to Business Analysis Includes The Standard for Business Analysis, Chapter 5: Solution Evaluation, Section 5.3.3: Assess Solution Limitations

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 7: Solution Evaluation, Section 7.3.3: Assess Solution Limitations

Business Analysis Techniques: 72 Essential Tools For Success, Chapter 5: Strategy Analysis, Section 5.13: Impact Analysis

Seven Steps to Mastering Business Analysis, Chapter 9: Solution Assessment and Validation

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, when a project team faces an obstacle that affects the project schedule, such as a task delay, the first step is to identify the cause and impact of the problem. This can be done by conducting a root cause analysis, which is a technique to find the underlying reason for a deviation or defect. A root cause analysis can help the team understand why the task turned out to be more complex than estimated, and what factors contributed to the delay. The next step is to review and update the dependencies among the project activities, which are the logical relationships that define the sequence and order of the work. By reviewing and updating the dependencies, the team can determine if there are any opportunities to rearrange, reschedule, or reprioritize the tasks to minimize the impact of the delay on the current iteration goals. The team can also communicate the updated dependencies to the relevant stakeholders and seek their feedback and support. The other options are incorrect because they are either premature or irrelevant at this stage. Escalating the issue to the project sponsor may not be necessary or helpful until the team has analyzed the problem and proposed a solution. Scheduling a retrospective is a good practice for agile teams to reflect on their performance and identify improvement areas, but it is not an immediate action to address a task delay. Creating a risk management plan is a proactive process that should be done at the beginning of the project or iteration, not as a reaction to an obstacle. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300; Dealing with delays; Project Management Professional (PMP)® Articles

Sharing positive feedback from the customer with the project team is a good way to motivate and appreciate the team members for their work. It also helps to build trust and rapport between the project manager and the team, as well as the customer and the team. Following the meeting agenda and making a list of the next deliverables are important tasks, but they do not address the customer feedback. Documenting the feedback in the meeting minutes is not enough to acknowledge the team’s efforts and achievements. Starting to plan how to improve the dates of next deliverables is not relevant to the customer feedback and may imply that the project manager is not satisfied with the team’s performance. References: Project Management Professional Sample Questions, page 9, question 77. [A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)], Sixth Edition, page 339, section 9.4.2.3.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should plan, manage, and monitor the communication activities throughout the project life cycle. The project manager should also consider the stakeholder needs, preferences, and expectations when choosing the communication methods, tools, and technologies. The project manager should also update the communications management plan as needed to reflect any changes in the communication requirements or approach. Therefore, the project manager should update the communications management plan based on the product owner’s preferences and distribute it to the team. This will ensure that the communication is effective, timely, and consistent among the project stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 361-362, 368-369.

According to the PMBOK Guide, backlog grooming (also known as backlog refinement) is the process of reviewing, updating, and prioritizing the product backlog items to ensure that the product backlog is ready for the next sprint1. Backlog grooming is an ongoing activity that involves collaboration between the product owner, the development team, and the project manager (or scrum master). Backlog grooming helps to clarify the requirements, remove ambiguity, identify dependencies, estimate effort, and align the product backlog with the product vision and the customer needs2.

In this question, the project manager is faced with a problem that the product owner has uncovered a number of issues that they would like to be addressed before providing approval for the software built to date. These issues may indicate that the product owner is not satisfied with the quality, functionality, or usability of the software, or that the software does not meet the acceptance criteria or the customer expectations. The project manager should approach this problem by planning to address the issues through backlog grooming and incorporating them into the next sprint. This way, the project manager can ensure that the issues are properly documented, analyzed, and prioritized, and that the development team can work on them in the next iteration. This will also help to maintain the agile principles of delivering value, satisfying the customer, and embracing change3.

The other options are not the best ways to approach this problem. Referring the product owner to the change management plan, then escalating to the steering committee is not appropriate for an agile project, as it implies a rigid and formal process that may not be responsive to the customer feedback and the changing requirements. Referring the product owner to the signed business requirement document and explaining that the current plan cannot facilitate these changes is not helpful, as it may create conflict and dissatisfaction with the product owner, and it may also indicate that the project manager is not following the agile value of responding to change over following a plan3. Telling the product owner the issues will be addressed in the second version of the software is not acceptable, as it may delay the delivery of value, compromise the quality of the product, and lose the trust of the product owner.

An iterative delivery approach is a method of project management that breaks down large projects into smaller cycles or iterations, each delivering a usable and potentially releasable product increment12. An iterative delivery approach is suitable for projects that have a high degree of uncertainty, complexity, or change, such as the transformation of operational processes and the main system of a transportation company3. In order to help the team understand the work that needs to be done, the project manager needs to work with the team to decompose the scope into a work breakdown structure (WBS) and work packages. A WBS is a hierarchical decomposition of the project scope into smaller and more manageable components, each with a unique identifier and a clear definition of what is included and excluded4. A work package is the lowest level of the WBS, which represents a unit of work that can be assigned, executed, monitored, and controlled by a single person or a small group. By creating a WBS and work packages, the project manager can help the team to:

Clarify the project scope and objectives

Identify the deliverables and outcomes of each iteration

Estimate the resources, time, and cost of each work package

Define the roles and responsibilities of each team member

Establish the dependencies and sequence of work packages

Monitor and control the progress and quality of each iteration

Communicate and collaborate effectively with stakeholders References:

Incremental Delivery and the Principles of the Agile Manifesto

What is Iterative, Incremental Delivery? The Hunt for the Perfect …

An iterative and incremental approach to planning ERP projects

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) | Project Management Institute

[Work Package - Project Management Knowledge]

According to the PMBOK Guide, a stakeholder engagement plan is a document that identifies the current and desired levels of stakeholder engagement, and the strategies and actions to increase or maintain stakeholder support throughout the project. A stakeholder engagement plan is an essential tool for managing stakeholder expectations, addressing stakeholder concerns, and resolving stakeholder conflicts. Conflicts between project stakeholders can result in delays, rework, scope changes, or even project failure. Therefore, the project manager should focus on revisiting the stakeholder engagement plan, focusing on specific overlooked stakeholders, to identify the root causes of the conflicts and the best ways to engage them. By doing so, the project manager can improve the stakeholder relationships, align the stakeholder interests, and facilitate the deliverable and output approval process. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 8: Communications, Section 8.3: Manage Communications, pp. 126-1271

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 9: Stakeholders, Section 9.2: Plan Stakeholder Engagement, pp. 141-1431

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 9: Stakeholders, Section 9.3: Engage Stakeholders, pp. 144-1451

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Handbook, Section 5: Exam Content Outline, Domain 2: Planning, Task 2.4: Develop a stakeholder engagement plan, pp. 22-232

 A virtual workspace is a tool that allows team members to collaborate and communicate online, regardless of their physical location. A virtual workspace can help the project manager and the team to share information, documents, updates, feedback, and ideas in real time. A virtual workspace can also enhance the team’s trust, cohesion, and productivity. By encouraging all team members to use a virtual workspace, the project manager can ensure that everyone is on the same page and has access to the latest project information. The project manager can also monitor the team member’s progress and provide support if needed12.

Talking to the team member about their engagement and taking appropriate action is another option that can help the project manager in this situation. The project manager should try to understand the reasons behind the team member’s lack of communication and details, such as lack of motivation, skills, resources, or clarity. The project manager should also provide constructive feedback and guidance to the team member, and set clear expectations and goals for their performance. The project manager should also follow up with the team member regularly and recognize their achievements. If the team member does not improve their communication and details, the project manager may need to escalate the issue to the functional manager or consider reassigning the work to another resource34. References: = 12 Project Management Strategies To Improve Efficiency, Strategy 6: Use a virtual workspace; 8 Steps for Better Issue Management, Step 5: Communicate with the team; PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, pages 368-369, 376-377; Agile Practice Guide, pages 28-29, 50-51.

The correct answers are A and C. According to the PMBOK® Guide, the five whys and the Ishikawa diagrams are examples of data analysis techniques that can be used to identify the root causes of problems or issues1. The project manager can use these tools to determine why stakeholder engagement is not having the planned effect and address the underlying factors. The communications management plan is a document that describes how project communications will be planned, managed, and controlled2, but it does not help to analyze the reasons for stakeholder engagement issues. The issue log is a project document that records and monitors the issues that arise during a project3, but it does not help to find the root causes of those issues. Open-space meetings are a type of interpersonal and team skills that can be used to facilitate stakeholder engagement and collaboration, but they do not help to diagnose the problem of stakeholder engagement. References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, page 698; 2: PMBOK® Guide, page 377; 3: PMBOK® Guide, page 123; : PMBOK® Guide, page 704

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the principles of project management is to support team performance. This means that the project manager should foster a collaborative project team environment, build team competencies, and address and remove impediments, obstacles, and blockers for the team. In this scenario, the project manager should provide appropriate training to the team members who lack the necessary skills or knowledge to perform their tasks, rather than emphasizing deadlines, updating the schedule, or accepting the risk. Providing training will help the team improve their performance, deliver value, and meet the expectations of the steering committee and other stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 9, Principle 8: Support team performance.

Identifying the root cause of communication issues is the first step to enhance project team effectiveness. The project manager should use tools and techniques such as interviews, surveys, or root cause analysis to understand the factors that are affecting the communication among the team members. These factors could include cultural differences, language barriers, time zones, technology limitations, or personal preferences. Once the root cause is identified, the project manager can implement appropriate solutions to improve the communication and collaboration within the team. Implementing team colocation to improve communication is not a feasible option for a global virtual team, as it would incur high costs and logistical challenges. Initiating daily communication of project progress is a good practice, but it does not address the underlying communication issues. Scheduling a communications control board meeting is not relevant to the question, as it is a mechanism to monitor and control the communication management plan, not to enhance the team effectiveness. References: Project Management Professional Sample Questions, page 11, question 91. [A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)], Sixth Edition, page 368, section 10.2.2.5. [Agile Practice Guide], page 28, section 3.1.2.

A project charter is a project planning document that sells the project to stakeholders and sponsors. It provides a preliminary delineation of roles and responsibilities, outlines the project’s key goals, identifies the main stakeholders, and defines the authority of the project manager. A project charter is essential for any project, regardless of its size or complexity, as it serves the following purposes:

It authorizes the project and grants the project manager the permission to use organizational resources

It serves as a primary sales document that summarizes the project’s value proposition and return on investment

It acts as a roadmap that guides the project team and stakeholders throughout the project lifecycle

It helps to manage the project scope and avoid scope creep by establishing the project boundaries and deliverables

It facilitates communication and alignment among the project team, sponsors, and stakeholders by clarifying the project objectives, assumptions, risks, and constraints Therefore, the project manager should explain to the sponsor that a project charter is necessary to ensure agreement on scope and deliverables and to define the project manager’s responsibilities. Without a project charter, the project may face the following risks:

Lack of clarity and direction for the project team and stakeholders

Misalignment of expectations and goals among the project team, sponsors, and stakeholders

Scope creep and change requests that may impact the project schedule, budget, and quality

Conflicts and disputes over roles, responsibilities, and authority

Reduced stakeholder engagement and support References:

What is a Project Charter? Complete Guide & Examples

How to Write a Project Charter: Examples & Template Included

Project charter - Wikipedia