PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Practice Test Questions Answers

TIX provides services to the informatic equipment of large organisations. They operate an ISO 9001:2015 QMS that is being audited by an important

customer (second-party audit). During the audit, the audit team has identified two nonconformities. When preparing the Closing meeting, the audit

team discussed and agreed both nonconformities with TIX's quality manager. The Closing meeting was planned for 6pm with the general manager,

quality manager and service manager at the meeting room.

At 6pm, when the audit team enters the meeting room, only two people are present and waiting for them: the Health and Safety supervisor and the

warehouse supervisor. Neither have participated in the audit.

The dialogue among them is as follows:

Audit team leader: "Good evening, could you please inform the three managers that we are ready to start with the Closing meeting?"

Health and Safety supervisor: "Good evening. We are sorry to inform you that the general manager was involved in a serious car accident, and

the other two managers have had to leave urgently to attend the emergency."

Warehouse supervisor: "They have asked us to listen to what you need to say and to sign whatever we need to sign. We also have a message

from them about the two nonconformities. They wanted us to ask you if you could contact them in a couple of days to determine how to proceed."

Which one of the following options would be your preferred response to the final comment made by the warehouse manager?

What is a list of actions that should be performed during the audit with their respective timeline?

How much time is usually spent on the Stage 1 audit?

What is reliability in the context of service quality?

Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around 14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001.

Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled. The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean's requirements.

The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team. Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.

Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting

The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Based on Scenario 7, the team worked together to draft the final audit report. Is this acceptable?